For FunnyMoney - Who do you trust?

[General of Darkness]

Who do you trust? Alex Jones, David Icke, Michael Savage, Dr David Duke or Dr William Pierce?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjVRCc51NGA

[ximmy]

I'm listening to this now... thanks

[FunnyMoney]

What an easy question, but I wanted to view the video before posting my reply to your question.

And I thought you would have already known the answer, but maybe you missed my "Nobody Can Be Trusted" thread over at GIM1 which I posted just a week or two prior to the shut down and loss of my 3000 posts there.

No big deal, I saved the ones I wanted to. Find that thread and you will find the answer to your question.


But not to leave you in limbo nor play games, General, I will tell you more of my opinion and BTW JMHO.

You see, in all those threads I created over at GIM1, the posted replies created by anonymous Internet surfers provided much better insight into the truth than my original thread starting OP and of course much better insight than anything coming out of the MSM or well known pundits.

But that said, trust man? Your question is so entrenched in deception, I don't really even want to answer it. Trust in your fellow man is what got us into this mess, why would I ever want to trust someone? Trust is for God.

And if you're looking for my suggestion or rather the way I see things, then while I won't ignore my fellow man, I DMODD, so DYODD and maybe you too will decide that trust is a bit too important to give away to just anybody. My opinion is that trust is for God, so I would start there. Then given enough time and effort and a long enough life you might be able to trust another person almost as much, maybe. But if so, if you are truly lucky enough, if you finally are able to really give in and in your heart truly trust somebody else, then that person will likely be your wife.

[Book]

Watch it in high-definition 720p by clicking on the screen and going directly to Youtube. In high-definition some of the images are really stunning.

|--0--|

[ximmy]

This guy is amazing (david duke)... thanks General...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU4cvmk44MQ

[General of Darkness]

This guy is amazing (david duke)... thanks General...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU4cvmk44MQ



Duke is an amazing guy, but as a human being he's made some bad decisions that will haunt him. The Klan and being video taped at a stripe club. Here's my opinion on both.

The Klan - They get a bad rap, the media still blames them for hanging blacks but they hung more whites than blacks. The Klan, they hung people that needed to be hung, end of story. Cheap, affective, and got the issue resolved.

Stripe Club - That's what males will do when they're entertaining money folks.

With that aside. His HEART is in the right place, and that's what matters to me. Where is a person's heart.

[FunnyMoney]

...His HEART is in the right place, ....


I got a great laugh on this one. Not that it is or it isn't, that's not for me to judge. But was just curious how easily you know what's in a person's heart? ... :-*



David Duke: "Please read my book."

While I won't ignore anyone and did take the time to view the video and he might be a true Saint for all I know, I still don't think I need to read his book to answer the question directed at me on this thread, and if I do read the book I seriously doubt it would be able to change my mind regarding the reply I already made to the question...


Here it is again, I'm a little tired right now from all the bread , wine, and circus - but I think I've provided my answer clear enough...


...maybe you missed my "Nobody Can Be Trusted" thread over at GIM1 which I posted just a week or two prior to the shut down and loss of my 3000 posts there.

No big deal, I saved the ones I wanted to. Find that thread and you will find the answer to your question.


But not to leave you in limbo nor play games, General, I will tell you more of my opinion and BTW JMHO.

You see, in all those threads I created over at GIM1, the posted replies created by anonymous Internet surfers provided much better insight into the truth than my original thread starting OP and of course much better insight than anything coming out of the MSM or well known pundits.

But that said, trust man? Your question is so entrenched in deception, I don't really even want to answer it. Trust in your fellow man is what got us into this mess, why would I ever want to trust someone? Trust is for God.

And if you're looking for my suggestion or rather the way I see things, then while I won't ignore my fellow man, I DMODD, so DYODD and maybe you too will decide that trust is a bit too important to give away to just anybody. My opinion is that trust is for God, so I would start there. Then given enough time and effort and a long enough life you might be able to trust another person almost as much, maybe. But if so, if you are truly lucky enough, if you finally are able to really give in and in your heart truly trust somebody else, then that person will likely be your wife.

[ximmy]

Duke has a very concise and unoffensive way of explaining that not all men are created equal. Segregation is not a bad thing. When I empty my dishwasher, I don't just randomly throw everything in one cabinet, nor do I mix my socks with my shorts when folding clothes. Taken on a human level, we are indeed being fooled by the media to integrate and ignore our genetic differences. This is a bad thing for all except the ones who are behind the curtain pulling the strings and achieving their own supremacy through solidarity. It's the same seed that has endlessly exploited the cultures of the world for over a millennium.


he absolutely makes sense.. sense that a child can understand.. unlike some others who rant about things they don't understand...

[FunnyMoney]

he absolutely makes sense.. sense that a child can understand.. unlike some others who rant about things they don't understand...


The thread title was not "who does Zimy trust?" now was it.

But no offense, you're welcome to create one if you want to. Oh, but I guess why bother, it seems you really like DD, so good for you, trust him all you want. :-*

[ximmy]

he absolutely makes sense.. sense that a child can understand.. unlike some others who rant about things they don't understand...


The thread title was not "who does Zimy trust?" now was it.

But no offense, you're welcome to create one if you want to. Oh, but I guess why bother, it seems you really like DD, so good for you, trust him all you want. :-*


Yes, you are correct... Pardon me... The General did address this thread to you... I will make my exit... I'll be sure not to let the door hit me in the ass on the way out... :oo-->

[Twisted Titan]

I TRUST GOD........

EVERYBODY ELSE KEEP YOUR HANDS WHERE I CAN SEE THEM

[keehah]

The thread title was not "who does Zimy trust?" now was it.

But no offense, you're welcome to create one if you want to. Oh, but I guess why bother, it seems you really like DD, so good for you, trust him all you want. :-*


Your loss FunnyMoney.


Trust has several connotations. The typical definition of trust follows the general intuition about trust and contain such elements as:

- the willingness of one party (trustor) to be vulnerable to the actions of another party (trustee);
- reasonable expectation (confidence) of the trustor that the trustee will behave in a way beneficial to the trustor;
- risk of harm to the trustor if the trustee will not behave accordingly; and
- the absence of trustor's enforcement or control over actions performed by the trustee.

Trust can be naturally attributed to relationships between people. It can be demonstrated that humans have a natural disposition to trust and to judge trustworthiness that can be traced to the neurobiological structure and activity of a human brain, and can be altered e.g. by the application of oxytocin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxytocin).

For me it is more about identifying whom not to trust, otherwise I offer an expendable base level of trust to strangers or the questionable.

I could be persuated to agree with FunnyMoney on corporate and legal trust (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust) being destructive and best avoided.
______

Oxytocin Improves Social Behavior (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100216221350.htm)

First of all, the researchers observed the social behavior of the [Asperger syndrome] patients while they were interacting with three other people during a ball tossing game. Three profiles were represented: a player who always returned the ball to the patient, a player who did not return the ball, and finally a player who indiscriminately returned the ball to the patient or to other players. Each time the patient received the ball, he or she won a sum of money. The game was restarted ten times in order to allow the patient to identify the different profiles of his/her partners and act accordingly. Under a placebo, the patients returned the ball indiscriminately to the three partners. However, patients treated with oxytocin were able to discriminate between the different profiles and returned the ball to the most cooperative partner.

Very interesting. I have a deeper understanding now for the reasons for all the Autism causing treatments in our socieity to support control by a few who treat the rest little different than farm animals to generate wealth. The autistic trending livestock treats both fellow beast, and master (for better or worse) the same regardless of how he is treated by the master.

The master breaks the code (action and reaction) of physics and life that create the universe.

Vaccinations that destroy trust, literally and figuratively!

When you vaccinate against trust, only the criminals can be trusted.

(no offence meant to the autistic for using the term livestock, one does not need to be autistic to be livestock)

[gunDriller]

i thought the "Jewish Internet Defense Force" was crowing about their victory in getting David Duke kicked off Youtube.

did they crow prematurely ?

looks like his Channel is alive & well -
http://www.youtube.com/user/drdduke

[Spectrism]

I TRUST GOD........

EVERYBODY ELSE KEEP YOUR HANDS WHERE I CAN SEE THEM


Right. But apparently your opinion (nor mine) is not wanted in this thread. Let's all pretend its not here.

[FunnyMoney]

Right. But apparently your opinion (nor mine) is not wanted in this thread. Let's all pretend its not here.


You have to give me a little slack here. Sorry about the tactics, I had to say I was sorry on another thread as well. It seems last night I went a bit over the top with the "bread, wine, and circus" thing. While I don't believe in, "when in Rome, do as the Romans do" I sometimes have a bit of trouble keeping my cool. So sincerely, you opinion is welcome anyway you want to post it, nobody's on ignore, I don't know how to use the feature and I've only hit the "report" button once while on the Internet, and that was also because of too much "Rome".

I sometimes feel like I'm surrounded by 6 billion people who want to focus constantly on the "who" and I'm the only one screaming that it's the "how" which is the real road (JMHO) to improvement: it gets to be frustrating. But don't worry about me, I'm just one lone anonymous Internet voice. And I don't even know why the General singled me out for this question, I'm not even a private, matter of fact, I'm not even enlisted - I went "awol" years ago. So it would be better if you don't take it as if it really means much, but sorry if you did take it literally. As a consolation: there's plenty of people constantly focused on the "who" and it's been this way for, well... forever. So enjoy the company and flame away. I usually don't mind a bit, and am completely used to it. Think of it as a debate nothing more. A debate which got a little bit over-heated. Simply laugh at it if you can, I usually do, 'cept when under the spell of the "bread, wine, and circus" thing.


FunnyMoney

[bellevuebully]

Right. But apparently your opinion (nor mine) is not wanted in this thread. Let's all pretend its not here.


You have to give me a little slack here. Sorry about the tactics, I had to say I was sorry on another thread as well. It seems last night I went a bit over the top with the "bread, wine, and circus" thing. While I don't believe in, "when in Rome, do as the Romans do" I sometimes have a bit of trouble keeping my cool. So sincerely, you opinion is welcome anyway you want to post it, nobody's on ignore, I don't know how to use the feature and I've only hit the "report" button once while on the Internet, and that was also because of too much "Rome".

I sometimes feel like I'm surrounded by 6 billion people who want to focus constantly on the "who" and I'm the only one screaming that it's the "how" which is the real road (JMHO) to improvement: it gets to be frustrating. But don't worry about me, I'm just one lone anonymous Internet voice. And I don't even know why the General singled me out for this question, I'm not even a private, matter of fact, I'm not even enlisted - I went "awol" years ago. So it would be better if you don't take it as if it really means much, but sorry if you did take it literally. As a consolation: there's plenty of people constantly focused on the "who" and it's been this way for, well... forever. So enjoy the company and flame away. I usually don't mind a bit, and am completely used to it. Think of it as a debate nothing more. A debate which got a little bit over-heated. Simply laugh at it if you can, I usually do, 'cept when under the spell of the "bread, wine, and circus" thing.


FunnyMoney


I think spec was supporting your position.

[Bigjon]

Right. But apparently your opinion (nor mine) is not wanted in this thread. Let's all pretend its not here.


You have to give me a little slack here. Sorry about the tactics, I had to say I was sorry on another thread as well. It seems last night I went a bit over the top with the "bread, wine, and circus" thing. While I don't believe in, "when in Rome, do as the Romans do" I sometimes have a bit of trouble keeping my cool. So sincerely, you opinion is welcome anyway you want to post it, nobody's on ignore, I don't know how to use the feature and I've only hit the "report" button once while on the Internet, and that was also because of too much "Rome".

I sometimes feel like I'm surrounded by 6 billion people who want to focus constantly on the "who" and I'm the only one screaming that it's the "how" which is the real road (JMHO) to improvement: it gets to be frustrating. But don't worry about me, I'm just one lone anonymous Internet voice. And I don't even know why the General singled me out for this question, I'm not even a private, matter of fact, I'm not even enlisted - I went "awol" years ago. So it would be better if you don't take it as if it really means much, but sorry if you did take it literally. As a consolation: there's plenty of people constantly focused on the "who" and it's been this way for, well... forever. So enjoy the company and flame away. I usually don't mind a bit, and am completely used to it. Think of it as a debate nothing more. A debate which got a little bit over-heated. Simply laugh at it if you can, I usually do, 'cept when under the spell of the "bread, wine, and circus" thing.


FunnyMoney



I think you are half right, half wrong and I'm all right, both who and how are equally important.

[Neuro]

Right. But apparently your opinion (nor mine) is not wanted in this thread. Let's all pretend its not here.


You have to give me a little slack here. Sorry about the tactics, I had to say I was sorry on another thread as well. It seems last night I went a bit over the top with the "bread, wine, and circus" thing. While I don't believe in, "when in Rome, do as the Romans do" I sometimes have a bit of trouble keeping my cool. So sincerely, you opinion is welcome anyway you want to post it, nobody's on ignore, I don't know how to use the feature and I've only hit the "report" button once while on the Internet, and that was also because of too much "Rome".

I sometimes feel like I'm surrounded by 6 billion people who want to focus constantly on the "who" and I'm the only one screaming that it's the "how" which is the real road (JMHO) to improvement: it gets to be frustrating. But don't worry about me, I'm just one lone anonymous Internet voice. And I don't even know why the General singled me out for this question, I'm not even a private, matter of fact, I'm not even enlisted - I went "awol" years ago. So it would be better if you don't take it as if it really means much, but sorry if you did take it literally. As a consolation: there's plenty of people constantly focused on the "who" and it's been this way for, well... forever. So enjoy the company and flame away. I usually don't mind a bit, and am completely used to it. Think of it as a debate nothing more. A debate which got a little bit over-heated. Simply laugh at it if you can, I usually do, 'cept when under the spell of the "bread, wine, and circus" thing.





I think you are half right, half wrong and I'm all right, both who and how are equally important.

Yes it is good to focus on the ones who do it too. Know thy enemy...

[nunaem]

Where does Why? fit into this?

[nunaem]

Where does Why? fit into this?


Just to expand on this.. Painstaking, multi-generational plots are inconsistent with the motive of mere selfishness. Selfish people generally don't devote their lives so that their great grand-children will be richer than they are, they usually spend all their money and power to their progeny's detriment. It takes a special family cohesiveness and devotion to put that much planning into a project that won't see its fruition until many generations down the road. Something that most peoples lack.

I think you all know where I'm going with this.

[JDRock]

Duke has a very concise and unoffensive way of explaining that not all men are created equal. Segregation is not a bad thing. When I empty my dishwasher, I don't just randomly throw everything in one cabinet, nor do I mix my socks with my shorts when folding clothes. Taken on a human level, we are indeed being fooled by the media to integrate and ignore our genetic differences. This is a bad thing for all except the ones who are behind the curtain pulling the strings and achieving their own supremacy through solidarity. It's the same seed that has endlessly exploited the cultures of the world for over a millennium.


he absolutely makes sense.. sense that a child can understand.. unlike some others who rant about things they don't understand...


So true, thanx.

[MAGNES]

TRUST NOBODY ! Do your own research and work, reading, study, etc .

Be smart selling ideas.

9/11, Wars, Freedom Erosion, Economy, people are waking up slowly.

@ Nunaem, they are successful are they not, it takes a special kind of hatred
to plot to dominate like that, they created Israel that way, slowly, over hundreds
of years, from their own writings, "war on rome", you are Rome, we are subhuman.
They are the ones that have held back progress , always were, they
created dark ages of past, see EM, it is true what he says.

First they have to destroy your leaders, todays are easy, but historical leaders.
Then they take you down their path. These plots have already been successful.
The Protocols were already enacted. Genocide already took place.

"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races...and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel...will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition..." (Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574)






I TRUST GOD........

EVERYBODY ELSE KEEP YOUR HANDS WHERE I CAN SEE THEM


Right. But apparently your opinion (nor mine) is not wanted in this thread. Let's all pretend its not here.


CHRISTIANS BUILT THE WEST !

I am not even religious.

That is why we are targets, whoever doesn't
understand this by now has some sort of issue.
"WAR ON ROME", ZOHAR, perpetual war, we are Rome.
West, East, Rome, Byzantium, Germany, Russia,
as one was destroyed the others rebuilt. Look
at the flags, god's bird, The Double Headed Eagle,
as one proof, a highly Christian symbol, even Rothchilds
stoled the symbol, cause they destroyed us already
many times. Lots of other related material too on
here.

http://www.catholicvoice.co.uk/pinay/
"venetian" bankers led the destruction, destroyed Europes
greatest city, technology, knowledge, they took over
England and created Freemasonry, that was their main
base of operation, created communism. They work
through deceit mainly.

http://i56.tinypic.com/1z2odqa.jpg

http://i51.tinypic.com/2cqfyhe.jpg

[uranian]

I sometimes feel like I'm surrounded by 6 billion people who want to focus constantly on the "who" and I'm the only one screaming that it's the "how" which is the real road (JMHO) to improvement.

an impression i have often had of people who appear to be of good heart to me and are christian, is that their christianity is irrelevant, they would be good people regardless of their faith. the same is true in the opposite direction, while i see judaism as one of the nuttier of the religions (the only vaguely sane religions i've seen are eastern, taoism for example), those who profess judaism and then go on to commit selfish acts would have committed those selfish acts regardless of their judaism. seems to me the worst you can say about judaism in this regard is that it offers a social scene to psychopaths. all monotheistic religions are largely nuts, as witnessed by a few quotes from the koran, bible and talmud:


All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground. Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper.


Believers, do not make friends with any but your own people. They desire nothing but your ruin. You believe in the entire Book. When they meet you they say: ‘We, too, are believers.’ But when alone, they bite their finger-tips with rage.


When one mourning succeeds another, he may cut his hair with a knife but not with shears. If his clothes are dirty, he may wash them in cold water but not in feet-water. A mourner and one who is under the ban, when on the road, are allowed to wear sandals; however, they must remove them as soon as they reach the town.

if you can guess which ridiculous quote is from which crazy book, well done.

most people simply use religion to justify their own ends, whether for good or for bad.

that there are racial differences between people is clear, but an emerging body of evidence is showing that it is more environment than genetic code that shapes a person, e.g. it is possible to actually remove a cell's DNA and it will continue its function unimpaired. while it is clear that the jews own the mass media and the banking industry, the real problem is that people will believe the MSM without question, and will not question the notion that never-ending exponential growth based upon usury/fiat is reasonable. it doesn't really matter who the people are that lead the MSM/banks, as there will always be some group that will take that role; what does matter is the people's desire to drink the koolaid. you could imprison every jew, every banker and every MSM journalist, and i would bet generously that you would not change a thing.

[Horn]

"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah.


And at the same time Israel a martyr.

[Horn]

Who do you trust? Alex Jones, David Icke, Michael Savage, Dr David Duke or Dr William Pierce?

PatColo told me I shoudn't marry any of them, and I trust him. :)

[nunaem]

CHRISTIANS BUILT THE WEST !


I would say that un-Christian Christians built the West. Whenever communities took Jesus' teachings literally and tried to put all of them into practice they've turned out to be communistic do-nothings.