PDA

View Full Version : Most 9/11 responders settle suits over WTC dust



MNeagle
19th November 2010, 11:04 AM
Most 9/11 responders settle suits over WTC dust


NEW YORK – More than 10,000 people have joined a legal settlement that will pay hundreds of millions of dollars to ground zero workers exposed to toxic World Trade Center dust.

The near-universal acceptance of the deal was announced by a court Friday.

It will mean an end to most litigation over New York City's failure to provide protective equipment to construction workers, police and firefighters who cleared rubble.

Only around 500 of the thousands who sued the city over the cleanup declined to take the offer.

At least 95 percent had to sign on to make the deal effective. It just cleared that hurdle, with 95.1 percent.

The settlement will provide at least $625 million. Related deals could boost that total to more than $725 million.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101119/ap_on_re_us/us_attacks_health

Glass
19th November 2010, 03:49 PM
All run by Ken Feinberg. I think he stated that it was not in the best interest for claimants to go into court and his job was to keep them out.

gunDriller
6th January 2011, 06:46 AM
part of the situation with the WTC buildings before they were demolished was - asbestos. big asbestos liability.

New Yorkers got to breathe a bunch of that dust the week of 9-11 - courtesy of Israel & their supporters in the US government.

mamboni
6th January 2011, 06:56 AM
part of the situation with the WTC buildings before they were demolished was - asbestos. big asbestos liability.

New Yorkers got to breathe a bunch of that dust the week of 9-11 - courtesy of Israel & their supporters in the US government.


Right! And I for one have not heard one mention of the asbestos exposure which was MASSIVE. Yet if a school kid in a 100 year old grade school walks by a pipe insulated with asbestos and a 2 mm tear in the lining, it is a huge scandal! Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers and New Jersians were exposed to asbestos on 9-11 and we are starting to now see a predictable explosion in regional rates of chronic lung disease and cancer. This is only going to get worse.

PatColo
6th January 2011, 02:01 PM
All run by Ken Feinberg. I think he stated that it was not in the best interest for claimants to go into court and his job was to keep them out.



Weaselberg is the "fixer" again with the Gulf bio/chem-warfare op too. I suspect he gets a phat percentage of whatever portion of the designated $20B compensation fund he's able to "save".

Feinberg Says Half of $20 Billion BP Fund Should Cover Claims (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-31/feinberg-says-half-of-20-billion-bp-fund-may-be-enough-to-cover-claims.html)

also see,

BP doesn't pay fisherman/clean-up worker claims; pays stripper $80K (http://gold-silver.us/forum/gulf-oil-disaster/bp-doesn%27t-pay-fishermanclean-up-worker-claims-pays-stripper-$80k/msg139825/#msg139825)

Nordmann
7th January 2011, 02:13 PM
Hush money.

gunDriller
9th January 2011, 06:34 AM
part of the situation with the WTC buildings before they were demolished was - asbestos. big asbestos liability.

New Yorkers got to breathe a bunch of that dust the week of 9-11 - courtesy of Israel & their supporters in the US government.


Right! And I for one have not heard one mention of the asbestos exposure which was MASSIVE. Yet if a school kid in a 100 year old grade school walks by a pipe insulated with asbestos and a 2 mm tear in the lining, it is a huge scandal! Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers and New Jersians were exposed to asbestos on 9-11 and we are starting to now see a predictable explosion in regional rates of chronic lung disease and cancer. This is only going to get worse.


sorry to quote Jewpedia but they do have a decent definition of Mesothelioma -

"Mesothelioma, more precisely malignant mesothelioma, is a rare form of cancer that develops from the protective lining that covers many of the body's internal organs, the mesothelium. It is usually caused by exposure to asbestos.[1]

Its most common site is the pleura (outer lining of the lungs and internal chest wall), but it may also occur in the peritoneum (the lining of the abdominal cavity), the heart,[2] the pericardium (a sac that surrounds the heart) or tunica vaginalis.

Most people who develop mesothelioma have worked on jobs where they inhaled asbestos particles, or they have been exposed to asbestos dust and fiber in other ways. It has also been suggested that washing the clothes of a family member who worked with asbestos can put a person at risk for developing mesothelioma.[3] Unlike lung cancer, there is no association between mesothelioma and smoking, but smoking greatly increases the risk of other asbestos-induced cancers.[4] Compensation via asbestos funds or lawsuits is an important issue in mesothelioma (see asbestos and the law)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesothelioma


Jewpedia - all this talk about Mesothelioma & not one word about the most recent large incident of asbestos exposure - New Yorkers & 9-11.

mamboni
13th January 2011, 07:31 AM
part of the situation with the WTC buildings before they were demolished was - asbestos. big asbestos liability.

New Yorkers got to breathe a bunch of that dust the week of 9-11 - courtesy of Israel & their supporters in the US government.


Right! And I for one have not heard one mention of the asbestos exposure which was MASSIVE. Yet if a school kid in a 100 year old grade school walks by a pipe insulated with asbestos and a 2 mm tear in the lining, it is a huge scandal! Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers and New Jersians were exposed to asbestos on 9-11 and we are starting to now see a predictable explosion in regional rates of chronic lung disease and cancer. This is only going to get worse.





Jewpedia - all this talk about Mesothelioma & not one word about the most recent large incident of asbestos exposure - New Yorkers & 9-11.



Exactly!

PatColo
10th April 2011, 05:32 PM
Another travesty: City interrupts wake to take back corpse of 9/11 first responder (http://911blogger.com/news/2011-03-31/another-travesty-city-interrupts-wake-take-back-corpse-911-first-responder)

"... Apparently, the NYC Department of Health wasn't happy with the conclusion of Wong's doctor re the cause of his death, and exerted pressure to have the Medical Examiner's office examine his remains some more. In the end, the death certificate was changed to identifiy the cause of death as 'pending.'

Oh, how I wish I were making this up:

... "

keehah
25th April 2012, 01:24 PM
http://www.mesothelioma.com/news/2012/04/insurance-company-says-it-wont-pay-any-more-world-trade-center-asbestos-claims.htm#ixzz1t5OvGRSA

April 10, 2012

New York, New York - American Home Assurance, the company that issued a general liability policy to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1966 at the start of the construction of the Twin Towers, has filed a claim in New York County Court saying they have no obligation to defend or indemnify any further asbestos claims from the site, due to the fact that the policy issued has a limit of $10 million per occurrence, a number that has already been reached.

..."...To date, American Home has paid in excess of $10 million to indemnify insureds in response to World Trade Center asbestos claims. Its obligations, if any, are exhausted and no coverage is available under the policy for pending WTC asbestos claims.”

A representative for the insurance company notes that since the attacks, they have been subject to thousands of personal-injury claims arising from asbestos exposure. Also named as defendants in many of the claims were Alcoa Company, DiBono Plastering Company, the Port Authority, and Tishman Realty and Construction Company. The latter was the construction manager for the project.

VT April 20, 2012: Insurer Caps WTC-Demolition Asbestos Payout at 10 Million (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/10/insurer-caps-wtc-demolition-asbestos-payout-at-10-million-silverstein-laughs-all-the-way-to-the-bank/)

...American Home Assurance has announced that it is capping payouts for WTC-demolition asbestos claims at a measly $10 million.

The announcement underlines just how much cheaper it is to demolish asbestos-laden skyscrapers without a permit, than to follow legal procedures.

Larry Silverstein, a reputed illicit-sex-industry mobster, purchased the World Trade Center in 2001, shortly after the New York Port Authority lost an asbestos lawsuit and was ordered to remove all asbestos from the Twin Towers. Cost estimates for that asbestos removal ranged from the low billions to the tens of billions – far more than the outdated, half-empty buildings were worth. (The City of New York had been desperately seeking a way to demolish the Towers since around 1990, but was prevented from doing so by asbestos issues.)

Silverstein would have gone bankrupt within a few years at most had the Towers not been illegally demolished on September 11th, 2001. Thanks to that illegal demolition, Silverstein – who had doubled the WTC’s terrorism insurance and changed it to cash payout when he finalized his purchase in July, 2001 – walked off with a 5 billion dollar cash return on his 100 million dollar investment. When last sighted, Silverstein was back in court asking for another 11 billion dollars from airline insurers.

Silverstein is notorious for confessing on national television to the illegal demolition of World Trade Center Building 7.

During a recent interview former intelligence community insider and current Veterans Today Editor Gordon Duff stated that the crimes of 9/11 were conceived in New York City, by people linked to organized crime and the Israeli Mossad, as an illegal demolition project, and subsequently sold to corrupt elements of the Bush Administration, the intelligence community, and the military (especially the Armageddonite wing of the US Air Force). Duff added that many of those with direct knowledge of the crimes have come forward, and suggested that non-complicit insiders are working to bring the perpetrators to justice by any available means.