View Full Version : Could this be what Matt Simmons was talking about..
EE_
12th November 2010, 03:47 PM
before he was murdered?
Mounting Evidence Points To 2 Wellheads at Macondo
Posted on November 12, 2010 by concernedcitizensofflorida
Deciphering the Da Vinci Code of BP’s Well Deception.
-BK Lim
11 Nov 2010 – dedicated to Sharyn Burley & Gary Simmons for their efforts to spread the truth.
There have been consistent rumors since the disaster broke out that BP had drilled two wells. Figure 135-1 shows 2 different well heads placed side by side. Lately we have also seen the corrosive effects of the “potent mixture” that is pouring out not only from the broken wells but also through the crevices in the seafloor. Naturally the vessels working the longest would suffer the most corrosion. See the many you-tube video postings on the “rumors” of hull corrosion. The difference in the “age” of the two wells is most telling if you examine in close up view the yellow marker band. Test your observation and investigative skills on the number of differences between these two well heads.
The rest: http://phoenixrisingfromthegulf.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/mounting-evidence-points-to-2-wellheads-at-macondo/
General of Darkness
12th November 2010, 03:56 PM
Excellent find, and yes I definitely think that's what Matt was talking about.
Glass
12th November 2010, 04:34 PM
yes this is what it was all about. There was a very good video that showed the footage BP were playing. It showed clearly that they had 2 different wells. The key information was the GPS positions of the wells displayed on the video. It was clear that well B footage had replaced well A footage. You can see various text labels displayed in those pictures at the link. It was basically something like that text showing the actual GPS location.
Then you simply go to the plans submitted by BP for approval and match them up. They did apply to drill an A and B well and they did identify their locations and the locations did match the videos. BP did swap the video feed.
Just to clarify the information in the pictures because it is not explained outright. The pictures show 2 wells. There is a yellow band around the well pipe. On one well the band is above what look like take off valves of some sort which protrude from the well pipe. In the other picture the band is below the take off valves which also are protruding from the well pipe. Clearly 2 different wells exist.
There is no 3rd party confirmation that BP ever shut down the busted well. For all we know it could still be flowing. It would be interesting to know if they are still out spraying. That would be a bad sign things are still not fixed.
midnight rambler
12th November 2010, 04:40 PM
That would be a bad sign things are still not fixed.
The perception of reality is more important than reality itself.
"What they don't know won't hurt them."
gunDriller
12th November 2010, 05:46 PM
i never believed the official cost estimates of the cost to fix the well.
$10 billion for destroying an ocean and sickening 20 million people seemed like a low estimate. $10 trillion would be more realistic.
if the US or UK governments told the truth about BP's liability, BP would cease to exist in its current form - it would be owned by the people who were hurt by the well. the stock value would drop to zero. it would take a lot of banks and pension funds with it.
my guess is, they're lying because, from their point of view, they can't tell the truth.
k-os
12th November 2010, 05:53 PM
my guess is, they're lying because, from their point of view, they can't tell the truth.
My guess is that they're lying too, but because the technology to get to the truth only exists in the hands of major oil companies. That, and they'd certainly be suicided if they got close to discovering it.
EE_
12th November 2010, 06:38 PM
Isn't it amazing how the greatest environmental disaster just disappeared from your talmudvision?
I have never believed for a second, that this disaster is over.
Libertytree
12th November 2010, 07:03 PM
The Gulf catastrophe is ongoing IMO, yeah they've done an excellent job of hiding it temporarily via the use of corexit, media blackouts and the restricted zones. It will resurface, sota speak, and when it does it will be with a vengence, the shame of it is though is that it will be plain, simple folks that pay the price for what has been done.
keehah
12th November 2010, 09:08 PM
The way I understand it, is that both wells were drilled from the same wellhead. The 'open hole' Matt talked about were oil volcanos about 5 miles from the wellhead.
The first or the second well casing was not containing the oil-methane etc. It was leaking into a lower strata layer and about 5 miles to the south east was reaching the surface of the sediments as new oil volcanos. These were noticed about a month before the Mars sacrifice date by the NOAA's Research Vessel Thomas Jefferson .
Hopefully these volcanos are not releasing the same volumes anymore. I think these things tend to self seal, and the BP fuck-up helped drain more of the reservoir pressure.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.