View Full Version : Moscow Building 5000 Bomb Shelters by 2012…
Ares
11th November 2010, 06:51 PM
Sometimes you come across information that make you stop and go, Say What! Russia Today just put out a video and news report that Russia is building 5000 more bomb shelters in Moscow. This will be done on a hurried time frame by 2012. I was taken aback by this and the past rolled in like a huge wave. I remembered building homes in America with special areas in the basement that could be used as a bomb shelter. I also remember the many drills at school that had to do with a nuclear attack…
It just struck me as very strange that it would be pronounced so strongly and with a haste that this will and must be done by 2012. It makes your thinking’s take off and go into high gear…
The expression “Cold War” has made a huge comeback in the news and now it seems to be invading our lives again whether we want it to be there or not…
So Windows to Russia will watch this subject and see what comes of it. Because if they are going to build 5000 bomb shelters in less than two years, then there is going to be a lot of construction going on…
Windows to Russia!
Video at link: http://windowstorussia.com/moscow-building-5000-bomb-shelters-by-2012.html
k-os
11th November 2010, 07:40 PM
Interesting. I wonder if there is a fringe group of Russians who think that these are their version of FEMA camps.
Ares
11th November 2010, 07:49 PM
Interesting. I wonder if there is a fringe group of Russians who think that these are their version of FEMA camps.
The way the article was written, it makes it sound as if it's the Russian government footing the bill to build these shelters. The question is why and what purpose?
k-os
11th November 2010, 07:52 PM
Interesting. I wonder if there is a fringe group of Russians who think that these are their version of FEMA camps.
The way the article was written, it makes it sound as if it's the Russian government footing the bill to build these shelters. The question is why and what purpose?
I agree. I have the same questions. Could be anything.
platinumdude
11th November 2010, 07:55 PM
They're not for protection against a war. Think Mayan.
Twisted Titan
11th November 2010, 08:05 PM
Or it could be because they are siting on a crap load of dollars and want to find some use for them before they go to zippo as that would certainely foment revolution in their country.
Just tossing that out there as a possible.
T
vacuum
11th November 2010, 09:03 PM
Hm
- china and russia create a joint oil pipleline not denominated in dollars
- china fires a missile off our coast
- obama travels with a massive amount of protection
- russia building 5000 bomb shelters withing the next 13 months
learn2swim
11th November 2010, 09:21 PM
Why did they build shelters in the past? There's your answer.
learn2swim
11th November 2010, 09:27 PM
From Joel Skousen
Did you know?
The Russians are building tremendous new nuclear/biological and chemical weapons systems--all with the assistance of US technology transfers. They are deploying on average, 3 new Topol-M 6th generation ballistic missiles per month. We built our last MX over 10 years ago, and are disarming unilaterally. Further, the Russian are building huge underground nuclear bunkers and weapons production facilities in the Ural Mountains, clearly intended to function during a nuclear war. The US intelligence community (under both Republican and Democratic administrations) knows this and are actively covering for the Russians, so the American people won't become alarmed.
Both Republican and Democratic administrations have been supplying the Chinese with high technology weapons systems for years, knowing that they, in turn, are supplying other enemies (Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, North Korea) as well. Both Russia and China continue to protest against any US anti-ballistic missile system, even though such systems are purely defensive. It doesn't take a genius to understand that ABM systems only threaten someone who intends to launch ballistic missiles someday.
President Clinton directed our military to absorb a nuclear first strike rather than launch on warning (our only true deterrent to a first strike) and to prepare to retaliate afterward. That first strike will take down all command and control, all bombers (since none are on alert), most missiles, and all satellite and submarine communications.
According to the House Armed Services Committee, the following reductions have taken place during the Clinton Administration: Strategic and General Purpose Forces from 1990 to 1997: B-52 Bombers have gone from 220 to 56. B-1 Bombers from 90 to 60; Strategic Defense Interceptor Aircraft from 36 to 0; and Army Divisions (1990 to 1997) have gone from 18 Active down to 10. Reserve divisions have gone from 10 to 8. Army Brigades (1990 to 1997) have declined from 8 Active to 3 and Reserve brigades have gone down from 27 to 18.
http://www.joelskousen.com/
Yeah, a lot of things took place during the Clinton years to screw us later--- Now.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.