PDA

View Full Version : We're All Lootie



Twisted Titan
7th October 2010, 08:44 AM
Hat Tip to Dmac for pulling this article up

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=168485

It really just drives home the point that playing by the rules is a game for fools and you will lose everything you have.

Things have gotten so corrupt the only solution left is repudiation







We're All Lootie


Seriously.....

I've read this bill - and on the surface, it does nothing in reality.

But then we have stories like this:

A bill that homeowners advocates warn will make it more difficult to challenge improper foreclosure attempts by big mortgage processors is awaiting President Barack Obama's signature after it quietly zoomed through the Senate last week.

...

The legislation could protect bank and mortgage processors from liability for false or improperly prepared documents.

Oh really?

Well, not unless abused.

But then again, what hasn't been abused?

Where is the Rule of Law in this country?

Look, black-letter law has been routinely ignored - not just by this administration, but by the last too. Some of the more-egregious examples were capital structure priority laws in the Chrysler and GM bankruptcies, in which certain people who had capital preference were literally stripped of their funds so that the UAW could obtain a "top up" of their medical benefits plan - something that has been litigated before and was ruled black-letter unlawful.

Then we have the banks - first, we had what was a clear act of extortion by Bernanke and Hank Paulson in the presentment of their "couple of page" blank check demand to Congressional leaders in the dark of night in 2008 - coupled with Bernanke intentionally draining the SOMA, or system liquidity, which I argue triggered an intentional stock market sell-off in order to "sell" this to Congress.

And, of course, we have Kanjorski literally threatening FASB openly in a Congressional hearing: Either make accounting fraud - that is, the ability to mark so-called "assets" to a model, willfully ignoring their current value - lawful, or Congress will do so by legislation.

Let's look at a short list folks. This is what you've tolerated just in the last few years.

Your school's funds, including those in Florida, were "invested" in instruments that the people responsible - and at the highest level of State Government - knew they could not legally buy. This blew up in their face. Nobody has been indicted for this, yet the money is still gone.


You were sold funds (money) on a predatory basis. State Law prohibited this. Your State Attorney General went to court to stop it. The Bush Administration sued to prevent enforcement of those laws, and got a Federal Judge - who they, of course, control - to block enforcement. You got ripped off, and what's worse, the housing bubble and subsequent collapse was, in part, CAUSED by this predatory lending. Your State Attorneys General and Legislators refuse to protect your rights and enforce the law, despite the 10th Amendment clearly requiring that they do so.


Banks are illegally attempting to lock people out of their own homes. Yes, their homes - not the Banks'. The bank has no foreclosure judgment in hand when they do this, and do not have a right of possession. When the cops are called they refuse to arrest the perpetrators, claiming there is no "criminal intent." If attempting to seize someone's home without having the legal right to do so isn't criminal intent, can I ask what is?


Banks were (and are) insolvent. Kanjorski, a Congressman, threatens FASB, the accounting standards board, telling them in open congressional hearing that if they do not change the accounting rules so that black-letter false values for "assets" - that is, fraud - is not made legal Congress will pass a law to make it so. They fold, of course - how do you stop Congress when it intends to legislate you out of existence unless you do what it wants? This results in a huge stock market rally but the rotting fish in these loans is still there and still rotting.


Banks then try to foreclose on these notes, as the cash flow is starting to get a bit thin. But that's a problem - they never transferred the notes to the trusts when they originated and packaged the loans, and in some states that transfer not only had to be done under black-letter law, it also had to be recorded along with the payment of fees. Black-letter law, again, says that REMICs, the underlying mortgage securities, cannot take in new notes after their closing dates, and without the note there is no standing to foreclose at all. This is a rather uncomfortable situation - so to get around it, they start filing false "lost note" affidavits and "robosigned" notarizations that the people doing the signing didn't even read! (A note you destroyed or failed to transfer on purpose, instead sending them to India in crates, isn't lost!) These are acts of fraud upon the court (no longer an allegation, as courts have ruled it as thus) and perjury (any false swearing in a court is perjury) and yet the judges in these courts have not held the people doing the false swearing in criminal contempt. In short, courts are no longer places where the citizens can come for lawful redress of grievance when they get scammed if the entity doing the scamming is a big Wall Street operation.
So what do we have left folks?

Your State and Local Governments will not protect you against being butt-****d by Wall Street Bankers.

Your Federal Government actively conspires with the same Wall Street Bankers, holding you down on your stomach while they take turns from behind.

These offenses have now reached the level of literal physical theft of real property.

Not one - not one - candidate has risen and provided as his campaign pledge and platform:

If you elect me all the jackals and thieves who have done this will go to prison. I will act singularly to do so, as what has been done to you to is unconscionable and unlawful, irrespective of all other legislative priorities, until these acts are stopped and the harm done to you by these acts is repaid in full by those responsible.

Not one.

What political solution remains?

If there is no political solution, and no redress available in the courts, then your options are to either bend over, place a stick in your teeth, and redefine these acts of **** as "sex", or to in some fashion revolt.

Revolt comes in two forms. One that meets the definition of sedition and is thus black-letter unlawful (and that law, you can bet, the government will enforce) and one that is perfectly legal.

The latter act is one that I am now extraordinarily close to being forced to recommend.

I am speaking of refusing to pay.

Everything.

And everyone.

There is no crime in refusing to pay and withdrawing ALL of your money from the banks.

The problem is that The American People won't do it, even though doing it would force an immediate resolution to these problems, as every bank in America would instantaneously collapse due to the people's collective vote of "no confidence", delivered lawfully through refusal to engage in commerce with them.

How do I know America won't do it?

Because 10% of the population is unemployed as a direct and proximate result of these frauds and scams and yet there are no mass-marches on Washington DC.

No sit-ins.

No people driving 5mph on the freeway during rush hour as a pack of three cars, blocking traffic (and accepting a traffic ticket) as a very effective means of disrupting commerce and saying "no more damnit!"

Nothing.

So what you get from me, instead, is a chronology of these frauds and scams. I'll keep writing about them for the time being, but I have no faith in the people in this nation any longer.

The nation we once were - the nation that responded to a stick in our collective eye on December 7th, 1941 - no longer exists.

Instead, we've been reduced to infantile sucklers on a Government Teat.

Instead of wanting to better ourselves through hard work, capital formation and saving, we now are reduced to this as a nation:



That is what's left of America, and we smile while doing it. We're willing to screw everyone else, and so when it's done to us, we just respond with more of it ourselves, instead of well-justified outrage and demands that it stop - backed up with whatever level of insistence is necessary to force it to stop.

On this path all asset prices ultimately collapse.

Productive work ends and everyone looks for a way to rob someone. They find it - after all, robbing people isn't really that complicated, and in fact it's no more complicated than the guy who walks into the "Stop-N-Rob" and sticks a pistol up the cashier's nose. Yeah, we try to make out like it's more complex and to hide it in reams of paper and various obstructions, but what's really going on is nothing more complicated than the old gun up-the-nose trick.

This, of course, produces nothing (you're simply stealing someone else's "stuff") and as the percentage of people who turn to robbery rises, all productive work and betterment of society for all slows down and ultimately ceases.

That day is arriving, and if you're not prepared for what it will mean, and what will come as a consequence, you're going to be very, very sorry.

At the end of 2008 I wrote a Ticker in which I said "We're all Madoff."

I was wrong.

We're all Lootie.

Good luck America.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Twisted Titan
7th October 2010, 08:49 AM
http://www.cnbc.com/id/39550663




A bill that homeowners advocates warn will make it more difficult to challenge improper foreclosure attempts by big mortgage processors is awaiting President Barack Obama's signature after it quietly zoomed through the Senate last week.


The bill, passed without public debate in a way that even surprised its main sponsor, Republican Representative Robert Aderholt, requires courts to accept as valid document notarizations made out of state, making it harder to challenge the authenticity of foreclosure and other legal documents.

The timing raised eyebrows, coming during a rising furor over improper affidavits and other filings in foreclosure actions by large mortgage processors such as GMAC, JPMorgan [





Questions about improper notarizations have figured prominently in challenges to the validity of these court documents, and led to widespread halts of foreclosure proceedings.

The legislation could protect bank and mortgage processors from liability for false or improperly prepared documents.

The White House said it is reviewing the legislation.

"It is troubling to me and curious that it passed so quietly," Thomas Cox, a Maine lawyer representing homeowners contesting foreclosures, told Reuters in an interview.

A deposition made public by Cox was what first called attention to improper affidavits by GMAC.

Since then, GMAC, JPMorgan and others have halted foreclosure actions in many states after acknowledging that they had filed large numbers of affidavits in which their employees falsely attested that they had personally reviewed records cited to justify the foreclosures.

Cox said the new obligation for courts to recognize notarizations of documents filed by big, out-of-state companies, would make it more difficult and costly to challenge the validity of the documents.

The law, the "Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act," requires all federal and state courts to recognize notarizations made in other states.

The law specifically includes "electronic" notarizations stamped en masse by computers.

Currently, only about a dozen states allow electronic notarizations, according to the National Notary Association.

"Constituents" Pressed For Passage

After languishing for months in the Senate Judiciary Committee, the bill passed the Senate with lightning speed and with hardly any public awareness of the bill's existence on Sept.27, the day before the Senate recessed for midterm election campaign.

The bill's approval involved invocation of a special procedure.

Democratic Senator Robert Casey, shepherding last-minute legislation on behalf of the Senate leadership, had the bill taken away from the Senate Judiciary committee, which hadn't acted on it.

The full Senate then immediately passed the bill without debate, by unanimous consent. The House had passed the bill in April.

The House actually had passed identical bills twice before, but both times they died when the Senate Judiciary Committee failed to act.

Some House and Senate staffers said the Senate committee had let the bills languish because of concerns that they would interfere with individual state's rights to regulate notarizations.

Senate staffers familiar with the judiciary committee's actions said the latest one passed by the House seemed destined for the same fate.

But shortly before the Senate's recess, Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy pressed to have the bill rushed through the special procedure, after Leahy "constituents" called him and pressed for passage.

The staffers said they didn't know who these constituents were or if anyone representing the mortgage industry or other interests had pressed for the bill to go through.

These staffers said that, in an unusual display of bipartisanship, Senator Jeff Sessions, the committee's senior Republican, also helped to engineer the Senate's unanimous consent for the bill.

Neither Leahy's nor Session's offices responded to requests for comment Wednesday.

In background interviews, several Senate staffers denied that it would have any adverse effect on the legal rights of homeowners contesting foreclosures, and said the law was intended only to remove an impediment to interstate commerce.

"Suspicious" Timing

Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner told Reuters in an interview that the law would weaken protection of homeowners by requiring many states to accept lower standards for notarizations.

She said it was "suspicious" that the law unexpectedly passed just as the mortgage industry is facing possible big costs from having filed false or improperly notarized documents.

Notarizations are made by notaries licensed by individual states.

The purpose of notarizations is to attest to the identity of the person whose signature is on a legal document.

For affidavits - sworn statements filed in court cases - the person who made the affidavit also is required to swear under oath before a notary that the affidavit is true.

In recent depositions in several foreclosure cases, GMAC and other mortgage processors' employees have testified that they signed large numbers of affidavits without ever appearing before the individuals who notarized them.

The bill was first sponsored by Aderholt in 2006.

He told Reuters in an interview that he proposed it because a court stenographer in his district had asked for it due to problems with getting courts in other states to accept depositions notarized in Alabama.

Aderholt said organizations of court stenographers supported the bill, but said he wasn't aware of any backing by banks or other business groups.

Aderholt said that he hadn't expected the Senate to pass the bill, and "we were surprised that it came through at the eleventh hour there."

Book
7th October 2010, 09:15 AM
Your Federal Government actively conspires with the same Wall Street Bankers, holding you down on your stomach while they take turns from behind.



http://images.politico.com/global/080919_paulson_allen.jpg

http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/ED-AJ031_bw0218_E_20090217150946.jpg

http://images.politico.com/global/080922_rogers_lead.jpg

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13764.html

:oo-->

Twisted Titan
7th October 2010, 09:44 AM
After languishing for months in the Senate Judiciary Committee, the bill passed the Senate with lightning speed and with hardly any public awareness of the bill's existence on Sept.27, the day before the Senate recessed for midterm election campaign.

The bill's approval involved invocation of a special procedure.

The full Senate then immediately passed the bill without debate, by unanimous consent.



And thats how it works........


Justice isnt Blind folks......... ITS FOR SALE

chad
7th October 2010, 09:47 AM
if they pass this it could be the tipping point. it's the lead story on huffpo, and even democrats are pissed. they're all threatening to desert obama if he signs this. i ray he does, maybe it'll wake people up and cause them to do something.

Ponce
7th October 2010, 10:17 AM
Titan? had I "played" by the rules I would have nothing today.........when those above you tells you the rules and they themselves don't followed it you then have no choice but to do the same.

Twisted Titan
7th October 2010, 10:27 AM
If you have to follow the rules.......... YOUR NOT ON THE INSIDE.

Gordon Gekko

Ponce
7th October 2010, 10:29 AM
Or........have no common sense to see what is going on