BREAKING FOX NEWS: Bin Laden and PatColo Hiding in Pakistan

[Book]

http://files.myopera.com/bcdc/albums/35555/thumbs/osama%20bin%20laden%20%28bert%20is%20evil%29_jpg.j pg_thumb.jpg

Report: Bin Laden, Zawahiri Hiding in Pakistan

Published October 18, 2010

FoxNews.com

Bin Laden has been on the F.B.I.'s most-wanted list for more than 10 years

Al Qaeda leader Usama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri are believed to be hiding near each other in relative comfort in northwest Pakistan, a senior NATO official told CNN on Monday.

The two men are believed to be living in homes near one another and are protected by members of Pakistan's spy agency, the ISI, and locals, the network reported. Pakistan strongly denies protecting members of the terror network.

"Nobody in Al Qaeda is living in a cave," the unnamed official was quoted as saying.

Bin Laden is believed to have escaped from Afghanistan's Tora Bora region, a Taliban stronghold, during a U.S. bombing raid in 2001 and has moved around Pakistan since.

The official told CNN the Al Qaeda leader is likely to have traveled in recent years throughout the country's rugged tribal region from near the Chinese border to neighboring Afghanistan.

The same official also confirmed to the network that top Taliban leader Mullah Omar has been moving between the Pakistani cities of Quetta and Karachi over the last several months.

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in an interview earlier this month that Al Qaeda has been weakened in the past two to three years and predicted that the network's top two leaders eventually would be hunted down.

"It would certainly be significant if we were to find and kill Bin Laden or Zawahiri. We are seeking to do that," he said. "I actually believe that some point in time it will happen."

Linky (http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/10/18/report-bin-laden-deputy-hiding-pakistan/)

:)

[RJB]

I knew it. Throw the Book at him. :)

[keehah]

Book smart I will assume. Because its obvious who PatColo is and it is not the uni-brow.

http://unconfirmedsources.com/nucleus/media/13/20090123-BertErnisBushresize.jpg

Bin Laden Family Members Evacuated from US in Wake of the 9/11 Attacks (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15186)
Part III
by Robert Bridge Global Research, September 17, 2009

Osama bin Laden was suspect number one on 9/11, yet the U.S. authorities commit yet another inexplicable act: they release all members of the bin Laden family who were residing at the time in the US.

Let’s imagine that a mass murder has been committed in Smalltown, America and the suspect is at large. Where is the first place the investigators will invariably go to search for clues as to either the whereabouts of the killer or his or her motives? Yes, to the immediate families of the suspected killer.

So why did the US authorities let the immediate kin of bin Laden escape on planes out of Dodge?

“Even though American airspace had been shut down," Sky News reported, "the Bush administration allowed a jet to fly around the US picking up family members from 10 cities, including Los Angeles, Washington DC, Boston and Houston.”

“Two dozen members of Osama bin Laden’s family were urgently evacuated from the United States in the first days following the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington,” CBS reported.

“Most of bin Laden’s relatives were attending high school and college,” the article continued. “Many were terrified, fearing they would be lynched after hearing reports of violence against Muslims and Arab-Americans.”

The skies over America in the days following 9/11 were in lock-down mode yet the entire family of America’s number one enemy is released without due question. Furthermore, not only are these individuals duly released, they are released on commercial jets, the very mode of transport that bin Laden allegedly used to wreak havoc on the northeastern United States.

This is truly amazing, and bears repeating: not a single American citizen could fly after 9/11, yet we give permission to the family of the evil mastermind who allegedly used commercial jets to damage four buildings to escape from the United States on commercial jets! This sort of irrational behavior on the part of the authorities almost makes it look as if the Bush administration knew that Osama bin Laden was not responsible for the attacks so releasing the bin Ladens would not mean much. Or maybe we are missing something here?

Let's briefly imagine a reversal of roles: an American, who is believed to be hiding out in enemy territory overseas, is accused of killing thousands of innocent people in Jeddah one Tuesday morning. Meanwhile, dozens of his American relatives are attending university in Jeddah. How would the Saudi government, or any government for that matter, respond to that predicament? I think it would be a safe bet that the Saudi government might, at the very least, ask those Americans, who are probably innocent, of course, not to leave town until further notice. If nothing else, it seems to be normal protocol for any investigation, whatever the size. But the sheer size and brutal surprise of 9/11 allowed us to set aside our common sense and accept any explanation, however asinine.

___________________

Very good interview:

http://www.ajpfiles.com/October2010/Alex.Jones.10.13.2010.mp3

http://www.alexjonespodcasts.com/October2010/

Wednesday 10-13-10 - Alex welcomes back to the show Hamid Gul, a retired Pakistan Army three star general known for heading the Inter-Services Intelligence, the Pakistani intelligence agency, after the Soviet-Afghan War. Gul talks with Alex about the U.S. military escalation in Pakistan and how the Afghan insurgency is untenable and cannot be won.

[Ponce]

And after we hunt down Bin Laden? whos next?.........the US will come with another buggy man to blame for what is going on, when they themselves are the guilty ones.

[Cebu_4_2]

Pat Colo must be at work lol.

[ximmy]

Pat Colo must be at work lol.


When he gets here we can expect the flying joo-jitsoo image he liberally uses... :D

[keehah]

'Local' Likudnik rag getting in on the act....

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Laden+living+comfortably+Pakistan/3687786/story.html

KABUL - Al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden is living comfortably in a house in northwest Pakistan close to his deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri, CNN on Monday quoted a NATO official as saying.

The Saudi-born militant wanted for the September 11 attacks on the United States nine years ago is being protected by local people and "some members of the Pakistani intelligence services," the television network said.

It also said that the al-Qaida number two, the Egyptian-born Zawahiri, was living close to him.

"Nobody in al-Qaida is living in a cave," the unnamed senior NATO official is quoted as saying in a report datelined Kabul.

[midnight rambler]

No doubt this house bin Laden is in is located close to a hospital so he doesn't have far to go for his kidney dialysis. :sarc:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51mVZdur0oL._SS500_.jpg

[PatColo]

They sure seem to be chomping at the bit to vilify Pakistan... remember the wikileaks limited hangout affair a few months ago? What did the "damning leaked revelations" do? Vilify Pakistan... I guess they have something TPTB want?

One of David Ray Griffin's 911 books:
Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? (http://www.amazon.com/Osama-Bin-Laden-Dead-Alive/dp/1566567831/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51tTvClc0GL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg

related article,

http://www.globalresearch.ca/coverStoryPictures/15601.jpg


Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15601)

by David Ray Griffin

Is Osama bin Laden still alive? I have dealt with this question in a recent little book entitled Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive? The present essay summarizes the main points of this book.



Since the transference of power from the Bush administration to that of Barack Obama administration, the question of whether bin Laden is dead or alive has become more important.



Although George W. Bush famously said that he wanted Osama bin Laden “dead or alive,” he made clear that he was not serious about this. Besides stating that he was not concerned about bin Laden, he demonstrated this by diverting most of America’s military resources to Iraq. Bush could, of course, be unconcerned about bin Laden because he knew that, besides the fact that bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11, he was probably dead anyway.



I do not know what President Obama and his people think about these matters, but their rhetoric presupposes that bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and is still alive.



In November 2008, for example, a Washington Post story said:

“President-elect Barack Obama . . . intends to renew the U.S. commitment to the hunt for Osama bin Laden. . . . ‘This is our enemy,’ one adviser said of bin Laden, ‘and he should be our principal target.’”

In his White House address of March 27 of this year, President Obama said:

“[A]l Qaeda and its allies - the terrorists who planned and supported the 9/11 attacks - are in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Multiple intelligence estimates have warned that al Qaeda is actively planning attacks on the U.S. homeland from its safe-haven in Pakistan. . . . [A]l Qaeda and its extremist allies have moved across the border to the remote areas of the Pakistani frontier. This almost certainly includes al Qaeda's leadership: Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri.”

Obama has appealed regularly to these intelligence estimates, which have invariably claimed that bin Laden is hiding in Pakistan, somewhere along its border with Pakistan. This claim has been used to justify the extension of US military activity into Pakistan, with the result that people now speak of the “AfPak war.”



One way to argue against this war is to point out that, if these intelligence experts do not even know whether bin Laden is alive, they certainly cannot know where he is and what he is thinking.



There are, to be sure, other good arguments against the this war, and many critics are making these arguments. But to point out that bin Laden is almost certainly dead provides an argument that goes to the heart of the publically articulated rationale for this war.



Of course, another way to argue against this war would be to point out that bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11. But even though our own FBI has admitted that it “has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” a large part of the American population has been conditioned to reject all revisionism about 9/11 out of hand. As we saw recently with “the Van Jones affair,” people are considered unfit for public service if they once signed a document suggesting that the official account of 9/11 might not be fully true.



My little bin Laden book is primarily for people who, besides assuming that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, also believe that the AfPak war is justifiable because we need to prevent him from planning another attack. Many such people will turn against the war if they become aware of convincing evidence that bin Laden is almost certainly dead. There is considerable evidence for this conclusion.



This evidence is of two types: objective evidence and testimonies.



Objective Evidence that Bin Laden is Dead



The objective evidence includes the following facts:



First, up until mid-December 13, 2001, the CIA had regularly been intercepting messages between bin Laden and his people. At that time, however, the messages suddenly stopped, and the CIA has never again intercepted a message.



Second, on December 26, 2001, a leading Pakistani newspaper published a story reporting that bin Laden had died in mid-December, adding:

“A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement . . . stated . . . that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial.”

Third, bin Laden had kidney disease. He had been treated for it in the American Hospital in Dubai in July 2001, at which time he reportedly ordered two dialysis machines to take home. If you have ever wondered what bin Laden was doing the night before the 9/11 attacks, CBS News reported that he was being given kidney dialysis treatment in a hospital in Pakistan. And in January of 2001, Dr. Sanjay Gupta said – based on a video of bin Laden that had been made in either late November or early December of 2001 – that he appeared to be in the last stages of kidney failure.



Fourth, In July of 2002, CNN reported that bin Laden’s bodyguards had been captured in February of that year, adding: “Sources believe that if the bodyguards were captured away from bin Laden, it is likely the most-wanted man in the world is dead.”



Fifth, the United States has since 2001 offered a $25 million reward for any information leading to the capture or killing of bin Laden. But this reward offer has produced no such information, even though Pakistan has many desperately poor people, only about half of whom have been supportive of bin Laden.



Testimonial Evidence that Bin Laden Is Dead



In addition to this objective evidence, we had considerable testimony in 2002, from people in position to know, that bin Laden was dead, or probably so. These people included:

• President Musharraf of Pakistan;



• Dale Watson, the head of the FBI’s counterterrorism unit;



• Oliver North, who said: “I'm certain that Osama is dead. . . And so are all the other guys I stay in touch with”;



• President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan;



• Sources within Israeli intelligence, who said that any new messages from bin Laden were “probably fabrications”;



• Sources within Pakistani intelligence, who “confirmed the death of . . . Osama Bin Laden” and “attributed the reasons behind Washington's hiding news on the death of Osama Bin Laden to the desire of the hawks of the American administration to use the issue of al-Qaida and international terrorism to invade Iraq.”

For this reason, perhaps, the stories about the demise of bin Laden largely came to an end in the latter part of 2002, when the United States was gearing up for its attack on Iraq. From then until now, there have been few such stories.



Recently, however, two former intelligence officers have spoken out. In October 2008, former CIA case officer Robert Baer suggested in passing during an interview on National Public Radio that bin Laden was no longer among the living. When Baer was asked about this, he said: “Of course he’s dead.”



In March of 2009, former Foreign Service officer Angelo Codevilla published an essay in the American Spectator entitled “Osama bin Elvis.” Explaining his title, Codevilla wrote: “Seven years after Osama bin Laden's last verifiable appearance among the living, there is more evidence for Elvis's presence among us than for his.”



This is an excellent article, with only one serious flaw. In 2007, Benazir Bhutto, being interviewed by David Frost, referred to Omar Sheikh as “the man who murdered Osama bin Laden.” Codevilla cited this statement as further evidence that bin Laden is dead. But Bhutto had simply misspoken: She had meant to say “the man who murdered Daniel Pearl,” which is the standard way of referring to Omar Sheikh. That she misspoke was shown the next day, when she told CNN: “I don’t think General Musharaf personally knows where Osama bin Laden is.” Ten days later, speaking to NPR, she reported having asked a policeman assigned to guard her house: “Shouldn’t you be looking for Osama bin Laden?” This flaw aside, Codevilla’s article provides good support for his claim that the widespread belief in bin Laden’s continued existence is not backed up by evidence.



What about the “Messages from Osama bin Laden”?



Many people, of course, assume that there is a lot of evidence that bin Laden is still alive, namely, the dozens of audio tape and video tape “messages from bin Laden” that have appeared since 2001. These tapes provide good evidence, however, only if they are authentic. The longest chapter of my book is devoted to this question.



I show, in the first place, that the technology for making fake audio and video tapes is now so advanced that even experts can be fooled. So although the press regularly tells us that intelligence agencies have authenticated the latest bin Laden tape, it is virtually impossible to prove a tape to be authentic.



It is sometimes possible, however, to prove a tape to be a fake. For example: If the person hired to play bin Laden writes with his right hand; if he is much heavier and darker than bin Laden was in a tape made about the same time; if he has fatter hands and shorter fingers; if his nose has a different shape. And if, in discussing the Twin Towers, he says that the fire melted the steel, whereas the real bin Laden would have known that a building fire cannot melt steel. I am speaking here of the video that was allegedly found by US troops in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, in November 2001, which is widely known as the “bin Laden confession video.”



Also obviously fabricated was the “October Surprise” video, which appeared on October 29, 2004, just in time to help George W. Bush get reelected. One clue that it was a fake, aside from its timing, is provided by its language. Bin Laden’s own messages were saturated with references to Allah and the Prophet Mohammed. But in this October Surprise video, Allah was mentioned rarely and the only “Mohammad” mentioned was Mohamed Atta. Also, whereas undoubtedly authentic bin Laden messages portrayed worldly events as cause or at least permitted by Allah, the speaker on this October Surprise video gave a purely secular account of events, even telling the American people: “Your security is in your own hands.”



The most obviously faked video is one that, appearing in 2007, was identical to the October Surprise video of 2004, except that the bin Laden figure now had a completely black beard, leading me to call it the video from “Blackbeard the Terrorist.” Although pundits tried, with straight faces, to explain why bin Laden might have dyed his beard, or put on a fake one, this video was best treated with the respect it deserved by a YouTube video featuring a actor wearing a very long, very black, beard, and saying:



Hello, long time no see. It is me, Osama bin Laden. And no, this not to be confused with just-for-men hair color commercial. . . . I make this video to prove to world that me still alive and kicking.



This video is very funny. But there is, of course, nothing funny about the fact that obviously fake bin Laden videos have been used, and are still being used, to justify the AfPak war, which continues to kill dozens if not hundreds of innocent people each week, including women and children attending weddings and funerals.



Conclusion



If my little book, by showing that bin Laden has probably long been dead, can help shorten this war, it will have served its main purpose.



Its other main point, to which a separate chapter is devoted, is that these fake bin Laden tapes appear to be simply one part of an extensive propaganda operation, in which the US military intelligence is using tax dollars – illegally – to propagandize the American public, with the aim of furthering the militarization of America and its foreign policy.



I hope my little book will stimulate the 9/11 truth movement, along with the anti-war movement in general, to take on more fully the task of exposing this propaganda effort, to which a growing portion of our tax dollars is being devoted.

Griffin's been sick/recovering btw, slowing down:
David Ray Griffin: An Account of My Recent Illness(es) October 6, 2010 (http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20101006181013809)

[MAGNES]

They sure seem to be chomping at the bit to vilify Pakistan... remember the wikileaks limited hangout affair a few months ago? What did the "damning leaked revelations" do? Vilify Pakistan... I guess they have something TPTB want?


The NeoCons gave Pakistan the bomb, and they destroyed Plame and her network
for doing real work on WMD. Oligarchs of Russia, Jews, helped, big time partners.

Now Obama has expanded the war to Pakistan bombing civilians, PNAC doctrine.

Sibel Edmonds is key here. Nobody challenges here testimony cause it is real truth.
Sworn under oath, they would destroy her if they could, if she told a lie, they just
ignore her.

@ BOOK , unfair title to Pat, one of the best people gim had, we outing the Khazars,
Pat is number one, I have pointed out to Pat many times there are real muslim terrorists,
you need patsies too, pointed out the Jihadists working with the NeoCons, Serbia etc,
and the destruction of the West through immigration, I am no fan of Muslims, etc,
everyone does their main thing sometimes, Pat is good, which is why they banned him
for no reason on gim, an outrage, I have disagreed with Pat , you see me often times
disagreeing with Book, lol, Book is the best though at what he does too, sometimes not. ;D
Let's not gang up on the wrong people, let them post, etc, so I act as a counter,
deliberately. Maybe Pat strongly disagrees with my past posts on muslims, he left me
alone and did not show any personal animosity. There are different issues. Let's not
confuse them like Poddy does, Muslims = Bad = Jew Wars on them for lies and your enslavement.
Their biggest targets are the seculars, Iraq, Palestinians, etc, why ?

[Book]

@ BOOK , unfair title to Pat, one of the best people gim had...



I very seldom, if ever, disagree with PatColo and he knows the title of this thread was actually mocking those here who have recently been accusing him of being an evil mooslim spy...lol.

:D

[MAGNES]

@ BOOK , unfair title to Pat, one of the best people gim had...



I very seldom, if ever, disagree with PatColo and he knows the title of this thread was actually mocking those here who have recently been accusing him of being an evil mooslim spy...lol.

:D


Okay thanks, good to know, I didn't get it, maybe I am slow or missed some stuff on here.

So what I said applies to everyone making accusations that you mention as well.

The NeoCons and the media are good at confusing issues, seen many arguments on other
forums too, mixing issues, who is pro and con, with regards to muslims, jews, military,
sometimes it gets hot.

Poddy refers to Norman Poderetz, Bush's main adviser, writes a book,
muslim's bad history = " war on terror " good. Poddy has a history.

[RJB]

I very seldom, if ever, disagree with PatColo and he knows the title of this thread was actually mocking those here who have recently been accusing him of being an evil mooslim spy...lol.

:D
You mean that Pat wasn't the pointy headed muppet? :D

[FreeEnergy]

Wait, wait...

This Yemenite-looking jew they commonly call "Bin Laden" is hiding where again? :oo--> :conf:

(for those who didn't get the reference, Yemen is one of the places thought to be the original home of the "chosen" people).


I saw last night FAUX did a broken cross (a.k.a. "peace") version of their logo. That was their lowest moment, the only thing lower they could do is attach a Bahomet emblem somewhere.