PDA

View Full Version : The Fed is dead, maybe by 2012



Ares
7th October 2010, 09:29 AM
ARROYO GRANDE, Calif. (MarketWatch) — OK, so Nassim Nicholas Taleb, the “Black Swan” author, actually said: “The Fed won’t exist in 25 years.” Warning: It’ll happen much sooner, fallout of the coming Second American Revolution.

It’s inevitable: Wall Street banks control the Federal Reserve system , it’s their personal piggy bank. They’ve already done so much damage, yet have more control than ever.

Warning: That’s a set-up. They will eventually destroy capitalism, democracy, and the dollar’s global reserve-currency status. They will self-destruct before 2035 … maybe as early as 2012 … most likely by 2020.

Last week we cheered the Tea Party for starting the countdown to the Second American Revolution. Our timeline is crucial to understanding the historic implications of Taleb’s prediction that the Fed is dying, that it’s only a matter of time before a revolution triggers class warfare forcing America to dump capitalism, eliminate our corrupt system of lobbying, come up with a new workable form of government, and create a new economy without a banking system ruled by Wall Street.

Read 'America on the brink of a Second Revolution.'

Let’s reexamine the timeline closely:

Stage 1: The Democrats just put the nail in their coffin confirming they’re wimps when they refused to force the GOP to filibuster Bush tax cuts for billionaires.

Stage 2: In the elections the GOP takes over the House, expanding its strategic war to destroy Obama with its policy of “complete gridlock” and “shutting down government.”

Stage 3: Post-election Obama goes lame-duck, buried in subpoenas and vetoes.

Stage 4: In 2012, the GOP wins back the White House and Senate. Health care returns to insurers. Free-market financial deregulation returns. Lobbyists intensify their anarchy.

Stage 5: Before the end of the second term of the new GOP president, Washington is totally corrupted by unlimited, anonymous donations from billionaires and lobbyists. Wall Street’s Happy Conspiracy triggers the third catastrophic meltdown of the 21st century that Robert Shiller of “Irrational Exuberance” fame predicts, resulting in defaults of dollar-denominated debt and the dollar’s demise as the world’s reserve currency.

Stage 6: The Second American Revolution explodes into a brutal full-scale class war with the middle class leading a widespread rebellion against the out-of-touch, out-of-control Happy Conspiracy sabotaging America from within.

Stage 7: The domestic class warfare is exaggerated as the Pentagon’s global warnings play out: That by 2020 “an ancient pattern of desperate, all-out wars over food, water, and energy supplies would emerge” worldwide and “warfare is defining human life.”

In this rapidly unfolding scenario, the Fed cannot survive. Why? Not because the Fed is at the center of America’s economic problems, beyond repair, a dying institution. But because the Fed is a pawn of Wall Street’s Happy Conspiracy, which is incapable of seeing the train wreck that it set up.

This out-of-control, conspiracy of greedy Wall Street bankers, corporate CEOs, corrupt politicians and Forbes 400 billionaires will, in the near future, trigger the third catastrophic meltdown of the 21st century, a collapse that paradoxically can transform America into a new, stronger post-capitalist economy … but only after a revolution and brutal class warfare. But few will talk about what’s coming.
Warning: Never trust the American Treasury Secretary

So who can you trust to tell us the truth? Taleb says it’s very simple. His “simple metric” was made clear at a recent “Washington Ideas Forum” in a piece by Atlantic editor Nicole Allan: Unfortunately most fail Taleb’s test. Most get it wrong. Many lie, exaggerate, speak half-truths or, worse, say nothing.

Here’s Taleb’s “simple metric for judging whose economic opinions are worth his time: ‘Did someone predict the crisis before it happened” in the past? “If the answer is no, I don’t want to hear what the person says. If the person saw the crisis coming then I want to hear what they have to say” about future crises.

Taleb target No. 1: Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who spoke just before Taleb at the forum. Of course, experience tells us you really can’t trust anyone in government. All politicians fudge the numbers, cherry-pick data to suit their personal goals, biases and political rhetoric.

Remember Hank Paulson, Wall Street’s Trojan Horse inside Washington? Earlier he had made over half a billion as Goldman’s CEO. Back in July 2007 before the meltdown he bragged to Fortune that this is “the strongest global economy I’ve seen in my business lifetime.” Never trust anything “leaders” like him say. Never.

Worse, he and our clueless Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke later lied to the public that the subprime crisis was “contained.” No, my friends, you cannot trust politicians and government insiders. Never.
Warning: Never trust economists and bestselling authors

Allan continues: “Other unlucky economic figures who failed Taleb’s test included writers Paul Krugman and Thomas Friedman. ‘You have a million people on this planet who call themselves economists,’ Taleb said. ‘How many people understood the risks of the system” before the crisis? Paul Krugman was not one of them.’”

Taleb warns: Nobel economist Krugman not only supports Keynesian deficit spending, he favors the “transformation of private debt, with all the moral hazard it entails, into public debt” that’s toxic from a “risk standpoint.” Worse, it’s “immoral.” Our “grandchildren should not bear the debts of the grandparents.” OK, add Nobel economists to the list of people Taleb says you can’t trust to speak “the truth.

Actually, using Taleb’s “metric,” you can’t trust any economists. Why? Because all economists, even the best, are capable of making catastrophic errors: Remember Greenspan’s sad apologies during congressional hearings after undermining America for 18 years. And remember Michael Boskin’s classic $12 trillion error? Bush Sr’s chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a respected Stanford economist, attempted to justify some cockamamie logic that his newfound Social Security savings would lower America’s debt, giving a political boost for his party. He was $12 trillion wrong.

No, folks, you can’t trust any economists, they’re just average humans. Most have strong political biases. They’re hired mercenaries who say whatever their employers ask them to say, pawns working for some Wall Street bank, corporation or politicians.

Yes, Allan reveals another character Taleb can’t trust for economic advice. Prizewinning authors like NY Times columnist Tom Friedman who’s book, The World is Flat is “very bad for society,” misleading, having failed to “assess risk.” So scratch celebrity authors from the list you can trust to tell you the truth about the future of America.
Warning: Never trust Congress, the Fed chairman or the president

Taleb is merciless when it comes to politicians like President Obama, Congress and The Fed chairman: You can’t trust any of them. Earlier Bernanke’s reappointment “stunned” Taleb: He “doesn’t even know he doesn’t understand how things work or that the tools he uses are not empirical,” wrote Taleb in HuffPost. But it’s “the Senators appointing him who are totally irresponsible ... The world has never, never been as fragile,” and we’re stuck with an economist running The Fed whose methods make “homeopath and alternative healers look empirical and scientific.”

Obama’s reappointment of Bernanke left Taleb so distraught he “withdrawing into the Platonic tranquility of my library, to work on my next book, find solace in science and philosophy, and … structure trades betting on the next mistake by Bernanke, Summers and Geithner.”

Taleb’s “metric” essentially warns Americans to trust no one, certainly not Washington and Wall Street insiders. The vast majority fail his simple metric, “Did someone predict the last crisis before it happened? ... If the answer is no, I don’t want to hear what the person says. If the person saw the crisis coming, then I want to hear what they have to say’.”

In fact, back in 2008 as the subprime credit meltdown accelerated and it was obvious to virtually everyone worldwide, we reported on the cascading bogus predictions made by well-known gurus flooding prime-time news, highlighted in BusinessWeek, Kiplinger’s and USAToday, comments made even as the 2008 crash was spreading worldwide:

Bernanke: “I don’t anticipate any serious failures among large internationally active banks.” Wow, was he ever wrong.

Billionaire Ken Fisher: “This year will end in the plus column ... so keep buying.” Main Street lost trillions on advice like this.

‘Mad Money’ Jim Cramer: “Bye-bye bear market, say hello to the bull.”

Goldman Sachs’ Abby Joseph Cohen: “The fear priced into stocks is likely to abate as recession fears fade.” Soon after, Goldman was essentially bankrupt.

Congressman Barney Frank: “Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are fundamentally sound.”

Barron’s: “Home prices about to bottom.” Three years later they still haven’t

Worth: “Emerging markets are the global investors’ safe haven.”

Kiplinger’s: “Stock investors should beat the rush to the banks.” Costly advice.

Bernie Madoff: “It’s virtually impossible to violate the rules.” But it’ll happen again.

Bad calls? Yes, very bad. Back in mid 2008 we reviewed 20 who would meet Taleb’s “metric” and earned our trust for the future. These twenty did warn America between 2000 and 2008. Although few listened: We reported on warnings from economists Gary Shilling, Marc Faber and Nouril Roubini, the St. Louis Fed president (Greenspan ignored him, just as Bernanke is ignoring the Kansas City Fed president today), former Nixon Commerce Secretary and SEC chairman, billionaires Warren Buffett and oilman Richard Rainwater, institutional portfolio managers Jeremy Grantham, Bill Gross and Robert Rodriguez, and major cover stories in Fortune, Harper’s, Vanity Fair, The Economist and The Wall Street Journal.

But for every one warning back then, there were hundreds of happy-talkers inside the Happy Conspiracy’s propaganda machine, conning the public, either unconsciously denying reality or consciously lying about it.

Remember: Bloomberg Markets magazine reported that even Paulson predicted a meltdown was coming. But all he did was privately warn Bush two years earlier, in 2006, then he and the Fed chairman failed to tell the truth to the public for two years. That’s immoral, dishonest, a lie.

So who can you trust? Nobody, not me, not even Taleb. Why? In the final analysis the Buddha said it best: “Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.”

Unfortunately, America is losing its capacity to reason, its common sense, its values, its vision of the future. More of us need to trust Taleb’s “simple metric.”

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-fed-is-dead-maybe-by-2012-2010-10-05

Ares
7th October 2010, 09:30 AM
It's the End of the World and Farrell Knows It

If you thought Paul Farrell was a pessimist before, after reading this article from him (Posted above) you will look back on the others and view those as the musings of a cock-eyed optimist drinking Kudlow Kool-Aid.

In his most recent piece, he takes inspiration from Taleb's trust (almost) no one idea and lays out a scenario for the Fed to fail no later than 2020 under the weight of layers of corruption and conflicts that leads to class warfare and riots over food and water. If it is not clear his is talking about the US.

First things first the Fed as we know it (or think we know it) is the third central bank the US has had so the Fed failing one way or another would not be unprecedented and the reasons Farrell cites are close to the reasons why the first two shut down (per my limited understanding).

A modern failure of the Fed would certainly be disruptive in a meaningful way but as a practical matter would probably look more like a restructuring of some sort. The country would continue to have a central bank. During such a disruption I would expect just about every foreign market to panic down with the US market as a restructuring of the US central bank would reasonably scare the hell out of a lot of people.

In the article Farrell cites quotes from various people that were very wrong about the financial crisis including “Emerging markets are the global investors’ safe haven" from Worth (magazine?). Again were there to be a central bank failure I would expect most world markets to panic down right along with the US as in 2008. A realistic expectation for global diversification should not include completely missing a panic like 2008 or the crash of 1987.

I believe I set a reasonable goal for global investing before the crisis and have mentioned it many times since. In seeking out countries that offer the best chance of diversification I think you need countries that have different fundamental attributes than the US--they should also be relatively healthy and give some reasonable hope of doing well. In that light a realistic hope is that some countries with different attributes might turn down at a different time than the US, recover quicker, go down less or any combo of the three and there were many countries that did exactly this through the recent/current financial crisis.

The three that I wrote about most often in that context were Brazil, Chile and Norway. We know that the S&P 500 peaked in October 2007. Brazil and Norway peaked in May 2008; they generally kept going up for eight months past the US peak. Chile peaked about the same time as the US but only went down about 30% at its worst compared to 55% for the S&P 500. Chile is now about 40% above its old peak, Brazil is about 20% above its old peak while Norway is down a little less than 20% from its peak and the SPX is down around 26% from its peak.

There are many other examples, of course, but these are the ones I wrote about the most. In the face of another panic that might come about due to some fundamental shock, real or perceived, something similar will happen again in terms of other markets. Looking over the course of the last decade, as I have mentioned dozens of times, the US along with several other "important" markets were down for the decade while plenty of markets were up plenty--as I have said those countries went on without us and this effect would happen again. That is not to say it will necessarily be same ones, that is for you to sort out for yourself but it will happen.

There will always be an argument like the one Farrell is making and it will always be compelling to you on some level but the most extreme outcomes are incredibly rare although markets often brace for the absolute worst.

Disclosure: None

http://seekingalpha.com/article/228767-it-s-the-end-of-the-world-and-farrell-knows-it?source=email

Ponce
7th October 2010, 10:22 AM
As long as "they" exist there will be a "Federal Reserve" in one form or other.......been here sinse Jesus times and here they will remain for a long time..............keeping cancer in control does not removed the cancer.

FunnyMoney
7th October 2010, 11:33 AM
As long as "they" exist there will be a "Federal Reserve" in one form or other.......been here sinse Jesus times and here they will remain for a long time..............keeping cancer in control does not removed the cancer.


Yep, now we're getting somewhere.



Treating the symptoms does not cure the disease.


Attacking those who currently profit from the 100% criminal system does not stop the thefts, it just sends the profits to a different set of criminals.


:boohoo

Silver Shield
8th October 2010, 05:43 AM
I love the end, "believe no one, not even me, unless it agrees with your own logic and common sense ." Buddha


That is how I started my Academy.

Far to often we seek "truth" from others.
When the truth is with us all along.

Just like Dorothy is the Wizard of Oz, she could have gone home any time if she just tapped her SILVER shoes together.

Shami-Amourae
8th October 2010, 05:46 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=od6-8MizZKE

FunnyMoney
9th October 2010, 02:22 PM
I liked the video, thanks for posting it, Shami-Amourae.


At 8 min. into the video, they explain how the Fed is guilty of going against the coinage act of 1792 for which the penality is death.

"Getting rid of the Fed would solve 90% of the problems we have today..." - Judge Napolitano