U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

[Ares]

ATLANTA, Jan. 18, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED.

Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

"There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter. These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons. Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case. The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court."

The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

"Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts."

By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

William M. Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a civil lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, 32-year federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay a fortune in legal fees of Maid of the Mist. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

After attempting to get the case reopened with new evidence that proved fraud upon the courts and obstruction of justice, Judge Evans and Judge William S. Duffey committed a variety of crimes and violations of Constitutional rights, as did judges with the Eleventh Circuit. All of this was detailed for the Supreme Court.

Windsor says: "I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges. I have been contacted by people from all over the country and around the world with their stories of judicial corruption with judges all over the U.S.

"My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I do not believe there is a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. In my opinion, we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

"In my opinion, this is the most serious issue that our country has ever faced. Our rights have been stolen. And the mainstream media refuses to cover this story because they are afraid of the judges. Heaven help us.

"I believe our only hope in America is if the masses become aware of what is taking place. I am writing an expose, and my book will be available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and on amazon.com soon. The publisher will decide if the title is Lawless America or Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed."

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20110118.CL31921&show_article=1

[Ares]

From here on forward if the population gets wind of this. It's only a matter of time before they stop complying knowing full well the corruption they face at the hands of a "judge".

[Twisted Titan]

WHEN INJUSTICE BECOMES LAW

REBELLION BECOMES DUTY.

[osoab]

From here on forward if the population gets wind of this. It's only a matter of time before they stop complying knowing full well the corruption they face at the hands of a "judge".


I think your too optimistic Ares. The sheep will follow what .gov tells them.
Think of all the proganda that has been spewed out in recent weeks questioning if the Constitution is outdated.

[Cobalt]

Okey Dokey
If they don't have to follow the Constitution, I don't have to follow any laws they set forth

[Ares]

Okey Dokey
If they don't have to follow the Constitution, I don't have to follow any laws they set forth


I couldn't agree more.

[7th trump]

First of all what law (type or form) are we talking about that the SC is saying can ignore the US Constitution.

For instance, the 14th establishes a different citizen, one that is subject to congress, US citizen, that dont enjoy all the protections of the first ten amendments. That law form is the "Civil Law" and written up as code or statutes most of which are not positive law, but rules and regulations.

What I beleive you are witnessing is the US SC admitting to the public, for the first time, via a recent court decision on the subject, that as a federal (Title 5 section 552a(13)) "US citizen" the US Constitution doesnt apply as it does to the People!
I beleive they are telling you that you are not the People of the United States of America, but "federal personel" where judges can rule a decision based on the "Civil Law form".

[7th trump]

Okey Dokey
If they don't have to follow the Constitution, I don't have to follow any laws they set forth

Oh yes you will........and I'm not being a smart ass about it either.
Go here www.state-citizen.org and www.1215.org to see why.

[Awoke]

You took the words right out of my mouth, Cobalt.


EDIT to add, in the words of my friend Twisted Avatar: CLICK CLICK!

[Twisted Titan]

From here on forward if the population gets wind of this. It's only a matter of time before they stop complying knowing full well the corruption they face at the hands of a "judge".




I think your too optimistic Ares. The sheep will follow what .gov tells them.
Think of all the proganda that has been spewed out in recent weeks questioning if the Constitution is outdated.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bftACyHdbvw

[MetalsMan]

7th Trump is RIGHT!

Listen to this:
http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/lectures/sovereignty/track06.mp3

More here:
http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/lectures/sovereignty/index.html

[Twisted Titan]

I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges.



The "Blue" Gang and The "Black" Gang
Work together to make dam sure
THAT YOU DO HANG

[po boy]

See the press and the court are not telling you that most of our parents sold us into slavery via birth certificates and social security numbers to be regulated by not so civil law.

Over time and through indoctrination in public school we have become ignorant masses to these losses of Creator given rights and responsibilities which were and still are protected by the constitution for the few who know how.

Now trying to restore our rights is not wanted by a system designed to reduce the masses to slavery.

JetGraphics has linked to yahoo groups in the past on the old GIM1 here is a link for those who wish to read it.
groups.yahoo.com/group/NASP/message/29 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NASP/message/29)

[MetalsMan]

See the press and the court are not telling you that most of our parents sold us into slavery via birth certificates and social security numbers to be regulated by not so civil law.

Over time and through indoctrination in public school we have become ignorant masses to these losses of Creator given rights and responsibilities which were and still are protected by the constitution for the few who know how.

Now trying to restore our rights is not wanted by a system designed to reduce the masses to slavery.




BINGO!!!

The Birth Certificate, Social Security Card, etc, etc, etc.
make us "FEDERAL Employees" and "US Citizens" subject to
their PRIVATE statutes, Civil "Law" etc.

You are a "US Citizen" when you sign up for federal benefits
such as Social Security. See 5USC 552a (13)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/usc_sec_05_00000552---a000-.html


You have to OPT OUT and become a "People" (We the People).
(Common Law)

[Book]

Second Judicial Misconduct Complaint

Judge Orinda D. Evans



I hereby petition the Judicial Council for review of my complaint against Judge Orinda D. Evans in Civil Action Number 1:06-CV-0714-ODE.

This petition should be granted because (1) Judge Evans is guilty of conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts. (2) Judge Evans is guilty of a complete void of impartiality. (3) Judge Evans treated the Defendants in a hostile manner. (4) Judge Evans violated Canons 1, 2, and 3 of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. (5) Judge Evans had improper motives. (6) Judge Evans concealed evidence. (7) Judge Evans welcomed every imaginable form of professional misconduct by the Plaintiffs’ Attorneys, and she turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to massive perjury and hundreds of Rule 11 and Rule 37 violations.

The dismissal of my Complaint by Judge Stanley Birch is ridiculous. Judge Birch is one of the dishonest judges with the Eleventh Circuit who has actively participated in the cover-up for Judge Evans, so he had no business dealing with this complaint. Judge Birch claims that nothing related to what a judge does can be the conduct addressed by a judicial misconduct complaint. This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. He is expressing that I can complain about Judge Evans stealing money from a bank, but I can’t complain about her stealing money in her courtroom. Dishonesty and corruption must not be allowed to take place in a courtroom!

Judge Birch says there is no credible evidence that would lead a reasonable person to conclude that Judge Evans violated the law and my Constitutional rights. Bull manure. My Complaint includes detailed documentation of hundreds of intentional false statements by Judge Evans. I ask this Judicial Council to grant me a hearing and/or allow me to present to the Council the result of a survey of 100 reasonable people chosen at random that will establish that “reasonable people” believe Judge Evans is the crook that I know her to be.

Judge Evans is a criminal. She is as crooked as any judge could ever be. She has worked with the Plaintiffs’ attorneys to “steal” one and a half million dollars from me in the guise of a lawsuit. The facts and the law are meaningless to Judge Evans. If an HONEST judge examines the evidence in this case and her rulings, an HONEST judge will see that she has repeatedly made statements in her orders that are totally false. She has done this intentionally.

It is impossible for me to begin to address the issues in five pages. Please allow me to complain about being restricted to five pages and no attachments in this Petition. Judge Evans has made hundreds of false statements in orders in this case. It would take far more than five pages to merely list all of her false statements, lies, invented facts, citations of bias, and other wrongdoings. It is impossible to properly plead my case in five pages. Judge Evans participated in stealing over a million dollars from me, and you give me five pages. I’d call this justice at its worst, but that seems par for the course in federal court in Atlanta. The only way to deal with this matter is with a hearing.

My Complaint outlines the wrongdoing of Judge Evans. For more details, see it. Also see the docket in 1:06-CV-0714-ODE.

Canons 1, 2, and 3 are each focused on the alleged importance of impartiality. Judge Evans was totally biased in this case, and exhibits to my Complaint detailed many of those prior to now. Truthfully, I am worn out from trying to obtain one iota of justice from judges in Atlanta, Georgia so I haven’t taken the time to detail her latest atrocities.

There is gross judicial misconduct. Judge Evans has committed hundreds of criminal acts.

Judge Evans concealed material evidence that should have been provided to the Defendants. Judge Evans lied in her orders in this regard.

The various rulings of Judge Evans in this case were not fair or logical and showed a partiality to the Plaintiffs from the very beginning. There are 416 sentences in this Order Granting Summary Judgment. TWO HUNDRED AND TEN (210) of the 416 are false or incorrect. This is not “directly related to the merits of a decision or procedural ruling;” this is BIAS; this is incompetence; this is a lack of integrity; this is impropriety; this is illegal.

The constitutional rights of the Defendants were violated repeatedly. Judge Evans continues to violate the Canons and my Constitutional rights by refusing to recuse herself and continuing to make biased rulings.

Judge Evans violated the law and manufactured her own law and facts to rule against the Defendants. Judge Evans included alleged facts in her orders that were not even presented by the Plaintiffs or the Defendants.

I will spend the rest of my life telling the world the story about this lawsuit and the federal courts in Atlanta. My book was to be titled “Lawless America,” but I am now using “Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed” with the byline “InJustice in America.” Your actions will be detailed in my book and on my website.

This Judicial Council needs to have a hearing on this matter. Please do not sweep this under the rug with another canned response. Judge Evans needs to be removed as a judge and impeached.

There is way too much proof for you to make a decision based upon five pages double-spaced. I can prove to honest judges that Judge Evans is as dishonest as any judge could ever be. But you will automatically want to assume that Judge Evans is right and I am wrong. The only way that I can prove otherwise is with a hearing or a meeting or far more documentation than this.

Judge Evans is committing criminal acts on the bench. You have notice. If you fail to act, you will be committing misprision of felonies. Even worse, you will be violating your oaths of office and your moral and ethical obligations. You will also be committing criminal acts.

If you are not a judge in the Northern District of Georgia or with the Eleventh Circuit, you may be honest, and you may be the only hope for something to be done. I know that most of the judges with the Eleventh Circuit are dishonest and corrupt, and I can prove it. Judges with the Eleventh Circuit, except Judge Tjoflat (who I suspect to be honest based upon reading many of his opinions), are being sued by me in Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-02027-WSD. I recently submitted a motion to name each of them as one of the DOE parties.
Here is what each of you needs to answer: Should federal judges be allowed to lie hundreds of times in decisions? Should federal judges be allowed to commit criminal acts? Should federal judges be allowed to conceal evidence that would prove fraud upon the court by the Plaintiffs and by the judge? Should federal judges be allowed to ignore all of the uncontroverted facts? Should federal judges be allowed to ignore every binding legal precedent? Should federal judges be allowed to threaten litigants and use her judicial power to improperly and illegally inflict financial devastation on a litigant? Should federal judges be allowed to do whatever they personally want to do with no regard whatsoever to the law, honesty, ethics, or morality? Judge Evans is guilty on all counts.

William M. Windsor

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php/news/25-dishonest-judges/81-second-judicial-misconduct-complaint-against-judge-orinda-d-evans

:D

[po boy]

More info on rights......"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a FIGHTING clause. It's benefits can be retained only by sustained COMBAT. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted npon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in person." McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. . . . He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus." [Emphasis added]freedom-school.com/belligerent-claimant/belligerent-claimant.html (http://freedom-school.com/belligerent-claimant/belligerent-claimant.html)

[sirgonzo420]

See the press and the court are not telling you that most of our parents sold us into slavery via birth certificates and social security numbers to be regulated by not so civil law.

Over time and through indoctrination in public school we have become ignorant masses to these losses of Creator given rights and responsibilities which were and still are protected by the constitution for the few who know how.

Now trying to restore our rights is not wanted by a system designed to reduce the masses to slavery.




BINGO!!!

The Birth Certificate, Social Security Card, etc, etc, etc.
make us "FEDERAL Employees" and "US Citizens" subject to
their PRIVATE statutes, Civil "Law" etc.

You have to OPT OUT and become a "Person" (We the People).
(Common Law)





Be careful there grasshopper... in law, a "person" is NOT singular for "people".

Men, women, and children are people.

Persons are not.

Persons are (generally state-created) legal fictions.

[MetalsMan]

See the press and the court are not telling you that most of our parents sold us into slavery via birth certificates and social security numbers to be regulated by not so civil law.

Over time and through indoctrination in public school we have become ignorant masses to these losses of Creator given rights and responsibilities which were and still are protected by the constitution for the few who know how.

Now trying to restore our rights is not wanted by a system designed to reduce the masses to slavery.




BINGO!!!

The Birth Certificate, Social Security Card, etc, etc, etc.
make us "FEDERAL Employees" and "US Citizens" subject to
their PRIVATE statutes, Civil "Law" etc.

You have to OPT OUT and become a "Person" (We the People).
(Common Law)





Be careful there grasshopper... in law, a "person" is NOT singular for "people".

Men, women, and children are people.

Persons are not.

Persons are (generally state-created) legal fictions.



Thanks. I fixed my post above.

You're right. You must get the wording correct or you're screwed.

New to this. Learning as fast as I can... ;D

[Cobalt]

How can they (Supreme Court) rule the Constitution is void?

If it is, then they themselves don't exist because it was the Constitution that created them.

http://www.evgschool.org/branches.jpg

[MetalsMan]

How can they (Supreme Court) rule the Constitution is void?

If it is, then they themselves don't exist because it was the Constitution that created them.

http://www.evgschool.org/branches.jpg



Did the Constitution create them... or did
they get added to usurp the People's power?

:conf:

[ximmy]

It's almost time...

[Libertytree]

Those assclowns have been operating against the Constitution for years and years but now the SC has raised the stakes by openly decreeing that the Constitution can and will be voided at any time of their choosing. This decision is a blatant declaration from the .gov of a great big fuck YOU! to the American people. They disgust me and I'm sickened by reading this. fuck THEM!!!!

Edit: Apparently the F word can't be capitalized, or any of the letters used in higher case.

[Ares]

I've come to the conclusion contract with the state or not, they do not care. If that was the case the states would still be sitting senators. Instead states have no voice in the legislative process even though there is evidence that the 17th amendment was never properly ratified.

Stop quoting laws to us. We carry swords. - Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus 106-47 BC

Thanks to Palini for showing me that quote.

[undgrd]

A lot to research in this thread...tagging.

Thanks

[Antonio]

As a Russian I have an eerie feeling that this guy:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=lenin&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=

has woken up and already bought a one-way ticket to USA.

[Apparition]

It was inevitable after centuries of it being distorted and intentionally misinterpreted.

[palani]

It was inevitable after centuries of it being distorted and intentionally misinterpreted.


Amendments have the inherent ability to amend and that is precisely what the 14th amendment did. Since 1868 the U.S. has been operating under a truncated constitution composed almost solely of the 14th amendment. There are only several prohibitions contained in the 14th amendment: you cannot question the national debt as long as you are benefiting from it and you can only participate in elections as an insurgent.

They have always been fairly clear about what they are about. Consistent too. People are just too lazy and contented (and trusting) to get out and do anything about the situation. Wonder how much longer that is going to continue.

[7th trump]

Very good post Palani...............hats off to ya! ;)

[po boy]

A lot to research in this thread...tagging.

Thanks


If have some time take a listen library.georgegordon.com/audio (http://library.georgegordon.com/audio)go to page 43 scroll and listen to admiralty,
also if you then filter by year 2005 and on pages 10 and 11 look for social security.