PDA

View Full Version : Fake Lawyer Tahir Malik Tried Over 60 Cases, With No Law Degree



MNeagle
9th January 2011, 08:23 PM
Tahir Malik, a 47-year-old man from Skokie, Illinois, "walked around the courtroom like he was a hotshot, strutting around," said one of his clients.

He tried more than 60 cases, charging between $500 and $4,500 to his clients. He worked on traffic court cases, mortgage foreclosures, and some low-level criminal cases.

One problem: Malik never spent a day in law school. Instead, it appears that he learned his lawyering skills from his own criminal background.

"From his own arrest history, he was familiar enough with the court system to make certain motions and file certain documents in the court," said Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. "There is no question that dozens of people from all over Cook County were misled by this guy."

The Tribune reports that Malik's father Rahim says that he likely also picked up some of his legal knowledge from watching television.

Apparently, he was finally busted on December 17, when personnel at the Cook County Courthouse found some of his behavior suspicious and questioned his credentials. They found that he had none.

Malik faces two counts of false impersonation of a lawyer, as WGN reports. He will appear in court on January 28 -- no word yet on whether he will be representing himself.

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/235533/thumbs/s-MALIK-large.jpg
Tahir Malik.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/09/fake-lawyer-tahir-malik-t_n_806443.html



Too bad they didn't reveal what his 'success' rate was. Also, of those who hired him, what their recourse is (if any) if they lost their case.

Dogman
9th January 2011, 08:26 PM
:ROFL:

F.U.B.A.R! ;D

They probably will have to revisit every case he touched.

:lol

willie pete
9th January 2011, 08:40 PM
if he hires his own lawyer, I hope they check his credentials :D

MNeagle
9th January 2011, 08:43 PM
Maybe they'll put him away long enough that he can earn his law degree on the taxpayer dime!

Mouse
9th January 2011, 10:56 PM
False impersonation of a lawyer....

I plead quilty.....

I did not (false) impersonate a lawyer. I did the positive of impersonating a lawyer. I falsely plead guilty as I did not actually impersonate a shark, I falsely appeared to falsely impersonate. I falsely agree that this charge is true. Therefore I actually demand the false court with false jurisdiction drop this negative charge. I actually did impersonate a lawyer, so your charge is false. I never did falsely impersonate a lawyer.

Your witness.