PDA

View Full Version : The ONLY Reason Stocks Have Rallied This Month



mamboni
28th September 2010, 08:39 PM
The ONLY Reason Stocks Have Rallied This Month

Submitted by Phoenix Capital Research on 09/28/2010 19:19 -0500

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/only-reason-stocks-have-rallied-month

Bank of AmericaBen BernankeCredit SuisseGoldman SachsInsider SellingOpen Market OperationsPermanent Open Market OperationsPOMOQuantitative Easing




The Fed generally claims that it stopped its first Quantitative Easing (QE) program back in March 2010 and that there were no additional debt monetizations between then and the announcement of its QE lite program in August.



Yet, as I’ve proven time and again, the Fed has continued to monetize Wall Street’s debts EVERY options expiration week since QE 1 ended… proving beyond a doubt that the Fed’s QE program did NOT actually end in March.



Here’s the chart of the Fed’s recent actions for those of you who haven’t seen this before. Options expiration weeks are astericked***.



Week
Fed Action

July 22
-$8 billion

July 15
+$8.6 billion***

July 8 2010
+$1 billion

July 1 2010
-$13 billion

June 24 2010
+$175 million

June 17 2010***
+$12 billion

June 10 2010
-$4 billion

June 3 2010
+$2 billion

May 27 2010
-$16 billion

May 20 2010***
+$14 billion

May 13 2010
+$10 billion

May 6 2010
-$4 billion

April 29 2010
-$1 billion

April 15 2010***
+$31 billion

April 8 2010
+$420 million

April 1 2010
-$6 billion




You’ll note that the Fed ALWAYS made its largest capital contributions during options expiration weeks. Heck it pumped $31 BILLION into the system in April 2010, just ONE MONTH after it claimed QE 1 ended!



However, since that time the Fed has pumped a total of over $65 billion into Wall Street on options expiration weeks. On non-expiration weeks the Fed either withdraws money or makes small money pumps.



This pattern finally ended in August 2010 when the Fed failed to pump the system on options expiration week. But then again, why bother? The Fed was about to announce its QE lite program in which it would use the interest on maturing securities to purchase Treasuries from Wall Street Primary Dealers via its Permanent Open Market Operations (POMO).



I realize that last sentence is a lot to take in. So let me explain how this new QE Lite Program works before we continue.



During Treasury auctions there are 18 banks, called Primary Dealers, who are given unprecedented access to US Debt (Treasuries) in terms of pricing and control. These are the BIG BOYS of finance including firms like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Bank of America, Credit Suisse, and others.



During its QE 1 Program, the Fed bought over $1.0 trillion in securities from these firms. Its new QE lite program consists of it using the interest and proceeds from the securities in its portfolio that are maturing to buy Treasuries from the Primary Dealers via Permanent Open Market Operations (POMO).



In simple terms, the POMO actions allow the Fed to pump money into Wall Street (by buying Treasuries from the Primary Dealers) without DIRECTLY monetizing Treasury debt (the Treasuries had already been issued). The Primary Dealers then take this fresh capital from the Fed and plow into stocks, forcing the sort of ramp job we saw last week on Friday.







All told, the Fed has bought $20 billion worth of Treasuries in this fashion, $11.15 of which it purchased last week alone. With this kind of weekly money pumping in place, Bernanke and pals don’t need to continue their “behind the scenes” games (like the options expiration week money pumps).



Or do they?



Unbeknownst to most investors, last week Ben Bernanke pumped an additional $11.05 BILLION into the system ON TOP of the $11.15 pumped via the POMOs. In plain terms, the Fed juiced the system by $20+ billion in a single week, bringing its liquidity pumps RIGHT BACK QE 1 LEVELS.



If you want to know why stocks have rallied in the last month, this is THE reason. The economy isn’t improving and the European Crisis isn’t over. Nothing has improved. All that has happened is the Fed funneled money into the Primary Dealers who ramped the market.



This is also the reason why the latest rally has almost entirely consisted of gap ups: the Primary Dealers ramp the market and then the computer trading programs take care of the rest.







In plain terms, the market is being juiced higher, plain and simple. There is no fundamental reason for stocks to be rallying. Moreover, we have numerous signs of a top forming (mutual fund cash levels, insider selling to buying ratios, negative divergence, etc). Those who choose to buy into the farce of a rally are going to get what’s coming to them. And when they do, it won’t be pretty.



Good Investing!



Graham Summers

Sparky
28th September 2010, 09:53 PM
I don't think there's anything new here. I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who thinks this market rally has anything to do with fundamentals.

However, I take exception to the concluding statement. Although I hold a short position, I have little confidence that anyone can be sure we are near a top right now. To say that with certainty is to disregard the entire essay, i.e. this rally is based on no real fundamentals. It can go on that way for a long time.

MNeagle
28th September 2010, 09:59 PM
Who was our resident Martin Armstrong proponent? The last I read from MA, 'the markets won't crash' anytime soon.

Anyone know where to find his latest?

mamboni
28th September 2010, 10:00 PM
I don't think there's anything new here. I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who thinks this market rally has anything to do with fundamentals.

However, I take exception to the concluding statement. Although I hold a short position, I have little confidence that anyone can be sure we are near a top right now. To say that with certainty is to disregard the entire essay, i.e. this rally is based on no real fundamentals. It can go on that way for a long time.

+1000%

Book
28th September 2010, 10:08 PM
To say that with certainty is to disregard the entire essay, i.e. this rally is based on no real fundamentals.



http://www4.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/William+Morris+Agency+Celebrates+Network+Televisio n+gReWxJQKDpsl.jpg

Never was based upon fundamentals. The FED never gets audited. Jew Teevee investor manipulation. Goes up and the tribe makes money. Goes down and the tribe makes money. Not one of these zio-criminals ever sees a prison cell.

:oo-->

Quixote2
29th September 2010, 02:46 PM
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/bring-conspiracy-theories

There is a wonderful conspiracy theory propagated by Tea Partiers that has been making the rounds in the financial markets for the past several months. In a desperate attempt to salvage the November election, president Obama has ordered Fed governor Ben Bernanke to flood the system with $2 trillion of liquidity. This is the QEII you have been hearing so much about. The move will give the economy a much needed shot in the arm that will enable the Democrats to retain control of both houses of Congress. Two more years of Obamanomics will then follow.

The only problem with this theory is that it is complete hogwash. For a start, Ben Bernanke is a Republican originally appointed by President Bush. Then there is Fed independence to consider. The board of governors is well stocked with enough conservatives, like Richard Fisher (click here for my chat with him at http://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/june_25__2008.html ), to make such a politically inspired maneuver impossible. If the Fed weren’t set up this way, it would become a political football kicked back and forth with every election. Congress would order the stimulus machine to be stuck permanently in the “ON” position.

You also have to ask the question of whether QEII will make any difference at all to the economy. With banks desperately seeking to deleverage and unwilling to lend, the level of interest rates today is truly irrelevant. The 35 million homeowners with negative equity, about 25% of the total, certainly aren’t going to be refinancing anytime soon. Much of the drag on the economy springs from the sorry state of the real estate market (click here for “Years of Pain to Come In Residential Real Estate” at http://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/september-14-2010-2.html ), so there is little the Fed can do, unless it starts buying millions of houses and burning them down.

Personally, I think the American central bank is out of bullets, and that any such gestures would amount to pushing on a string. Believe me, I have been watching the Japanese do this for 20 years, to no effect. There is one thing the Fed does understand, and that is that any QEII implemented now would be highly inflationary down the road. This fits nicely with my (TBT) recommendations.

But hey, as I learned in my journalism days, never let the truth get in the way of a good story. My late editor at The Economist, the brilliant Peter Martin, taught me that belief will trump fact every time. Facts change, opinions don’t. That totally works for me, because this theory on the true motivations of the Fed is driving cash into hard assets at an unprecedented rate, commodities and companies that I have been pounding the table about for the past 18 months. I made that call because it dovetailed nicely with global macroeconomic trends which I see continuing for another decade. Most people get invited to dinners. I get invited to mines.

If the market wants to run the prices of my assets up for the wrong reasons, I say bring it on! The dollars I am making as a result are just as good at the bar.

mamboni
29th September 2010, 03:00 PM
Who was our resident Martin Armstrong proponent? The last I read from MA, 'the markets won't crash' anytime soon.

Anyone know where to find his latest?


Ask and yee shall receive:

http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/Gold%20an%2011%20Year%20High%20for%202010%2009-17-2010.pdf