Was the primary reason for building WTC 1 & 2 their total destruction later?

[midnight rambler]

Certainly looks that way.

Why build a couple of white elephant monstrosities with a very limited lifetime which are ultimately a demo nightmare? Why would any thinking humans build such towers without considering what will need to be done with them once they're obsolete? (the aluminum skin fastened to steel rendered them obsolete the day they were drawn up on the prints - they knew the aluminum skin was failing within five years of completion and that within 30 years of life the aluminum skin would be falling off)

Curious evidence.

http://letsrollforums.com/press-release-world-trade-t24256.html?s=86e176c6fbd6ac29bcdec9bd57e30f6a&

[Book]

http://gothamist.com/attachments/jen/2007_05_silvserstein.jpg

Larry Silverstein signed the LEASE for the WTC a few months before 9-11 with a multi-billion-dollar terrorism insurance policy.

Oy Vey!

:oo-->

[woodman]

It is certainly worth considering. These people think far ahead.

[gunDriller]

i have wondered that myself.

what was very unusual about the collapse of the buildings was the absence of chunks of concrete. it mostly turned into dust.

it takes a hell of a lot of energy to turn concrete into dust.

what i've wondered is - what was the water content of the concrete, OR, was there something else in it that would make it susceptible to electromagnetic radiation (fancy name for radio waves, light, infrared, etc.) ? that something else would be conductive particles - something simple like waste aluminum.

there was something odd about the reaction of the concrete. i've always wondered if that was a design flaw, or something reflective of a demolition planned far in advance. i'm not sure when the WTC's were built. i don't think Israel got serious about creating mayhem in America until the 1960's.

[vacuum]

gunDriller, I think you are perceptive and correct. I'm almost certain it was a scalar weapon used to disintegrate the buildings. Here's a good website that can be researched showing many of the bizarre things that happened on 911. She concludes it was some type of energy weapon. A scalar weapon would be more precise.

http://drjudywood.com/

I particularly like this animation:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/46_wtc1spiretodustjg4.jpg

http://drjudywood.com/media/dustspire.gif


But you're right, nothing conventional really explains this too well, imo:

http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/bubbler.jpg

[Book]

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/january2010/040110top2.jpg

Why isn't the 9-11 Commission in prison?

:oo-->

[Hatha Sunahara]

Here's a guy who believes just what your question asks.

http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/index.htm

He worked for the Soviet Union's nuclear intelligence organization responsible for compliance of nuclear treaties. He says that the WTC towers building plans included a plan for the demolition of the buildings with nuclear demolition devices even before they were built. He also says the Sears Tower in Chicago had a similar plan.

He's prioduced a series of 26 10 minute videos describing everything related to the destruction of the WTC towers. He also has a link at this site to a book he wrote about it called The Third Truth. I've watched the videos, and read the book. It is certainly a theory worth considering because it holds together much better than the Official Story.


Hatha

[Awoke]

It is certainly a theory worth considering because it holds together much better than the Official Story.


Hatha


A wet paper bag full of bricks holds together better than the official story!

[Hatha Sunahara]

I believe the Official Story was deliberately made to NOT hold up to scrutiny. The goal was to stimulate the diversity of conspiracy theories about what actually happened. This divides us humans into 'camps'. Like the 'thermite camp. And the Beam Weapon Camp. And the micronuke camp, and the big bomb below camp, and the no planes camp. And a multitude of other camps. And we promote our pet theory, and argue with the competing camps. This makes us divided and we lose sight of the real enemy, and cease to be a real threat to that enemy. I think we should just forget about all these competing ideas on how it was done, and start talking about why the government and the media are covering up what really happened. We should have the question 'Why are you lying?' as a mantra.

The problem with this is that the people who did 911 have all the power because we have given it to them. So, until we take the power back from them we will have to settle for 911 being a complete mystery. With a diversity of competing camps offering a multitude of conspiracy theories. The argument should be why there is so much 'smoke and mirrors' about 911. Why do the media and the government seem to be creating the smoke and mirrors. We are still working on mysteries like the JFK assassination, the MLK assassination, and the OKC bombing. All of them had patsies. 911 had dead arab hijacker patsies. And on all these mysterious events, we are divided into 'camps'.

I suppose our great grandchildren may stop asking questions about these events and accept the Official Story. The people who did it just have to ignore all of us until we die. Not a problem for people who own the media and create the money. Then they will get away with their crimes. Because they are above the law.


Hatha

[Antonio]

Here's a guy who believes just what your question asks.

http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/index.htm

He worked for the Soviet Union's nuclear intelligence organization responsible for compliance of nuclear treaties. He says that the WTC towers building plans included a plan for the demolition of the buildings with nuclear demolition devices even before they were built. He also says the Sears Tower in Chicago had a similar plan.

He's prioduced a series of 26 10 minute videos describing everything related to the destruction of the WTC towers. He also has a link at this site to a book he wrote about it called The Third Truth. I've watched the videos, and read the book. It is certainly a theory worth considering because it holds together much better than the Official Story.


Hatha


Yes, this is highly interesting but still not 100% certain. A must-know for any 911 researcher nonetheless. I admit I sat with my mouth wide open while watching his vid about a year ago, delivered in PURPOSEFULLY horrendous English (as a Russian I am ready to testify that for some reason the guy
exaggerates his thick Russian accent).

[gunDriller]

gunDriller, I think you are perceptive and correct. I'm almost certain it was a scalar weapon used to disintegrate the buildings. Here's a good website that can be researched showing many of the bizarre things that happened on 911. She concludes it was some type of energy weapon. A scalar weapon would be more precise.


thanks !

what i have been wanting to do is to take some test pieces of concrete, and to put them in a microwave oven, to see if they become crumbly.

but i don't have a microwave oven !

if you drop a huge slab of concrete 500 feet, it normally does not turn into concrete debris until it hits the ground. then you end up with chunks of concrete, twisted steel rods, dust, etc.

but that's not what happened on 9-11. and i think each WTC building had about 300,000 tons of concrete. the details are at Jim Hoffman's website -

http://research.wtc7.net/

scalar weapons, huh ?

the net effect of whatever weapon it was, was to disintegrate the structure of the building (the steel), and to pulverize the concrete.

another part of the signature is the pool of molten metal that stayed molten for several days.

it's obvious that it was a controlled demolition.

[Antonio]

I`m the only person to announce on the web (GIM) that I stuck my Radalert geiger counter out of my Bronx window a few hrs after 911 and it showed about 37/ct per minute (I don`t remember the very exact number due to shock, sat on the floor for 3 next days staring at TV). The normal background radiation in NYC is 8-16 ct/min. When I saw 911 on TV (and smelled the smoke) and saw the mushroom cloud, my only thoughts were,"nukes and coup d`etat".