PDA

View Full Version : Madsen on RT: Wikileaks to publish UFO reports



DMac
7th December 2010, 07:56 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXJUZMMNUpY

This past weekend, the whistle blowing website WikiLeaks released thousands more confidential US State Department articles that could damage foreign relations. However, it seems as though Julian Assange has become too comfortable with the spotlight and is unwilling to give it up. With his pending Interpol investigation and rape charges, he will be in the spotlight for some time. Plus according to RT Contributor Wayne Madsen, Julian Assange plans to release hidden UFO reports.

Ares
7th December 2010, 09:26 AM
It get's even weirder. Check this out

Assange Accuser Worked with US-Funded, CIA-Tied Anti-Castro Group

http://my.firedoglake.com/kirkmurphy/2010/12/04/assanges-chief-accuser-has-her-own-history-with-us-funded-anti-castro-groups-one-of-which-has-cia-ties/#

PatColo
7th December 2010, 09:42 AM
Duff had some short commentary on this,

GORDON DUFF: WAYNE MADSEN ON WIKILEAKS AND UFO’S (VIDEO) (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/06/gordon-duff-wayne-madsen-on-wikileaks-and-ufos-video/)

pretty guarded language. Others like Ed Griffin and C.A.Fitts have written of their open mindedness re UFOs.

JohnQPublic
7th December 2010, 10:13 AM
I see a big opportunity to "leak" the truth about evil aliens here. Then the sheeple will bleat for more security.

Alien threat = Psyop and/or demonic operation

(the opprtunity could be Assange's "insurance" document, but I kind of doubt that, since many may not believe it).

Horn
7th December 2010, 10:18 AM
Somedays a post Apocalyptica world looks like a more appealing place to be.

DMac
7th December 2010, 10:18 AM
It get's even weirder. Check this out

Assange Accuser Worked with US-Funded, CIA-Tied Anti-Castro Group

http://my.firedoglake.com/kirkmurphy/2010/12/04/assanges-chief-accuser-has-her-own-history-with-us-funded-anti-castro-groups-one-of-which-has-cia-ties/#




Wow, great link, thanks.

Here is some more info solidifying the lacking integrity of WikiLeaks.

Zbigniew Brzezinski: Who is Really Leaking to Wikileaks? (http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2010/11/zbigniew-brzezinski-who-is-really.html)

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: It's not a question of worry. It's, rather, a question of whether WikiLeaks are being manipulated by interested parties that want to either complicate our relationship with other governments or want to undermine some governments, because some of these items that are being emphasized and have surfaced are very pointed.

And I wonder whether, in fact, there aren't some operations internationally, intelligence services, that are feeding stuff to WikiLeaks, because it is a unique opportunity to embarrass us, to embarrass our position, but also to undermine our relations with particular governments.

______________

Cui bono?

Awoke
7th December 2010, 11:56 AM
Pfft. Zbiggy. Have a nice sleep in hell for eternity, lucie.

DMac
7th December 2010, 12:52 PM
Webster Tarpley:

Julian Assange Is A CIA, MI6 Asset - WikiLeaks Is A Secret Operation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKkPUJf0nis

Tarpley also claims Assange is on Soros' payroll.

Is Assange a Soros and CIA asset? (http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2010/12/01/is-assange-a-soros-and-cia-asset/)

Knowing Webster Tarpley's past and his stubborn ignorance of Israel (http://www.theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=36617), I am not surprised at all that he calls Assange a CIA/MI6 asset.

Awoke
7th December 2010, 12:55 PM
Wikileaks popped up out of nowhere and has recieved massive mainstream media exposure. If that doesn't scream "Controlled information for the sheep", I don't know what does.

Do not let yourself be lead to play into the hands of the lucies. Leaderless resistance.

JohnQPublic
7th December 2010, 01:01 PM
...Knowing Webster Tarpley's past and his stubborn ignorance of Israel (http://www.theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=36617), I am not surprised at all that he calls Assange a CIA/MI6 asset.


He is a "LaRouche asset" (or at least closely allied). The Larouche organization are largely jewish, and they always blame the British for everything that most people blame the jews for!

learn2swim
7th December 2010, 01:04 PM
Wikileaks is a western intelligence op, no doubt. The media has been showering them with coverage from day one. They don't really release any big time secrets. This will probably be used as a reason to control the internet.

mrnhtbr2232
7th December 2010, 01:10 PM
.gov is having a hard time making anything they throw at the wall stick. I seem to recall not too long ago it was Pfc. Bradley Manning as their scapegoat. Now he's incognito in a Quantico jail. If you follow the story plot, the UFO documents would have also come from this guy if their game plan was solid. Instead we get Assange and his noodle strainer condom. Bottom line: Wikileaks is second fiddle only to 9/11 as the biggest fraud perpetrated in recent memory. It is patently false, a complete deception, and working perfectly for everyone except people smart enough to understand what's really going down.

DMac
7th December 2010, 01:17 PM
...Knowing Webster Tarpley's past and his stubborn ignorance of Israel (http://www.theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=36617), I am not surprised at all that he calls Assange a CIA/MI6 asset.


He is a "LaRouche asset" (or at least closely allied). The Larouche organization are largely jewish, and they always blame the British for everything that most people blame the jews for!



LaRouche got his fingers in Tarpley a long time ago. Tarpley seems to try hard to disavow the current link, but seems to have a hard time with it - he has been seen cavorting with confidants of LaDouche.


Webster G. Tarpley’s Toxic Waste is Polluting the Antiwar Movement (http://chipberlet.blogspot.com/2007/09/webster-g-tarpleys-toxic-waste-is.html)

Beware of Webster Tarpley's Disinformation (http://www.whale.to/b/webster_tarpley.html)

A Damp Squib: Webster Griffin Tarpley - Guy Fawkes Day Talk (http://paulstott.typepad.com/911cultwatch/2007/11/webster-griff-1.html)

"Ex"-Larouchie Webster Tarpley (http://www.laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Library.WTarpley)

Horn
7th December 2010, 03:33 PM
...Knowing Webster Tarpley's past and his stubborn ignorance of Israel (http://www.theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=36617), I am not surprised at all that he calls Assange a CIA/MI6 asset.


He is a "LaRouche asset" (or at least closely allied). The Larouche organization are largely jewish, and they always blame the British for everything that most people blame the jews for!


Let's just get one thing straight, There is also good reason for blaming the City of London as well.

Or any other of these "Western European Allies".

Oligarchy is their true aim, and on the back or side by side jews they run.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
7th December 2010, 05:21 PM
...Knowing Webster Tarpley's past and his stubborn ignorance of Israel (http://www.theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=36617), I am not surprised at all that he calls Assange a CIA/MI6 asset.


He is a "LaRouche asset" (or at least closely allied). The Larouche organization are largely jewish, and they always blame the British for everything that most people blame the jews for!


Let's just get one thing straight, There is also good reason for blaming the City of London as well.

Or any other of these "Western European Allies".

Oligarchy is their true aim, and on the back or side by side jews they run.






You get major points for implicating both parties, not just one or the other.

JohnQPublic
7th December 2010, 06:09 PM
...Knowing Webster Tarpley's past and his stubborn ignorance of Israel (http://www.theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=36617), I am not surprised at all that he calls Assange a CIA/MI6 asset.


He is a "LaRouche asset" (or at least closely allied). The Larouche organization are largely jewish, and they always blame the British for everything that most people blame the jews for!


Let's just get one thing straight, There is also good reason for blaming the City of London as well.

Or any other of these "Western European Allies".

Oligarchy is their true aim, and on the back or side by side jews they run.






There is truth in that statement. The jews were the bankers to the princes for centuries. And the Larouchians also do attack certain jewish groups (ADL, certain sects of masonry, etc.).

learn2swim
7th December 2010, 07:06 PM
Everything you wanted to know
about Wikileaks but didn't know to ask

Julian Assange

He's a guy with a vague history...

Who travels the world without visible means of support...

His parents: Members of an LSD "cult" that abused kids...

Hmmm...

He's not against war...

He hates the 9/11 truth movement...

He has no info about the Bush or Obama White House...or the Federal Reserve Bank...or Goldman Sachs (but he is helping take down Bank of America)...

His "leaks" paint Pakistan as a threat and foreign politicians the CIA doesn't like as jerks...

He believes Osama is alive...and probably in Pakistan...

Everything else he "leaks" is stuff we all already knew...

The mainstream media loves him...

The right wingers love to hate him and are using him as a justification to censor the Net...

If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck and smells like a duck...

Another intelligence agency spectacle.

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/988.html

gunDriller
8th December 2010, 04:59 AM
Webster Tarpley:

Julian Assange Is A CIA, MI6 Asset - WikiLeaks Is A Secret Operation


so, in other words, Tarpley & Assange are co-workers, sort of.

Tarpley has never said a word critical of Israel. same for Assange's leaks.

nice big charade they have going !

chad
8th December 2010, 05:01 AM
i don't understand all of this "wikileaks came out of nowhere" nonsense. they've been releasing stuff since 2006, which is 5 years (come jan 1st). they released info about asia and africa for years before they "came out of nowhere."

Awoke
8th December 2010, 05:23 AM
What I meant is that no-one had really heard of Wikileaks, and then all of a sudden everyone has heard of Wikileaks. It's a frothing household name now.

Suspicious to say the least.

chad
8th December 2010, 05:35 AM
What I meant is that no-one had really heard of Wikileaks, and then all of a sudden everyone has heard of Wikileaks. It's a frothing household name now.

Suspicious to say the least.


ok, got you then. i admit it is suspicious, especially this assange fellow.

he's the guy that really came out of nowhere. the site was originally founded by professors, dissidents, etc. then this nobody guy shows up to "run it." i would suspect he was trained by an intelligence agency and sent it in to co-opt it once it came on the radar screen. i remember reading a lot of their stuff years ago and it was more national geographic type reports, you could even edit them yourself if you had info. when assange showed up, it went in to lockdown mode, probably in 2007 or so. he is suspect.

DMac
8th December 2010, 06:22 AM
What I meant is that no-one had really heard of Wikileaks, and then all of a sudden everyone has heard of Wikileaks. It's a frothing household name now.

Suspicious to say the least.


ok, got you then. i admit it is suspicious, especially this assange fellow.

he's the guy that really came out of nowhere. the site was originally founded by professors, dissidents, etc. then this nobody guy shows up to "run it." i would suspect he was trained by an intelligence agency and sent it in to co-opt it once it came on the radar screen. i remember reading a lot of their stuff years ago and it was more national geographic type reports, you could even edit them yourself if you had info. when assange showed up, it went in to lockdown mode, probably in 2007 or so. he is suspect.


Are you familiar with John Young? He is the owner of the leaks site http://cryptome.org. I've been browsing that site for nearly 10 years. He was one of the original founders of WikiLeaks, with Assange, until Assange and he had a falling out. Here are some of the details:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20011106-281.html

snip

Who were the other Wikileaks founders?
Young: I'm not going to talk about those. I'll say Julian (Assange) was clearly there. I elected to conceal those names when I published these messages. And I think it's basically a violation of Cryptome's policy--to publish the names of people who do not want to be identified.

You had a falling-out with the other Wikileaks founders?
Young: Yes. But it was over this: someone said that the initial goal was $5 million. That caught my attention. One, because I think the type of stuff I was going to publish, you should never do it for money. Only because that contaminates the credibility and it turns it into a business opportunity where there's great treachery and lying going on.

And it will contaminate Wikileaks. It always does. In fact, that's the principal means by which noble endeavors are contaminated, the money trail. That's pretty obvious. I happen to think that amateur stuff is better than paid stuff.

How long were you involved before you resigned?
Young: Not long. A few weeks. It wasn't long. However, one of the things that happened is that somehow I got subscribed to that list under another nym and the messages kept coming in. I got to keep reading what they were saying about me after they booted me off. The messages kept coming in. So I published those too.

Did they criticize you for, well, leaking about Wikileaks?
Young: They certainly did. They accused me of being an old fart and jealous. And all these things that come up, that typically happen when someone doesn't like you. That's okay. I know you would never do that and journalists never do that, but ordinary people do this all the time.

DMac
8th December 2010, 07:34 AM
Australia says U.S, not WikiLeaks founder, responsible for leaks (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40561853)

Awoke
8th December 2010, 08:16 AM
Isn't assange a jew?

Horn
8th December 2010, 08:25 AM
Webster Tarpley:

Julian Assange Is A CIA, MI6 Asset - WikiLeaks Is A Secret Operation


so, in other words, Tarpley & Assange are co-workers, sort of.

Tarpley has never said a word critical of Israel. same for Assange's leaks.

nice big charade they have going !


The pundits & or politicians that touch on Israel briefly are just as suspect as those that have never said a word, if not more so.

I mean if they've seen the conspiracy, and had balls enough to speak of it once, how could it not be used in every other sentence?

Sometimes I have more faith in those that haven't put two & two together yet.

DMac
8th December 2010, 08:27 AM
Isn't assange a jew?


Does it even matter at this point? He's funded by Soros and in Netanyahu's good grace...