RUSSIA KOSHER NWO TEAMMATE

[Book]

http://jewsribsinbearjaw.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/putin-at-table-with-jews.jpg

Russia has agreed to return to the war in Afghanistan at the request of the Western states which helped the mujahedin to drive its forces out of the country 21 years ago.

The Independent has learnt that Moscow is engaged in training the Afghan army and counter-narcotics troops and has agreed in principle to supply Nato with several dozen helicopters for use in Afghanistan.

:oo-->

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/exclusive-afghanistan-russia-steps-in-to-help-nato-2117468.html

[DMac]

Putin is another Chabad BFF :oo-->


From the horse's mouth, re: NATO-Russian relations & Afghanistan:
(video clip from NATO conference)
07 Oct. 2009

http://www.natochannel.tv/default.aspx?aid=3519

snip from the transcript:


Q: Yes, hi, Brooks Tigner, Jane's Defence. Two quick questions, if I may? You mentioned that Russia and NATO might discuss ways that Russia could support or cooperate the Alliance in Afghanistan.

My question is, beyond Russia's current offer of indirect assistance, and it is indirect, by allowing transit of ISAF material across its territory, what is plausible in terms of additional Russian support or cooperation?

Second question, different topic. You mentioned that on the common military budget that the gap between requirements and resources must be filled as soon as possible, either by making savings or reviewing NATO's priorities. My question, does reviewing options or those priorities include a further loosening of the way that the SIP can be used for operational purposes? And would that be in a substantial way? For instance, the Alliance is already doing this on the airborne ground surveillance system, and that's expensive.

ANDERS FOGH RASMUSSEN: Well, first about Russia and a possible Russian contribution to our mission in Afghanistan. I could mention some examples of how we could further Russian engagement in Afghanistan. Russia has already provided transit through Russia. I think this transit agreement could be expanded. That's one thing.

Next, Russia could provide equipment for the Afghan Security Forces. Thirdly, Russia could provide training. These are just some examples, and I think we should explore, in a joint effort, how we could further Russian engagement. I know from the Russians that they are interested, actually, in a stronger engagement and we have to find pragmatic ways and means, because basically Afghanistan is one of the areas in which we share interests with Russia, and that's exactly my point. We may have disputes with Russia in some areas, but we should focus on practical cooperation in areas where we share interests, and Afghanistan is one of them.

Concerning your second question, which is a bit technical, I would say, at this stage I would just indicate that everything is on the table. And we will now examine, we will explore in the coming weeks and months how we can fill the gap between requirements and resources.

I don't think it would be appropriate to comment on this in further details at this stage, but everything is discussed.

Next up is the meeting with NATO leadership and Medvedev.

Medvedev to attend NATO summit in Lisbon (http://en.rian.ru/world/20101019/161011034.html)

snip

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said he would attend the NATO summit in Lisbon on November 20.

[DMac]

Makes sense, get Russia back in Afghanistan now that we are about to invade Pakistan...

[DMac]

I think I know why Russia is being invited back to Afghanistan:

Gazprom may join TAPI pipeline project - Russia's deputy PM (http://en.rian.ru/business/20101022/161051544.html)

More men to protect the pipelines...

[Book]

Russian gas giant Gazprom may participate in a consortium to build the trans-Afghanistan (TAPI) gas pipeline for the transfer of Turkmen gas to Pakistan and India, Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin said on Friday.

You nailed it DMac.

:o