PDA

View Full Version : Hitler explains his reasons for invading Soviet.



Nordmann
14th November 2010, 01:50 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd_CA9dVTnI

Heimdhal
14th November 2010, 04:43 PM
Tagged for later viewing.

hoarder
14th November 2010, 04:44 PM
To get as many goyim killed as possible.

Fortyone
14th November 2010, 05:09 PM
To get as many goyim killed as possible.


explain

hoarder
14th November 2010, 05:22 PM
To get as many goyim killed as possible.


explain
The end result reveals the original intention. WW2 cost goyim a lot of lives, wealth and freedom. Jews are the beneficiaries of WW2.

The big players of the era were Jewish actors. FDR=Jew, Churchill=Jew, Stalin=Jew, Adolf Schickelgruber Hitler Rothschild=Jew.
Then Eisenhower=Jew finished off the German troops.

Everything went according to plan. Now the Khazars have permanent victim status, which is exactly what they wanted.

woodman
14th November 2010, 05:26 PM
To get as many goyim killed as possible.


explain
The end result reveals the original intention. WW2 cost goyim a lot of lives, wealth and freedom. Jews are the beneficiaries of WW2.

The big players of the era were Jewish actors. FDR=Jew, Churchill=Jew, Stalin=Jew, Adolf Schickelgruber Hitler Rothschild=Jew.
Then Eisenhower=Jew finished off the German troops.

Everything went according to plan. Now the Khazars have permanent victim status, which is exactly what they wanted.




Excellent post hoarder. I think this as well. It went according to plan. The Jews declared war on Germany and the rest of us as well.

"By way of deception, so shall we wage war." Motto of the Israeli secret service, Mossad.

hoarder
14th November 2010, 05:43 PM
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
— Vladimir Ilyich Lenin


‘We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people.’ Rabbi Reichorn in Le Contemporain, July 1, 1880


"Even if we Jews are not bodily with you in the trenches, we are nevertheless morally with you. This is OUR WAR, and you are fighting it for us." (Les Nouvelles Litteraires, February 10, 1940).

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 06:02 PM
To get as many goyim killed as possible.


explain
The end result reveals the original intention. WW2 cost goyim a lot of lives, wealth and freedom. Jews are the beneficiaries of WW2.

The big players of the era were Jewish actors. FDR=Jew, Churchill=Jew, Stalin=Jew, Adolf Schickelgruber Hitler Rothschild=Jew.
Then Eisenhower=Jew finished off the German troops.

Everything went according to plan. Now the Khazars have permanent victim status, which is exactly what they wanted.




I don't blame Hitler for coming to power and doing right by his people.

I blame the Allies for doing the jews bidding. THAT is what got White people killed.

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 06:06 PM
You guys have no effing idea.


For thousands of years we live with one nation calling themselves the chosen ones. Rings the bell?

It is right there, in first five books of the Bible, also called "the jewish Torah".

It is their god Yahveh by the hand of jewish writer telling them they are the ones.

Right there in front of you. National socialism (fascism) for one, "chosen" race. Thousands of years old. Pronounced in every synagogue around the world.

Yet, when a white race does the same exact thing, only for their own, white people, for less than 6 years - it is condemned and demonized to this day. You can't hear less hysterical screaming about any other event.


Why, oh why is that, I wonder.

So why did Hitler attacked the Soviets? He had no other choice. For his whole economy was financed by the banksters to do one thing - go to war (long before hitler came to power). Surprisingly, Americans financed Stalin's economy to go to war too, millions and millions of various equipment and major factories.

They were financed by the banks FOR PROFIT, to get US and the world out of the great depression - the last engineered financial collapse of the world's fiat economy.

hoarder
14th November 2010, 06:11 PM
I don't blame Hitler for coming to power and doing right by his people.

Hitler did right by his people, we can agree on that! His people are thankful! :D

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 06:14 PM
I would like to add this as well.

For those who think Hitler was a jew or jewish agent at least consider this possibility as I have considered the possibility of the former.

If Hitler was legit, what better way to alienate him from his own people and destroy his memory with those who agreed with his philosophy than to claim he was a jew?

If Hitler was legit, not only does claiming he was a jew destroy his memory, but more so it further disheartens people like us to ever think that we could be or could have a leader who would stand up to marxism and eradicate it from our borders. People like me take hope at least that at one time in history people understood the jewish question, understood that they are behind EVERYTHING that is evil and destructive in this world. They elected a man who was instrumental in teaching them.

But to claim he was a jew brings on such a defeatist attitude because all of your would be heroes you turn into filthy hook nosed rats.

I know full well as most of you do how much of a stranglehold the jew has on our society and our world, but the stranglehold he has over your mind is the greatest of all. Why would you rebel when you believe that all the would be leaders are just controlled opposition? You won't and as I said that stranglehold is the greatest of all.

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 06:15 PM
I'll add more. Do you know why Molotov-Ribbentropp Pact is the most studied pact in american schools? Yet I don't remember it in my school years, nobody really cares about it outside of "the capitalist first world". I actually had to look it up first time I've heard about it.

You know why?

Because Hitler and Stalin were aware of the hidden hand that runs the show. And they were both financed to go to war against each other.

But what banksters feared the most is the pact between the two. It meant no war, actually a war of two VERY STRONG nations that had no central banksters and that kicked bankers out AGAINST BANKER nations. That would be a major snafu by the banking cartel, it should have never happened.

You never read in history books who actually financed the whole debacle, pulling economies of both countries out of complete ruin and making them two technological powerhouses. Which was impossible without a banker or two.

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 06:19 PM
You guys have no effing idea.





Do you ever pause and wonder if it is YOU who has no motherfucking clue?

After all it is YOU who bought into the greatest lie ever told that the jews are the Israelites of the Bible.

They have stolen your identity and your so ******* confused you try to make sense of it all and shoot your own allies.


Read every word of these, study it and understand it. Or don't at your peril.

http://www.truthinourtime.com/2010/02/50-reasons-why-jews-are-not-israel.html
http://gold-silver.us/forum/religion-and-philosophy/the-identity-challenge/

hoarder
14th November 2010, 06:27 PM
If Hitler was legit, what better way to alienate him from his own people and destroy his memory with those who agreed with his philosophy than to claim he was a jew?

I like the strategic-value approach.
1) Supposing Hitler was not a Jew, what value to the cause of the survival of our race does idolizing him serve? Does this not alienate racially aware Whites from non racially aware Whites?
2) Supposing Hitler was a Jew, what value is it to Jews by telling the world "Hitler was a Jew"? If everyone was taught in school that Hitler was a Jew, do you think the rest of the story, hollow-cost etc, would not be subject to re-evaluation?

Book
14th November 2010, 06:27 PM
I would like to add this as well.

For those who think Hitler was a jew or jewish agent at least consider this possibility as I have considered the possibility of the former.

If Hitler was legit, what better way to alienate him from his own people and destroy his memory with those who agreed with his philosophy than to claim he was a jew?

If Hitler was legit, not only does claiming he was a jew destroy his memory, but more so it further disheartens people like us to ever think that we could be or could have a leader who would stand up to marxism and eradicate it from our borders. People like me take hope at least that at one time in history people understood the jewish question, understood that they are behind EVERYTHING that is evil and destructive in this world. They elected a man who was instrumental in teaching them.

But to claim he was a jew brings on such a defeatist attitude because all of your would be heroes you turn into filthy hook nosed rats.

I know full well as most of you do how much of a stranglehold the jew has on our society and our world, but the stranglehold he has over your mind is the greatest of all. Why would you rebel when you believe that all the would be leaders are just controlled opposition? You won't and as I said that stranglehold is the greatest of all.


I totally agree with NordicBerserker and have in the past argued with Hoarder and JDRock about this. CHAPTER 11 (http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv1ch11.html) says it all.

|--0--|

Book
14th November 2010, 06:33 PM
http://www.crazygaijin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/250px-Swasticookies.jpg

Let's take a warm cookie break...lol.

:D

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 06:34 PM
NordicBerserker, we are discussing reasons for Hitler invading Soviets, not if the jews of Israel are the same as jews of the bible. On that I agree with you, they are not.

My point is in an entirely different angle.

hoarder
14th November 2010, 06:35 PM
I totally agree with NordicBerserker and have in the past argued with Hoarder and JDRock about this. CHAPTER 11 (http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv1ch11.html) says it all.

|--0--|
Even if Chapter 11 is 100% true (I didn't read it but will assume it's all true), why would this prove that Hitler is 100% non-Jew? Heck even Henry Makow writes things that are true. Saying things that are true is EXACTLY how controlled opposition gains influence. Once in power they can decieve and omit important details later.

edit: BTW, thanks for the cookies!

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 06:39 PM
hoarder, thanks. It makes no difference if Hitler was jewish or not. In either case he had no possible way of doing what he did on his own, and was totally and completely financed by jewish (and non-jewish) bankers. He was not running the show on key issues, he was a tool.

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 06:39 PM
If Hitler was legit, what better way to alienate him from his own people and destroy his memory with those who agreed with his philosophy than to claim he was a jew?

I like the strategic-value approach.
1) Supposing Hitler was not a Jew, what value to the cause of the survival of our race does idolizing him serve? Does this not alienate racially aware Whites from non racially aware Whites?
2) Supposing Hitler was a Jew, what value is it to Jews by telling the world "Hitler was a Jew"? If everyone was taught in school that Hitler was a Jew, do you think the rest of the story, hollow-cost etc, would not be subject to re-evaluation?



1) Admiring what Hitler accomplished does several things. Notably that it is possible to eradicate jewish marxists from your country and THRIVE. More importantly that it is possible for people to wake up on a mass scale and to forget relatively small disagreements and focus on the destructive hand of the jew.

2) Suppose he was, I have already explained the value. That it alienates him from people who would otherwise adopt his political philosophy. For example, people read and study diligently and somewhere along the line eventually study things Hitler wrote and say "gee this guys worldview and mine are quite similar perhaps the US could one day rise up and throw out the jews........... oh but I see here is a jewish agent, well scratch that idea resistance is futile"

You think it would destroy the Holocaust ™ if everyone in the world knew Hitler was a jew? Get real, the only thing it would do is slightly alleviate White guilt that the leader wasn't White but this would be mitigated because after all it was the rank and file who voted for him and threw the rats in ovens.

Plus there are still jews that are generally accepted as evil people Madoff is the first that comes time mind. So they would just say he was an evil jew who followed the wishes of the evil white people who demanded he do something about jews having to much money.

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 06:43 PM
hoarder, thanks. It makes no difference if Hitler was jewish or not. In either case he had no possible way of doing what he did on his own, and was totally and completely financed by jewish (and non-jewish) bankers. He was not running the show on key issues, he was a tool.


I think it is prudent at this juncture for all sides to admit that there is no way we will know 100% the answer to this question. So while I enjoy a spirited debate I do not wish to alienate people who I most likely agree with on the vast majority of subjects. So none of us can act like we know with 100% certainty one way or the other we are just basing opinions on what we have read and learned so far.

I fully understand your point believe me I do, and I can't rule it out 100% as a possibility.

However if you are honest you cannot 100% rule out mine either.



" In either case he had no possible way of doing what he did on his own,"

This resistance is futile attitude is the part I take exception with from those who claim Hitler was a jew.

Book
14th November 2010, 06:50 PM
(I didn't read it but will assume it's all true)



You disappoint me Hoarder. It would be ten minutes well spent.

:oo-->


...prove that Hitler is 100% non-Jew?

We know that Jesus was 100% Jew and they hate him almost as much as they hate Hitler...lol.

:D

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 06:53 PM
We know that Jesus was 100% Jew and they hate him almost as much as they hate Hitler...lol.




10 minutes that could change your life book.

http://www.truthinourtime.com/2010/02/50-reasons-why-jews-are-not-israel.html

hoarder
14th November 2010, 06:58 PM
1) Admiring what Hitler accomplished does several things. Notably that it is possible to eradicate jewish marxists from your country and THRIVE. More importantly that it is possible for people to wake up on a mass scale and to forget relatively small disagreements and focus on the destructive hand if the jew.Those of us who are awake already know what can be done and how. The issue is increasing our numbers (awake goys) so that we can implement actions.


2) Suppose he was, I have already explained the value. That it alienates him from people who would otherwise adopt his political philosophy. Who cares about political philosophy? The objective is to wake up as many people as possible, regardless of whether they are socialists, libertarians or anarchists. Carrying the baggage of what "Hitler" means to people will only hinder our efforts convincing teevee brainwashed people they have been lied to.

For example, people read and study diligently and somewhere along the line eventually study things Hitler wrote and say "gee this guys worldview and mine are quite similar perhaps the US could one day rise up and throw out the jews........... oh but I see here is a jewish agent, well scratch that idea resistance is futile" In reality, following a leader en masse IS futile precisely because such a leader in the present or future will most likely be a Marrano. To dream otherwise is unrealistic.


You think it would destroy the Holocaust ™ if everyone in the world knew Hitler was a jew? Get real, the only thing it would do is slightly alleviate White guilt that the leader wasn't White but this would be mitigated because after all it was the rank and file who voted for him and threw the rats in ovens. It would not automatically and simultaneously destroy the hollow-hoax but it would be extremely damaging to the OJV (Official Jewish Version). Historians and amateur historians would be debating WW2 issues until the cows come home and this is exactly what the Khazars don't want.


Plus there are still jews that are generally accepted as evil people Madoff is the first that comes time mind. So they would just say he was an evil jew who followed the wishes of the evil white people who demanded he do something about jews having to much money. people of weak intellect might buy that, but it really makes no sense.

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 07:01 PM
people of weak intellect might buy that, but it really makes no sense.



Need I remind you that Palin is respected for her opinion by a large segment of society.

hoarder
14th November 2010, 07:05 PM
(I didn't read it but will assume it's all true)



You disappoint me Hoarder. It would be ten minutes well spent. What would it accomplish? I already conceded that I would probably agree with every word.


:oo-->


...prove that Hitler is 100% non-Jew?

We know that Jesus was 100% Jew and they hate him almost as much as they hate Hitler...lol.

:D


Jesus was not a Khazar. Most Jews think Hitler was not a Jew. The Rothschilds don't need for them to think otherwise.

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 07:08 PM
Jesus was not a Khazar. Most Jews think Hitler was not a Jew. The Rothschilds don't need for them to think otherwise.
[/quote]

Jesus was not a jew, nor a khazar.

Jesus was an Israelite a literal descendant of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. The "jews" today are none of these, some are edomites some are khazars but they are the synagogue of Satan Rev: 2:9, 3:9

Understanding who Israel is (the anglo saxon celtic and caucasian people) is the starting point for truly understanding Scripture.

MAGNES
14th November 2010, 07:11 PM
I always learn something in these threads.

They don't bug me.

We already had a couple of long threads I weighed in on strongly on one.

I ain't doing it again.

Bottom line, Hitler is accountable at the very least for the destruction
of Europe and Germany, without his failures we would not be in this mess.

European man has been enslaved by Hitlers failures and what came out of them.

Russians as an example can be our greatest allies.
Go wave a swastika in Russia , see what happens, it is terribly divisive symbol.
It is not even allowed on StormFront for that reason and for the reason of
giving our enemies an opportunity to attack us and smear us.

I don't mind people like Fred on here or NB talking, I actually learn stuff.

Now Book, thanks for the link, I am totally with hoarder on this.

An armed middle class, armed farmers, taking no more bull, those are our leaders, nobody else.
And the parasite knows this, they have always been targets.

No dogmas, no sacred cows, no failed generals, etc,

What Hitler wrote is of no consequence, it may read right, but actions speak louder than words,
and where we are.

The Masonic FED Banksters armed and created Hitler and Stalin, for one.

What is IG Farben, What is Thyssen Krupp ?

The truth leads to the Federal Reserve Jews that mass murdered the Russians.
And the " holocaust " being a hoax, imagine if we could educate people on that.
The entire PC movement is based on it giving total immunity to the mass murderers
and our own enslavement even today.

Book
14th November 2010, 07:22 PM
(I didn't read it but will assume it's all true)



You disappoint me Hoarder. It would be ten minutes well spent.



What would it accomplish? I already conceded that I would probably agree with every word.



What would you spending ten minutes reading Chapter 11 (http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv1ch11.html) accomplish?

:o (for once I am speechless)

7th trump
14th November 2010, 07:27 PM
"Understanding who Israel is (the anglo saxon celtic and caucasian people) is the starting point for truly understanding Scripture."

You couldnt have said the truth more Nordicberserker.

Book
14th November 2010, 07:29 PM
What Hitler wrote is of no consequence, it may read right, but actions speak louder than words, and where we are...



http://www.france24.com/en/files/imagecache/france24_ct_player_thumbnail/article/image/merkel-netanyahu.jpg

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/03/04/world/clinton600.jpg

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/01_02/BushES1101_468x351.jpg

http://antievil360.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/obama-israel.jpg?w=359&h=278

:oo-->

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 07:38 PM
The Masonic FED Banksters armed and created Hitler and Stalin, for one.

The truth leads to the Federal Reserve Jews that mass murdered the Russians.


slight correction. Stalin was likely not created by the FED Banksters, their front man in Soviet Russia was Trotsky. Only when trotskists lost to Stalin and were either expelled or executed the bankers began to look for ways to hook him. I think they succeeded.

What we would never find out is what the world would be like had Stalin-Hitler anti-banker pact succeeded.

hoarder
14th November 2010, 07:48 PM
slight correction. Stalin was likely not created by the FED Banksters, their front man in Soviet Russia was Trotsky. The Stalin-Trotsky rift was a media fabrication designed to distance the Marxist tribe from Stalins misdeeds.
Stalins wives were Jewish. Communism was Jewish. Lenin was Jewish. Marx was Jewish.

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 07:51 PM
slight correction. Stalin was likely not created by the FED Banksters, their front man in Soviet Russia was Trotsky. The Stalin-Trotsky rift was a media fabrication designed to distance the Marxist tribe from Stalins misdeeds.
Stalins wives were Jewish. Communism was Jewish. Lenin was Jewish. Marx was Jewish.


Absolutely.

http://www.truthinourtime.com/2009/10/jews-and-communism.html

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 07:55 PM
hoarder, thanks. It makes no difference if Hitler was jewish or not. In either case he had no possible way of doing what he did on his own, and was totally and completely financed by jewish (and non-jewish) bankers. He was not running the show on key issues, he was a tool.


I think it is prudent at this juncture for all sides to admit that there is no way we will know 100% the answer to this question. So while I enjoy a spirited debate I do not wish to alienate people who I most likely agree with on the vast majority of subjects. So none of us can act like we know with 100% certainty one way or the other we are just basing opinions on what we have read and learned so far.

I fully understand your point believe me I do, and I can't rule it out 100% as a possibility.

However if you are honest you cannot 100% rule out mine either.



" In either case he had no possible way of doing what he did on his own,"

This resistance is futile attitude is the part I take exception with from those who claim Hitler was a jew.



So you think that a poor school student, a failed art student, a mediocre military man (corporal) could turn germany around, magically get Ruhr area from France and Belgium, restart german economy from basically a default, create a masonic-like cult, etc, etc (I could go on) just on his speech skills?

He must be one great orator. ::) :P

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 08:00 PM
slight correction. Stalin was likely not created by the FED Banksters, their front man in Soviet Russia was Trotsky. The Stalin-Trotsky rift was a media fabrication designed to distance the Marxist tribe from Stalins misdeeds.
Stalins wives were Jewish. Communism was Jewish. Lenin was Jewish. Marx was Jewish.


not entirely correct. you fail to see that yet stalin cleaned up jewish communists almost completely from the top positions. had he been part of the kagal, like you paint it here, he wouldn't have to.

The Kagal is showing you who they don't like, and the more they yell "stalin was bad" (look at any major jewmedia) the more you know he was the one who tried to get away from Kagal. 1937, the great purge was about what? everybody who was suspected to be a foreign spy or agent was killed. think why.

LuckyStrike
14th November 2010, 08:12 PM
not entirely correct. you fail to see that yet stalin cleaned up jewish communists almost completely from the top positions. had he been part of the kagal, like you paint it here, he wouldn't have to.

The Kagal is showing you who they don't like, and the more they yell "stalin was bad" (look at any major jewmedia) the more you know he was the one who tried to get away from Kagal. 1937, the great purge was about what? everybody who was suspected to be a foreign spy or agent was killed. think why.


Let me clarify.

Are you arguing that Stalin was good or better than Hitler?

I would love to see a list of jews purged by Stalin. I was under the impression that under his rule most likely at the behest of his JEWISH WIFE that antisemitism was a CAPITAL CRIME

Meanwhile in Germany jews were forcibly expelled from the country.

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 08:24 PM
In Germany, jewish bankers were expelled. The rest were asked to leave with a blessing from England and Rothschilds , and ROthschilds had a land ready and prepared for zionists, but it was in the desert and for some odd reason jews from european cities just didn't quite wanted to go live there...

Stalin and antisemitism quote is western propaganda that jewish media is turning on its head. Stalin purged international Jewish communists, and when they saw that there may be pogroms of regular jews (which have nothing to do with communist jews or jewish bankers), he had to publicly announce that any antisemitic crimes will be punished.


Even in the jewpedia, if you read toward closer to the end there you'll see details on jewish purges of 1930ies and 40ies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_and_Joseph_Stalin

One more link to jewpedia, Stalin and the great purge:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge

MAGNES
14th November 2010, 08:29 PM
slight correction. Stalin was likely not created by the FED Banksters, their front man in Soviet Russia was Trotsky. Only when trotskists lost to Stalin and were either expelled or executed the bankers began to look for ways to hook him. I think they succeeded.

What we would never find out is what the world would be like had Stalin-Hitler anti-banker pact succeeded.


How's this, the USSR was a total creation and supported right to the very end by the FED Banksters,
right to the very end. Factories, money, weapons, subsidies, food donations, technology, fuel, all hidden
from the public or dressed up as " humanitarian ", you want sources, I ain't a noob on this stuff.

When people in the USA are starving and " just in time " is blamed,
I am sure they would appreciate it very much to learn that years of
grain storage , enough to feed the country was given to prolong the
inevitable collapse of the USSR, right to the end keeping Jew commies in power.

They do lots of crap for show, or just let it play out , but intervene when required.

FED Banksters had point men in USSR directing everything at one point, micromanage even.
Same in China to an extent, same in Japan I am learning now.

In the end the Jew Communists, became the Oligarchs and looted Russia of what was left.
How surprising. They do WMD, PlameGate was about this, Pakistan, Iran, they armed them.
As before, set up wars. Like Iraq too.

Russian Jew commies are gov officials now in the West, total free pass.

Look at Israel cooperating at times with USSR, I thought it was the Arabs ?
All Pollards info went to USSR. USSR and Israel totally had West penetrated.

@ Book, what's your point, ? , everything is f*cked up friend,
no Hitler, no Israel , you making my argument ?

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 08:36 PM
MAGNES, I agree on "total creation", and I agree that most of it was a plan. I also am aware of the factories built with US money, etc. Including the bank. Including way before land-lease. I agree none of it was by luck or incident.

Still, I believe that Stalin was an odd ball that they didn't expect, but they handled.

MAGNES
14th November 2010, 08:45 PM
MAGNES, I agree on "total creation", and I agree that most of it was a plan. I also am aware of the factories built with US money, etc. Including the bank. Including way before land-lease. I agree none of it was by luck or incident.

Still, I believe that Stalin was an odd ball that they didn't expect, but they handled.


Fine, I wouldn't argue with anyone on details, you help a group of people and like thieves
they fight among themselves, they may loose control of them, maybe they just helped
them along, Stalin may have been a loose cannon, maybe he decided to get rid of all
his threats and competition, who knows, I won't argue these points, it is very telling
in the end you have the total looting of Russia by Jews and agents of Rothchild,
like Marc Rich, looting Russia of all resources long before fall, they made a move
on major oil interests, Putin stepped in and took it back. They all got free passes
and work to attack Russia in press and through terrorists, wars, etc, in my parts,
whole neighborhoods of Russian Jews with money , wtf ? They are new immigrants.
Ugly Jew commie billionaires buying sports teams and nobody presses them, lol .

Same applies to Hitler, they helped him along at very least, maybe he was legit.
I didn't say he wasn't above, in the end he failed, but I do believe things I did
not state, it does not matter at this point, he failed, Khazars won.

You want to out the Jews people, Fed Banksters, they armed and created everyone.
They owned the " death camps ", that is why they didn't bomb their own factories, rofl !
After the war they took apart their own factories, bolt for bolt and shipped them to USSR.
They paid for it.

FreeEnergy
14th November 2010, 08:53 PM
magnes, buddy!
http://www.buddy-icons.info/img/smile/1514.gif

never heard of marc rich being tied to this. any good reading material you can suggest?

and I'll tell you where my sources come from. :)

MAGNES
14th November 2010, 09:08 PM
magnes, buddy!
http://www.buddy-icons.info/img/smile/1514.gif

never heard of marc rich being tied to this. any good reading material you can recommend?


Just reading of past from net.
There is lots, even in the media, I paid close attention to NeoCons, and they
are number one partners with Oligarchs, I also tried to follow what is happening
in Russia. Rich is Mossad, huge commodity trader that gets free pass, he reportedly
was buying resources from the USSR for 10cents on the dollar, that was the scam,
before USSR fell, then he was point man for Oligarchs raping Russia, along with
Summers, Orszag, Clinton Teams, they kept Yeltsin drunk and gave him some
money through his daughter who married one Oligarch, looted Russia, all Jews,
there is something like 80 Russian Billionaires with Israeli
passports, who knows what happened on local level with factories, Marc Rich
name is or was all over internet on these issues above. Clinton pardoned him.
Oligarchs are still raping Russia, wars, propaganda. A key Forbes writer was
murdered in Russia, wrote a book, I had a thread on agora1 with links, it's
gone now, it was good. Putin slowly took some back, but he rides a fine line.

"marc rich" oligarchs looting russia
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22marc+rich%22+oligarchs+looting+russia+&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

Many writers write about Rich, antiwar.com Raimondo archive , others, Wayne Madsen
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j021601.html

Fine tune the searches and you will find gems.

HOW MARC RICH LOOTED RUSSIA

Rod Dreher, in the New York Daily News, recounts the story of how Rich looted Russia in the aftermath of the Soviet Union's collapse, citing Paul Klebnikov, a Russia expert and senior editor of Forbes magazine. Klebnikov is the author of Godfather of the Kremlin,

SIBEL EDMONDS IS KEY HERE.

hoarder
15th November 2010, 05:04 AM
not entirely correct. you fail to see that yet stalin cleaned up jewish communists almost completely from the top positions. The Jewsmedia reports stated that "stalin cleaned up jewish communists almost completely from the top positions"

Jews do not and did not get into high positions of wealth and power on their individual efforts. They got there by their group efforts and they know it. They undertsand that they owe everything to the cohesive tribe. This is part of their culture.

Light
15th November 2010, 05:10 AM
Jesus was a Jew. To claim otherwise is imbecilic. ;D

Spectrism
15th November 2010, 05:40 AM
Those who glorify Hitler are freekin scary in their delusion.

Hitler was a liar, deceiver and murderer. Did you not hear how he was describing the nations who "joined" his cause? Belgium, Netherlands, Spain and even France. Yeah right... sure. If you cannot see the lies of Hitler, then you probably have a hard time seeing the lies of Obama.

Here is a good rule of thumb- ALL world governments are corrupt and run by murderers.

nunaem
15th November 2010, 06:11 AM
Why do I never see/hear Hitler speaking calmly and rationally on TV? It's almost as if they were trying to distort his image. :o




Jesus was a Jew. To claim otherwise is imbecilic. ;D


Not only is Jesus Jewish, Christianity is too.

Book
15th November 2010, 06:53 AM
Here is a good rule of thumb- ALL world governments are corrupt and run by murderers owned by jews.



Fixed it for you.

:)

LuckyStrike
15th November 2010, 08:31 PM
Jesus was a Jew. To claim otherwise is imbecilic. ;D


You have been proven to be a complete tool on this website and are an obvious sockpuppet. I will continue to hound you about this moronic statement until you either retract it or apologize for wasting our bandwidth.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/formula-one-champ-jenson-button-escapes-armed-gang-in-brazil-after-qualifing/

LuckyStrike
15th November 2010, 08:33 PM
Not only is Jesus Jewish, Christianity is too.


Hurr Durr let me spout off against what NordicBerserker posted yet not refute a WORD of it.

Light
18th November 2010, 03:54 PM
Some "folk" just can't stand the fact that Jesus was a Jew. That one simple historical fact refutes their entire twisted movement. :D

mick silver
18th November 2010, 03:57 PM
"Even if we Jews are not bodily with you in the trenches, we are nevertheless morally with you. This is OUR WAR, and you are fighting it for us." (Les Nouvelles Litteraires, February 10, 1940).

that sounds about right thanks hoarder

hoarder
18th November 2010, 04:17 PM
Some "folk" just can't stand the fact that Jesus was a Jew. That one simple historical fact refutes their entire twisted movement. :D
Some folks just can't comprehend that 90% of so-called "Jews" today are actually Khazar imposters.

nunaem
18th November 2010, 04:28 PM
Some "folk" just can't stand the fact that Jesus was a Jew. That one simple historical fact refutes their entire twisted movement. :D
Some folks just can't comprehend that 90% of so-called "Jews" today are actually Khazar imposters.


Who wrote the Talmud? Keep in mind Khazaria converted to Judaism in the 700s. They may be imposters, but they didn't have to pervert Judaism in order to make it a parasitic cult, it was that way when they arrived.

hoarder
18th November 2010, 04:37 PM
[quote=nunaem ]

Who wrote the Talmud? Keep in mind Khazaria converted to Judaism in the 700s. They may be imposters, but they didn't have to pervert Judaism in order to make it a parasitic cult, it was that way when they arrived.
Officially the Talmud was written by Semitic Jews a century before the Khazars converted, but I think they simply switched dates around. The Talmud is grounded in racial supremacy. Knowing that, we understand that racial supremacists don't welcome other races into their fold.

Why would the Semitic Jews have written the Talmud just prior to welcoming the Khazars?

The Talmud reflects the mentality of Khazars.

nunaem
18th November 2010, 04:54 PM
What of the Roman writers and historians, Seneca and Cicero off the top of my head, who wrote of the Jews and corroborated what we know of them today? This was even before Christ, and long before Khazaria was a nation.

Here is list of quotes, many of them in pre-christian times:
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/repute.htm

Cicero, 1st century BC: "The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers."

Seneca, 1st century: "The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have given laws to the conquerors."

Sounds like the Khazars fit right in with the tribe.

Book
18th November 2010, 05:06 PM
Some folks just can't comprehend that 90% of so-called "Jews" today are actually Khazar imposters.



...and that the "real" Talmudist jews are just as bad.

:D

hoarder
18th November 2010, 05:16 PM
What of the Roman writers and historians, Seneca and Cicero off the top of my head, who wrote of the Jews and corroborated what we know of them today? This was even before Christ, and long before Khazaria was a nation.

Here is list of quotes, many of them in pre-christian times:
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/repute.htm

Cicero, 1st century BC: "The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers."

Seneca, 1st century: "The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have given laws to the conquerors."

Sounds like the Khazars fit right in with the tribe.
That was before the talmud was written.

After studying Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the King of the Khazars chose Judaism for his tribe. It's pretty obvious why it appealed to him.

sirgonzo420
18th November 2010, 05:41 PM
http://www.crazygaijin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/250px-Swasticookies.jpg

Let's take a warm cookie break...lol.

:D


LOL.

Do you pay that ole granny royalties for using her picture?

If not, you should.... lol... you use it enough!

sirgonzo420
18th November 2010, 05:43 PM
Some folks just can't comprehend that 90% of so-called "Jews" today are actually Khazar imposters.



...and that the "real" Talmudist jews are just as bad.

:D


It sucks, but jews that follow the talmud are a sketchy bunch.

And jews that don't consider themselves "religious" are damn near as sketchy.

Hell, everybody is sketchy.

sirgonzo420
18th November 2010, 05:45 PM
Some "folk" just can't stand the fact that Jesus was a Jew. That one simple historical fact refutes their entire twisted movement. :D


LOL.

Some of us "folk" aren't Christian.

nunaem
18th November 2010, 06:21 PM
Not only is Jesus Jewish, Christianity is too.


Hurr Durr let me spout off against what NordicBerserker posted yet not refute a WORD of it.


Yes, Jesus was a Jew and he thinks you are a DOG compared to his people.


[24] And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an house, and would have no man know it: but he could not be hid.
[25] For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of him, and came and fell at his feet:
[26] The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.
[27] But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it unto the dogs.
[28] And she answered and said unto him, Yes, Lord: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children's crumbs.
[29] And he said unto her, For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter.
[30] And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid upon the bed.

Hypertiger
18th November 2010, 06:55 PM
Hitler was an idiot.

He crossed his borders and had no ability to defend against the consequences of that action.

Hitler was installed into power because of his emotional problems.

The only way Hitler and crew could have thought crossing a border was a good idea is if they were given a guarantee.

Saddam was told he was going to be ruler of the Middle East.

The Jews were in all the positions within Germany as they are now in the USA.

There was zero way Hitler could have gained power without Jewish help.

The Israeli's need to erect the biggest statue of Hitler on Earth as the greatest hero and champion of Zionism.

Remove Hitler from the equation and there's no Israel.

Hitler eliminated all the Jewish agents that were instructed to help him gain power.

All those agents were just like soldiers in the trenches that had to go over the top when the whistle blew.

Any other simple Jews annihilated were just oblivious conscripts.

The top will supply you all with a leader or gain control of your leader and then manipulate them into marching you all off a cliff.

That's Hitler.

woodman
1st January 2011, 07:31 AM
I would like to add this as well.

For those who think Hitler was a jew or jewish agent at least consider this possibility as I have considered the possibility of the former.

If Hitler was legit, what better way to alienate him from his own people and destroy his memory with those who agreed with his philosophy than to claim he was a jew?

If Hitler was legit, not only does claiming he was a jew destroy his memory, but more so it further disheartens people like us to ever think that we could be or could have a leader who would stand up to marxism and eradicate it from our borders. People like me take hope at least that at one time in history people understood the jewish question, understood that they are behind EVERYTHING that is evil and destructive in this world. They elected a man who was instrumental in teaching them.

But to claim he was a jew brings on such a defeatist attitude because all of your would be heroes you turn into filthy hook nosed rats.

I know full well as most of you do how much of a stranglehold the jew has on our society and our world, but the stranglehold he has over your mind is the greatest of all. Why would you rebel when you believe that all the would be leaders are just controlled opposition? You won't and as I said that stranglehold is the greatest of all.


Of course I don't know if Hitler was pro-German or a Zionist. My gut feeling says he was a zionist masquerading as a patriotic German. I have found a fascinating article that I think you should read. There are so many opinions and so little time to research things on our own. Read this with an open mind however.

This is from: http://www.jewishracism.com/freespeech.htm
Scroll down a little way to the article:

Free Speech, Free David Irving
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Prof. Norman G. Finkelstein has ably argued, the Holocaust has become an industry for Zionists and a means to control public opinion in a most corrupt and deplorable fashion. The dead are not only exploited to fill the coffers with cash, their names are invoked to cover up of the misdeeds of Jewish racists past and present. Zionists and Jewish racists have an interest not only in obstructing an investigation into the demographic horrors of the Holocaust, and the apartheid crimes of Israel, but desperately want to hide from the public the crimes of racist Zionists in the persecution of Jews in the twentieth century. Nazism was more than a German nationalist movement. For many years, Nazism was a Zionist and a Bolshevist movement disproportionately led by men and women of partial, in some cases perhaps even full, Jewish descent.

Why would any Jew sponsor Hitler, or found an anti-Jewish society? After Jewish emancipation, the vast majority of European Jews wanted to assimilate into Western society. Racist Zionist Jews, a small minority in the Jewish community, feared that the “Jewish race” would disappear through the “final solution to the Jewish question” of “assimilation”, or so they stated in their writings and speeches of the nineteenth century. The Nazis did not coin the phrase “final solution to the Jewish question”, nor did the Nazis intend it to mean the extermination of the Jews. The Zionists used the expression to refer to the integration of Jews, which process the Zionists loathed. The political Zionists were and are racist segregationists. Both the political Zionists and the Nazis, who were in fact political Zionists, offered an alternative “final solution to the Jewish question” to that of assimilation, one of Jewish segregation in a “world ghetto”, which is another Zionist phrase. Before the Nazis even came into existence, the political Zionists called for the segregation of Jews into a ghetto.

The “final solution” of extermination was not proposed by a German Nazi, but rather by an American Jew; and it was not the extermination of Jews which he proposed, but the genocide of German Gentiles. Theodor Newman Kaufman advocated the genocidal sterilization of all Germans as a “final solution” in 1941 in his book Germany Must Perish!, Argyle Press, Newark, New Jersey, (1941), before the Wannsee-Konferenz occurred. Kaufman’s book was merely a more modern manifestation of the ancient racist Jewish divine commandment that Jews must exterminate the seed of Esau/Edom/Amalek/Haman, lest God exterminate the Jews, themselves; which “race” of Esau came to signify Gentiles in general. I do not touch upon the question of whether and which Nazis did in fact attempt to exterminate European Jews under their control. There certainly was an ancient Jewish tradition that assimilatory Jews must be exterminated. Numerous Jewish prophets called for the genocide of Jews and Gentiles in their pursuit of Jewish world domination and a messianic age, when all religions other than Judaism would be suppressed, when all the nations would be destroyed, and when Gentile cattle would serve the Jews as slaves or face certain death.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Perhaps the truth is far more exotic than our mundane, quickly formed opinions would have us believe. We have been led down the garden path again and again and again. Time to stop being led. Don't look for glorious leaders. None of them are glorious. They get where they are by being something far more sinister. It is a sure bet that anyone in a top position of political power, and surely Hitler was such, was put there by someone above them.

gunDriller
1st January 2011, 08:02 AM
i don't know why Hitler over-stepped his capabilities and invaded countries outside Germany.

i do know that as an American growing up in Jew-managed American public schools, i have had it drilled into me since birth that Hitler is the "worst of the worst" - which is not to say that he was a nice guy.

is it child abuse to teach American school-children about terrible Holocausts that didn't happen the way we were taught ?

The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry
by Walter Sanning
http://www.amazon.com/Dissolution-Eastern-European-Walter-Sanning/dp/0939484110

(based on census records, Sanning puts the death-toll for Jews in occupied Europe at 200K)

while i was sitting in elementary school learning about the alleged most horrible of crimes, in the 1960's, my own country was killing approx. 4.5 million civilians in Southeast Asia.

so we know -
* that what we were taught about Hitler is wrong - there were approx. 3.5 million Jewish people in Europe at the beginning of WW2.
* that the history of Nazi Germany has been politicized so much, it's hard to tell what really happened, exactly.
* the Zionists have been beating Americans and Europeans over the head with the "6 million Jews died" hoax for about 50 years, and even Israeli children are taught similarly.
* while all that is going on, the US & Israel are going around the world conducting war after war after war.
* Hitler just might be a red herring, to some extent.

if Zionism were a Swiss Army Knife, the "Hitler" blade would be the biggest tool.

i am reluctant to use Hitler as a metaphor for a "terrible bogey man", because that is what the Zionists want.

Hitler most likely died in 1945 ... the Zionists kept on killing.

Bush, Harriman, Rothschild, Israel - some of the real Monsters of the 20th century. and, unfortunately, of the 21st century.

given that Judaism has been a religion of Ritual Human Sacrifice for thousands of years, that also tells us who are the real Monsters of human culture. Judaism's tradition in this regard even predates Zionism, e.g. Blood Passover and the Jewish-dominated slave trade.

woodman
1st January 2011, 08:18 AM
exellent post gundriller. I especially like "if Zionism were a Swiss Army Knife, the "Hitler" blade would be the biggest tool."
That is worthy of a sig line.