U.S. MILITARY CIVIL DISTURBANCE

[mick silver]

http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/CIVIL_DISTURBANCE_PLANNING.pdf

[Glass]

lost me at
Further, it may very well be that police/military "civil disturbance" planning is the animating force and the overarching logic behind the incredible nationwide growth of police paramilitary units, a growth which coincidentally mirrors rising levels of police violence directed at the American people, particularly "non-white" poor and working people

[Mouse]

Perhaps you should read the rest of it, just in case.

It really doesn't provide much useful information, just more historical context for where we are today, which could be very useful for you tomorrow.

[FunnyMoney]

Perhaps you should read the rest of it,...



The concept of martial rule, as distinct from martial law, is not written, and therefore is an eminently more workable arrangement for "law enforcement forces". That s because, as FM 19-15 points out, "martial rule is based on public necessity. Public necessity in this sense means public safety." According to the manual, U.S. state authorities "may take such action within their own jurisdictions." And yet, "whether or not martial rule has been proclaimed, commanders must weigh each proposed action against the threat to public order and safety. If the need for martial rule arises, the military commander at the scene must so inform the Army Chief of Staff and await instructions. If martial rule is imposed, the civilian population must be informed of the restrictions and rules of conduct that the military can enforce." Realizing the power of free speech, the manual suggests that "during a civil disturbance, it may be advisable to prevent people from assembling. Civil law can make it unlawful for people to meet to plan an act of violence, rioting, or civil disturbance. Prohibitions on assembly may forbid gatherings at any place and time." And don t forget, "making hostile or inflammatory speeches advocating the overthrow of the lawful government and
9
threats against public officials, if it endangered public safety, could violate such law." During civil disturbance operations, "authorities must be prepared to detain large numbers of people", forcing them into existing, though expanded "detention facilities." Cautioning that "if there are more detainees than civil detention facilities can handle, civil authorities may ask the control forces to set up and operate temporary facilities." Pending the approval of the Army Chief of Staff, the military can detain and jail citizens en masse. "The temporary facilities are set up on the nearest military installation or on suitable property under federal control." These "temporary facilities" are "supervised and controlled by MP officers and NCOs trained and experienced in Army correctional operations. Guards and support personnel under direct supervision and control of MP officers and NCOs need not be trained or experienced in Army correctional operations. But they must be specifically instructed and closely supervised in the proper use of force."



I guess that pretty much does away with the idea of "no standing army"





Perhaps you should read the rest of it, just in case....

[Glass]

Well civil law is not law but policy under colour of law and it has no bearing on a lawful government because there isn't one. The public is not you or me, it is the institutions and facilties of the corporation excercising defacto rule. I'll have a go at reading again later but anyone who thinks minorities are more agressively oppressed than the white guy have got an agenda IMO. Martial law or rule or whatever they are going to call it simply draws the lines between the two waring factions. 1 side is organised with a significant war machinery. The other side is disorganised or irregular with no significant war machinery and only militia and underground type tactics to rely upon.

In case no one noticed it, it is the warfare method the organised US military has been developing it's techniques against for the last 40 odd years. Since Vietnam. The only difference here is that they are using a different key word set because they are waging this war on home territory.

So now having read it, the programs rely on the randomness and unorganised nature of an uprising. This is pretty much a given based on what I have said above. Momentum is key. Deplete momentum then it becomes a slogging match. Who can out slog who. Interference with Information, relocation and detention activities is required.

I think I mentioned it before, from On War and Art of War. The best war is one that is not fought with force. If you can degrade your enemy to minimum force levels then do that. When force comes into play then momentum is required. In US lingo it is overwhelming force or shock and awe. So my questions are: is there a war occuring now. are there 2 or more sides engaged in any (such) war?

[Twisted Titan]

Thanks Mick always love me a PDF to add to library

[mick silver]

i knew you would T T