PDA

View Full Version : Honest Answer To Gov't Woes Is Bankruptcy



Twisted Titan
18th January 2011, 10:15 AM
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/559977/201101141830/Honest-Answer-To-Govt-Woes-Is-Bankruptcy.htm


Honest Answer To Gov't Woes Is Bankruptcy

Government budget crises can be painful, but the political rhetoric accompanying these crises can also be fascinating and revealing.

Perhaps the most famous American budget crisis was New York City's, back during the 1970s. When President Gerald Ford was unwilling to bail them out, the famous headline in the New York Daily News read, "Ford to City: Drop Dead."

President Ford caved and bailed them out, after all. The rhetoric worked.


That is why so many other cities and states — not to mention the federal government — have continued on with irresponsible spending, and are now facing new budget crises, with no end in sight.

What would have happened if Ford had stuck to his guns and not set the dangerous precedent of bailing out local irresponsibility with the taxpayers' money? New York would have gone bankrupt. But millions of individuals and organizations go bankrupt without dropping dead.

Bankruptcy conveys the plain facts that political rhetoric tries to conceal. It tells people who depended on the bankrupt government that they can no longer depend on that bankrupt government. It tells the voters who elected that bankrupt government, with its big spending promises, that they made a bad mistake that they would be wise to avoid making again in the future.

Legally, bankruptcy wipes out commitments made to public sector unions, whose extravagant pay and pension contracts are bleeding municipal and state governments dry. Is putting an end to political irresponsibility and legalized union racketeering dropping dead?

Politics being what it is, we are sure to hear all sorts of doomsday rhetoric at the thought of cutbacks in government spending. The poor will be starving in the streets, to hear the politicians and the media tell it.

Party On

But the amount of money it would take to keep the poor from starving in the streets is chump change compared to how much it would take to keep on feeding unions, subsidized businesses and other special interests who are robbing the taxpayers blind.

Letting armies of government employees retire in their 50s, to live for decades on pensions larger than they were making when they were working, costs a lot more than keeping the poor from starving in the streets.

Pouring the taxpayers' money down a thousand bottomless pits of public and private boondoggles costs a lot more than keeping the poor from starving in the streets.

Bankruptcy says: "We just don't have the money." End of discussion


Bailouts say: "Give the taxpayers a little rhetoric, and a little smoke and mirrors with the bookkeeping, and we can keep the party rolling."

Pass The Problem

One of the political games that is played during a budget crisis is to cut back on essential services like police departments and fire departments, in order to blackmail the public into accepting higher tax rates. Often, a lot more money could be saved by getting rid of runaway pension contracts with public sector unions.

Bankruptcy can do that. Bailouts cannot.

What the public needs are current policemen and current firemen, not retired policemen and retired firemen, much less bureaucrats retired on inflated pensions.

The political temptation to create extravagant pensions is always there, not only at state and local levels, or at the federal level, but in countries around the world. Why? Because pensions are benefits that can be promised for the future, without raising the money to pay for them.

Politicians get the votes of those to whom pensions are promised, without losing the votes of taxpayers — and they leave it up to future government officials to figure out what to do when the money is just not there. It is a surefire guarantee of political irresponsibility.

All of this works politically only so long as the voting public accepts budget crisis rhetoric at face value, without bothering to stop and think about what it means and implies

Hatha Sunahara
18th January 2011, 10:28 AM
Bankruptcy is punishment for doing things that don't work. It's function is to cleanse the economy of failure. A failure to recognize this is a symptom of corruption, which is a higher form of bankruptcy. Too big to fail means too rotten to die. Instead of letting them die, we feed these corpses putting us in danger of being corpses ourselves.


Hatha

palani
18th January 2011, 11:37 AM
Bankruptcy says: "We just don't have the money."

Not so. To be insolvent is to turn over all assets so that one may remain out of prison while continuing to show performance on all contracts. This is known as being responsible.

Bankruptcy is to turn ones back on responsibility while holding on to some assets which are protected from seizure.

The difference between insolvency and bankruptcy is a little moral thing called responsibility.

Cobalt
18th January 2011, 11:44 AM
The problems with the current bankrupt laws is

#1 Too easy, you should have to start at square one, not keep a whole bunch of stuff that you never paid for

#2 Doesn't say long enough that you were a deadbeat and skipped out on responsibility

Twisted Titan
18th January 2011, 11:54 AM
Too big to fail means too rotten to die.

Sig Line right there Hatha

mick silver
18th January 2011, 12:20 PM
but but that would mean that they would have to say they were all wrong .... not going to happen if they can make it work a little longer