View Full Version : TSA May Exempt Muslims From Airport Pat-Downs
Twisted Titan
21st November 2010, 09:22 AM
http://landofthefreeish.com/tsa/tsa-may-exempt-muslims-from-airport-pat-downs/
TSA May Exempt Muslims From Airport Pat-Downs
As the U.S. government retaliates against an American for refusing to allow airport security to grope his genitals, the nation’s Homeland Security secretary considers waving the intrusive “pat-downs” for Muslim women who consider them offensive.
The demand came last week from the politically-connected Muslim rights organization that serves as the U.S. front for the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas. Calling the searches “invasive” and “humiliating,” the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) advises Muslim women wearing religious head covers known as hijabs to reject full-body checks before boarding planes.
Those who are selected for the secondary screenings should remind Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officers that they are only supposed to pat down the head and neck and that they should not subject Muslim women to a full-body or partial body pat-down, according to CAIR’s advisory. It further says that, instead of a body search, Muslim women can request to check their own hijab and have officers perform a chemical swipe of their hands.
While Americans are forced to deal with the degrading searches, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is actually considering exempting Muslims as per CAIR’s demands. Madame Secretary confirmed this week that there will be “adjustments” and “more to come” on the issue of Muslim women in hijabs undergoing airport security pat-downs.
In the meantime her agency is targeting a San Diego man who received worldwide media coverage for refusing to let a TSA agent conduct a thorough body search that he felt amounted to a “sexual assault.” Referring to his genitals, the man told the TSA officer; “you touch my junk and I’m going to have you arrested.”
The head of TSA in San Diego called a press conference this week to announce that the agency has launched an investigation into the 31-year-old software programmer who was not allowed to board the plane. The feds plan to prosecute and fine him thousands of dollars for making them look bad. Actually, the official charge is leaving the airport’s security area without permission, which is prohibited to prevent terrorism.
Speaking of, TSA’s lapses over the years have certainly left the country vulnerable to another terrorist attack. The agency in charge of securing the nation’s transportation system has approved background checks for illegal immigrants working in sensitive areas of a busy U.S. airport and has failed miserably to ensure the security of tens of thousands of cargo packages transported daily in the bellies of passenger planes.
Just last week a Massachusetts news station revealed that TSA cleared dozens of illegal immigrants to train as pilots in the U.S., despite “strict security controls” implemented after 9/11. Some of the illegal immigrants provided the station with official TSA documents approving pilot lessons through the agency’s alien flight student program. After the story broke, Homeland Security officials promised to “review the process” for clearing foreign nationals to become licensed pilots.
Twisted Titan
21st November 2010, 09:23 AM
And the fomenting continues unabated.........
JohnQPublic
21st November 2010, 09:33 AM
Wow. We have gone from the politically correct 'not targetting those most closely identifiable as 9/11 terrorists' based on their race/religion to allowing them to board planes with less of a search than those not identifiable as 9/11 terrorists. Until now, incompetence has known no equal.
StackerKen
21st November 2010, 09:43 AM
yeah..... what ever happened to " No search without probable cause"?
This seems to be just the opposite :-\
BrewTech
21st November 2010, 10:00 AM
Muslims are 'those most closely identifiable as 9/11 terrorists' ???
Seriously?
Neuro
21st November 2010, 10:07 AM
Absurd! I don't think Muslims were instrumental in the 9/11 attacks, but that is the official version, now the officials are going to allow Muslim women a lighter search than non-Muslims. I think this is equally humiliating for any person regardless of sex, religion, clothing. It appears as they really just wants to insult people because they can. ABSURD!!
willie pete
21st November 2010, 10:10 AM
haven't all the most recent threats (shoebomber,underwear bomber, the group with the liquids) been from muslims?
BrewTech
21st November 2010, 10:12 AM
To me it is clear what the agenda is here...
TSA engages in behavior that will get folks pissed off, in spite of the fact is is supposed to be for their own "security"..
Certain congesscritters call for airports to 'opt out' of TSA's "services"... some do.
TSA announces they will stop searching certain Muslims.
After folks have settled down a bit thinking they have won a battle against tyranny, a plane goes BOOM (or a nuke, or whatever) and there is "overwhelming evidence" that a scary Mooslim terrorist that was not scannned or groped was responsible for the deaths of all those innocent people.
The sheep are told "WE TOLD YA SO!!" repeatedly in the MSM, and are eager to be protected against the new and improved Mooslim threat, and will forevermore gladly accept what ever "security measures" the gov and TSA see fit to implement.
Muslims are revillified, and the sheep are back in their place, cowering in fear.
Easy as pie!
Twisted Titan
21st November 2010, 10:48 AM
Helps to keep the fear going strong...........
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20101121/ts_afp/usattacksyemenqaedaclaim
The Yemen-based branch of Al-Qaeda has vowed further small but frequent attacks against the West such as last month's cargo plane parcel bombs, in a "strategy of a thousand cuts" that will "bleed the enemy to death", a monitoring group said.
Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) said the packages it put aboard freight planes bound for the US in late October were never intended to cause mass casualties, but were aimed at creating maximum economic damage.
The group said the parcels, which were intercepted in Dubai and Britain, were part of "Operation Hemorrhage," a plan that had cost just 4,200 dollars to mount.
It said there was now little focus on large-scale mass-casualty attacks like those on New York and Washington in September 2001.
"To bring down America we do not need to strike big," the network said in an English-language magazine called Inspire, which was monitored Saturday by the US-based Intelcenter.
"In such an environment of security phobia that is sweeping America, it is more feasible to stage smaller attacks that involve less players and less time to launch and thus we may circumvent the security barriers America worked so hard to erect," AQAP said.
"This strategy of attacking the enemy with smaller, but more frequent operations is what some may refer to as the strategy of a thousand cuts. The aim is to bleed the enemy to death."
The two parcels were addressed to synagogues in Chicago and found to contain the hard-to-detect explosive PETN hidden in ink toner cartridges.
A massive global security clampdown on airfreight followed the discovery, with a number of countries banning cargo or flights originating from Yemen, including the United States, Canada and several western European countries.
The AQAP magazine details the "total bill of 4,200" dollars for Operation Hemorrhage, adding that it was three months in the planning and execution.
"On the other hand this... will without a doubt cost America and other Western countries billions of dollars in new security measures. This is what we call leverage.
"From the start our objective was economic... It was determined that the success of the operation was to be based on two factors: The first is that the packages pass through the latest security equipment.
"The second, the spread of fear that would cause the West to invest billions of dollars in new security procedures.
"We will continue with similar operations and we do not mind at all in this stage if they are intercepted. It is such a good bargain for us to spread fear amongst the enemy and keep him on his toes in exchange of a few months of work and a few thousand bucks."
The magazine says AQAP intends to pass on its know-how to other radical Islamists around the world, to encourage them to mount similar operations.
"We are laying out for our enemies our plan in advance because... our objective is not maximum kill but to cause a hemorrhage in the aviation industry, an industry that is so vital for trade and transportation between the US and Europe."
IntelCenter chief executive Ben Venzke said the level of operational detail AQAP had provided in the magazine marked a departure for Islamists.
"We have never seen a jihadist group in the Al-Qaeda orbit ever release, let alone only a few weeks after, such a detailed accounting of the philosophy, operational details, intent and next steps following a major attack," he said.
"This may represent a new level of interaction by jihadi groups following an operation and is a far cry from the days of shadowy claims and questions as to who was actually responsible.
"AQAP is a dedicated, unwavering and sophisticated group. It will continue to strike at the US in creative new ways and it is only a matter of time until one of their attacks results in thousands dead and/or severe economic damage."
BrewTech
21st November 2010, 10:57 AM
"AQAP is a dedicated, unwavering and sophisticated group. It will continue to strike at the US in creative new ways and it is only a matter of time until one of their attacks results in thousands dead and/or severe economic damage, in spite of the fact that we subject all you dumb sheep to naked scannner radiation and sexual assault, so don't be surprised when the shit really goes down!"
Fixed it for them.
BrewTech
21st November 2010, 11:01 AM
haven't all the most recent threats false flag events (shoebomber,underwear bomber, the group with the liquids) been from pinned on muslims muslim patsies?
I figured that's what you really meant to say... right?
;)
Neuro
21st November 2010, 11:10 AM
"On the other hand this... will without a doubt cost America and other Western countries billions of dollars in new security measures. This is what we call leverage.
The terrorists speaks like investment bankers... LOL!
BrewTech
21st November 2010, 11:26 AM
"On the other hand this... will without a doubt cost America and other Western countries billions of dollars in new security measures. This is what we call leverage.
The terrorists speaks like investment bankers... LOL!
Not to mention they started using the western intelligence convention of naming their activities "Operation XXXXXXX"...
LOL.
Neuro
21st November 2010, 11:31 AM
"On the other hand this... will without a doubt cost America and other Western countries billions of dollars in new security measures. This is what we call leverage.
The terrorists speaks like investment bankers... LOL!
Not to mention they started using the western intelligence convention of naming their activities "Operation XXXXXXX"...
LOL.
I wonder if they even bothered to translate this into Arabic... Or maybe Arabic speaking terrorist sympathizers isn't an important target group any longer!
LOL.
Desolation LineTrimmer
21st November 2010, 11:38 AM
Muslims are greatly implicated in terrorism of the airways, even if some of the actions can be plausibly understood as false-flag operations, which is debatable. 9/11 was probably a real world Muslim attack on the USA with passive connivance by Mossad.
Uncle Salty
21st November 2010, 05:01 PM
Muslims are greatly implicated in terrorism of the airways, even if some of the actions can be plausibly understood as false-flag operations, which is debatable. 9/11 was probably a real world Muslim attack on the USA with passive connivance by Mossad.
So controlled demolition is considered "passive connivance?"
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
mick silver
21st November 2010, 05:45 PM
we are the terrorists not them . this is what our gov working on
BrewTech
21st November 2010, 06:45 PM
Oh look... Mike Adams agrees with me...
http://www.naturalnews.com/030471_TSA_false_flag_operation.html
MAGNES
21st November 2010, 06:52 PM
Until now, incompetence has known no equal.
According to the propaganda sold it would be incompetence.
Debating them on TV, this would be the approach.
But incompetence has nothing to do with the truth.
TSA is part of very sinister plan against people, IMO.
This was all planned and many saw it coming.
IMO this is near the beginning of their plans.
Consider years ago there was 1 million + Americans
on " no fly list ". TSA Chertoff, Patriot Act author, mr cancer machine,
scanners, in place before key events as excuse to use
them both, Mossad family, and PNAC NeoConArtist.
Look at the UK, a total Orwellian Police State.
They are forcing everyone through those machines
by law too.
TSA now needs false flag security incident to convince Americans to accept obscene pat-downs
http://www.naturalnews.com/030471_TSA_false_flag_operation.html
@ BrewTech, you are right, DLT is partially right too, they need each other, you need patsies.
But no way they did all the coordination, mechanics, and destruction of evidence, Chertoff was
behind all of this. Key man. " passive " Not with Chertoff as key man, DLT .
BrewTech
21st November 2010, 06:54 PM
Muslims are greatly implicated in terrorism of the airways, even if some of the actions can be plausibly understood as false-flag operations, which is debatable. 9/11 was probably a real world Muslim attack on the USA with passive connivance by Mossad.
I'd love to hear your take on which group (zionists or muslim extremists) handled which tasks in the execution of " the worst terrorist attack on american soil in the history of the entire universe". I mean, a shitload of coordination had to take place to make it look real, so which tasks were delegated to who?
Desolation LineTrimmer
26th November 2010, 05:40 PM
Muslims are greatly implicated in terrorism of the airways, even if some of the actions can be plausibly understood as false-flag operations, which is debatable. 9/11 was probably a real world Muslim attack on the USA with passive connivance by Mossad.
So controlled demolition is considered "passive connivance?"
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
No aircraft hit the towers first?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.