PDA

View Full Version : Scientists Say They're Zeroing in on 'Universal' Flu Vaccine



Twisted Titan
11th January 2011, 02:08 PM
http://www.aolhealth.com/condition-center/cold-flu/universal-flu-vaccine?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl3%7Csec1_lnk3%7C194761


Scientists Say They're Zeroing in on 'Universal' Flu Vaccine




People who caught the H1N1 virus last winter hold a secret, and it could be the key to developing a "universal" flu vaccine that would protect against most types of the winter illness.

Scientists say that an analysis of antibodies made from those who were infected with swine flu and recovered shows an unexpected response to the virus by their immune systems -- which made a host of antibodies that could ward off many other strains of flu.

Those include most forms of H1N1 from the last 10 years, a strain of H5N1 bird flu and the deadly "Spanish flu" that killed scores of people in 1918.

Producing one vaccine that could fight multiple strains of flu would be revolutionary, since it would end the annual rush to predict which one will be dominant that season and make a vaccine in bulk that will kill it.

"We didn't expect to see these types of antibodies," first author Jens Wrammert, assistant professor of microbiology and immunology at Emory University's Vaccine Center, told AOL Health. "We were surprised at the finding."

The results, published in the Jan. 10 edition of the Journal of Experimental Medicine, are "something like the Holy Grail for flu vaccine research," said one of the study's lead authors Patrick Wilson, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Chicago.

"It demonstrates how to make a single vaccine that could potentially provide immunity to all influenza," he said in a news release put out by the University of Chicago Medical Center.

He and others who have been working on a so-called "universal flu vaccine" say that the implications are far-reaching. Bringing the illness under control could essentially save tens of thousands of lives. Estimates of annual flu deaths in the U.S. run between 3,300 and 49,000.



The Chicago/Emory School of Medicine team studied nine people who had been infected during the H1N1 pandemic's first round in 2009, before a vaccine for it had been created. They began taking blood samples and making antibodies from those patients in the hopes of developing a shot that could protect health-care workers.

The scientists wound up making 86 antibodies that responded to the H1N1 swine flu virus and tested them on other strains of the flu. Five of the 86 warded off multiple types of the virus, including most H1N1 strains from the last decade, the "Spanish flu" and one form of avian flu, the researchers said.

They also tested the antibodies on mice and found that the animals got complete immunity from a normally deadly injection of the flu virus, even up to 60 days after exposure.

"The surprise was that such a very difficult influenza strain, as opposed to the most common strains, could lead us to something so widely applicable," Wilson said.

The H1N1 epidemic swept the U.S. during the winter of 2009-2010 and infected up to 60 million people. A quarter of a million of them were hospitalized.

"Our data shows that infection with the 2009 pandemic influenza strain could induce broadly protective antibodies that are only rarely seen after seasonal flu infections or flu shots," Wrammert said in a statement. "These findings show that these types of antibodies can be induced in humans ... and suggest that a pan-influenza vaccine might be feasible."

But researchers are likely years away from bringing an all-encompassing flu shot to market.

"They're trying to develop a vaccine that would induce these types of immuno-responses," he told AOL Health. "It still requires a lot of additional studies before such a vaccine would be available, for sure."

Twisted Titan
11th January 2011, 02:11 PM
The H1N1 epidemic swept the U.S. during the winter of 2009-2010 and infected up to 60 million people. A quarter of a million of them were hospitalized.


Dose anybody remeber this??? cause I sure dont .

nunaem
11th January 2011, 02:13 PM
"The H1N1 epidemic swept the U.S. during the winter of 2009-2010 and infected up to 60 million people. A quarter of a million hypochondriacs were hospitalized."

That's more like it.

Neuro
11th January 2011, 02:18 PM
Scientists say that an analysis of antibodies made from those who were infected with swine flu and recovered shows an unexpected response to the virus by their immune systems -- which made a host of antibodies that could ward off many other strains of flu.

Those include most forms of H1N1 from the last 10 years, a strain of H5N1 bird flu and the deadly "Spanish flu" that killed scores of people in 1918.
The only reasonable reason I can see, to people getting antibody responses to viral strains that were extinct before they were born, is that the 'swine' flu was bioengineered with these viral strains... They really are trying to kill us!

Cobalt
11th January 2011, 02:38 PM
Bleach kills just about any influenza virus, how about we start filling the vials with clorox then line up the politicians with the big pharma ceo's for a trial run.

chad
11th January 2011, 02:39 PM
i haven't had the flu for probably 15 years. ::)

Serpo
11th January 2011, 05:45 PM
Zeroing In.......ZERO being the operative word.........ZERO left standing after this baby hits the streets......

keehah
11th January 2011, 06:32 PM
The H1N1 epidemic swept the U.S. during the winter of 2009-2010 and infected up to 60 million people. A quarter of a million of them were hospitalized.


Dose anybody remeber this??? cause I sure dont .


It was a lighter than normal flu season. Only difference was it was the year they changed the definition of epidemic/pandemic to make it applicable to an average (or below average) flu season.

Booga booga! Send us your moola!

Dr Keiji Fukuda, Special Adviser to the Director-Generalon Pandemic Influenza,
World Health Organization 14 January 201 (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/vpc_transcript_14_january_10_fukuda.pdf)0


The formal definitions of pandemics by WHO can be seen in the guidelines which have been
provided to countries. Now these guidelines were first developed in 1999 and then updated
subsequently in 2005 and then in 2009. And when you look at them you will see how the many
hundreds of scientists who work with WHO on these definitions and on these guidelines really
tried to improve the definitions to make them clearer from the guidelines. One of the things that
WHO did not do in any of these definitions was make severity part of the definition.

Mouse
11th January 2011, 07:35 PM
including most H1N1 strains from the last decade,


They had this shit for a decade? But it was brand new last year?

I got a brand new 280zx to sell you.

Bullion_Bob
11th January 2011, 10:21 PM
I'd be vary wary of this "finding".

Sounds to me like their approach is all about using people like guinea pigs. They are talking about creating a static product against an ever changing organism like a virus. On it's face it does not add up logistically.

"Oops we got it wrong again! Sorry for the autism, blood poisoning, and cancer, but hey, the flu was ok this year right? No? worse? Oh...."