Elton John, Husband Welcome New Son

[Book]

http://www.mtv.com/shared/promoimages/bands/j/john_elton/with_husband/281x211.jpg

Elton John, Husband Welcome New Son

Elton John must have been really nice this past year. The legendary singer and songwriter and his husband welcomed a new child into their lives on Christmas Day.

The "Benny and the Jets" singer and filmmaker David Furnish are the parents to a 7-pound, 15-ounce boy named Zachary Jackson Levon Furnish-John. The baby was delivered through an unidentified surrogate mother.

The child is the first for John, 63. Us Weekly confirmed the adoption on Monday.

In a joint statement, the pair said of the adoption: "Zachary is healthy and doing well. [We are] overwhelmed with happiness and joy at this very special moment."

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1654959/20101228/john_elton.jhtml

[General of Darkness]

That's fucking disgusting.

[learn2swim]

A freaking degenerate society, no doubt. :-\

[joe_momma]

Not certain that having a child at 63 is remotely good for the child.

On the other hand, when Sir Elton dies, the kid will be set for life!

[Spectrism]

In the good ole days, this would be ridiculed.

In my world, if a pair of gays wanted children, I would have them both locked in a cell for 9 months and let them produce their own. This "surrogate" crap would be illegal.

[Olmstein]

Headline should read "Elton John buys an infant"

[Hillbilly]

:puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke :puke

[Santa]

Headline should read "Elton John buys an infant"


Exactly.

That photo of John is very disturbing.

[mick silver]

it look like he put his junk stuff in a jar an pay a woman to have his baby

[Libertarian_Guard]

it look like he put his junk stuff in a jar an pay a woman to have his baby


In the past, Sir Elton was better know to have 'put it in the can' - - but whatever works best will do.

[midnight rambler]

The only reason I clicked on this thread is to pose the questions: Don't you have better things to do with your time Book than be concerned about some media nonsense spew? And why take up bandwidth posting it? What benefit is there for GSUS readers in this matter? Is calling attention to this nonsense improving our lot, or dragging us down?

Thanks for the exposure, we'd be lost without your valued input on matters so crucial to our survival. :sarc:

[DMac]

Someone's got to keep GSUS users in the loop with pop culture.

[Ares]

Who's Elton John?

[midnight rambler]

Someone's got to keep GSUS users in the loop with pop culture.


Why? What difference does it make 'being in the loop' with respect to such nonsense? How does 'being in the loop' with such nonsense improve and enrich our lives?

Dunno about you, but I prefer knowing less about fudgepackers, not more. Perhaps if we paid less attention to them they would drop from sight.

God help us.

[joe_momma]

Who's Elton John?


I think he was in the Beatles, Black Sabbath, or the Eagles - you know, one of those old bands the baby-boomers keep going on about.....

[DMac]

Someone's got to keep GSUS users in the loop with pop culture.


Why? What difference does it make 'being in the loop' with respect to such nonsense? How does 'being in the loop' with such nonsense improve and enrich our lives?

Dunno about you, but I prefer knowing less about fudgepackers, not more. Perhaps if we paid less attention to them they would drop from sight.

God help us.


Next time I'll add the ;) smiley and :sarc: tag to avoid confusion..

[MNeagle]

oh lighten up. It's a slow news week. There have been far more ______ subjects discussed here.

[Libertarian_Guard]

Who's Elton John?


I think he was in the Beatles, Black Sabbath, or the Eagles - you know, one of those old bands the baby-boomers keep going on about.....


Shame on you!

[Santa]

Who's Elton John?


I think he was in the Beatles, Black Sabbath, or the Eagles - you know, one of those old bands the baby-boomers keep going on about.....


THAT's AGEIST!!! :boohoo

[Spectrism]

ELTON JOHN- isn't that a toilet for old people?

[RJB]

Don't you have better things to do with your time Book than be concerned about some media nonsense spew? And why take up bandwidth posting it? What benefit is there for GSUS readers in this matter? Is calling attention to this nonsense improving our lot, or dragging us down?

Thanks for the exposure, we'd be lost without your valued input on matters so crucial to our survival. :sarc:

I know. I had just figured out a way to bring down the FED and return to metal money. If I would have put my plan into action, Gold would be the standard within a day. I was just about to bring this utopia upon us, but then I clicked on this thread and completely lost my train of thought. Sorry guys, I dropped the ball...

[Book]

Don't you have better things to do with your time Book than be concerned about some media nonsense spew? And why take up bandwidth posting it? What benefit is there for GSUS readers in this matter? Is calling attention to this nonsense improving our lot, or dragging us down? Thanks for the exposure, we'd be lost without your valued input on matters so crucial to our survival.



Seems like this thread struck a personal nerve with you MR. Are you making wedding plans? Anything to announce?

;D

[Book]

Headline should read "Elton John buys an infant"



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/12/29/article-1342346-0666B78E000005DC-388_634x801.jpg
A kiss for Lev: Sir Elton cuddles the little boy, who he wasn't allowed to adopt,
on his visit to a Ukrainian orphanage in September 2009

:oo-->

[willie pete]

surrogate mother? .....she probably made a few million $$$'s off that deal...and I'll bet it wasn't a deal until it was confirmed a boy.... :D

[Libertytree]

Relocate this thread for the POS it is, WGAF?!! Mega waste of bandwidth.

[Book]

Relocate this thread for the POS it is, WGAF?!! Mega waste of bandwidth.



You want to put them back in the closet? Don't Ask, Don't Tell was rescinded by Congress last week...

:oo-->

[TheNocturnalEgyptian]

I honestly could not care less about this.

[ximmy]

homosexuals are gay...

[Libertytree]

I don't give a sh!t one way or another about anyone's sexuality preferences, to each their own. But...is this a pertinent gold/silver/metals/news forum or an off shoot of the UK daily mail or a news whore for the flavor of the day of F'd up celebs?

Funny Money made a very salient point earlier today in the CNBC Pot thread, same applies.

[Bullion_Bob]

Even though buddy is fucked up, the guy is a talented musician, and deserves some kind of happiness in his life.

Maybe this is it, maybe not. It's not for me to decide. He'll be remembered far longer than 99.999% of the people talking about him.

[Book]

But...is this a pertinent gold/silver/metals/news forum or...



The Gold/Silver/Metals section is down the hall first door on the left. This is the GENERAL DISCUSSION SECTION. You lost or just trying to censor the forum?

:dunno

[midnight rambler]

Even though buddy is f*cked up, the guy is a talented musician, and deserves some kind of happiness in his life.

Maybe this is it, maybe not. It's not for me to decide. He'll be remembered far longer than 99.999% of the people talking about him.



Elton John lost me with respect to buying any more of his work at Goodbye Yellow Brick Road, however he (along with Bernie Taupin) is a talented musician despite the fact that he's a f-a-g.

Question for you Book: How many gold and platinum albums have YOU made?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elton_John_discography

[Libertytree]

But...is this a pertinent gold/silver/metals/news forum or...



The Gold/Silver/Metals section is down the hall first door on the left. This is the GENERAL DISCUSSION SECTION. You lost or just trying to censor the forum?

:dunno




I reckon I'm lost and found my way into a gay celebrity adaption forum. ;D

[midnight rambler]

But...is this a pertinent gold/silver/metals/news forum or...



The Gold/Silver/Metals section is down the hall first door on the left. This is the GENERAL DISCUSSION SECTION. You lost or just trying to censor the forum?

:dunno




I doubt that, however it's clearly apparent you have too much time on your hands by posting utter nonsense with absolutely NO redeeming qualities.

[Book]

Question for you Book: How many gold and platinum albums have YOU made?



Question for you MR: How is this in the best interest of the CHILD or our society?

:oo-->


"David always wanted to adopt a child and I always said 'no' because I am 62 and I think because of the traveling I do and the life I have, maybe it wouldn't be fair for the child," John told reporters at the time.

[Book]

Elton John lost me with respect to buying any more of his work at Goodbye Yellow Brick Road



http://cn1.kaboodle.com/hi/img/b/0/0/59/1/AAAACxelRm4AAAAAAFkUSQ.jpg?v=1246564306000

Don't get tear stains on your fan pillow. Your life will go on somehow after Elton's marriage...

:)

[midnight rambler]

Question for you Book: How many gold and platinum albums have YOU made?



Question for you MR: How is this in the best interest of the CHILD or our society?

:oo-->


"David always wanted to adopt a child and I always said 'no' because I am 62 and I think because of the traveling I do and the life I have, maybe it wouldn't be fair for the child," John told reporters at the time.


Since you're a HUGE unrepentent and unabashed proponent of the Nanny State your comments don't surprise me in the least.

There is a lot more to life in this world than you're apparently able to comprehend.

[midnight rambler]

Elton John lost me with respect to buying any more of his work at Goodbye Yellow Brick Road



http://cn1.kaboodle.com/hi/img/b/0/0/59/1/AAAACxelRm4AAAAAAFkUSQ.jpg?v=1246564306000

Don't get tear stains on your fan pillow. Your life will go on somehow after Elton's marriage...

:)


WTF is up with you wanting to degrade the quality of the content of this forum to the level of a checkout stand tabloid???

[midnight rambler]

Gonna drop a lil' bombshell (for some) here, mainly for the benefit of others since I doubt your pea-brain will grasp it - but living souls chose their parents before they pop into existence in this world. So this child which you're showing an unnatural and inordinate amount of interest in actually chose these two fudgepackers as his 'parents'.

And I have little doubt that the child you seem so concerned about will have a much better life than these children.

http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/3308068.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=45B0EB3381F7834DC6BC1021CE7DA13C4ED47275A76FB823 03AA0CF64F13FC89

[ximmy]

Gonna drop a lil' bombshell (for some) here, mainly for the benefit of others since I doubt your pea-brain will grasp it - but living souls chose their parents before they pop into existence in this world.

:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: Pardon... :ROFL: :ROFL: Pardon me please... :lol

[sirgonzo420]

Gonna drop a lil' bombshell (for some) here, mainly for the benefit of others since I doubt your pea-brain will grasp it - but living souls chose their parents before they pop into existence in this world. So this child which you're showing an unnatural and inordinate amount of interest in actually chose these two f-a-gs as his 'parents'.



I don't buy it...

if people choose their parents before they're born, why the hell did my wife pick my in-laws?

:conf:

[ximmy]

The child chose to be abused...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osc8vuronhg&feature=related

[midnight rambler]

Gonna drop a lil' bombshell (for some) here, mainly for the benefit of others since I doubt your pea-brain will grasp it - but living souls chose their parents before they pop into existence in this world. So this child which you're showing an unnatural and inordinate amount of interest in actually chose these two f-a-gs as his 'parents'.



I don't buy it...

if people choose their parents before they're born, why the hell did my wife pick my in-laws?

:conf:


Because it's a learning experience for a soul, for the same reason a soul would chose a couple where one is an alcoholic and the other is mentally deranged (as only one example).

[midnight rambler]

The child chose to be abused...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osc8vuronhg&feature=related


That's exactly right. Such an experience renders a child with a 'problem' which will take 'a lifetime' to 'solve' or 'work out'.

(I'm not suggesting that child abuse is good, only acknowledging that it exists in the world the way the world currently is.)

Without pressure, a soul will not evolve.

[midnight rambler]

Here's one example where a child advised his parents that he "picked" them to be his parents.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-OApQ_iXvw

[ximmy]

The child chose to be abused...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osc8vuronhg&feature=related


That's exactly right. Such an experience renders a child with a 'problem' which will take 'a lifetime' to 'solve' or 'work out'.

(I'm not suggesting that child abuse is good, only acknowledging that it exists in the world the way the world currently is.)

Without pressure, a soul will not evolve.


Nice segway to promote your eastern style philosophy... responsibility of living persons, morals, natural laws take the back seat to nirvana which comes from one's own works and merit.

[midnight rambler]

The child chose to be abused...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osc8vuronhg&feature=related


That's exactly right. Such an experience renders a child with a 'problem' which will take 'a lifetime' to 'solve' or 'work out'.

(I'm not suggesting that child abuse is good, only acknowledging that it exists in the world the way the world currently is.)

Without pressure, a soul will not evolve.


Nice segway to promote your eastern style philosophy... responsibility of living persons, morals, natural laws take the back seat to nirvana which comes from one's own works and merit.


LOL You're full of it! That's your own self-formed perception you're attempting to attach to me. Nothing could be further from the truth. I'll wager you cannot even cite the various names for Natural Law, including the Latin name for Natural Law (no, it's not 'natural law' in Latin). And you speak of the responsibility of "living persons" (no such thing) - again I'll wager you practice limited liability as a matter of course in your own personal affairs on a daily basis.

[ximmy]

The child chose to be abused...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osc8vuronhg&feature=related


That's exactly right. Such an experience renders a child with a 'problem' which will take 'a lifetime' to 'solve' or 'work out'.

(I'm not suggesting that child abuse is good, only acknowledging that it exists in the world the way the world currently is.)

Without pressure, a soul will not evolve.


Nice segway to promote your eastern style philosophy... responsibility of living persons, morals, natural laws take the back seat to nirvana which comes from one's own works and merit.


LOL You're full of it! That's your own self-formed perception you're attempting to attach to me. Nothing could be further from the truth. I'll wager you cannot even cite the various names for Natural Law, including the Latin name for Natural Law (no, it's not 'natural law' in Latin). And you speak of responsibility of "living persons" (no such thing) - again I'll wager you practice limited liability as a matter of course in your own personal affairs.



LOL.. again pardon me... :ROFL: have you made your donation to scientology lately... :lol

[midnight rambler]

The child chose to be abused...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osc8vuronhg&feature=related


That's exactly right. Such an experience renders a child with a 'problem' which will take 'a lifetime' to 'solve' or 'work out'.

(I'm not suggesting that child abuse is good, only acknowledging that it exists in the world the way the world currently is.)

Without pressure, a soul will not evolve.


Nice segway to promote your eastern style philosophy... responsibility of living persons, morals, natural laws take the back seat to nirvana which comes from one's own works and merit.


LOL You're full of it! That's your own self-formed perception you're attempting to attach to me. Nothing could be further from the truth. I'll wager you cannot even cite the various names for Natural Law, including the Latin name for Natural Law (no, it's not 'natural law' in Latin). And you speak of responsibility of "living persons" (no such thing) - again I'll wager you practice limited liability as a matter of course in your own personal affairs.



LOL.. again pardon me... :ROFL: have you made your donation to scientology lately... :lol


Is that the best rebuttal you can muster?

Ximmy: cannot cite the source of natural law therefore hasn't a clue as to what natural law is all about
Ximmy: a hypocrite who condemns others for not taking responsibility yet practices limited liability as a matter of course on a daily basis

Silence is acceptance...

[ximmy]

The child chose to be abused...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osc8vuronhg&feature=related


That's exactly right. Such an experience renders a child with a 'problem' which will take 'a lifetime' to 'solve' or 'work out'.

(I'm not suggesting that child abuse is good, only acknowledging that it exists in the world the way the world currently is.)

Without pressure, a soul will not evolve.


Nice segway to promote your eastern style philosophy... responsibility of living persons, morals, natural laws take the back seat to nirvana which comes from one's own works and merit.


LOL You're full of it! That's your own self-formed perception you're attempting to attach to me. Nothing could be further from the truth. I'll wager you cannot even cite the various names for Natural Law, including the Latin name for Natural Law (no, it's not 'natural law' in Latin). And you speak of responsibility of "living persons" (no such thing) - again I'll wager you practice limited liability as a matter of course in your own personal affairs.



LOL.. again pardon me... :ROFL: have you made your donation to scientology lately... :lol


Is that the best rebuttal you can muster?

Ximmy: cannot cite the source of natural law therefore hasn't a clue as to what natural law is all about
Ximmy: a hypocrite who condemns others for not taking responsibility yet practices limited liability as a matter of course on a daily basis

Silence is acceptance...


Midnight Rambler... fitting name... "Rambler"... bait and switch tactic... FAIL...

[midnight rambler]

Midnight Rambler... fitting name... "Rambler"... bait and switch tactic... FAIL...




I'm sure the reason you fail to get it is because it's before your time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEQL6z1U0wY

[ximmy]

Midnight Rambler... fitting name... "Rambler"... bait and switch tactic... FAIL...




I'm sure the reason you fail to get it is because it's before your time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht1VIna-Vjo&feature=related


oh... pardon me... were you talking? ::)

[ximmy]

Gay couple left free to abuse boys - because social workers feared being branded homophobic

A homosexual foster couple were left free to sexually abuse vulnerable boys in their care because social workers feared being accused of discrimination if they investigated complaints, an inquiry concluded yesterday.

Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey were one of the first homosexual couples in the country to be officially approved as foster parents.

They looked after 18 children in only 15 months.

Ian Wathey (left) and Craig Faunch were jailed last year for sexually abusing young boys

With no previous convictions, they came across as respectable men who simply wanted to help boys with a variety of problems.

In reality, they were paedophiles, who repeatedly abused the children in their care.

Even when the mother of two of the children reported her suspicions to the council, officials accepted the men's explanations and did nothing.

Instead of banning children from staying with Faunch and Wathey, they sent youngsters with more serious problems to them. Between them, the couple abused four boys aged between eight and 14.

In a scathing report published yesterday, Wakefield Metropolitan District Council was condemned for treating the men as "trophy carers".

The children's charity Kidscape said those in charge of overseeing the safety of children in the care of Faunch and Wathey had allowed political correctness to override common sense.

The report, following an independent review of the case, said: "One manager described the couple as 'trophy carers' which led to 'slack arrangements' over placement.

"Another said that by virtue of their sexuality they had a 'badge' which made things less questionable.

"The sexual orientation of the men was a significant cause of people not 'thinking the unthinkable'.

"It was clear that a number of staff were afraid of being thought homophobic.

"The fear of being discriminatory led them to fail to discriminate between the appropriate and the abusive."

The report also accused the council of failing to carry out proper assessments before and after the children were placed with Faunch and Wathey.

"Issues arose in the first longer-term placement of two children, including potential indicators of child sexual abuse, which were inadequately investigated, understood or acted upon," it said.

"More children were then placed with Faunch and Wathey, some successfully, some with concerns which were again inadequately investigated, understood or acted upon.

"The practice of some social workers in this case was deficient."

The report's authors, led by former Surrey social services chief Brian Parrott, said they could not be sure that Faunch and Wathey were "predatory paedophiles" who became foster carers in order to have access to children.

They added: "Our criticisms are much more of those in middle management whose job it was to piece together what was really happening, to ask the right questions and to be critical and probing."

Wathey, 42, was jailed for five years in June last year after being convicted of four counts of sexual activity with a child and one offence of causing a child to watch sexual activity.

Faunch, 33, received a six-year jail sentence after he was found guilty of five charges of engaging in sexual activity with a child and two of taking indecent photographs of a child.

The couple, who lived together in Pontefract, West Yorkshire, were approved as foster carers by the council in August 2003.

Their victims included a 14-year-old boy with Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism,who had a mental age of seven and was forced by Wathey to watch gay pornography.

Another youngster with a "very troubled background" was only in their care for a few weeks before being abused by Faunch.

But social workers had been aware of "inappropriate" behaviour long before then.

Just eight months after they started as professional foster carers a mother of eight-year-old twins, who couldn't cope with raising them on her own, voiced concerns about them with social services.

While visiting the twins, the 34-year old single mother was shown a picture taken by Faunch showing one of the boys going to the lavatory during a visit to Butlin's holiday camp in Skegness and discovered a similar snap had been taken of the other twin.

A social worker took the photograph and promised a full investigation.

But the court heard that not only did social services staff lose the photo, they decided against contacting police after accepting Faunch's explanation that he was trying to embarrass the boys into shutting the lavatory door.

Police later discovered that, days after the photos were taken, Faunch recorded an indecent video of the twins taking a shower. They began abusing the boys three months later.

Undetected, the offences continued over an 11-month period, Leeds Crown Court was told last year.

Police were called in to investigate the couple only after one of the abused boys told a woman he had been touched by one of the men.

Faunch abused all four boys and Wathey targeted one of them.

Judge Sally Cahill, QC, said neither had shown "empathy, remorse or any responsibility for their actions".

Yesterday's report said that the fostering panel which approved Faunch and Wathey accepted without hesitation their request to look after only boys on the basis that they didn't feel equipped to look after girls.

The report made 41 recommendations for overhauling the council's fostering process.

Last night, Michelle Elliott, a director of Kidscape, said: "Common sense went out of the window when they allowed political correctness to take over in this case.

"I don't care if you are homosexual or bisexual - if you are taking care of children you need to be vetted and subjected to the same investigation as anyone else.

"Child abuse knows no gender boundaries."

Elaine McHale, the council's corporate director of family services, said it would be "inappropriate" to comment on the report until after a meeting of the full council on September 12.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480151/Gay-couple-left-free-abuse-boys--social-workers-feared-branded-homophobic.html#ixzz19YCGztmf

[Horn]

Who's the originator of this "thread of torment"?

[Book]

So this child which you're showing an unnatural and inordinate amount of interest in actually chose these two fudgepackers as his 'parents'.



Probably the most absurd example of "blaming the victim" ever posted on the internet.

:oo-->

[midnight rambler]

Who's the originator of this "thread of torment"?


Why, GSUS's #1 class act aka Mr. "I love the Nanny State!", of course!

http://www.planettrash.org/modules/xcgal/albums/userpics/10001/Starving%20Child.JPG

[Book]

:oo-->




WTF is up with you wanting to degrade the quality of the content of this forum...

[midnight rambler]

So this child which you're showing an unnatural and inordinate amount of interest in actually chose these two fudgepackers as his 'parents'.



Probably the most absurd example of "blaming the victim" ever posted on the internet.

:oo-->


Souls exist prior to their incarnation in this world (“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you" Jeremiah 1:5) and are blessed with the facility of free will at all times (which naturally includes that 'time outside of time' where 'time' is not a factor).

As I posted earlier, I suspected you would not be able to grasp such metaphysical concepts considering you are so grounded in man's creation, i.e. the Nanny State where *superior* men tell other men how to conduct themselves.

[BrewTech]

Obviously this subject has led to hostilities between members so I think it's time to shut this one down...

Thread closed.

~Scorp~

































;D What?

[Book]

Elton John lost me with respect to buying any more of his work at Goodbye Yellow Brick Road, however he (along with Bernie Taupin) is a talented musician despite the fact that he's a f-a-g.



http://www.tvornottv.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sir-elton-john.jpg

How many years did it take you to (finally) realize your hero was a homosexual?

:oo-->

[Book]

“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you" Jeremiah 1:5



http://www.cinemablend.com/images/sections/27768/elton_john_27768.jpg

You and Elton attend the same church?

:)

[midnight rambler]

A much more pertinent question is: Will you ever come to the realization that you're a fascist?

[Book]

http://blog.newsok.com/gossip/files/2009/09/Elton-John-adoption.jpg

:oo-->

[BrewTech]

A much more pertinent question is: Will you ever come to the realization that you're a fascist?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

[Book]

http://towleroad.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/elton_john_tutu.jpg

Role Model for teen boys...

:oo-->

[willie pete]

[quote=BrewTech ]
Obviously this subject has led to hostilities between members so I think it's time to shut this one down...

Thread closed.

~Scorp~

:lol :lol :lol :lol ....that's a great one BT...I laughed my ass off......

[Book]

A much more pertinent question is: Will you ever come to the realization that you're a fascist?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law



Nailed it.

:)

[BrewTech]

A much more pertinent question is: Will you ever come to the realization that you're a fascist?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law



Nailed it.

:)


It would technically have to be reviewed by the judges as neither "Hitler" nor "nazi" was mentioned specifically.

[ximmy]

And it came to pass that these souls made the wrong choice in choosing their mother...

Mother Kills Her Children with Angle Grinder

Dead children are never a nice sight, but when the little ones get murdered by their own parent, it gets beyond horrific. However, this case is far more shocking – two children, a 6 year old boy named Vinicius and his little sister Thaís who was only 1 year and 7 months old were butchered by their own mother. By the very person who gave them birth.
On November 7, 2006, 25 year old Rosa Camacho Elisangela grabbed an angle grinder, started it up and walked up to the room where her two children were. It’s hard to imagine what it must have been like for the siblings – who were just playing together – to listen to the sound of the power tool come closer and closer to the room and when the door burst opened, to see their mother, a person whom you naturally expect to always be there for you and to always protect you, come at you with that fast spinning disc that can cut through metal.
What happened to that instinctive love that a mother naturally feels for her children? Killing little children is an act that raises many questions on its own, but how could a woman kill children who came out of her own body? How could you possibly deal with the pictures of your own kids crying while you’re cutting them up with an angle grinder popping up in your mind for the rest of your life?
Rosa Camacho Elisangela allegedly suffered from Post Natal Depression (doctors will find a name for anything – if you like farting in water and tell your doc about it, he’ll come up with a diagnosis for a previously unspecified condition he’d cleverly name The Irresistible Water Farting Urge Syndrome). That Tuesday, the day when she killed her own kids with an angle grinder started as your average day:
A mother of two took her children to school in the morning, run her own errands during the day, picked up the kids from school in early afternoon, headed home with them, put them in the bedroom, opened her husband’s toolbox, picked up an angle grinder, revved it up, walked up to the bedroom, grabbed at 6 year old Vinicius and beheaded him right there, with that angle grinder all the while little one and a half year old Thaís was watching in horror. Her turn at being killed with the angle grinder came next.
Gilmar de Paula Oliveira, the father of killed children was the first to witness the grisly scene. Can you imagine a better picture returning home after a whole day at the job than finding your own kids lying dead in a pool of blood?
Rosa Camacho Elisangela didn’t resist the arrest and confessed to killing her own children. I don’t think she’s having any more of them anytime soon.

[Book]

It would technically have to be reviewed by the judges as neither "Hitler" nor "nazi" was mentioned specifically.



Let's see the end result:


There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[3] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress. This principle itself is frequently referred to as Godwin's law.

:)

[Spectrism]

So this child which you're showing an unnatural and inordinate amount of interest in actually chose these two fudgepackers as his 'parents'.



Probably the most absurd example of "blaming the victim" ever posted on the internet.

:oo-->


Souls exist prior to their incarnation in this world (“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you" Jeremiah 1:5) and are blessed with the facility of free will at all times (which naturally includes that 'time outside of time' where 'time' is not a factor).

As I posted earlier, I suspected you would not be able to grasp such metaphysical concepts considering you are so grounded in man's creation, i.e. the Nanny State where *superior* men tell other men how to conduct themselves.


No. Your interpretation denies the power of the verse. What God is saying here is not that the soul pre-existed, but that God is outside of time and not bound by his own creation. God knows everything before its time since God is timeless. He knows the end from the beginning. There are many verses to collaborate what I am saying.

[hoarder]

How many gold and platinum albums have YOU made?


If you really consider this an accomplishment, you might give thought to WHO RUNS HOLLYWOOD and thus the music/recording industry, what their social engineering objectives are, and WHY they go so far out of their way to find and promote homos to idol status for young goy boys to worship.
Elton John = useful idiot.

[JDRock]

Obviously this subject has led to hostilities between members so I think it's time to shut this one down...

Thread closed.

~Scorp~
bwaaaahaaaa :ROFL:

































;D What?

[midnight rambler]

A much more pertinent question is: Will you ever come to the realization that you're a fascist?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law


I was under the impression you were smarter than this. I admit I was mistaken in this regard.

FASCIST. A believer in the corporate state. -Black's Law Dictionary 4th Ed.

Anyone who thinks Book isn't a dyed in the wool believer in the corporate state is completely blind or suffering from rectal-cranial inversion.

[Book]

Anyone who thinks Book isn't a dyed in the wool believer in the corporate state is completely blind...



:oo-->


There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[3] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress. This principle itself is frequently referred to as Godwin's law.

MR took the focus off ELTON JOHN and his "husband" adopting a little boy.

[BrewTech]

A much more pertinent question is: Will you ever come to the realization that you're a fascist?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law


I was under the impression you were smarter than this. I admit I was mistaken in this regard.




Pointing out a manifestation of Godwin's Law makes me dumb? How's that?

I won't disagree with the definition of fascism that you have provided, nor will I submit an opinion on whether Book fits that definition or not. That wasn't my goal when I posted into this thread.

Sometimes I agree with Book, sometimes I don't.

For the record, I don't really give a sh*t what EJ is doing. I don't really think it's a great idea for a kid to be raised by two old gay men, but then again, I have more important things to worry about these days, like paying the rent and keeping the lights on.

Oh, and posting smartass comments on a thread to try to get folks to lighten up a bit.

[Horn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLi5tO6je5o

[Horn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg1dMpu4v7M