PDA

View Full Version : Arizona sues US government over illegal immigrants.



Ponce
11th February 2011, 11:16 AM
I can see this happening in just about every state but for Mexfornia.
================================================== ======


Friday, February 11, 2011 Arizona sues US government over illegal immigrants.

© AFP/Getty Images/David Mcnew
AFP/Activist Post

PHOENIX, Arizona (AFP) - Arizona is counter-suing the US government, charging that Washington has failed to protect it from an invasion of illegal immigrants and related violent crime, its governor has said.

The lawsuit, which seeks federal compensation, is in response to a federal lawsuit filed by President Barack Obama's administration last year challenging Arizona's enforcement of a new immigration law along the US-Mexican border.

"Our citizens have lived with this dark cloud for too long .. It's time for the federal government to do its job and secure the border," said Governor Jan Brewer, announcing the lawsuit outside the federal courthouse in Phoenix.

The lawsuit notably charges that the US federal government has failed to reimburse Arizona for more than $760 million in costs for incarcerating illegal immigrants.


"While control of the border is a federal responsibility, illegal aliens who successfully cross the border and commit crime in Arizona become an Arizona responsibility," said Attorney General Tom Horne.

Brewer said the boundary between Arizona and Mexico remains a dangerous place despite stepped-up enforcement along the nearly three thousand mile border by federal authorities.

She also cited the recent death of a US Border Patrol officer as evidence of illegal incursions across the border by criminal drug cartels. "Our border and immigration system are still broken," she said.

The lawsuit also seeks compensation from the federal government for the cost to the state of securing the border.

Brewer claimed fighting illegal immigration had cost the state more than a billion dollars, funds the state simply does not have while facing a serious budget crisis.


Immigrant solidarity: ©AFP/Robyn Beck
She noted that the legal action is being paid for with private funds and is not costing taxpayers. Horne said he expects the lawsuit to be settled in the US Supreme Court.

But other state officials challenged Brewer over the merits of another legal fight with the government.

"Filing a lawsuit won't solve our problems," said attorney Kyrsten Sinema, who serves in the Arizona state Senate. "It won't solve the immigration crisis all of us face in this country," Sinema said.

A throng of opponents were kept back by police, but jeered and shouted "We are not illegal" at the governor, who had to speak loudly to be heard over the demonstrators.

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/02/arizona-sues-us-government-over-illegal.html

kregener
11th February 2011, 11:28 AM
State Nullification: Requisite To Freedom
By Chuck Baldwin
February 10, 2011

This column is archived at
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?p=3049

I was thrilled to see J.B. Williams report in NewsWithViews.com that
the State of Montana has a broad-based State nullification bill
currently proposed in its legislature. Derek Skees (R-Whitefish) is
the State legislator who has introduced this much-needed legislation.

See the story at:

http://www.newswithviews.com:80/JBWilliams/williams130.htm

The fact is, Skees’ State Nullification bill is only one of several
outstanding freedom-first bills that is currently before the Montana
legislature. I urge readers to go to PolyMontana.com to look at the
many other fine pieces of pro-freedom legislation pending in the
Montana State legislature:

http://polymontana.com/legislators/freedom-bills/

Unfortunately, one of those very fine bills has already been
defeated: the “Sheriffs First” bill sponsored by Senator Greg
Hinkle (R-Thompson Falls). This bill is long overdue and absolutely
necessary to prevent federal usurpation of State and local law
enforcement. That the Montana legislature failed to pass this bill
indicates just how necessary it is to elect State legislators who
truly understand constitutional government. I urge readers to read the
following defense of the Sheriffs First law, written by my son,
Constitutional Attorney Tim Baldwin:

http://tinyurl.com/4aclefs

Look through the list of the other freedom bills presently before the
Montana State legislature and one will instantly recognize the
potential for this State to stand at the “tip of the spear” in the
reclamation and restoration of State sovereignty, freedom, and
independence. (Plus, it reinforces why my family and I made the
life-changing decision to move to this beautiful and wonderful State.)

For example, there is a bill to nullify federal health care laws; a
bill to eliminate the misapplication of the 14th amendment to the US
Constitution; a bill to nullify the Endangered Species Act; a bill to
authorize permit-less Concealed Carry; a bill to transfer management
of certain federal lands; a bill to provide the State eminent domain
authority for federal lands; and, of course, the Sheriffs First act,
which would have required the Sheriff’s authorization for federal
law enforcement agencies to conduct arrests, searches, and seizures.

I would dare say: if you are a freedom-minded individual, goose bumps
ran up your spine just from reading the above summary. I got goose
bumps simply writing about it. Can one imagine the kind of freedom
that would be unleashed in this great State should even a handful of
these bills actually become law? And think of the numbers of other
State legislatures that would quickly follow suit (especially here in
the West) should any State legislature pass and a State governor sign
these kinds of freedom protections into law!

This is why I keep insisting that, if freedom has a chance to survive
in these United States, the American people must get their eyes off of
Washington, D.C., and start focusing on their individual states. The
authority and power to properly defend liberty has always rested with
the states. I’m not saying we should not be concerned about who our
US representatives and senators are--or who is elected President. I am
saying, however, that freedom will never be restored from inside the
Beltway. It is State independence, resolve, and nullification that
will ultimately preserve and protect our liberties. And, as the
creators of the US Constitution acknowledged, State nullification is
absolutely requisite to freedom’s survival.

And, fortunately, Montana is not the only State with freedom-loving
men and women in its legislature. I am hearing of lawmakers in states
such as Oklahoma and Virginia (and several others) who are introducing
similar freedom bills in their respective State legislatures. The
question is, as always, will the people of these states get behind
their brave legislators and help them get these freedom bills passed?
If they are preoccupied with watching the major television network
news channels (that focus almost entirely on national and
international politics), they will not even know that these freedom
bills are being proposed (most local media ignore them, too), and,
therefore, will be totally inactive and ineffective in helping to
restore the freedoms they claim to love.

I repeat: if freedom is to have a new birth in America, we must stop
focusing on Washington, D.C., and start focusing on our individual
states! I cannot overstate it: liberty will be won or lost at the
State level!

P.S. This Sunday, February 13, 2011, I will bring Part 3 of my
message, “The True Meaning of Romans 13.” This message will be
livestreamed this Sunday afternoon, at 2:30 pm (MST).

To watch this presentation live this Sunday afternoon, go to:

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=17

Plus, my first two messages on Romans 13 (and many other messages)
may be viewed or downloaded at:

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?cat=16

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these
editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be
made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=19

(c) Chuck Baldwin



NOTE TO THE READER:

Chuck Baldwin is a syndicated columnist, radio broadcaster, author, and
pastor dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America
was founded. He was the 2008 Presidential candidate for the Constitution
Party. He and his wife, Connie, have been married for 37 years and have 3
children and 7 grandchildren. See Chuck's complete bio at:

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=6

This email editorial cannot be considered Spam as long as the sender
includes contact information and a method of removal.

To subscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=450

To unsubscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=457

Chuck Baldwin's commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished,
reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does not
charge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied
intact and that full credit is given and that Chuck's web site address is
included.

Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions or
advertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin for
permission. Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling an
interview with Chuck should contact sec@chuckbaldwinlive.com

Readers may also respond to this column via snail mail. The postal address
is P.O. Box 37070, Pensacola, Florida, 32526. When responding, please
include your name, city and state. And, unless otherwise requested, all
respondents will be added to the Chuck Wagon address list.

Please visit Chuck's web site at http://chuckbaldwinlive.com

Grand Master Melon
11th February 2011, 11:30 AM
I really don't know whom I dislike more, Sinema or Brewer.

That being said I do like the whole screw you to the feds move she's pulling here.