Another interesting website which should occupy you for a while

[midnight rambler]

http://www.raven1.net/ravindex.htm

[Ponce]

I love to read..........thanks ;D

Any more like this one out there?........come on, talk to papa.

[midnight rambler]

I love to read..........thanks ;D

Any more like this one out there?........come on, talk to papa.


I post 'em as I find 'em.

[Book]

Website not for the paranoid...lol.

:D

[Ponce]

Well Book, that leaves you and I out of there hahahahahha.

[TheNocturnalEgyptian]

Cross posted to my other sites, thank you for the excellent link.

[woodman]

Great stuff! I just spent two hours avidly reading. I've read reports of group stalking before. A freind of my ex-wife claimed he was being group stalked back in 1980. He ended up committing suicide.

[Book]

http://thesibylspeaks.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/punkd.jpg

http://movie.masjo.com/images/mission-impossible-iii.jpg

http://tn4th.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/paulson-bernanke-geithner-7702621.jpg


Conspiracy (civil)

A civil conspiracy or collusion is an agreement between two or more parties to deprive a third party of legal rights or deceive a third party to obtain an illegal objective.[1] A conspiracy may also refer to a group of people who make an agreement to form a partnership in which each member becomes the agent or partner of every other member and engage in planning or agreeing to commit some act. It is not necessary that the conspirators be involved in all stages of planning or be aware of all details. Any voluntary agreement and some overt act by one conspirator in furtherance of the plan are the main elements necessary to prove a conspiracy. A conspiracy may exist whether legal means are used to accomplish illegal results, or illegal means used to accomplish something legal.[2] "Even when no crime is involved, a civil action for conspiracy may be brought by the persons who were damaged."[1]

:)

[JDRock]

bump... for future perusal....

[woodman]

As long as we are investigating, here is a good read:
http://waronyou.com/forums/index.php?topic=13558.0

I certainly don't agree with him on all points but he does make some salient observations:


From his book 'Understanding the F Word':

"In retrospect, we should have known something was amiss right away. A rather odd, but seemingly trivial aspect of the 1992 presidential campaign that brought Clinton to power should have signaled to the people that something wasn't quite right about the American political landscape.
The event referred to actually occurred after the close of the campaign, when the bright lights were mostly turned away. That was when Clinton's campaign manager, James Carville, and Bush's campaign manager, Mary Matalin - who had just conducted a no-holds barred, anything goes, win-at-all-costs mudfest - decided to cap off the campaign by getting married.
Nothing unusual about that, right? We all know that opposites attract. Even when those opposites have just devoted a considerable amount of energy to, by appearances anyway, completely destroying the reputations and careers of the other's candidate and campaign team. Even when those opposites are allegedly fiercely opposed to the other's ideology and have absolutely no respect for the integrity of the other's mission.
It does seem just a bit odd, however, that two such opposites would even have the opportunity to attract one another in the course of such a vicious campaign. How is it even possible that they could have interacted on a level that would have fostered a personal, let alone an intimate, relationship?
Unless, that is, the adversarial nature of this particular campaign, and of political campaigns in general, was largely an illusion -- a sham foisted on the people to foster the perception that the American political system is based on deep divisions between competing political parties and ideologies.
This is precisely why nearly all political campaigns for major office in this country quickly degenerate into mud-slinging contests. In truth, this is the only way that the illusion of diversity can be maintained. The real issues are rarely discussed because, quite frankly, there is nothing to discuss. "