PDA

View Full Version : Ron Paul Is About to Totally Revolutionize the House Monetary Policy Panel



sunshine05
4th November 2010, 06:36 PM
Ron Paul Is About to Totally Revolutionize the House Monetary Policy Panel
Published: Thursday, 4 Nov 2010 | 4:35 PM ET

By: John Carney
Senior Editor, CNBC.com


Odds are you haven’t heard of the monetary policy subcommittee. Officially known as the House Subcommittee for Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology, it’s a subdivision of the House Financial Services Committee that has mostly occupied itself with pressing questions of issuing commemorative coins and whether or not to eliminate the penny.

That’s about to change. Ron Paul, the Republican Congressman from Texas, is the ranking member of the monetary policy subcommittee, and when the next Congress takes over he’ll likely be the chairman of the subcommittee.

And Congressman Paul has some big plans.

“I will approach that committee like no one has ever approached it because we’re living in times like no one has ever seen,” Paul said in an interview with NetNet Thursday.

Paul said his first priority will be to open up the books of the Federal Reserve to the American people.

“We need to create transparency there. To see what it is they are buying and lending, and who it is they are dealing with,” Paul said.

Paul mentioned that he hoped to use subcommittee hearings to educate the public about the causes of business cycles—which he believes are mainly attributable to monetary manipulation by central bankers.

Monetary reform is also on the agenda. Paul is a noted advocate of the gold standard.

“We will have to have monetary reform,” Paul said. “I think those on the other side of this issue are already planning. They are going to try to replace a bad system with an equally bad system.”

http://www.cnbc.com/id/40013227

Libertarian_Guard
4th November 2010, 06:42 PM
No, it's not "likely" - - he will chair the subcommittee - - as the senior member, of the majority party, it can't be otherwise.

Jazkal
4th November 2010, 06:44 PM
They are going to try to replace a bad system with an equally bad system.”

Anyone have any idea what he is talking about here?

Libertytree
4th November 2010, 06:48 PM
They are going to try to replace a bad system with an equally bad system.”

Anyone have any idea what he is talking about here?


Global fiat dollar/unit. ???

osoab
4th November 2010, 06:53 PM
No, it's not "likely" - - he will chair the subcommittee - - as the senior member, of the majority party, it can't be otherwise.


He could get bumped out by his own party.

It seems odd to me that he hasn't been already.

chad
4th November 2010, 06:57 PM
bullshit. ron paul is about to give some speeches about ben franklin to fox news in the rotunda.

zap
4th November 2010, 07:08 PM
If he digs to deep, he'll have an accident.

Libertarian_Guard
4th November 2010, 07:12 PM
No, it's not "likely" - - he will chair the subcommittee - - as the senior member, of the majority party, it can't be otherwise.


He could get bumped out by his own party.

It seems odd to me that he hasn't been already.


Say What?

I DON'T THINK SO!

The election would only serve in taking the 'tea party' one step foward and three steps backwards, if this be the case.

sirgonzo420
4th November 2010, 08:08 PM
bullsh*t. ron paul is about to give some speeches about ben franklin to fox news in the rotunda.


Give the dude a break.

At least his voting record is perfectly constitutional. Congress is full of treasonous assholes, but Ron Paul is not one of them.

He even returns his salary to the Treasury every year.

What more can the old man do?

Seriously?

midnight rambler
4th November 2010, 08:15 PM
What more can the old man do?

Hmmm...let's see...oh! He could have challenged the eligibility of Obongo! No, instead he chose to play nice and not make waves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0WZO3M3X84

http://www.trashmenagerie.com/images/nelson_munz/simpsons_nelson_haha2.gif

Some champion.

The perception of reality is more important than reality itself.

sirgonzo420
4th November 2010, 08:21 PM
What more can the old man do?

Hmmm...let's see...oh! He could have challenged the eligibility of Obongo! No, instead he chose to play nice and not make waves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0WZO3M3X84

http://www.trashmenagerie.com/images/nelson_munz/simpsons_nelson_haha2.gif

Some champion.

The perception of reality is more important than reality itself.


Obama is a puppet.

The Federal Reserve has much more power than Obama.

Ron Paul fights the Federal Reserve, or at least calls attention to the general shadiness of the Fed.

Why pick on Ron Paul, who is a Congressman who is actually doing his job properly, when there are about 534 other congresspeople who are treasonous assholes?

midnight rambler
4th November 2010, 08:24 PM
Why pick on Ron Paul

He's just another liar, why not pick on him? Think he desires a pass for lying because he tells partial truths, knowingly makes omissions, and engages in subterfuges so the unaware are led to astray?

Libertarian_Guard
4th November 2010, 08:30 PM
What more can the old man do?

Hmmm...let's see...oh! He could have challenged the eligibility of Obongo! No, instead he chose to play nice and not make waves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0WZO3M3X84

http://www.trashmenagerie.com/images/nelson_munz/simpsons_nelson_haha2.gif

Some champion.

The perception of reality is more important than reality itself.


Obama is a puppet.

The Federal Reserve has much more power than Obama.

Ron Paul fights the Federal Reserve, or at least calls attention to the general shadiness of the Fed.

Why pick on Ron Paul, who is a Congressman who is actually doing his job properly, when there are about 534 other congresspeople who are treasonous assholes?



Well said my friend, very well said!

BarneyFag
4th November 2010, 10:39 PM
Why pick on Ron Paul

He's just another liar, why not pick on him? Think he desires a pass for lying because he tells partial truths, knowingly makes omissions, and engages in subterfuges so the unaware are led to astray?


Jesus we have gone from one extreme to the other.