nunaem
12th January 2011, 06:43 PM
:oo-->
http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2011-01-13-palin13_ST_N.htm
Sarah Palin's newest Facebook page video scolds critics who say her high firepower rhetoric could have contributed to Saturday's Arizona shooting rampage. But her use of an emotionally-charged phrase has spawned a controversy all its own.
Palin called herself the victim of "blood libel" — the original term for blaming Jews for the death of Christ and an anti-Semitic rallying call that led to countless deaths of Jews, primarily in Europe and Russia.
Many rabbis called her remarks insensitive, ill-chosen and offensive to Holocaust survivors and other victims of anti-Semitism.
Palin's new video "was like waving a red flag," said Rabbi David Sapperstein, executive director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism. "It concerns us. It escalates the intensity of the rhetoric, rather than calming it down. It seems to me she's missed an opportunity at real leadership."
Palin aide Rebecca Mansour said the former Alaska governor stands by her video.
"There has been an incredible increase in death threats against Gov. Palin since the tragedy in Arizona, since she's been accused of having the blood of those victims on her hands," Mansour said. "When you start to accuse people of having the blood of innocent people on their hands, it incites violence."
Most of those accusations start with a map Palin posted this fall that has since been removed. It put cross-hair symbols on a map of congressional districts Palin wanted to see turn Tea Party-style Republican in the mid-term elections.
All weekend, the nation watched replays of a video from this fall in which U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who police called the target of Saturday's shootings, express concern that her district was "targeted."
But Mansour told a radio host Monday, "We never, ever, intended it to be gun sights. It was simply cross-hairs like you'd see on maps."
"Blood libel" points to a misused biblical passage about Jews and the crucifixion of Christ.
In Matthew 27:25, where the Gospel re-tells the decision to crucify Jesus, "All the people answered, 'His blood is on us and on our children.' "
This passage was the pretext of anti-Semitism for 2,000 years and the motive behind centuries of mass killings, known as pogroms, in Eastern Europe when Jews were falsely accused of using Christian children's blood in religious rites.
Rabbi Brad Hirschfield, president of the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, said Palin's own words — that violent political language can endanger people — are "affirming exactly what her critics charge."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-blood-libel-20110113,0,3315967.story
'Blood libel' has particular, painful meaning to Jewish people
The phrase used by Sarah Palin against her detractors usually refers to the false accusations made for centuries against Jews, often to malign them as child killers — and sometimes leading to massacres of their communities.
In saying her critics "manufactured a blood libel," Sarah Palin deployed a phrase linked to the false accusations made for centuries against Jews, often to malign them as child killers who coveted the blood of Christian children.
Blood libel has been a central fable of anti-Semitism in which Jews have been accused of using the blood of gentile children for medicinal purposes or to mix in with matzo, the unleavened bread traditionally eaten at Passover.
The spreading of the blood libel dates to the Middle Ages — and perhaps further — and those allegations have led to massacres of Jewish communities for just as long.
The term blood libel carries particular power in the Jewish community, though it has taken on other shades of meaning. Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said Wednesday that "while the term blood libel has become part of the English parlance to refer to someone being falsely accused, we wish that Palin had used another phrase, instead of one so fraught with pain in Jewish history."
One of the first recorded tragedies attributed to blood libel occurred in the 12th century, when a boy named William in Norwich, England, was found dead with stab wounds. Local Jews were accused of killing the child in a ritual fashion and, according to several histories on religion, most of the Jewish population there was subsequently wiped out.
Such charges continued for centuries, with Jews often assigned blame in the unsolved killings of children. Many of the dead children were considered martyrs; several were elevated to sainthood by the Roman Catholic or Orthodox churches.
Allegations of blood libel spread during the Holocaust and persist today.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2011-01-13-palin13_ST_N.htm
Sarah Palin's newest Facebook page video scolds critics who say her high firepower rhetoric could have contributed to Saturday's Arizona shooting rampage. But her use of an emotionally-charged phrase has spawned a controversy all its own.
Palin called herself the victim of "blood libel" — the original term for blaming Jews for the death of Christ and an anti-Semitic rallying call that led to countless deaths of Jews, primarily in Europe and Russia.
Many rabbis called her remarks insensitive, ill-chosen and offensive to Holocaust survivors and other victims of anti-Semitism.
Palin's new video "was like waving a red flag," said Rabbi David Sapperstein, executive director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism. "It concerns us. It escalates the intensity of the rhetoric, rather than calming it down. It seems to me she's missed an opportunity at real leadership."
Palin aide Rebecca Mansour said the former Alaska governor stands by her video.
"There has been an incredible increase in death threats against Gov. Palin since the tragedy in Arizona, since she's been accused of having the blood of those victims on her hands," Mansour said. "When you start to accuse people of having the blood of innocent people on their hands, it incites violence."
Most of those accusations start with a map Palin posted this fall that has since been removed. It put cross-hair symbols on a map of congressional districts Palin wanted to see turn Tea Party-style Republican in the mid-term elections.
All weekend, the nation watched replays of a video from this fall in which U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who police called the target of Saturday's shootings, express concern that her district was "targeted."
But Mansour told a radio host Monday, "We never, ever, intended it to be gun sights. It was simply cross-hairs like you'd see on maps."
"Blood libel" points to a misused biblical passage about Jews and the crucifixion of Christ.
In Matthew 27:25, where the Gospel re-tells the decision to crucify Jesus, "All the people answered, 'His blood is on us and on our children.' "
This passage was the pretext of anti-Semitism for 2,000 years and the motive behind centuries of mass killings, known as pogroms, in Eastern Europe when Jews were falsely accused of using Christian children's blood in religious rites.
Rabbi Brad Hirschfield, president of the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, said Palin's own words — that violent political language can endanger people — are "affirming exactly what her critics charge."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-blood-libel-20110113,0,3315967.story
'Blood libel' has particular, painful meaning to Jewish people
The phrase used by Sarah Palin against her detractors usually refers to the false accusations made for centuries against Jews, often to malign them as child killers — and sometimes leading to massacres of their communities.
In saying her critics "manufactured a blood libel," Sarah Palin deployed a phrase linked to the false accusations made for centuries against Jews, often to malign them as child killers who coveted the blood of Christian children.
Blood libel has been a central fable of anti-Semitism in which Jews have been accused of using the blood of gentile children for medicinal purposes or to mix in with matzo, the unleavened bread traditionally eaten at Passover.
The spreading of the blood libel dates to the Middle Ages — and perhaps further — and those allegations have led to massacres of Jewish communities for just as long.
The term blood libel carries particular power in the Jewish community, though it has taken on other shades of meaning. Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said Wednesday that "while the term blood libel has become part of the English parlance to refer to someone being falsely accused, we wish that Palin had used another phrase, instead of one so fraught with pain in Jewish history."
One of the first recorded tragedies attributed to blood libel occurred in the 12th century, when a boy named William in Norwich, England, was found dead with stab wounds. Local Jews were accused of killing the child in a ritual fashion and, according to several histories on religion, most of the Jewish population there was subsequently wiped out.
Such charges continued for centuries, with Jews often assigned blame in the unsolved killings of children. Many of the dead children were considered martyrs; several were elevated to sainthood by the Roman Catholic or Orthodox churches.
Allegations of blood libel spread during the Holocaust and persist today.