gunDriller
26th December 2010, 06:50 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/26/us/26spill.html
it's a long 12 page article (maybe they make you click more so they can shove more ads in your face ?).
it does a good job of describing the chaos on the deck.
but i'm not sure if the article has an agenda (to deflect criticism of BP and the drilling subcontractor by making it sound like it was "just a terrible accident".)
based on the eyewitness accounts of crew members, we know that safety protocols were deliberately ignorred in the weeks before the disaster, and that insiders (Goldman Sachs) may have caught wind of this and sold BP short.
it's a long 12 page article (maybe they make you click more so they can shove more ads in your face ?).
it does a good job of describing the chaos on the deck.
but i'm not sure if the article has an agenda (to deflect criticism of BP and the drilling subcontractor by making it sound like it was "just a terrible accident".)
based on the eyewitness accounts of crew members, we know that safety protocols were deliberately ignorred in the weeks before the disaster, and that insiders (Goldman Sachs) may have caught wind of this and sold BP short.