Do you have cognizance?

[midnight rambler]

If you don't, then I urge you to get it.

1
: a distinguishing mark or emblem (as a heraldic bearing)
2
a : knowledge, awareness <had no cognizance of the situation> b : notice, acknowledgment <take cognizance of their achievement>
3
: jurisdiction, responsibility

[Ponce]

Hey rambler, glad to see that I am not the only nut job around here hahahahahahaahha

[midnight rambler]

Hey rambler, glad to see that I am not the only nut job around here hahahahahahaahha


Thx for your reply Ponce, but could you explain to me what's nutty about increasing one's knowledge/awareness and taking responsibility?

Of all people, I would think that you would have a deep appreciation for all the above. I mean hell's belles, who's got more toilet paper than Ponce??

[TheNocturnalEgyptian]

A: Do you understand?

M: No, I don't understand.

A: What don't you understand? Perhaps I can explain it to you.

M: What makes you think I don't comprehend what you said? I comprehend perfectly - I just don't understand.

[midnight rambler]

A: Do you understand?

M: No, I don't understand.

A: What don't you understand? Perhaps I can explain it to you.

M: What makes you think I don't comprehend what you said? I comprehend perfectly - I just don't understand.


Now that's an example of cognizance.

[vacuum]

Responsibility: the ability to respond

Usually to new information, or to a current situation.

[Ponce]

Hahahhaahahahah that was the ignoran Cuban part of me playing around with you.......after six wars for five countries and after all the preparations that I have made for the past ten years I should know something about the subject..........and like guys said, I must have all that tp for a reason ;D

[palani]

A: Do you understand?

M: No, I don't understand

Refusal of a contract offer is associated with dishonor and that will result in conviction. After all, you have been instructed to agree with your opponent. Far better to say "I conditionally accept understanding if you will acknowledge your role as fiduciary of the express charitable trust and agree to payment of any charge that might result from my understanding."

[Ponce]

Palani?..........if you please........do it now in English.......not everyone here is a good for nothing of a lawyer who's only object in life is to double talk in order to confused people.

[TheNocturnalEgyptian]

Translation is roughly: Yes I cede sovereignty if you pay for all damages associated with my loss of liberty.



To understand XYZ is to stand under XYZ. To understand is to agree.

That's from Black's Law Dictionary.

[palani]

Palani?..........if you please........do it now in English.......not everyone here is a good for nothing of a lawyer who's only object in life is to double talk in order to confused people.
Everything you do is contract. Anytime someone approaches you it is with an offer to engage in contract. There are no exceptions.

There are four things you can do with an offer:
accept
reject
go silent (accept by silence)
counteroffer

If you want to accept fine. Have at it. Go ahead and understand and you will be surety for the defendant an d go to trial.

If you reject then you raise argument when you have been told to agree with your opponent. This is dishonor and you go to trial.

If you go silent then you accept and go to trial (in older times silence was not considered very honorable so you would have been escorted in chains to the lowest part of the dungeon, laid on the floor and have around 500 lbs of armor piled on you so you could not move and so expire).

Counteroffer has the effect of canceling the offer by negotiation but you do it by AGREEING. Make sure the counteroffer is in your favor.

Even a warrant for your arrest is an offer to contract. A speeding ticket or a traffic violation is an offer to contract. There is no involuntary servitude. You do it to yourself through your understanding (and acceptance).

[StackerKen]

Thats good stuff Palani. Makes sense to me now

How about if I just claim Non-citizenship of this world?

Therefor I can not enter any binding contracts on the planet :)

In other words...

I aint playin that... ;)

[palani]

Thats good stuff Palani. Makes sense to me now

How about if I just claim Non-citizenship of this world?

Therefor I can not enter any binding contracts on the planet :)

In other words...

I aint playin that... ;)



The system plays by a different set of rules. They need your consent. Deny anything and you have entered the door of dishonor through denial. What you say is really less important than the form in which you say it.

What it stems from is the prohibition against involuntary servitude and the need to give you due process. You need to know what due process actually is. There are two elements in due process: notice and right to inquire. Their offer is your notice. This offer also endows you with the right to inquire (which you did not possess before). Inquiry means just that ... you ask questions. The first statement you make (for example, I am not a citizen of this world) terminates your due process and from there you proceed to hearing where you will be pronounced guilty. Unless you want this you ask questions like a two year old and NEVER make a single statement.

Why do you think they are advising you to remain silent? If you go silent you accept. Instead you ask questions ....( Asking ... As King!!!! )The master asks the questions. The servant responds. Which role do you choose to play?

[vacuum]

palani, could you explain this concept of dishonor?

[palani]

palani, could you explain this concept of dishonor?

To dishonor is to refuse. It is the antithesis of agreeing


Matthew 5:25
Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.


TO DISHONOR, contr. This term is applied to the nonfulfilment of commercial engagements. To dishonor a bill of exchange, or a promissory note, is to refuse or neglect to pay it at maturity.

[Ponce]

OK Palani, I don't who the heck you are but you are coming in loud and clear........... now then, as per the video of a few days ago....the judge and the sheriff, who gave me a summons, both work for the county and unless the judge aproves the (the now speeding ticket) summons and fines me then neither one of them will get pay............should I bring this up at the start of the trial as I am planning to do? as a conflict of interest?

First post of the day.............good morning to one and all.

[palani]

now then, as per the video of a few days ago....the judge and the sheriff, who gave me a summons, both work for the county and unless the judge aproves the (the now speeding ticket) summons and fines me then neither one of them will get pay............should I bring this up at the start of the trial as I am planning to do? as a conflict of interest?

First post of the day.............good morning to one and all.

Good morning.

You had 72 hours to abate the nuisance and that grace period is over. Since you have already elected for silence you have already lost. As you are going to show up for court you grant them jurisdiction. Frankly your best bet is to pay up and start studying some of this material so you have a better shot at freedom next time.

Marc Stevens material is for those who like to argue (the door of dishonor). He is entertaining though and quite skilled. This does not necessarily mean that anyone who tries his techniques will succeed. Other sources of information are Ticketslayer (they give you the procedure for abatement) and creditorsincommerce.com (lots of free audio downloads and they have seminars occasionally).

Don't hold the system responsible for your failure to learn how it works. It really is a good system and they do an excellent job of putting you to the test.

[BillBoard]

.
It really is a good system and they do an excellent job of putting you to the test.



Palani why do you call it a good system? I neither think of it as good or evil, all it is a system of administration and now abused for the benefit of the few. jmho.

[palani]

Palani why do you call it a good system? I neither think of it as good or evil, all it is a system of administration and now abused for the benefit of the few. jmho.

I believe James Allen said it best

Every man is where he is by the law of his being; the thoughts which
he has built into his character have brought him there, and in the
arrangement of his life there is no element of chance, but all is
the result of a law which cannot err. This is just as true of those
who feel "out of harmony" with their surroundings as of those who
are contented with them.

You have to determine if the "law of your being" is declared by someone in power.

[messianicdruid]

If you don't, then I urge you to get it.
1: a distinguishing mark or emblem (as a heraldic bearing)
2a : knowledge, awareness <had no cognizance of the situation> b : notice, acknowledgment <take cognizance of their achievement>
3: jurisdiction, responsibility

Feb 14th 2010, about 6 am I had a dream. I was somewhere in Washington DC, in a large upstairs room, sitting at a long wooden table. A mature, business-like, oriental woman brought me a stack of about twenty-five 8x10 photographs and said “We want you to approve these for use as propaganda“.

I was still working on a government contract, and the woman seemed to be part of upper management, but her request made me wonder why they were seeking my approval.

I started looking at the pictures, figuring they would reveal a
motive. The pictures were of various sites around the District of
Columbia, statues, buildings, parks and such. About halfway through the pictures I found one of myself, with my back to the camera, wearing casual clothing, and fishing in a small pond. You could not tell it was me just by looking at the picture, unless you knew me pretty well.

In the background of this picture there was a chain link fence with a view {two or three miles away} of a large government building on a hill, and on the right, a line of tall evergreen trees through which I could see the grave of JFK with the Eternal Flame on it {about ¾ mile away}.

I kept looking through the other pictures as I was continuing to question the purpose of this exercise. When I finished I told her I didn’t see any problem with them.

Then she said, “They want you to go over to the White House to see if there is anything they can do to make you more hinetic.”

At this word, I woke up, because I did not know what it meant. As I lay in bed, I was thinking “high” “net” “ic” and thinking it meant something like high output or high production or more useful.

Later over coffee, I told my little sister, where I had stayed the night, about this dream and the new word. She called {texted} on her cell phone which told us:

hinetic - to announce, to denote, to be a sign or indication of, have meaning or make known.

It also made reference to the words, connotation and compulsion.

After I got back to my apartment, I entered “dictionary” in Google and searched the first 14 hits, and none of them could offer a definition for the word “hinetic“. Several of them asked if I meant “kinetic”.

So I called her back and asked, “Who did you call?” She said it was a text. You compose a text such as: What does hinetic mean? Then send it to 542542, so I did. The response was:

Welcome to kgb! J Our agents are already working to find you an expert answer. $0.99/ea. Std msg & data rates may apply. Txt HELP 4 help & STOP 2 stop.

So I typed HELP. Then I received “Unfortunately we haven’t been able to deliver your answer. Sorry. You may want to top up your phone or contact your operator about technical troubles." I had plenty of minutes on my cell phone.

The curious thing is, I read the definition, underlined above, right on her phone.

Does cognizance, in some way, mirror hinetic { heraldic }?

[BillBoard]

Palani why do you call it a good system? I neither think of it as good or evil, all it is a system of administration and now abused for the benefit of the few. jmho.

I believe James Allen said it best

Every man is where he is by the law of his being; the thoughts which
he has built into his character have brought him there, and in the
arrangement of his life there is no element of chance, but all is
the result of a law which cannot err. This is just as true of those
who feel "out of harmony" with their surroundings as of those who
are contented with them.

You have to determine if the "law of your being" is declared by someone in power.

Ok, color me dumb as a box of bricks... I don't get it.

Even if I called the system good, it wouldn't make it so. Unless I was benefiting from it...

Hmm,.. on second thought, you may be on to something.

[palani]

Ok, color me dumb as a box of bricks... I don't get it. Even if I called the system good, it wouldn't make it so. Unless I was benefiting from it...
Maybe not benefiting so much as not being affected by the legislation the rest of you folks feel you are being pounded with.

Remember these rules for contracting work both directions. I have been helped any number of times by government employees who chose to accept my offers by refusing to respond to them. Only several departments opted to send me counter-offers. I prefer to have my offers accepted but then again a counter-counter-offer generally does the trick just as well.

[palani]

http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/tucker/tuck-5a.htm

http://i51.tinypic.com/dxic6t.jpg

This is the situation as of 1803. It substantially changed with the 14th amendment because it goes without saying the feds have cognizance of their own citizens. At the time though there was no federal common law as stated.