PDA

View Full Version : Nation’s top bank regulators proposing a “global solution” to the Foreclosure



Twisted Titan
27th October 2010, 10:46 AM
Sheila Bair, the chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, offered the proposal in a speech on Monday as a way to avoid lawsuits that might slow legitimate foreclosures.

“I fear that the litigation generated by this issue could ultimately be very damaging to our housing markets if it ends up unduly prolonging those foreclosures that are necessary and justified,” she told a housing conference in Washington, D.C.

Currently about a third of all home sold are foreclosed properties.

An aide to Bair said any “global solution” would require agreement from banks, mortgage investors and borrowers, as well as the 50 states Attorneys General who are investigating the paperwork scandal.




Under her proposal, banks would get legal protection from lawsuits in exchange for providing a struggling homeowner at least a 25% reduction in the monthly mortgage payment.

Bair said that in mortgage modifications the FDIC has been involved with that reduce monthly payments for homeowners by 10% to 40% cut “redefault” rates in half.

“We know from experience that reducing the monthly payment through modification raises the chance that the borrower will make good on the loan,” Bair said. “We also know that in too many instances, servicers have not made meaningful efforts to restructure loans for borrowers who have documented that they are in economic distress.”

Financial industry sources said the proposal would be difficult to implement – getting agreement among multiple parties would not be easy – and, with billions of dollars of souring mortgages involved, could be costly to banks.

A spokesman for the attorneys general declined to comment directly on Bair’s proposal.

But he said, “Our group of attorneys general and banking regulators is currently looking into the foreclosure problems that have come to light. In addition to our active inquiries with servicers and lending institutions, we are engaged in extensive dialogue. We will continue that dialogue with those inside and outside of our multistate group to ensure this process is both thorough and expeditious. We intend to be fair to consumers, lenders, and investors, and continued input and dialogue will help us attain that objective.”

Twisted Titan
27th October 2010, 10:49 AM
Those who think the courts will "protect" their property are going to been for a nasty ass surprise.


Better to stuff your pockets with as much Gold and Silver as possible until the nationalization occurs.

You do know Nationalization is coming right.......dont you??



T

chad
27th October 2010, 10:58 AM
the entire point of this scheme is to get people who are otherwise off the hook if litigation were to go forward to instead re-affirm the loan and let the bank of the hook. they don't give 2 shits about people, they're just trying to get signatures.

Jazkal
27th October 2010, 11:12 AM
You do know Nationalization is coming right.......dont you??

What are they going to nationalize?

chad
27th October 2010, 11:14 AM
the housing market. and i'd argue that it's already nationalized. 97% of all new loans now are immediately sold to freddie + fannie, banks aren't keeping anything. the government will own all mortgage loans soon.

Sparky
27th October 2010, 01:01 PM
I had to take a minute to wrap my head around this statement. (One reason is that the sentence structure contains an error.):

Bair said that in mortgage modifications the FDIC has been involved with that reduce monthly payments for homeowners by 10% to 40% cut “redefault” rates in half.

She's taking a bad result and framing it to sound good. I could take the same result, and word it like this:

"Even when the FDIC reduces homeowners payments by 10% to 40%, half of them still go on to default again!"

Not quite as encouraging, eh? More deception by the pols.

Twisted Titan
27th October 2010, 02:15 PM
the entire point of this scheme is to get people who are otherwise off the hook if litigation were to go forward to instead re-affirm the loan and let the bank of the hook. they don't give 2 sh*ts about people, they're just trying to get signatures.


DING!!!! DING!!!!! DING!!!! DING!!! DING!!! DING!!!


Anybody who went for a mortgage mod and redefaulted again is in the world of worst postions because of just what you said

A) They Re Affirmed the debt

B) They waived all possible avenues of recourse because the modification was continigent on that.

C) They will make sure they can persue you for personal damages as opposed to the property itself being the only collateral