Log in

View Full Version : WHY WOMEN IN CHINA DO NOT GET BREAST CANCER



Twisted Titan
4th December 2010, 12:38 PM
WHY WOMEN IN CHINA DO NOT GET BREAST CANCER By Prof. Jane Plant, PhD, CBE

I had no alternative but to die or to try to find a cure for myself. I am a scientist - surely there was a rational explanation for this cruel illness that affects one in 12 women in the UK ?

I had suffered the loss of one breast, and undergone radiotherapy. I was now receiving painful chemotherapy, and had been seen by some of the country's most eminent specialists. But, deep down, I felt certain I was facing death. I had a loving husband, a beautiful home and two young children to care for. I desperately wanted to live.

Fortunately, this desire drove me to unearth the facts, some of which were known only to a handful of scientists at the time.

Anyone who has come into contact with breast cancer will know that certain risk factors - such as increasing age, early onset of womanhood, late onset of menopause and a family history of breast cancer - are completely out of our control. But there are many risk factors, which we can control easily.

These "controllable" risk factors readily translate into simple changes that we can all make in our day-to-day lives to help prevent or treat breast cancer. My message is that even advanced breast cancer can be overcome because I have done it.

The first clue to understanding what was promoting my breast cancer came when my husband Peter, who was also a scientist, arrived back from working in China while I was being plugged in for a chemotherapy session.

He had brought with him cards and letters, as well as some amazing herbal suppositories, sent by my friends and science colleagues in China .

The suppositories were sent to me as a cure for breast cancer. Despite the awfulness of the situation, we both had a good belly laugh, and I remember saying that this was the treatment for breast cancer in China , then it was little wonder that Chinese women avoided getting the disease.

Those words echoed in my mind.

Why didn't Chinese women in China get breast cancer?

I had collaborated once with Chinese colleagues on a study of links between soil chemistry and disease, and I remembered some of the statistics.

The disease was virtually non-existent throughout the whole country. Only one in 10,000 women in China will die from it, compared to that terrible figure of one in 12 in Britain and the even grimmer average of one in 10 across most Western countries.

It is not just a matter of China being a more rural country, with less urban pollution. In highly urbanized Hong Kong , the rate rises to 34 women in every 10,000 but still puts the West to shame.

The Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have similar rates. And remember, both cities were attacked withnuclear weapons, so in addition to the usual pollution-related cancers, one would also expect to find some radiation-related cases, too.

The conclusion we can draw from these statistics strikes you with some force. If a Western woman were to move to industrialized, irradiated Hiroshima , she would slash her risk of contracting breast cancer by half. Obviously this is absurd.

It seemed obvious to me that some lifestyle factor not related to pollution, urbanization or the environment is seriously increasing the Western woman's chance of contracting breast cancer.

I then discovered that whatever causes the huge differences in breast cancer rates between oriental and Western countries, it isn't genetic.

Scientific research showed that when Chinese or Japanese people move to the West, within one or two generations their rates of breast cancer approach those of their host community.

The same thing happens when oriental people adopt a completely Western lifestyle in Hong Kong . In fact, the slang name for breast cancer in China translates as 'Rich Woman's Disease'. This is because, in China, only the better off can afford to eat what is termed ' Hong Kong food'.

The Chinese describe all Western food, including everything from ice cream and chocolate bars to spaghetti and feta cheese, as "Hong Kong food", because of its availability in the former British colony and its scarcity, in the past, in mainland China .

So it made perfect sense to me that whatever was causing my breast cancer and the shockingly high incidence in this country generally, it was almost certainly something to do with our better-off, middle-class, Western lifestyle.

There is an important point for men here, too. I have observed in my research that much of the data about prostate cancer leads to similar conclusions.

According to figures from the World Health Organization, the number of men contracting prostate cancer in rural China is negligible, only 0.5 men in every 100,000.
In England, Scotland and Wales , however, this figure is 70 times higher. Like breast cancer, it is a middle-class disease that primarily attacks the wealthier and higher socio-economic groups, those that can afford to eat rich foods.

I remember saying to my husband, "Come on Peter, you have just come back from China . What is it about the Chinese way of life that is so different?"

Why don't they get breast cancer?'
We decided to utilize our joint scientific backgrounds and approach it logically.

We examined scientific data that pointed us in the general direction of fats in diets.
Researchers had discovered in the 1980s that only l4% of calories in the average Chinese diet were from fat, compared to almost 36% in the West.
But the diet I had been living on for years before I contracted breast cancer was very low in fat and high in fibre.
Besides, I knew as a scientist that fat intake in adults has not been shown to increase risk for breast cancer in most investigations that have followed large groups of women for up to a dozen years.
Then one day something rather special happened. Peter and I have worked together so closely over the years that I am not sure which one of us first said:

"The Chinese don't eat dairy produce!"
It is hard to explain to a non-scientist the sudden mental and emotional 'buzz' you get when you know you have had an important insight. It's as if you have had a lot of pieces of a jigsaw in your mind, and suddenly, in a few seconds, they all fall into place and the whole picture is clear.

Suddenly I recalled how many Chinese people were physically unable to tolerate milk, how the Chinese people I had worked with had always said that milk was only for babies, and how one of my close friends, who is of Chinese origin, always politely turned down the cheese course at dinner parties.

I knew of no Chinese people who lived a traditional Chinese life who ever used cow or other dairy food to feed their babies. The tradition was to use a wet nurse but never, ever, dairy products.

Culturally, the Chinese find our Western preoccupation with milk and milk products very strange. I remember entertaining a large delegation of Chinese scientists shortly after the ending of the Cultural Revolution in the 1980s.

On advice from the Foreign Office, we had asked the caterer to provide a pudding that contained a lot of ice cream. After inquiring what the pudding consisted of, all of the Chinese, including their interpreter, politely but firmly refused to eat it, and they could not be persuaded to change their minds.

At the time we were all delighted and ate extra portions!

Milk, I discovered, is one of the most common causes of food allergies .

Over 70% of the world's population are unable to digest the milk sugar, lactose, which has led nutritionists to believe that this is the normal condition for adults, not some sort of deficiency. Perhaps nature is trying to tell us that we are eating the wrong food.

Before I had breast cancer for the first time, I had eaten a lot of dairy produce, such as skimmed milk, low-fat cheese and yogurt. I had used it as my main source of protein. I also ate cheap but lean minced beef, which I now realized was probably often ground-up dairy cow.

In order to cope with the chemotherapy I received for my fifth case of cancer, I had been eating organic yogurts as a way of helping my digestive tract to recover and repopulate my gut with 'good' bacteria.

Recently, I discovered that way back in 1989 yogurt had been implicated in ovarian cancer. Dr Daniel Cramer of Harvard University studied hundreds of women with ovarian cancer, and had them record in detail what they normally ate. Wish I'd been made aware of his findings when he had first discovered them.

Following Peter's and my insight into the Chinese diet, I decided to give up not just yogurt but all dairy produce immediately. Cheese, butter, milk and yogurt and anything else that contained dairy produce - it went down the sink or in the rubbish.

It is surprising how many products, including commercial soups, biscuits and cakes, contain some form of dairy produce. Even many proprietary brands of margarine marketed as soya, sunflower or olive oil spreads can contain dairy produce
.
I therefore became an avid reader of the small print on food labels.

Up to this point, I had been steadfastly measuring the progress of my fifth cancerous lump with callipers and plotting the results. Despite all the encouraging comments and positive feedback from my doctors and nurses, my own precise observations told me the bitter truth.

My first chemotherapy sessions had produced no effect - the lump was still the same size.

Then I eliminated dairy products. Within days, the lump started to shrink
.
About two weeks after my second chemotherapy session and one week after giving up dairy produce, the lump in my neck started to itch. Then it began to soften and to reduce in size. The line on the graph, which had shown no change, was now pointing downwards as the tumour got smaller and smaller.

And, very significantly, I noted that instead of declining exponentially (a graceful curve) as cancer is meant to do, the tumour's decrease in size was plotted on a straight line heading off the bottom of the graph, indicating a cure, not suppression (or remission) of the tumour.

One Saturday afternoon after about six weeks of excluding all dairy produce from my diet, I practised an hour of meditation then felt for what was left of the lump. I couldn't find it. Yet I was very experienced at detecting cancerous lumps - I had discovered all five cancers on my own. I went downstairs and asked my husband to feel my neck. He could not find any trace of the lump either.

On the following Thursday I was due to be seen by my cancer specialist at Charing Cross Hospital in London . He examined me thoroughly, especially my neck where the tumour had been. He was initially bemused and then delighted as he said, "I cannot find it." None of my doctors, it appeared, had expected someone with my type and stage of cancer (which had clearly spread to the lymph system) to survive, let alone be so hale and hearty.

My specialist was as overjoyed as I was. When I first discussed my ideas with him he was understandably sceptical. But I understand that he now uses maps showing cancer mortality in China in his lectures, and recommends a non-dairy diet to his cancer patients.

I now believe that the link between dairy produce and breast cancer is similar to the link between smoking and lung cancer.

I believe that identifying the link between breast cancer and dairy produce, and then developing a diet specifically targeted at maintaining the health of my breast and hormone system, cured me.

It was difficult for me, as it may be for you, to accept that a substance as 'natural' as milk might have such ominous health implications. But I am a living proof that it works and, starting from tomorrow, I shall reveal the secrets of my revolutionary action plan.

Extracted from Your Life in Your Hands, by Professor Jane Plant

MAGNES
4th December 2010, 12:48 PM
All joking aside, I have read medical reports on the mechanics of why
women get cancer, one of the number one causes is bras, they restrict
the ability of the breast tissues to do their job. Search online for this.

As far as milk, milk I don't think is the problem, nobody got cancer
and many lived to old age in old european towns, like my families
old european home, milk was a staple and cheese, some of the
healthiest group of people I have ever seen, many old are still
alive.

The problem is the crap they put in cows, injections,
and turning them into machinery over producing.

DMac
4th December 2010, 12:55 PM
Magnes, you are close there, IMO. The underwire is the problem. Most bra underwire is made of a nickel alloy. Nickel is toxic to the human body and when it touches the skin it can make its way into the bloodstream. If it is close to a breast, it can enter the lymph nodes and wreak havok (cancer!)

TT,

Very interesting, thanks for the article. Not much dairy in China, hm.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
4th December 2010, 01:01 PM
As far as nickel goes, just touching it can causes rashes and sores, There was an article a while back where a school used 100% nickel rivets to put some desks together, kids started getting bolt shaped rashes on the back of their calves just from coming in contact with the nickel



Japanese women who include tofu as part of their regular diet do not get breast cancer. When those same women move to America and adopt a traiditonal fast food american diet, their cancer rates are comprable with American women.




It's your diet and your environment.

mrnhtbr2232
4th December 2010, 01:03 PM
My wife survived breast cancer. The culprit was estrogen therapy. Several in-depth medical studies in our area found an over-representation of women with breast cancer who used it because it counteracted the effects of menopause and kept them in their MILF zone postponing the ravages of time.

RJB
4th December 2010, 01:04 PM
The problem is the crap they put in cows, injections,
and turning them into machinery over producing.


That's the key. People have been eating dairy for centuries without breast cancer.

From my reading it's more of the ubiquitous nature of hormones-- particularly estrogens. It's fed to animals and we consume it in milk and meat. Soybeans are one of the worst foods ever. It's indigestable with out either natural fermentation (which is good in small amounts) or a nasty chemical process to get the Textured soy protien (TSP)-- very high in estrogens.

Xeno-estrogens are present in petroleum products, these leach from plastic bottles into drinking water.

Probably the worse is "the pill." Breast cancer was relatively unheard of until the 1960s. The main side affects (besides breast cancer) are irratability, loss of libido, and weight gain. Also there is estrogen therapy.

This "breast cancer awareness" is BS to make you aware of it so you think it's normal rather than to investigate how you are being poisoned.

MAGNES
4th December 2010, 01:04 PM
There is actually reports out there about bra tightness.

It interferes with the breasts ability to filter toxins.

That is what I was referring to.

I said " all joking aside " , how many Chinese have large breasts
or even wear bras ?

Nickel is another issue, many are allergic to it and break out.
Womens costume jewelry is poison.

bras cancer
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bras+cancer&aq=f&aqi=g1g-m1g-v4g-sv1g-v3&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=


What is the number one cause of feet problem, similar answer, shoes.
Shoes that do not fit right and cause big problems for people, including
back and knee problems.

DMac
4th December 2010, 01:17 PM
The problem is the crap they put in cows, injections,
and turning them into machinery over producing.


That's the key. People have been eating dairy for centuries without breast cancer.

From my reading it's more of the ubiquitous nature of hormones-- particularly estrogens. It's fed to animals and we consume it in milk and meat. Soybeans are one of the worst foods ever. It's indigestable with out either natural fermentation (which is good in small amounts) or a nasty chemical process to get the Textured soy protien (TSP)-- very high in estrogens.

Xeno-estrogens are present in petroleum products, these leach from plastic bottles into drinking water.

Probably the worse is "the pill." Breast cancer was relatively unheard of until the 1960s. The main side affects (besides breast cancer) are irratability, loss of libido, and weight gain. Also there is estrogen therapy.

This "breast cancer awareness" is BS to make you aware of it so you think it's normal rather than to investigate how you are being poisoned.


+1414.50 Excellent point RJB

lapis
4th December 2010, 01:33 PM
All joking aside, I have read medical reports on the mechanics of why
women get cancer, one of the number one causes is bras, they restrict
the ability of the breast tissues to do their job. Search online for this.

I've heard that, but nothing will convince me to give up wearing one! No jungle boobies for me, thanks.


As far as milk, milk I don't think is the problem, nobody got cancer and many lived to old age in old european towns, like my families
old european home, milk was a staple and cheese, some of the
healthiest group of people I have ever seen, many old are still
alive.

Not just Europeans, but the African Masai also have been healthy consuming (raw, grass-fed) milk.

Indians consider dairy foods sacred, and Ayurveda (ancient Indian medicine) recommends drinking it warm with the addition of warming herbs.

Mongolians, who live north of China also have traditionally consumed dairy from all sorts of animals (cows, goats, horses, etc.). Their diet was mainly high-fat dairy and meat, and they were considered a hardy people and the men extremely fierce warriors during Genghis Khan's time.


The problem is the crap they put in cows, injections,
and turning them into machinery over producing.

Yep, and the type of cows that are mostly used are the high-yielding type rather than the traditional kind that don't give much milk.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
4th December 2010, 01:41 PM
There is actually reports out there about bra tightness.

It interferes with the breasts ability to filter toxins.

That is what I was referring to.

I said " all joking aside " , how many Chinese have large breasts
or even wear bras ?

Nickel is another issue, many are allergic to it and break out.
Womens costume jewelry is poison.

bras cancer
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bras+cancer&aq=f&aqi=g1g-m1g-v4g-sv1g-v3&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=


What is the number one cause of feet problem, similar answer, shoes.
Shoes that do not fit right and cause big problems for people, including
back and knee problems.



Proper Lymph function is one of the most important things you can do for yourself

I know a woman who recently avoided surgury,

She could barely breath

She started getting acupressure done...accupressure (also known as "triggerpoint") is when the fingers are used to massage the acupuncture sites....but there's no piercing, only massage. The massage forces the lymph nodes to flush themselves and clean themselves...The gentle "in/out" pressure of the fingers creates a wave like motion in the lymph nodes that literally flushes them


This woman coughed up some 3" plugs out of her lungs, I have pictures, very gross

She can finally breath after a lifetime of not being able to...

From 60 minutes on a massage table...The surgury would have been to remove those plugs, instead she just coughed them up


Proper elimination is key, most people never allow their bodies to eliminate naturally...

There are only a few things you can't eliminate naturally, heavy metals, fluoride. For those more drastic measures are necessary

It's not the end all, be all solution but every little bit helps

lapis
4th December 2010, 01:48 PM
This "breast cancer awareness" is BS to make you aware of it so you think it's normal rather than to investigate how you are being poisoned.




+1414.50 Excellent point RJB


+1414.50? LOL. I was puzzled about that number while wondering why it sounded so familiar...until I looked at the top right of my screen.

But yeah, that is an excellent point, and the whole pink ribbon breast cancer "awareness" industry just lines the pockets of the medical industrial complex.

Cancer is a huge money-maker for them, so I take any mainstream sources of (dis)information about what to do to avoid cancer (like eliminating nutrient-dense foods like whole-fat milk) with a huge grain of salt, since the media outlets often are in the same bed with them.

lapis
4th December 2010, 02:00 PM
There are only a few things you can't eliminate naturally, heavy metals, fluoride. For those more drastic measures are necessary

Dr. Natasha Campbell McBride, author of Gut and Psychology Syndrome, thinks that healthy gut flora eliminate toxins like mercury:

"Dr. Campbell-McBride points to a study showing that rats treated with antibiotics succumb to mercury poisoning while those with untreated gut flora do not. She believes the same is true of humans and that, while the government warns against eating fish because of mercury and PCB contamination, a healthy gut should be able to tolerate the exposure and get the health benefits of eating fish."

http://www.examiner.com/nutrition-in-philadelphia/dr-campbell-mcbride-explains-mind-body-belly-connection-at-nutrition-conference

Book
4th December 2010, 02:23 PM
http://www.kimberlykaye.com/blog/pics/chinabfmom.jpg

It ain't dairy products. It is something very natural that Chinese women are exposed to that American women are not.

:oo-->

palani
4th December 2010, 02:29 PM
I would be pointing a finger in the direction of the PASTEURIZATION of the milk rather than the milk itself. Raw milk is A no. 1 !!!!!

Serpo
4th December 2010, 02:51 PM
Yes milk is a totally different beast now days.Cows are fed anti biotics,the milk is pasturised, and then homoginisied which creates something completely different from raw milk

.It has been shown that young calves brought up on this type of milk look very runty and under nourished.

lapis
4th December 2010, 02:58 PM
[image of breastfeeding]

It ain't dairy products. It is something very natural that Chinese women are exposed to that American women are not.

:oo-->


Oh yeah, that! How could I forget? I hope I'm protected, having nursed for four years despite wearing a bra (underwire at that).

Behind all the disingenuous "breast is best" admonitions, American women are also told that breastfeeding is hard, inconvenient, and formula is almost as good.

Serpo
4th December 2010, 03:58 PM
[image of breastfeeding]

It ain't dairy products. It is something very natural that Chinese women are exposed to that American women are not.

:oo-->


Oh yeah, that! How could I forget? I hope I'm protected, having nursed for four years despite wearing a bra (underwire at that).

Behind all the disingenuous "breast is best" admonitions, American women are also told that breastfeeding is hard, inconvenient, and formula is almost as good.



The formula is to try and destroy us all in what everway possible
Mothers milk is best of course

Shami-Amourae
4th December 2010, 04:44 PM
I'm sure if we gave the Chinese women yearly mamograms this would change...

(Hint: Mamograms cause cancer.)

FreeEnergy
4th December 2010, 07:12 PM
I am going to quote original article and call BS


Milk, I discovered, is one of the most common causes of food allergies .

NO IT ISN'T. Garbage chemical cocktail in milk is most common source of allergies.


Over 70% of the world's population are unable to digest the milk sugar, lactose, which has led nutritionists to believe that this is the normal condition for adults, not some sort of deficiency. Perhaps nature is trying to tell us that we are eating the wrong food.

NO THE ARE NOT. The actual figure of lactose intolerance is way, WAAAAAY below 10%. Unfortunately to this lady-moron, she got cured for the wrong reasons. If 70% of adults were lactose intolerant, we as human race would all be extinct now.


Before I had breast cancer for the first time, I had eaten a lot of dairy produce, such as skimmed milk, low-fat cheese and yogurt.

AHA, HERE COMES THE CULPRIT. SKIMMED MILK (garbage that old farmers won't even feed to their animals because it causes significant health problems). LOW-FAT CHEESE AND YOGURT (same issue). And now that we know these were "low fat", I can also add that it was clearly not organic farm whole milk, but rather the same GARBAGE PRODUCED BY FRANKENSTEIN LABS FULL OF CHEMICAL COCKTAILS, again.

I still can't believe american chain stores are full of these "reduced fat" and "non-fat" milk and yougurt products and nobody really alarms the sheeple. in fact when I am in one by accident I usually see over 80% shelfs filled with this intolerable, cancer-causing garbage. Normal organic whole milk and yogurt is hard to come buy these days, unless you shop "organic" stores (which means you pay triple).

See, it is easy when you read the fine print.

FreeEnergy
4th December 2010, 08:41 PM
http://www.bodyearth.net/milk/worth-a-closer-look-low-fat-milk/

http://agriculturesociety.wordpress.com/2008/02/29/fat-free-low-fat-and-non-fat-do-not-equal-health/

General of Darkness
4th December 2010, 08:54 PM
:dunno

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wEai2kFHwxo/SbQ-wcCeVBI/AAAAAAAAD-w/1g7QYDuSUeM/s400/boob-scarf-nsfw-ish-.jpg

Bigjon
5th December 2010, 04:11 AM
http://jacobsonchiropractic.net/the-raw-milk-controversy-full-version/


A video of an hour-long conversation with Mark McAfee (Organic Pastures Dairy in Fresno, California: www.organicpastures.com) and Dr. Dale Jacobson, DC www.jacobsonchiropractic.net with an introduction to the history of milk up to the War of 1812 when distillery dairies first appeared and milk quality fell.


The link to the movie is at the top of the page. A direct link is blocked.

JDRock
5th December 2010, 09:38 AM
...thanx for the article...but 1 thing that baffles me, is WHY our grandparents smoked, drank, NEVER exercised, ate beef and dairy...eggs..bacon and nearly ALL lived to a good old age, hell there was just an article about the guy who finally quit smoking....at 106 YEARS OLD!
ithink the difference is, the older generations did not have PLASTIC coming in contact with their food supply at the levels we see now. containers were glass and metal WITHOUT the plastic liner...
i dunno, but i cant think of any other major change in the food supply...we
know that 100% of plastics cause cancer, yet the healthfood industry is nearly MUTE in opposition!....oh, thats right, all their "healthfood" is plastic wrapped. :oo-->

Neuro
5th December 2010, 10:53 AM
Bras and Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) has proven themselves to be important causes of breast cancer. Pasteurized and low fat milk products are of course not healthy, and may contribute to evolvement of breast cancer, and many other health problems...

jaybone
5th December 2010, 11:47 AM
Fluoridation of drinking water is also specifically prohibited in China.

k-os
5th December 2010, 01:02 PM
...thanx for the article...but 1 thing that baffles me, is WHY our grandparents smoked, drank, NEVER exercised, ate beef and dairy...eggs..bacon and nearly ALL lived to a good old age, hell there was just an article about the guy who finally quit smoking....at 106 YEARS OLD!
ithink the difference is, the older generations did not have PLASTIC coming in contact with their food supply at the levels we see now. containers were glass and metal WITHOUT the plastic liner...
i dunno, but i cant think of any other major change in the food supply...we
know that 100% of plastics cause cancer, yet the healthfood industry is nearly MUTE in opposition!....oh, thats right, all their "healthfood" is plastic wrapped. :oo-->


I am with you on the plastics, but also microwaves, frankenfood, chemtrails, fluoride, chemicals in make-up . . . there are so many possibilities, because we are being poisoned from so many directions.

palani
5th December 2010, 01:08 PM
ithink the difference is, the older generations did not have PLASTIC coming in contact with their food supply at the levels we see now.

Transfats are one molecule away from being plastic. If you rely upon them for nutrition your body attempts to re-create cells using these plastic fats and major organs start failing. Most notable is the liver. Then if you do suddenly start attempt to feed your body properly the liver is not able to produce the bile to break down the fats to even repair itself. Sort of a catch-22 situation.

Glass
6th December 2010, 02:29 AM
I'm going to throw out the suggestion that commercial milk production is one of the most heavily hormonal-ized industries out there. The dairy cows are pumped so full of hormones to increase yeild that IMO it is dangerous. Cows on hormones can be forced to produce a substantial amount more milk than they normally would. I'm not going to throw out a number but it would be a lot. I also think it might be hard to find out how much of an increase because they have been doing it for so long now, its possible no one remembers how much is natural for a cow to produce. So I think it is the hormones

Been away travelling for a few days, first post since I got back!

k-os
6th December 2010, 09:55 AM
I'm going to throw out the suggestion that commercial milk production is one of the most heavily hormonal-ized industries out there. The dairy cows are pumped so full of hormones to increase yeild that IMO it is dangerous. Cows on hormones can be forced to produce a substantial amount more milk than they normally would. I'm not going to throw out a number but it would be a lot. I also think it might be hard to find out how much of an increase because they have been doing it for so long now, its possible no one remembers how much is natural for a cow to produce. So I think it is the hormones

Been away travelling for a few days, first post since I got back!


Welcome back, and I'll agree that frankencows could have a lot to do with breast cancer rates here in America.

DMac
6th December 2010, 10:20 AM
It seems to come from all angles. Plastics and modifications to the flora/fauna we consume are attacking us with more than just cancer. For example:

Are kids really reaching puberty faster? (http://www.nhpr.org/node/16680)

snip


In a 2007 report for the Breast Cancer Fund entitled “The Falling Age of Puberty in U.S. Girls: What We Know, What We Need to Know,” ecologist Sandra Steingraber argues that unfettered access to computers and TVs over the last 30 years has led to an increasingly sedentary lifestyle among kids in the U.S. and beyond. Active kids produce more melatonin, a natural hormone that serves as the body’s internal clock and calendar. This could explain why sedentary kids are likely to go through puberty sooner: Their bodies think their decreased melatonin production is a trigger to move into puberty. “[Melatonin is] an inhibitory signal for puberty,” says Steingraber. “The more melatonin you have, the later you go into puberty.”


Some researchers believe that the preponderance of synthetic chemicals in more developed societies are interfering with human endocrine development and essentially “tricking” kids’ bodies into going through puberty prematurely (Getty Images)

Mentally, physically and spiritually we are attacked.

Melatonin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melatonin)

In mammals, melatonin is secreted into the blood by the pineal gland in the brain.


>:(

JDRock
7th December 2010, 03:35 PM
^
I like your theory, but doesn't China also use plastic on their food? I have never been there so I have no idea.


How about green tea consumption?



not petroleum based they dont....