PDA

View Full Version : Republicrats Waffling on repealing Obamacare, and Contract with America



Ares
20th October 2010, 07:45 PM
A top Senate Republican suggested Monday night that the party's prevailing strategies to curtail the new healthcare law might not be good ideas.

Sen. Judd Gregg (N.H.), the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said that repealing the new healthcare reform law — or looking to defund it — were not good options.

"I don't think starving or repealing is probably the best approach here," Gregg said on the Fox Business Network. "You basically go in and restructure it."

That's a change of pace even for Gregg, who's been among almost all fellow Republicans in the House and Senate who've called for the repeal of the measure, which Democrats passed through Congress earlier this year and President Obama signed into law.

"Our view is, you repeal and replace this bill," Gregg said on CNN in March. "You replace it with better law and better approaches towards healthcare."

He also said on CNBC as recently as last month that using the budget reconciliation process to repeal major parts of healthcare reform were an option, too.

GOP leaders are finally nearing the point where they might be faced with actual options to curtail or eliminate the healthcare law. Republicans are hoping to win back control of the House in Nov. 2's elections, and the party could retake the majority in the Senate if it makes a net gain of 10 seats on Election Day.

The Republican "Pledge to America," the House GOP's election-year governing agenda, included a "plan to repeal and replace the government takeover of healthcare," and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), who would become Speaker of the House under a GOP majority, said earlier this year that repealing the legislation was Republicans' "No. 1 priority."

Republicans have also openly acknowledged, though, that full repeal could be difficult as long as Obama is in the White House and the GOP is without veto-proof majorities in the House and Senate. GOP leaders have instead suggested they might look to defund elements of the bill and its implementation.

Repealing healthcare reform isn't the most politically popular move, either. Only 31 percent of registered voters told the Kaiser Health Tracking Poll that they favor repealing the legislation, though a separate poll conducted by Bloomberg News suggested that voters might want to see certain parts of the law stricken, like its tax on high-value insurance plans or its requirement that all individuals have health insurance.

Gregg said that some of the reforms in the existing legislation — including the cuts and savings in Medicare that Republicans had often decried during the debate over the legislation — "actually made some sense." But the longtime New Hampshire lawmaker, who's retiring at the end of his term in January, said that money should have been used to re-invest in Medicare.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/124749-gregg-repeal-isnt-best-approach-to-health-reform

Apparition
20th October 2010, 08:01 PM
Surprise!!! :sarc:

Filthy Keynes
20th October 2010, 08:04 PM
"replace it with a BETTER LAW"... yeah right! :oo-->

PS: Why do we even need ANY LAW at all? Why do we even need our GARGANTUAN OBESE FAT GOVERNMENT?! What have they ever done for ME lately?!

Ares
20th October 2010, 08:11 PM
One party shoves the "law" down the collective throat of the "taxpayer", the other party adds hor dourves pats itself on the back and says see, better "law".

mick silver
21st October 2010, 02:52 AM
am i the only one see this coming . beside you guys here

1970 silver art
21st October 2010, 03:45 AM
What I think will happen is once the Republicans take control the House and Senate, then they will just have an excuse for failing to repeal Obamacare. The Congress whores are not going to listen to the people. The lobbyist pimps got what they wanted when Obamacare was passed. Who is going to care? Doesn't everybody like Obamacare? Oops!!! I forgot. The people that will care and that do not like Obamacare will be the people and small businesses that will feel the adverse effects of this Obamacare legislation. In the meantime, health insurers are and will continue to jack up health insurance premiums 10% to 50% (or more) each year before Obamacare becomes fully effective in 2014.

Obamacare will adversely effect health insurers starting in 2014 but not before they jack up health insurance premiums to the point where most people will not be able to afford health insurance for themselves and their families. This is just my opinion here but the fact that the health insurance companies have 2 more years to jack up health insurance before the Obamacare legislation is fully effective is the lobby pimp's "gift" to the health insurers because once the legislation becomes effective, then they cannot increase health insurance premiums like they are now and they will be forced to take on more risks and increasing expenses (i.e. forced to accept pre-existing conditions and medical loss ratio issues).

Obamacare addresses insuring more people and it does not address the issue of increasing medical costs. The medical costs IMO will go up more since gov't is getting more involved in health care. The costs of whatever the gov't touches will increase and forcing citizens to buy a product from a private company is just bad IMO.

tekrunner
21st October 2010, 07:21 AM
A top Senate Republican suggested Monday night that the party's prevailing strategies to curtail the new healthcare law might not be good ideas.

Sen. Judd Gregg (N.H.), the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said that repealing the new healthcare reform law — or looking to defund it — were not good options.

"I don't think starving or repealing is probably the best approach here," Gregg said on the Fox Business Network. "You basically go in and restructure it."

That's a change of pace even for Gregg, who's been among almost all fellow Republicans in the House and Senate who've called for the repeal of the measure, which Democrats passed through Congress earlier this year and President Obama signed into law.

"Our view is, you repeal and replace this bill," Gregg said on CNN in March. "You replace it with better law and better approaches towards healthcare."

He also said on CNBC as recently as last month that using the budget reconciliation process to repeal major parts of healthcare reform were an option, too.

GOP leaders are finally nearing the point where they might be faced with actual options to curtail or eliminate the healthcare law. Republicans are hoping to win back control of the House in Nov. 2's elections, and the party could retake the majority in the Senate if it makes a net gain of 10 seats on Election Day.

The Republican "Pledge to America," the House GOP's election-year governing agenda, included a "plan to repeal and replace the government takeover of healthcare," and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), who would become Speaker of the House under a GOP majority, said earlier this year that repealing the legislation was Republicans' "No. 1 priority."

Republicans have also openly acknowledged, though, that full repeal could be difficult as long as Obama is in the White House and the GOP is without veto-proof majorities in the House and Senate. GOP leaders have instead suggested they might look to defund elements of the bill and its implementation.

Repealing healthcare reform isn't the most politically popular move, either. Only 31 percent of registered voters told the Kaiser Health Tracking Poll that they favor repealing the legislation, though a separate poll conducted by Bloomberg News suggested that voters might want to see certain parts of the law stricken, like its tax on high-value insurance plans or its requirement that all individuals have health insurance.

Gregg said that some of the reforms in the existing legislation — including the cuts and savings in Medicare that Republicans had often decried during the debate over the legislation — "actually made some sense." But the longtime New Hampshire lawmaker, who's retiring at the end of his term in January, said that money should have been used to re-invest in Medicare.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/124749-gregg-repeal-isnt-best-approach-to-health-reform




^^That's the exact reason democrats gave for not being able to pull troops out of Iraq when they took control of the house and Senate in 2006. Well they got that too and we're still in Iraq.