PDA

View Full Version : While you were griping about German Castrations... The Senate PASSED



osoab
20th December 2010, 04:37 PM
THE FOOD SAFETY BILL


UNANIMOUSLY!!!!!


In Sunday-evening surprise, Senate passes food-safety legislation (http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/food-safety/134447-in-sunday-evening-surprise-senate-passes-food-safety-bill-by-unanimous-consent)


In Sunday-evening surprise, Senate passes food-safety legislation
By Alexander Bolton - 12/19/10 07:55 PM ET

The Senate unexpectedly approved food-safety legislation by voice vote Sunday evening, rescuing a bill that floated in limbo for weeks because of a clerical error.

The Senate passed the Food Safety and Modernization Act on Nov. 30 by a vote of 73-25. But the bill was later invalidated by a technical objection because it was a revenue-raising measure that did not originate in the House — Senate staff had failed to substitute the food-safety language into a House-originated bill.

A coalition of groups supporting the bill sent a letter Sunday to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) calling for action on food safety.

“Our organizations are writing to support attaching S. 510, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, to the Senate's proposed short-term continuing resolution,” the groups wrote. “Strong food-safety legislation will reduce the risk of contamination and provide FDA with the resources and authorities the agency needs to help make prevention the focus of our food safety strategies.”

The American Public Health Association, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union and other groups signed the letter.

Democrats first attempted to attach the food-safety bill to a short-term spending measure, but Republicans balked because they wanted to keep that measure clean, according to Senate aides.

Republicans, however, later agreed to pass it by voice vote.

Reid announced he would send the legislation — this time properly attached to a House-originated measure — back to the lower chamber for final approval.

“Our food safety system has not been updated in almost a century. Families in Nevada and across America should never have to worry about whether the food they put on their table is safe," Reid said in a statement. "This is a common-sense issue with broad bipartisan support.

"Tonight we unanimously passed a measure to improve on our current food safety system by giving the FDA the resources it needs to keep up with advances in food production and marketing, without unduly burdening farmers and food producers,” he said.

The legislation is a high priority for Reid and Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa).

Reid’s staff earlier in the day had told a coalition of groups supporting the legislation that it had a chance of passing, but the prospects appeared to dim as Sunday wore on. The swift approval by unanimous consent caught some aides and lobbyists working on it by surprise.

Sen. Tom Coburn, the outspoken conservative Republican from Oklahoma, had been blocking the legislation, and lifted his objection at the final moment.

osoab
20th December 2010, 04:40 PM
Senators Bribed to Support S.510 – Food Safety Modernization Act (http://statesmansentinel.com/senators-bribed-support-food-safety-modernization-act)


November 28, 2010
By John W. Wallace
Liberty News Online

The following is a list of U.S Senators and the Bribes (I mean campaign contributions) that these Senators received from Special Interest Groups to either support or oppose S.510 – The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act. Money received by elected officials from Special Interest groups to vote a certain way on a bill or bills is nothing less than Bribery. I have listed the names of the Senators, the Party and State, and the amount of Special Interest Bribes (I mean campaign contributions) that they received thus far:


Name of Senator – Party & State – Bribe For S.510 or Bribe Against S.510

Daniel Akaka – D HI – Bribe For: $27,690 – Against: $700

Lamar Alexander – R TN – Bribe For: $190,421 – Against: $4,850

John Barrasso – R WY – Bribe For: $31,350 – Against: $27,500

Max Baucus – D MT – Bribe for: $123,803 – Against: $55,980

Evan Bayh – D IN – Bribe For: $45,200 – Against: 8,250

Mark Begich – D AK – Bribe For: $23,050 – Against: $2,000

Michael Bennet – D CO – Bribe For: $38,509 – Against: $22,050

Robert Bennett – R UT – Bribe For: $105,530 – Against: $10,000

Jeff Bingaman – D NM – Bribe For: $31,498 – Against: $8,450

Christopher Bond – R MO – Bribe For: $49,550 – Against: $5,200

Barbara Boxer – D CA – Bribe For: $120,000 – Against: $13,650

Sherrod Brown – D OH – Bribe For: $57,800 – Against: $6,600

Samuel Brownback – R KS – Bribe For: $20,950 – Against: $13,500

Jim Bunning – R KY – Brobe For: $20,700 – Against: $2,000

Richard Burr – R NC – Bribe For: $328,086 – Against: $32,292

Roland Burris – D IL – Bribe For: $0 – Against: $0

Maria Cantwell – D WA – Bribe For: $93,541 – Against: $2,750

Benjamin Cardin – D MD – Bribe For: $72,200 – Against: $0

Thomas Carper – D DE – Bribe For: $83,150 – Against: $0

Robert Casey – D PA – Bribe For: $80,576 – Against: $4,600

Saxby Chambliss – R GA – Bribe For: $557,694 – Against: $108,041

Thomas Coburn R OK – Bribe For: $64,400 – Against: $14,200

Thad Cochran – R MS – Bribe For: $50,144 – Against: $22,000

Susan Collins – R ME – Bribe For: $157,438 – Against: $7,800

Kent Conrad – D ND – Bribe For: $41,650 – Against: $29,612

Bob Corker – R TN – Bribe For: $298,639 – Against: $8,850

John Cornyn – R TX – Bribe For: $286,648 – Against: $254,730

Michael Crapo – R ID – Bribe For: $64,199 – Against: $14,350

Jim DeMint – R SC – Bribe For: $149,935 – Against: $5,000

Christopher Dodd – D CT – Bribe For: $36,400 – Against: $4,500

Byron Dorgan – D ND – Bribe For: $28,200 – Against: $6,000

Richard Durbin – D IL – Bribe For: $151,050 – Against: $19,000

John Ensign – R NV – Bribe For: $76,297 – Against: $10,500

Michael Enzi – R WY – Bribe For: $87,394 – Against: $21,450

Russell Feingold – D WI – Bribe For: $53,854 – Against: $2,200

Dianne Feinstein – D CA – Bribe For: $168,189 – Against: 25,314

Kirsten Gillibrand – D NY – Bribe For: $98,210 – Against: $10,650

Lindsey Graham – R SC – Bribe For: $101,272 – Against: $5,700

Charles Grassley – R IA – Bribe For: $112,150 – Against: $25,500

Judd Gregg – R NH – Bribe For: $26,000 – Against: $0

Kay Hagan – D NC – Bribe For: $36,250 – Against: $3,500

Thomas Harkin – D IA – Bribe For: $138,135 – Against: $40,600

Orrin Hatch – R UT – Bribe For: $102,215 – Against: $11,600
(See comment received from Senator Hatch’s Office below)

Kay Hutchison – R TX – Bribe For: $127,811 – Against: $103,386

James Inhofe – R OK – Bribe For: $66,744 – Against: $36,430

Daniel Inouye – D HI – Bribe For: $26,350 – Against: $11,200

John Isakson – R GA – Bribe For: $280,995 – Against: $10,100

Mike Johanns – R NE – Bribe For: $159,259 – Against: $59,785

Tim Johnson – D SD – Bribe For: $26,850 – Against: $15,000

Edward Kaufman – D DE – Bribe For: $0 – Against: $0

John Kerry – D MA – Bribe For: $14,406 – Against: $250

Amy Klobuchar – D MN – Bribe For: $149,778 – Against: $16,250

Herbert Kohl – D WI – Bribe For: $300 – Against: $0

Jon Kyl – R AZ – Bribe For: $363,660 – Against: $58,906

Mary Landrieu – D LA – Bribe For: $73,622 – Against: $2,250

Frank Lautenberg – D NJ – Bribe For: $37,883 – Agqinst: $3,550

Patrick Leahy – D VT – Bribe For: $13,800 – Against: $2,750

Carl Levin – D MI – Bribe For: $49,900 – Against: $2,000

Joseph Lieberman – I CT – Bribe For: $121,075 – Against: $0

Blanche Lincoln – D AR – Bribe For: $347,526 – Against: $125,297

Richard Lugar – R IN – Bribe For: $153,579 – Against: $21,000

John McCain – R AZ – Bribe For: $118,070 – Against: $21,525

Claire McCaskill – D MO – Bribe For: $48,950 – Against: $7,650

Mitch McConnell – R KY – Bribe For: $439,593 – Against: $42,244

Robert Menιndez – D NJ – Bribe For: $183,850 – Against: $250

Jeff Merkley – D OR – Bribe For: $27,350 – Against; $3,300

Barbara Mikulski – D MD – Bribe For: $52,165 – Against: $1,000

Lisa Murkowski – R AK – Bribe For: $164,713 – Against: $5,800

Patty Murray – D WA – Bribe For: $136,500 – Against: $3,150

Ben Nelson – D NE – Bribe For: $254,906 – Against: $44,950

Bill Nelson – D FL – Bribe For: $205,471 – Against: $35,748

Mark Pryor – D AR – Bribe For: $115,550 – Against: $16,565

John Reed – D RI – Bribe For: $29,350 – Against: $0

Harry Reid – D NV – Bribe For: $133,985 – Against: $10,000

James Risch – R ID – Bribe For: $56,750 – Against; $36,050

Pat Roberts – R KS – Bribe For: $167,294 – Against: $65,186

John Rockefeller – D WV – Bribe For: $21,250 – Against: $1,000

Bernard Sanders – I VT – Bribe For: $7,800 – Against: $4,200

Charles Schumer – D NY – Bribe For: $175,185 – Against: $14,200

Jefferson Sessions – R AL – Bribe For: $65,303 – Against: $16,800

Jeanne Shaheen – D NH – Bribe For: $17,090 – Against: $7,300

Richard Shelby – R AL – Bribe For: $73,616 – Against: $10,000

Olympia Snowe – R ME – Bribe For: $78,136 – Against: $2,000

Arlen Specter – D PA – Bribe For: $209,124 – Against: $9,400

Debbie Ann Stabenow – D MI – Bribe For: $84,941 – Against: $14,482

Jon Tester – D MT – Bribe For: $21,250 – Against: $61,550

John Thune – R SD – Bribe For: $218,900 – Against: $55,625

Mark Udall – D CO – Bribe For: $34,435 – Against: $45,050

Tom Udall – D NM – Bribe For: $27,102 – Against: $51,900

David Vitter – R LA – Bribe For: $188,225 – Against: $8,500

George Voinovich – R OH – Bribe For: $103,850 – Against: $185

Mark Warner – D VA – Bribe For: $116,450 – Against: $8,600

Jim Webb – D VA – Bribe For: $25,300 – Against: $7,700

Sheldon Whitehouse- D RI – Bribe For: $27,025 – Against: $1,500

Roger Wicker – R MS – Bribe For: $147,650 – Against: $16,250

Ron Wyden – D OR – Bribe For: $58,700 – Against: $4,900


Here’s a list of the Special Interest Groups that support S.510 and how much they bribed (I mean donated) to Senators:

Restaurants & drinking establishments $3,217,767
Food and kindred products manufacturing $1,753,503
Milk & dairy producers $1,717,687
Food stores $1,473,532
Beverages (non-alcoholic) $744,551
Vegetables, fruits and tree nut $709,238
American Veterinarian Medical Association $551,750
Beverage bottling & distribution $289,725
Food wholesalers $284,900
Food & Beverage Products and Services $281,137
Fishing $277,984
Chambers of commerce $219,234
Manufacturing $207,740
Food catering & food services $171,835
Confectionery processors & manufacturers $96,438
Consumer groups $6,100
Farm bureaus $0

Here’s a list of Here’s a list of the Special Interest Groups that sopposed S.510 and how much they bribed (I mean donated) to Senators:

Milk & dairy producers $1,717,687
Livestock $1,561,207
Farm organizations & cooperatives $412,976
Consumer groups $6,100
Farmers, crop unspecified $0

Horn
20th December 2010, 05:14 PM
This is that fine line where Capitalism crosses over to Oligarch Feudalism.

For some reason they're just too afraid to make public notice that productive farms & land will only be assigned to the nobles by the King's Court.

osoab
20th December 2010, 05:25 PM
This is that fine line where Capitalism crosses over to Oligarch Feudalism.

For some reason they're just too afraid to make public notice that productive farms & land will only be assigned to the nobles by the King's Court.


I am waiting for the water resources act, where they lay claim to the water in mud puddles at the federal level.
That will be the nail in the coffin. I also don't know if this was passed with the amendment that added the income level requirements.

As far as farms, within about 15-20 years tops, most of the handed down family farms will be gone.
Who could afford the estate taxes?

I think the only thing they are afraid of is doing too much at once. Even that can be overcome by enough distractions.
If I have to hear about the damn field conditions for MFN one more time, I think I may stop listening to all MSM.
The only reason I haven't yet is to listen to what the sheep are being fed.

Ponce
20th December 2010, 05:44 PM
osoab?.......you won't have to wait for "water in mud puddles" because they are going to tax you for the water falling in your property and not getting to where they can control it and sell it back to you.

osoab
20th December 2010, 05:48 PM
osoab?.......you won't have to wait for "water in mud puddles" because they are going to tax you for the water falling in your property and not getting to where they can control it and sell it back to you.


No, Ponce. They want to lay claim/ownership of all water, including the water in your WELL and mud puddles.

midnight rambler
20th December 2010, 05:55 PM
What a bunch of whores. Streetwalkers have more honor.

I thought this still had to pass the House.

hoarder
20th December 2010, 06:05 PM
I know the Food safety Act will be good for America because all the Jews in Congress voted for it.

osoab
20th December 2010, 06:06 PM
What a bunch of whores. Streetwalkers have more honor.

I thought this still had to pass the House.


In the article it says that they attached the bill to House sponsored legislation.
The legislation is heading back to the House for approval.

I read this yesterday. I swear the original piece said that it was tied to the legislation to allow .gov to continue at 2010 levels. I cannot currently find anything to support this.

However, I did find this.

http://www.naturalnews.com/030789_Food_Safety_small_farmers.html


(NaturalNews) The infamous S.510 "food food safety bill" was passed by the US Senate last night in a sneaky, last minute voice vote. All Senators voted for it, Republicans and Democrats alike. Not a single U.S. Senator -- not even Coburn -- objected to its passage.

With this vote, the US Senate now sends the bill back to the House of Representatives where it is due for a final vote as HR 2751 that would then send the bill to the White House for a presidential signature. This House vote could take place as early as tomorrow (Tuesday).


and

S.510 now HR 2751: Tell Reps to Vote NO on Food Safety Modernization Act (http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2010/12/20/s-510-now-hr-2751-tell-reps-to-vote-no-on-food-safety-modernization-act/)


On December 19, the Senate passed the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA, formerly S.510) as an amendment to H.R. 2751.

The House had previously passed FSMA as an amendment to a spending bill, H.R. 3082; Senate Democrats were not successful in advancing this version of H.R. 3082 and a subsequent amended version of 3082 which still included FSMA failed as well.

By unanimous consent without a recorded vote, the Senate passed FSMA after substituting its language in H.R. 2751, one of the “Cash for Clunkers” bills originating in the House in 2009; H.R. 2751 was sent back to the House where it could be voted on as early as Tuesday.

This is the last chance to defeat the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. People need to contact their Representatives now!

osoab
20th December 2010, 06:14 PM
I know the Food safety Act will be good for America because all the Jews in Congress voted for it.


Zionists. Dick Durbin isn't a jew.

osoab
20th December 2010, 06:52 PM
I would have changed the title by now, but there is still a fervent discussion of a 17 year old's relations with a 57 year old.

Distractions, Distractions.

midnight rambler
20th December 2010, 07:31 PM
I would have changed the title by now, but there is still a fervent discussion of a 17 year old's relations with a 57 year old.

Distractions, Distractions.


Between that and some hosing up their heads playing Satanic video games of death and destruction (aka "fruitless deeds of darkness") there's little time available for much of anything else.

Horn
20th December 2010, 07:41 PM
Zionists. Dick Durbin isn't a jew.


He wears a turban, Dick Durbin.

http://www.theodoresworld.net/pics/0906/richard_Durbin.jpg

osoab
20th December 2010, 07:42 PM
Zionists. Dick Durbin isn't a jew.


He wears a turban, Dick Durbin.

http://www.theodoresworld.net/pics/0906/richard_Durbin.jpg




If the price was right, I'm sure Dick would vote for it.
He is just a humble man of the people ya know.

mick silver
20th December 2010, 07:46 PM
the pig men just keeps making money on the side .... payday for there votes . i pray that in my life time they men are bought to trail for there crimes

Cobalt
20th December 2010, 08:02 PM
So they pass a bill on a Sunday night and then come Monday they release a terror threat about food poisoning :oo-->

Looks like food control was just handed over to Homeland Security in a nice tidy package.


If homeland Security now owns my garden they better get their selves over here and start weeding because I'm not doing it for them :-\

Bullion_Bob
20th December 2010, 08:39 PM
yeah...that's all good...but some stranger was castrated.

:o

mike88
20th December 2010, 08:49 PM
Got the stock "glad you contacted me on this vital issue" reply from one of the two wa. state senators so far. Cost was @ 200k for those two. When they start turning 50.00 tricks, I will be able to influence me some legiislation. On a similar note, the gov of New York State was convicted of accepting bribes in the form of World Series Tickets. How can a blind guy even see the game? wtf?

Awoke
20th December 2010, 11:13 PM
Simple non-compliance is all you need here.

Buddha
20th December 2010, 11:57 PM
Meanwhile, at the after party

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO9AIUaSxEA

Book
21st December 2010, 12:13 AM
Meanwhile, at the after party



Hilarious!

:D

Horn
21st December 2010, 05:06 PM
Al Qaeda threat involving hotels buffets 'credible,' report says



According to a Monday CBS report receiving much attention today, al Qaeda terrorists have talked about poisoning salad bars and hotel buffets at various U.S. hotels and restaurants over a single weekend. Department of Homeland Security officials have deemed the threat as a "credible" one.

While the report says that hotel industry security officials have been briefed about the potential threat, Joe McInerney, who runs the industry's chief association in Washington D.C. - said that federal officials say that "there is nothing specific" in terms of a potential threat against hotels so the industry isn't immediately worried although it is taking action.

http://travel.usatoday.com/hotels/post/2010/12/terror-threat-involves-hotels-and-restaurant-buffets/135823/1

osoab
21st December 2010, 05:09 PM
Al Qaeda threat involving hotels buffets 'credible,' report says



According to a Monday CBS report receiving much attention today, al Qaeda terrorists have talked about poisoning salad bars and hotel buffets at various U.S. hotels and restaurants over a single weekend. Department of Homeland Security officials have deemed the threat as a "credible" one.

While the report says that hotel industry security officials have been briefed about the potential threat, Joe McInerney, who runs the industry's chief association in Washington D.C. - said that federal officials say that "there is nothing specific" in terms of a potential threat against hotels so the industry isn't immediately worried although it is taking action.

http://travel.usatoday.com/hotels/post/2010/12/terror-threat-involves-hotels-and-restaurant-buffets/135823/1


So, what hotel chain is on the .gov $#*t List?