View Full Version : San Francisco outlaws McDonald's Happy Meals
madfranks
3rd November 2010, 11:32 AM
They actually did it! What pisses me off equally is that McDonalds will just sit there and take it, and comply with these idiotic laws! I really wish they'd stand up to the city and keep selling happy meals, ignoring every fine and threat, but that will never happen.
Link Here (http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/national_world/stories/2010/11/03/copy/san-francisco-outlaws-mcdonalds-happy-meals.html?adsec=politics&sid=101)
San Francisco outlaws McDonald's Happy Meals
SAN FRANCISCO -- San Francisco's Board of Supervisors has voted, by a veto-proof margin, to ban most of McDonald's Happy Meals as they now are served in restaurants.
The measure will make San Francisco the first U.S. city to forbid offering a free toy with meals that exceed prescribed levels of calories, sugar and fat.
The ordinance requires restaurants to provide fruits and vegetables with all meals that come with toys for children.
The ordinance, which takes effect in December, says restaurants may include a toy with a meal if the food and drink combined contain fewer than 600 calories, and if less than 35 percent of the calories come from fat.
"We are extremely disappointed with today's decision. It's not what our customers want, nor is it something they asked for," McDonald's spokeswoman Danya Proud said.
Ash_Williams
3rd November 2010, 11:39 AM
What happens if they charge 1 cent for the toy? And have a take a penny tray setup?
joe_momma
3rd November 2010, 11:44 AM
SF is overrun with bums, sorry, employment impaired persons.
The tip jar/penny trays would just become another source for them.
On the other hand, other than the projects (Potrero Hill) there really aren't a bunch of kids in SF so they probably don't sell that many anyway.
The good news is that Gavin Newsom (mayor SF) is now the lieutenant governor (elect). So this foolishness can be replicated statewide!
ximmy
3rd November 2010, 11:47 AM
"It's not what our customers want, nor is it something they asked for," McDonald's spokeswoman Danya Proud said.
Customers didn't ask for nutritious food either...
mick silver
3rd November 2010, 11:50 AM
they are just trying there best to stop every company in this country . i dont eat there crap but it people right to eat an buy what they want
Silver Rocket Bitches!
3rd November 2010, 12:02 PM
We will be seeing a lot of this type of legislation in the coming days.
Parading around pretending to be altruistic when in reality, it's all about control.
Apparition
3rd November 2010, 12:10 PM
San Fransicko's megalomaniacal career politicians strike again.
It seems to be only a matter of time before most of the SF-based businesses depart from SF and then Cali.
1970 silver art
3rd November 2010, 12:25 PM
Awwwww come on people. The SF Board of Supervisors knows what is best for it's people. Just let them tell the SF citizens what to do. The SF Board of Supervisors knows what is best for them and all they are doing is protecting the children from those evil happy meals. Everybody needs to remember that it is all about the children. This is such a wonderful idea to ban happy meals. GO SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS!!!!!!!!!
:sarc: :sarc: :sarc: :sarc: :sarc: :sarc:
ximmy
3rd November 2010, 12:30 PM
Funny.. I'm not feeling any sympathy for the Golden Arches...
I'll check again...
...
...
Nope... just not there...
mrnhtbr2232
3rd November 2010, 01:22 PM
The good news is that Gavin Newsom (mayor SF) is now the lieutenant governor (elect). So this foolishness can be replicated statewide!
And for those of us here who have to deal with this spawn of Getty being groomed for national office you just wait. Gavin Newsom will make Obama look like a saint. He's an empty suit greaser moron who takes his queues from his handlers -- a perfect up and coming NWO tool they will be more than happy to unleash. I suppose at this point it doesn't matter anyway. Never mind.
Dogman
3rd November 2010, 01:55 PM
That bunch in s/f are so far to the left they fell off the page! We are from the government and we are looking
out for you and your kids welfare.
Dam bunch of zits!
Twisted Titan
3rd November 2010, 03:29 PM
.............................
Book
3rd November 2010, 05:53 PM
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/lucass/fat_kid.jpg
:oo-->
Bullion_Bob
3rd November 2010, 06:38 PM
I think kids should be of legal age to decide if they want to eat McD's if their parents can't figure out that genetically modified sugar laden poison is not something you voluntarily feed to a developing child as a special event.
Thinking of Spurlock's health prognosis going off the charts in less than a month. Cigs, and booze take decades.
Then again cigs and booze might be the way to go too, some kind of trifecta. Toss a few smokes in the happy meal bag.
A nice apres smoke certainly completes my McD's experience.
Mouse
3rd November 2010, 11:09 PM
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/lucass/fat_kid.jpg
:oo-->
Just wondering if any of the inquiring minds on here ever noticed that these kids are wearing fat suits? Look closely. OK, back to your original programming. As for kids needing to be legal age to eat at MCdeath, the same crap is in everything kids eat from the grocery store, so unless your parents are on GSUS, you are probably eating shit. Just saying.
Carry on....
Cebu_4_2
3rd November 2010, 11:17 PM
Just wondering if any of the inquiring minds on here ever noticed that these kids are wearing fat suits? Look closely. OK, back to your original programming. As for kids needing to be legal age to eat at MCdeath, the same crap is in everything kids eat from the grocery store, so unless your parents are on GSUS, you are probably eating sh*t. Just saying.
Carry on....
Good catch on the fat suits however, how they do the kids head?
Mouse
3rd November 2010, 11:21 PM
happy meals, dumbass, how the hell you think? :)
ximmy
3rd November 2010, 11:32 PM
happy meals, dumbass, how the hell you think? :)
Gracious!!! :ROFL:
Horn
4th November 2010, 12:36 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CpRCc4Jre8
slvrbugjim
4th November 2010, 02:28 AM
Happiness is also banned as well..................................
Shorty Harris
4th November 2010, 05:20 AM
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/lucass/fat_kid.jpg
:oo-->
And, Also, Clearly not a pic from the U.S..Look at the poster in the background, what lang is that?? Mexico?? :-*
Sorry, now back to your regularly scheduled thread.
Book
4th November 2010, 05:25 AM
Just wondering if any of the inquiring minds on here ever noticed that these kids are wearing fat suits? Look closely.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/lucass/fat_kid.jpg
His fat face isn't wearing a suit...lol.
:oo-->
Book
4th November 2010, 05:30 AM
And, Also, Clearly not a pic from the U.S.
Not the U.S. Probably California.
:D
Book
4th November 2010, 05:41 AM
Toss a few smokes in the happy meal bag.
A nice apres smoke certainly completes my McD's experience.
http://i.cnn.net/money/galleries/2007/fortune/0712/gallery.101_dumbest.fortune/images/013_small_world.ce.jpg
http://www.funpeak.com/funnypics/fat-mc-donalds-women.jpg
HappySmoke instead of the HappyToy...lol.
:D
Book
4th November 2010, 06:04 AM
Awwwww come on people. The SF Board of Supervisors knows what is best for it's people. Just let them tell the SF citizens what to do. The SF Board of Supervisors knows what is best for them and all they are doing is protecting the children from those evil happy meals.
McDonald's would sell kids crack if allowed by the government. The government had to force CocaCola to stop including cocaine as an ingredient:
Coca-Cola did once contain an estimated nine milligrams of cocaine per glass, but in 1903 it was removed.[30]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola
:oo-->
Bullion_Bob
4th November 2010, 09:16 AM
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/lucass/fat_kid.jpg
:oo-->
Just wondering if any of the inquiring minds on here ever noticed that these kids are wearing fat suits? Look closely. OK, back to your original programming. As for kids needing to be legal age to eat at MCdeath, the same crap is in everything kids eat from the grocery store, so unless your parents are on GSUS, you are probably eating sh*t. Just saying.
Carry on....
I've actually sat beside a woman on a bus that had that exact fatroll folding effect on her ankles....talk about 100% authentic cankles.
This woman sounded like she was suffocating when she breathed. So nasty. Hair was greasy like crisco. I bet she could suck back a dozen big macs and not even flinch.
I can picture her as a child blissfully playing in the McMindfuck McPlayland with her special McToy reward for eating her McD's. 360 degree mind programming.
Have not seen anything nastier in person thus far.....fingers crossed.
Horn
4th November 2010, 11:00 AM
The government had to force CocaCola to stop including cocaine as an ingredient:
Force?
A result popular opinion, and a law passed towards including your ingredients.
And let's face it, the world was a better place back when Coke had cocaine in it.
Book
4th November 2010, 11:03 AM
...the world was a better place back when Coke had cocaine in it.
For corporate profits maybe.
:oo-->
sirgonzo420
4th November 2010, 11:10 AM
...the world was a better place back when Coke had cocaine in it.
For corporate profits maybe.
:oo-->
... we used real money back when Coke was coke.
Horn
4th November 2010, 11:16 AM
...the world was a better place back when Coke had cocaine in it.
For corporate profits maybe.
:oo-->
I'm sure it wasn't nearly as bad as the public school's history books would tell us.
Shortly after their inception all the World Wars taking place, would be a much better example of a cruel world.
ximmy
4th November 2010, 11:18 AM
Photo found to be fake... happy meals actually good for you!!!
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/lucass/fat_kid.jpg
Horn
4th November 2010, 11:26 AM
Photo found to be fake... happy meals actually good for you!!!
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/lucass/fat_kid.jpg
Do you feel we can legislate away obesity?
When some of the fattest minds are those composing our laws?
MNeagle
4th November 2010, 11:33 AM
I think they legislated obesity when they gave Monsanto GMO rights....
Horn
4th November 2010, 11:40 AM
I think they legislated obesity when they gave Monsanto GMO rights....
Yes, I imagine as a result of this legislation the "Happy Meal" will be skipped, and the only meal afforded will be candied dessert.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZHsXjSSpDk
ximmy
4th November 2010, 11:45 AM
:D
Book
4th November 2010, 11:51 AM
http://todayilaughed.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/mcdonalds.jpg
http://www.mopo.ca/uploaded_images/lovin_20it-720701.jpg
http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=7104382
http://www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/11504/1215462678/imkillinit.jpg
Horn
4th November 2010, 11:52 AM
"However, so that we do not offend them, go to the sea and throw in a hook, and take the first fish that comes up; and when you open its mouth, you will find a shekel. Take that and give it to them for you and Me."
http://biblebrowser.com/matthew/17-27.htm
Horn
29th November 2010, 08:58 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcZfyNtzm2A
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.