PDA

View Full Version : The Sick-Day Bounty Hunters



MNeagle
8th December 2010, 11:11 AM
As an alarming number of workers play hooky, corporations are clamping down -- and calling in the detectives.

Rick Raymond parked his black Kia SUV behind a row of trees and peered out at his target. It was 4 a.m. on a recent morning, and Raymond -- a seasoned private detective who has worked roughly 300 cases, from thieves to philandering spouses -- was closing in on a different sort of prey. Recently, Raymond has come to occupy a new and expanding niche in the surveillance universe. Corporations pay him to spy on workers who take "sick days" when they may not, in fact, be sick. Such suspicion has led Raymond to bowling alleys, pro football games, weddings, and even funerals. On this morning it has taken him to a field outside the home of an Orlando repairman whose employer is doubtful about his slow recovery from a car accident. Although Raymond tries to be impartial about his subjects, "80 to 85 percent of the time," he says, "there's definitely fraud happening."

Playing hooky without getting caught -- as immortalized in the cat-and-mouse skirmish between Ferris Bueller and Principal Rooney in "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" -- used to be an adolescent rite of passage. Now it has given rise to a thriving industry, with stern legal precedent to back it up. In 2008, Raybestos Products, a car parts manufacturer in Crawfordsville, Ind., hired an off-duty police officer to track an employee suspected of abusing her paid medical leave. When the employee, Diana Vail, was fired after the cop produced substantial evidence that she was exploiting her benefits, she sued Raybestos. In what became the landmark case for corporate snooping, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed her lawsuit. A panel of judges declared that while surveillance "may not be preferred employer behavior," it wasn't unlawful. According to Susan W. Kline, a partner at the Baker & Daniels law firm in Indianapolis, the case "encouraged [companies] to consider hiring their own private detectives." It also set a precedent, she says, that "reasonable suspicion" is sufficient justification for employer spying.

Such techniques have become permissible at a time when workers are more likely to play hooky. Kronos, a workforce productivity firm in Chelmsford, Mass., recently found that 57 percent of U.S. salaried employees take sick days when they're not really sick -- a nearly 20 percent increase from statistics gathered between 2006 and 2008. Taking such risks amid an economic meltdown, suggests Kronos Senior Director Joyce Maroney, has less to do with foolish confidence than a general lack of enthusiasm for work. "People are staying in jobs they don't like because of a fear that there won't be another job out there," she says. "With less job satisfaction, there's a greater propensity for sick-time abuse."

That's great news for the corporate surveillance business. Alliance Worldwide Investigative Group, a private investigation firm in Clifton Park, N.Y., with experience in corporate sleuthing, charges $75 per hour per investigator. And those hours add up. According to Alliance Chief Executive Officer and founder Mario Pecoraro Jr., successful surveillance requires establishing a pattern of activity that, he says, "can sometimes require multiple days, or even weeks."

Perhaps this is because workers have become increasingly inventive with their sick-day tomfoolery. This summer, Middletown (Pa.) schoolteacher Leslie Herneisey -- a three-time Teacher of the Year nominee -- was arrested and charged with lying to colleagues about having an inoperable brain tumor so she could take extended sick leave. In 2009 four firefighters in Haverhill, Mass., were suspended after a private investigator, hired by the mayor, caught them attending hockey games and engaging in other blatantly non-sick-day activities.

They are not alone in their ambition. Earlier this year, Raymond investigated an employee at a Florida health organization who called in sick with the flu for three days. As Raymond discovered, she was actually visiting the Universal Studios theme park. "On some of those roller coasters, they take your picture at a really sharp turn, and then you can buy it at a kiosk," Raymond recalls. "She went on three rides, and I bought all three of her pictures, which had the date at the bottom." When confronted with the evidence by her employers, Raymond says her first response was, "That's not me!" After they played Raymond's video of her volunteering at the theme park's animal show, her only defense was, "I don't even remember that!" She was fired.

While some employees may be less engaged in their jobs, many are increasingly interested in new and creative ways to get out of work. "It's all about technology these days," says Frank M. Ahearn, a New York-based equal opportunity "privacy consultant" who has helped employers "catch people who were supposed to be at work" and advised others on eluding their bosses. "If you understand how to use technology effectively, you can appear to be anywhere," he says. Ahearn once had a client who issued each of his employees a cellphone with a GPS tracking system. "He thought it was foolproof," Ahearn says. That was until the boss learned one employee had FedExed (NYSE: FDX - News) his phone to a hotel where he was supposed to be staying on a business trip. Instead, the worker opted for an exotic vacation. "It's a duel between bosses and their employees," Ahearn says. "Whoever has better technology usually wins."

One popular toy among the adult Ferris Bueller set is the SpoofCard. Sold on the Internet by Toms River (N.J.)-based TelTech Systems, a SpoofCard allows users to select any 10-digit number to appear on the phone of the person they're calling. When their customer calls in sick, the boss will see this number on the caller ID and assume the employee is at home in bed when he may actually be on line at the Matterhorn, or on the beach in Hawaii. Meir Cohen, president of TelTech Systems, insists SpoofCards don't pose any ethical dilemma. "We've had people misuse the technology occasionally for illegal purposes," he says, "but the majority of people use it to protect their privacy. If you have a boss that's prying into your personal life, this is a great tool."

Cohen also offers a chance to offset the SpoofCard with a new TelTech product, LiarCard, which uses voice analysis to determine if a caller is being dishonest. "We have companies that use the LiarCard for HR purposes," he says, "to find out if their employees are lying to them." Cohen doesn't mind selling a service to one customer that's designed to entrap another. "We want to help everyone," he says.

Cohen may have a point -- sometimes even corporate surveillance experts need watching. When he was working as a training director for a large detective firm, Rick Raymond once sent a rookie investigator and a seasoned veteran out on a routine job. Instead, the two opted to get drunk and watch football at a nearby Outback Steakhouse. Later that day, a secretary from Raymond's firm went to lunch at the same Outback and witnessed both detectives drinking beers and eating cheese fries. "They were there before she showed up," he says, "and they were still there, watching football and drinking beer, two hours later." When the pair submitted their surveillance logs for the week, both failed to mention their afternoon-long repast. Both were immediately fired.

As the sun rises over Orlando, Raymond's still sitting in his SUV, watching his repairman. He's now come to appreciate the employer-employee relationship. "I remember one worker who created an elaborate hoax to go on a cruise when he was supposed to be sick," Raymond says. "When he was shown the video surveillance I'd done, he actually said to his boss, 'I can't believe you'd be so sneaky.' The hypocrisy is amazing!" And it's great for business.

link (http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/111529/sick-day-bounty-hunters?mod=career-worklife_balance)

chad
8th December 2010, 11:15 AM
my wife has a policy:

if you are honest with her, she will let you use sick days for whatever, within reason.

if you lie to her and she finds out, you will get fired.

people need to differentiate between personal days and sick days. personal days are laid out in your contract. sick days are mandated the same for everyone in the company at a certain pay scale/job description, and the company pays for them. they're not personal vacation days.

DMac
8th December 2010, 11:16 AM
Scumbag PI going to get what's coming to him one of these days. Some shlep will call in sick, get photo'd being at the game, lose his job and end up killing the jerk.

Jerk's family will wonder, "why?!!!!"

:puke

k-os
8th December 2010, 11:28 AM
I don't have a problem with this at all. If an employee is abusing the benefits at work, the employer has every right to find out and replace that employee with someone that is more deserving of the job. It's nothing less than stealing. There are lots of unemployed people chomping at the bit right now, not to mention plenty of employers looking for reasons to let unproductive employees go. If someone is playing hooky during a depression like this, then they're obviously too stupid to have a job, or they hate their job so much that they truly need to be replaced.

Why anyone would think that their job is safe in a time like this, is beyond me. I am a contractor, and I fear every single day that the workload will slow or stop. I will do whatever I possibly can to make a deadline, just in the hopes that another project will come my way once this one is finished.

My word of advice to people who have jobs: You can dislike your job all of you want, but you had better appreciate it while you can.

DMac
8th December 2010, 11:43 AM
I don't have a problem with this at all. If an employee is abusing the benefits at work, the employer has every right to find out and replace that employee with someone that is more deserving of the job. It's nothing less than stealing. There are lots of unemployed people chomping at the bit right now, not to mention plenty of employers looking for reasons to let unproductive employees go. If someone is playing hooky during a depression like this, then they're obviously too stupid to have a job, or they hate their job so much that they truly need to be replaced.

Why anyone would think that their job is safe in a time like this, is beyond me. I am a contractor, and I fear every single day that the workload will slow or stop. I will do whatever I possibly can to make a deadline, just in the hopes that another project will come my way once this one is finished.

My word of advice to people who have jobs: You can dislike your job all of you want, but you had better appreciate it while you can.


I completely disagree with the first part in bold. The reality is likely closer to the scenario where an employee is overworked and uses a sick day to get the time off he or she was rejected when it was first requested.

The way I see it you are assuming the employers are benevolent. They are being robbed!!! :'( Oh those poor CEOs...

We've seen the recent posts on GSUS of how Federal employees are making an average of $20k more than private firm employees. Private enterprise is slowly but surely draining the life of the American worker -longer days, increased weekend work - it is the assault on the family, remember?

Your fear lies in being a contractor working in technology. You have zero security. As a fellow tech worker I learned by watching other admins go contract, thinking they hit it rich with the $100-200 hour pay, only to be broke and unemployed after a few years in their career.

Contractor work is another weapon being used against us (the workers). Less full time salary employees = more $$$ for the corporation. Defending the corporate monstrosity is a house slave mentality, IMO. Or rather Chinese factory laborer mentality.

k-os
8th December 2010, 11:55 AM
I don't have a problem with this at all. If an employee is abusing the benefits at work, the employer has every right to find out and replace that employee with someone that is more deserving of the job. It's nothing less than stealing. There are lots of unemployed people chomping at the bit right now, not to mention plenty of employers looking for reasons to let unproductive employees go. If someone is playing hooky during a depression like this, then they're obviously too stupid to have a job, or they hate their job so much that they truly need to be replaced.

Why anyone would think that their job is safe in a time like this, is beyond me. I am a contractor, and I fear every single day that the workload will slow or stop. I will do whatever I possibly can to make a deadline, just in the hopes that another project will come my way once this one is finished.

My word of advice to people who have jobs: You can dislike your job all of you want, but you had better appreciate it while you can.


I completely disagree with the first part in bold. The reality is likely closer to the scenario where an employee is overworked and uses a sick day to get the time off he or she was rejected when it was first requested.

The way I see it you are assuming the employers are benevolent. They are being robbed!!! :'( Oh those poor CEOs...

We've seen the recent posts on GSUS of how Federal employees are making an average of $20k more than private firm employees. Private enterprise is slowly but surely draining the life of the American worker -longer days, increased weekend work - it is the assault on the family, remember?

Your fear lies in being a contractor working in technology. You have zero security. As a fellow tech worker I learned by watching other admins go contract, thinking they hit it rich with the $100-200 hour pay, only to be broke and unemployed after a few years in their career.

Contractor work is another weapon being used against us (the workers). Less full time salary employees = more $$$ for the corporation. Defending the corporate monstrosity is a house slave mentality, IMO. Or rather Chinese factory laborer mentality.


I wasn't giving the corporations feelings one way or another. When you are an employee, you have rules. Sorry. Heck, I played hooky plenty of times . . . when there wasn't a fear of being fired.

I have zero security? True. But so does almost everyone else. That might be where my fear comes from for me, that's where my logic comes from for everyone.

All I am saying is that we live in harsh economic times, and people should do what they can to hold onto their jobs, if they want to keep their jobs.

Regarding the fat paycheck. After taxes, paid holidays, paid vacation, pension, sick days . . . I make exactly the same amount of money that I made as an employee. Actually less, because I had excellent health insurance where now I have none. The taxes are huge, and if you're not saving up for them, you will be hosed come tax time.

chad
8th December 2010, 11:57 AM
I don't have a problem with this at all. If an employee is abusing the benefits at work, the employer has every right to find out and replace that employee with someone that is more deserving of the job. It's nothing less than stealing. There are lots of unemployed people chomping at the bit right now, not to mention plenty of employers looking for reasons to let unproductive employees go. If someone is playing hooky during a depression like this, then they're obviously too stupid to have a job, or they hate their job so much that they truly need to be replaced.

Why anyone would think that their job is safe in a time like this, is beyond me. I am a contractor, and I fear every single day that the workload will slow or stop. I will do whatever I possibly can to make a deadline, just in the hopes that another project will come my way once this one is finished.

My word of advice to people who have jobs: You can dislike your job all of you want, but you had better appreciate it while you can.


I completely disagree with the first part in bold. The reality is likely closer to the scenario where an employee is overworked and uses a sick day to get the time off he or she was rejected when it was first requested.

The way I see it you are assuming the employers are benevolent. They are being robbed!!! :'( Oh those poor CEOs...

We've seen the recent posts on GSUS of how Federal employees are making an average of $20k more than private firm employees. Private enterprise is slowly but surely draining the life of the American worker -longer days, increased weekend work - it is the assault on the family, remember?

Your fear lies in being a contractor working in technology. You have zero security. As a fellow tech worker I learned by watching other admins go contract, thinking they hit it rich with the $100-200 hour pay, only to be broke and unemployed after a few years in their career.

Contractor work is another weapon being used against us (the workers). Less full time salary employees = more $$$ for the corporation. Defending the corporate monstrosity is a house slave mentality, IMO. Or rather Chinese factory laborer mentality.


yeah, but not ever company is att & t, verizon, etc. some of these places have 20 or 30 workers total. to them, this impacts their bottom line quite heavily.

i knew a guy who used to run a trucking outfit, 7 employees total. every time this one guy would "call in sick," he had to hire another guy to come in and do that guy's job for the day (fixing trucks). so then he had to pay the guy faking it plus another guy. it impacted him quite a bit.

he eventually found out the guy who was calling in sick was doing it on the days his new girlfriend had off and going to the casino, love shack, etc. i didn't feel bad for the guy who got fired.

Joe King
8th December 2010, 12:54 PM
Scumbag PI going to get what's coming to him one of these days. Some shlep will call in sick, get photo'd being at the game, lose his job and end up killing the jerk.

Jerk's family will wonder, "why?!!!!"
:puke


Ummm, because the shlep in question is psychotic?

If said schlep gets caught lying, there's no one to blame but the shlep.


Edited to add:


Private enterprise is slowly but surely draining the life of the American worker -longer days, increased weekend work - it is the assault on the family, remember?
Remember, private enterprise is a victim of monetary inflation too. Same as all of us are, and they're doing what they need to do in order to stay in business.

It's the same reason they "offshore".
Because no matter what you make, at some point material and/or labor will price you out of the market.

At some point, it all comes down to, do you want a job, or not?
...and if the companies aren't making $, the answer is automaticly "not".

DMac
8th December 2010, 01:03 PM
I don't have a problem with this at all. If an employee is abusing the benefits at work, the employer has every right to find out and replace that employee with someone that is more deserving of the job. It's nothing less than stealing. There are lots of unemployed people chomping at the bit right now, not to mention plenty of employers looking for reasons to let unproductive employees go. If someone is playing hooky during a depression like this, then they're obviously too stupid to have a job, or they hate their job so much that they truly need to be replaced.

Why anyone would think that their job is safe in a time like this, is beyond me. I am a contractor, and I fear every single day that the workload will slow or stop. I will do whatever I possibly can to make a deadline, just in the hopes that another project will come my way once this one is finished.

My word of advice to people who have jobs: You can dislike your job all of you want, but you had better appreciate it while you can.


I completely disagree with the first part in bold. The reality is likely closer to the scenario where an employee is overworked and uses a sick day to get the time off he or she was rejected when it was first requested.

The way I see it you are assuming the employers are benevolent. They are being robbed!!! :'( Oh those poor CEOs...

We've seen the recent posts on GSUS of how Federal employees are making an average of $20k more than private firm employees. Private enterprise is slowly but surely draining the life of the American worker -longer days, increased weekend work - it is the assault on the family, remember?

Your fear lies in being a contractor working in technology. You have zero security. As a fellow tech worker I learned by watching other admins go contract, thinking they hit it rich with the $100-200 hour pay, only to be broke and unemployed after a few years in their career.

Contractor work is another weapon being used against us (the workers). Less full time salary employees = more $$$ for the corporation. Defending the corporate monstrosity is a house slave mentality, IMO. Or rather Chinese factory laborer mentality.


yeah, but not ever company is att & t, verizon, etc. some of these places have 20 or 30 workers total. to them, this impacts their bottom line quite heavily.

i knew a guy who used to run a trucking outfit, 7 employees total. every time this one guy would "call in sick," he had to hire another guy to come in and do that guy's job for the day (fixing trucks). so then he had to pay the guy faking it plus another guy. it impacted him quite a bit.

he eventually found out the guy who was calling in sick was doing it on the days his new girlfriend had off and going to the casino, love shack, etc. i didn't feel bad for the guy who got fired.


I hear you regarding smaller businesses. The OP article mentioned corporations - "As an alarming number of workers play hooky, corporations are clamping down -- and calling in the detectives." - I can't imagine too many local shops hiring PI's to investigate their employees. I assumed this type of action was being taken by the mega-conglomerates.

Book
8th December 2010, 01:04 PM
http://www.gui.ie/uploads/STOCK_GOLFERS_WALKING.jpg

CEO of that same company with that same Surveillance Contractor "in a meeting" or "at a conference" or "out on a Marketing call".

:oo-->

milehi
8th December 2010, 01:26 PM
http://www.gui.ie/uploads/STOCK_GOLFERS_WALKING.jpg

CEO of that same company with that same Surveillance Contractor "in a meeting" or "at a conference" or "out on a Marketing call".

:oo-->


When you're the boss, you can do what you want. I'm the boss, and I spent the day snowboarding.

osoab
8th December 2010, 01:40 PM
What the hell is a sick day?

ShortJohnSilver
8th December 2010, 05:54 PM
My question is, how are the sick days accounted for, and why should you be effectively penalized for being healthy? I don't get it...

Ponce
8th December 2010, 07:16 PM
When I was running my own company I was paying by the piece work and they were making good money, two of them even bought a house and are still living in them.........I did find two workers who were taking piece work from the boxes of already finished a accounted for and were adding them to their to be paid boxes......they got fired.

k-os
8th December 2010, 07:56 PM
http://www.gui.ie/uploads/STOCK_GOLFERS_WALKING.jpg

CEO of that same company with that same Surveillance Contractor "in a meeting" or "at a conference" or "out on a Marketing call".

:oo-->


When you're the boss, you can do what you want. I'm the boss, and I spent the day snowboarding.


I am the boss, and I worked today. ;D Someone's gotta pay the vet bill!

Rebel Yarr
8th December 2010, 08:07 PM
As a fellow IT worker - I love contractors! They keep me employed! Corps use them to keep liabilities down. I don't blame them during times of uncertain futures. It goes in cycles. And...IT is a really sh*tty place to be in this economy.

I'd prefer contractors over outsourced services...

As far as taking sick days....shit you get a set number of days per year - as long as I am using those days - they have no reason to know why. What? I have to bring in a Dr note to work for taking an allotted sick day?

Book
8th December 2010, 08:09 PM
http://www.gui.ie/uploads/STOCK_GOLFERS_WALKING.jpg

CEO of that same company with that same Surveillance Contractor "in a meeting" or "at a conference" or "out on a Marketing call".

:oo-->


When you're the boss, you can do what you want. I'm the boss, and I spent the day snowboarding...



...yet go all menopausal if an employee takes a day off. There's a word for that...lol.

:)

k-os
8th December 2010, 08:19 PM
http://www.gui.ie/uploads/STOCK_GOLFERS_WALKING.jpg

CEO of that same company with that same Surveillance Contractor "in a meeting" or "at a conference" or "out on a Marketing call".

:oo-->


When you're the boss, you can do what you want. I'm the boss, and I spent the day snowboarding...



...yet go all menopausal if an employee takes a day off. There's a word for that...lol.

:)


Yep, the word is "boss". |--0--| If you don't like it, you should find another job.

zap
8th December 2010, 08:26 PM
Quote from Rebal Yarr (As far as taking sick days....sh*t you get a set number of days per year - as long as I am using those days - they have no reason to know why. What? I have to bring in a Dr note to work for taking an allotted sick day? )


Get sick on the weekends. :D

vacuum
8th December 2010, 08:27 PM
Serious question - what about mental health? Sometimes you need a day off...

I think its fine for people on salary, especially if they regularly put in more than 40 hours/week. Many times there is no loss to the company how something gets done, as long as it gets done.

Mouse
8th December 2010, 08:39 PM
I worked for a company that had great vacation and didn't even care about sick days. They worked you so hard you couldn't use the vacation days and it wouldn't matter if you used sick, personal or vacation days once you had your bank filled up with excess vacation hours. None of it mattered, because if you weren't productive enough, after eating shitloads of chargeable hours to stay in "budget" and zillions of hours prospecting, proposing and drumming up new work, you were going to go away. So the whole vacation/sick/personal days shit was a non-issue, since anyone could pretty much do whatever they wanted if the customers were happy and they were chargeable.

Next company gave you X many vacation days, and that was it. That was your sick bank, your vacation and your personal days. Do what you want with them, that's all you get. If you go over, they would dock pay. Worked pretty well, but then the folks lower in the totem pole got a week, some 2 weeks and only directors and above got 4 weeks. So everyone was sick and came to work all the time, and when their kids were sick, they had to use their vacation time to care for them. There was a damn fund where people who had days would give them to the pool and the people who were sick and out of meager vacation time could take from the pool. The biggest bullshit of this system was that most of the people in the company worked ass off and had less than 14 days total sick/vaca per year. You can't run a family like that very easily, as kids get sick a lot. And no vacation for you if you used your days to take care of kids. This company was fascist as all hell about a lot of things, but I think their policy was pretty good - just that everyone should have started out with at least three weeks.

There is not and should not be a "entitled" number of sick days. That's just a tax on the healthy. There should either be productivity goals and as long as you are producing, we don't care what time you put it into, or there should be a vacation/sick bank that is at least enough to get through the personal days. Otherwise, you are punching the clock and it's your pay every hour you miss, which also works. Entitled sick days are socialist bullshit.

On the other hand, our Euro friends, who are oh so happy get like, what 5-6 weeks of vacation, all kinds of benefits and healthcare? Works good until it doesn't.

If you are sick you should not be forced to bring the sickness to the office. If you abuse sickness, this will be pretty easy to trend. There has to be some flexibility. As a contractor I am not making much more hourly bump than these dicks chasing sick people, maybe I should try to do that in between projects.

It's a flippin disaster we are living in no matter which way you look at it.

SilverMagnet
8th December 2010, 08:41 PM
In my previous job with a major retailer in which I worked Sundays, I used to get sick on at least every other Sunday. The hangovers from Saturday night were just too much to contend with. 8)

hoarder
9th December 2010, 05:32 AM
If I was a Jewish CEO of some large corporation, I'd make sick leave contingent on getting a written "doctor's excuse". That way the goyim would be discouraged from using an alternative remedy and go directly to the pharmaceutical salesmen for their "written excuse" and get a prescription to some toxic poison in the process.

brosil
9th December 2010, 06:15 AM
Our company has comprehensive leave, a combination of sick leave and vacation. There's also a disability leave which requires a doctor's letter. Basically, if you want time off and the comp leave is available, you can take the time off. If there's no emergencies or scheduled work, you can take a mental health day when you need it. It's one of the reasons I keep working here. It means a lot to me.

brosil
9th December 2010, 06:16 AM
Our company has comprehensive leave, a combination of sick leave and vacation. There's also a disability leave which requires a doctor's letter. Basically, if you want time off and the comp leave is available, you can take the time off. If there's no emergencies or scheduled work, you can take a mental health day when you need it. It's one of the reasons I keep working here. It means a lot to me.