PDA

View Full Version : On Real Respect for the Constitution ... ron paul



mick silver
25th January 2011, 09:16 AM
http://www.thedailybell.com/1709/Ron-Paul-On-Real-Respect-for-the-Constitution.html ... I am pleased that the Constitution has received a lot of attention in recent weeks, thanks to the tea party movement. The 112th Congress kicked off with a reading of the Constitution on the floor of the House. It goes without saying that Members of Congress should have read the Constitution many times, and should continue to study it.

Citing the particular clause of the Constitution that authorizes newly introduced legislation is a reasonable suggestion, yet in reality it will do little to restrain unconstitutional growth of the federal government. We have had such rules in the past and no benefit came of it.

The laws that are passed reflect the preferences and personal agendas of those in charge. For too long those agendas have expanded government at the expense of personal liberty, regardless of which political party was in charge. This expansion of government clearly violated the Constitution, yet it was always argued that this or that program somehow conformed to that "living" document.

By misinterpreting the general welfare clause, the interstate commerce clause, and the "necessary and proper" clause, Congress has justified every conceivable expansion of the federal government. Congress also has misinterpreted the 14th Amendment and legislated as though it had repealed the 10th Amendment. Sadly, Congress has also systematically abdicated its prerogatives and responsibilities to the executive branch over many decades.

Too many people, in and out of Congress, grew up being taught that the Constitution was a "modern living document." Though the authors allowed for flexibility through the amendment process, this process has been ignored for the sake of speed and convenience. As a result, the Constitution now has little actual meaning.

Our Constitution should be viewed as law, and Members of Congress should be expected to follow, respect, understand, and uphold the law. But a document is just a piece of paper if those who represent us and promise to obey it ignore it instead. Celebrating the Constitution without this understanding will do nothing to restore the greatness of America.

Simply praising the document distracts from the need for Members to resist special interests, political self-interests, emergency needs in times of crisis, fear-based economic myths, and the persistent temptation to seek security over liberty while ignoring personal responsibility and self-reliance.

I wonder: will this welcomed renewed interest in the Constitution lead to a healthy reassessment of all of our policies? Will there be no more wars without an actual congressional declaration? Will the Federal Reserve Act be repealed? Will only gold and silver be deemed legal tender?

Will we end all unconstitutional federal departments, including the Department of Energy, Education, Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, and Labor?

Will the Patriot Act be repealed and all warrantless searches stopped?

Will the TSA be abolished?

Will the IRS's unconstitutional collection powers end?

Will executive and judicial quasi-legislative powers end?

Will we end the federal war on drugs?

Will we end the federal government's involvement in medical care?

Will we end all of the federal government's illusionary insurance programs?

Will we ban secret prisons, trials without due process, and assassinations?

Will we end our foreign policy of invasion and occupation?

For America to once again become the standard for a free society, our love of liberty and desire for peace must far surpass any public display of fidelity to the Constitution. We must first look to strong moral character, respect for the rule of law, and an understanding of the proper role of government in a free society.

Awoke
25th January 2011, 09:35 AM
Just a reminder: He's a Freemason too.

sirgonzo420
25th January 2011, 10:12 AM
Just a reminder: He's a Freemason too.


So were some of the Founding Fathers.

So is my grandpa.


YOU probably know more about the sinister side of masonry than many/most of the "porch masons" who comprise the bulk of modern freemasonry.

In short, they aren't ALL bad guys.


As a side note, I gave Ron Paul a masonic handshake once (having heard rumors of his being a mason), but he didn't respond any differently than he would've if I had given him a regular handshake.

He probably became a mason because he thought it was a good thing, and possibly for the networking.

nunaem
25th January 2011, 10:23 AM
I don't mind him being a mason, but I wonder why he is still alive after all this time. I know that if they did him in now it would cause an uproar but prior to 2007 there would hardly have been a peep.

Awoke
25th January 2011, 11:05 AM
Just a reminder: He's a Freemason too.


So were some of the Founding Fathers.

So is my grandpa.



So was my own father. He denies any luciferian ties in the FMC, but was only a blue lodge master mason. (3rd degree out of 33 degrees).



YOU probably know more about the sinister side of masonry than many/most of the "porch masons" who comprise the bulk of modern freemasonry.



I would have to agree with you on that. I had this discussion today with a co-worker who was approached and asked to join them. He asked the wrong guy if he was looking for my blessing.
In fact, my local lodge sent a "friend" of mine over to my house, in the guise of a friendly visit, which ended up being a polite visit in which he tried to get me to stop talking to people about the masons.




In short, they aren't ALL bad guys.



No, but they all belong to a bad organization.




As a side note, I gave Ron Paul a masonic handshake once (having heard rumors of his being a mason), but he didn't respond any differently than he would've if I had given him a regular handshake.

He probably became a mason because he thought it was a good thing, and possibly for the networking.


Yeah I remember you telling us about that on GIM. Good attempt. It would have been interesting if he had have reacted. You're sure you did it right?

Libertarian_Guard
25th January 2011, 04:02 PM
Just a reminder: He's a Freemason too.


So were some of the Founding Fathers.

So is my grandpa.


YOU probably know more about the sinister side of masonry than many/most of the "porch masons" who comprise the bulk of modern freemasonry.

In short, they aren't ALL bad guys.


As a side note, I gave Ron Paul a masonic handshake once (having heard rumors of his being a mason), but he didn't respond any differently than he would've if I had given him a regular handshake.

He probably became a mason because he thought it was a good thing, and possibly for the networking.


Sirgonzo

Very well said my friend. I know full well that most Masons join for one of three reasons. Networking / friendship or at the request of a family member. Any other reason might account for less than 1% of their membership, and Awoke could be among the 1% or less, he could petition for membership just so he might work his way up the food chain and learn their plans for world domination.

Then he could tell us all, what exactly is going on.

Awoke
25th January 2011, 05:55 PM
he could petition for membership just so he might work his way up the food chain and learn their plans for world domination.

Then he could tell us all, what exactly is going on.


Believe me, I considered doing that, but I can't turn my back on God like that, even if the end-goal is (intended to be) honorable.

Plus, I speak my mind when I see things happen that shouldn't. I know I would blow my cover at the first ritual.

MAGNES
25th January 2011, 06:10 PM
So is my grandpa.


3rd is nothing but they still know stupid things.

Some of the most significant posters on this had family masonic ties.

Like Rodin and Anty Ep. They ain't posting here, rodin is registered.
He is busy on other forums he tells me.

You didn't have the pleasure of knowing Anty Ep.

But you are following in his path on key history especially,
Anty Ep alone pointed to this, for us, and more, white washed
history, you even have a one shop stopping with your original find,
Pinay. Anty Ep was the King of GIM hands down in more ways than
one.

Awoke
26th January 2011, 07:27 AM
Just for the record, that "So is my Grandpa" quote should be attributed to Gonzo.

I got to see Anty Ep around GIM, but I didn;t pay particular attention to his posts. I remember you posts and PatColos posts as always being "Stand out" posts, but not Anty Eps posts.

Maybe I just didn't notice at the time, but if you have great respect for his posts, then I'm sure I would have too.

I also remember disagreeing with Rodin on a lot of things.