US admits adding fluoride to water is damaging teeth.

[Ares]

http://video.godlikeproductions.com/video/USA_admits_adding_fluoride_to_water_is_damaging_te eth_and_has_been_a_big_experiment

[mick silver]

is fluoride in rat poison ? then how in the hell could it be good for you

[Awoke]

IMO, the cumulative mental retardation is more of a concern, but this might stike a chord with some sheep and make them think about their pearly-whites.
(In the words of philo beddoe)

[keehah]

Damage control.

[Hermie]

is fluoride in rat poison ? then how in the hell could it be good for you


When you have to wear Hazmat suits when you handle it
should have been a tipoff it's not a good thing to be ingesting.

[Serpo]

is fluoride in rat poison ? then how in the hell could it be good for you


Ever seen an unhealthy rat....

[mick silver]

ive seen a few dead rats ...

[Serpo]

havnt dentists been saying this all along..... :sun: hahahaha

[madfranks]

IMO, the cumulative mental retardation is more of a concern, but this might stike a chord with some sheep and make them think about their pearly-whites.
(In the words of philo beddoe)


Spiritual retardation too, if you accept the pineal gland's role in human spirituality.

For those who don't know, fluoride kills the human pineal gland, located deep in the center of the brain. The pineal gland creates the molecule dimethyltryptamine (DMT) during spiritually significant moments in your life where it is immediately absorbed by the brain and assists in the perception of the spiritual world. The large scale fluoridation of the US water supply has helped usher in a whole generation of spiritually impotent people.

[oldmansmith]

Thanks Madfranks, I didn't know that. Thank God I grew up on well water or I guess I would never have been able to have an OBE. It does make perfect sense from their perspective though, people who can have adventures outside the body are not apt to go into debt in order to buy crap.

[Serpo]

IMO, the cumulative mental retardation is more of a concern, but this might stike a chord with some sheep and make them think about their pearly-whites.
(In the words of philo beddoe)


Spiritual retardation too, if you accept the pineal gland's role in human spirituality.

For those who don't know, fluoride kills the human pineal gland, located deep in the center of the brain. The pineal gland creates the molecule dimethyltryptamine (DMT) during spiritually significant moments in your life where it is immediately absorbed by the brain and assists in the perception of the spiritual world. The large scale fluoridation of the US water supply has helped usher in a whole generation of spiritually impotent people.



How to Detox Fluorides from Your Body
http://www.naturalnews.com/026605_fluoride_fluorides_detox.html


number of things mentioned here,here is one

Boron was studied in other parts of the world with pronounced success for fluoride detoxification. Borox, which contains boron, has a history of anecdotal success for detoxifying sodium fluoride. Yes, this is the borox you can find in the laundry aisles of some supermarkets. It needs to be taken in with pure water in small quantities.

As little as 1/32 of a teaspoon to 1/4 of a teaspoon in one liter of water consumed in small quantities throughout the day is what has been demonstrated as safe and effective. Around 1/8 of a teaspoon with a pinch of pure sea salt in a liter consumed in small quantities daily has been reported to have dramatic results. There is the possibility of a food grade version with sodium borate, if you can find it.




also it says on fluoride

....It damages the liver and kidneys, weakens the immune system, possibly leading to cancer, creates symptoms that mimic fibromyalgia, and performs as a Trojan Horse to carry aluminum across the blood brain barrier. The latter is recognized as a source of the notorious "dumbing down" with lower IQ's and Alzheimer's effects of fluoride.

[madfranks]

Thanks Madfranks, I didn't know that. Thank God I grew up on well water or I guess I would never have been able to have an OBE. It does make perfect sense from their perspective though, people who can have adventures outside the body are not apt to go into debt in order to buy crap.


Personally I think it's one of the main reasons why the US culture is so utterly materialistic.

[Shami-Amourae]

Found a YouTube version:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYnwnGbgQQM

This is pretty amazing they are finally admitting this shit.

[Serpo]

Its OK its safe fluoride from China ....so says the government.....which means the government has been drinking too much water as they are very ,very ,very DUMB.(the gulf is safe too)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_wyoY9syF4&feature=player_embedded#at=20

[Awoke]

Good contributions, people.

[madfranks]

http://www.naturalnews.com/026364_fluoride_pineal_gland_sodium.html



The Physiological Importance of the Pineal Gland

During the late 1990's in England, a scientist by the name of Jennifer Luke undertook the first study the effects of sodium fluoride on the pineal gland. She determined that the pineal gland, located in the middle of the brain, was a target for fluoride. The pineal gland simply absorbed more fluoride than any other physical matter in the body, even bones.

Because of the pineal gland's importance to the endocrine system, her conclusions were a breakthrough. Her study provided the missing link to a lot of physiological damage from sodium fluoride that had been hypothesized but not positively connected. A veritable root source for the chain reaction of blocked endocrine activity had been isolated.

Good news though. Frequent exposure to outdoor sunshine, 20 minutes or so at a time, will help stimulate a fluoride calcified pineal gland. Just make sure you take off your hat. This is more important than most realize, because the pineal gland affects so much other enzyme and endocrine activity, including melatonin production.

[k-os]

Fifty years of experimenting on us through forced fluoridation in the water supply . . . and now they're "wondering if it was a good idea at all" (and he chuckles when he says that).

50 YEARS!

[Serpo]

Fifty years of experimenting on us through forced fluoridation in the water supply . . . and now they're "wondering if it was a good idea at all" (and he chuckles when he says that).

50 YEARS!


Well no one said they where quick but they are obviously idiots of the first degree.

[Serpo]

This scam starts as follows: the CDC (Centers For Deceit Control and Procrastination) in their Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report of August 17, 2001/Vol 50/ No. RR-14 entitled "Recommendations for Using Fluoride to Prevent and Control Dental Caries in the United States, says on page 4, 5th paragraph, "that fluoride's predominant effect is after the tooth comes into the mouth and on the surface of the tooth".

The question posed to the CDC, the EPA, and the Public Health officials of "why then do we have to ingest it?" NEVER gets answered.

Then there's the issue of INFORMED CONSENT. Every doctor knows that they can't force any medication on an individual without their informed consent. The doctor has to tell the patient of the benefits and of any side effects of a prescribed medication. This puts the final decision to take or not take the medication in the hands of the patient. In addition, the patient has the right to question any treatment so as to make a better decision.

Fluoridation clearly violates this principle.

One of the arguments presented by those that push this crap is to say that no one is forced to drink the water. Yes, the fluoride comes to the tap but ultimately it's the individual's choice to open the tap and drink the water. Please stop laughing. This is their serious argument.

Another argument is that fluoride is not a drug but rather it is a nutrient. So when the question of since when is the toxic waste by-product of the phosphate fertilizer industry or the aluminum or steel industry a nutrient? They usually look at their watches and tell you that they hear their mother calling them and they have to go.

If it is indeed a nutrient why then do the CDC and the ADA (American Dimwit Association), the major pushers of fluoridation in the U.S., say that tooth decay is a "chronic infectious disease" and recommend fluoride to combat this disease? And why does the Fraud and Drug Administration call fluoride an "unapproved" drug? What a classic example of blatant hypocrisy and the anything goes mentality to make money for the pimp.

Earl Baldwin, a member of the British House of Lords and one of the advisory board members for the York Review, the UK sponsored review of fluoridation had this to say: "What physician do you know, who in his or her right mind, would treat someone he does not know and has never met, with a substance that's meant to do change in their bodies, with the advice: 'Take as much, or as little, as you like, but take it for a lifetime because it may help someone's teeth'?"

With fluoridation there is no control over who gets the "medication" or the dosage. What if someone is particularly sensitive to the substance? Tough! What if you're an athlete and drink a gallon of water a day? Tough!

When a person consumes a medication, say aspirin for example, isn't the dose for an infant or a child different that that for an adult? Obviously. With fluoride it's a one-fits-all mentality.

Let's say for a moment that the ingestion of fluoride is a good thing. Who gets more? Your body or your dishes when you wash them, your car when you wash it, your lawn when you water it, or the environment when you flush the toilet? You answer that one and then let me know if mandated fluoridation is a good thing or a bad thing.

Should you raise the issue of reduced tooth decay it has already be proven and documented that those living in unfluoridated communities have virtually the same rates of tooth decay as those living in fluoridated communities. But, there is one profound difference: those living in fluoridated communities have a much, much greater risk of dental fluorosis, which is symptomatic of the discoloration and eventual mottling of the teeth leading to a lifetime of cosmetic veneers or living with the disfiguration.

As if ruining your teeth isn't enough there has been credible documentation showing other debilitating effects. Dr. Phyllis Mullenix proved that fluoride had an adverse effect on the brain. As a result she was told that her work "was no longer relevant to dentistry" and fired. Peer-reviewed studies showing adverse effects on the thyroid gland were ignored as were studies linking fluoride to damage of the pineal gland. The pineal gland is located between the two hemispheres of the brain and is responsible for the synthesis and secretion of melatonin. Melatonin affects jet lag, sleep patterns and aging and by the time old age hits, the accumulation of fluoride in the pineal gland is in very high concentrations.

But wait, there's more. There is also a profound connection between fluoride and bone damage. With symptoms almost identical to arthritis beginning with aching bones and joints. But the best cover-up had to come out of Harvard University. Elise Bassin, as part of her 2001 doctoral thesis for her dental degree, found a connection between fluoride and bone cancer in adolescent boys. When she submitted her finding to Dr. Chester Douglas, the head of Harvard's Dental School, he omitted that finding when releasing her thesis. Why would he do this? Maybe the fact that he was on the payroll of the Colgate-Palmolive Company had something to do with it. Somehow, years later, Bassin's finding were found and released causing Harvard to do a complete investigation on Dr. Douglas. During the investigation Dr. Douglas made a $2 million donation to Harvard and was eventually exonerated.

One other finding was an adverse effect on the kidneys. It was found that fluoride can damage the kidneys at high levels and that someone with poor kidney function would have limitations clearing fluoride from the body making that person especially vulnerable to fluoride's other toxic effects.

With all this adversity is there any group, organization or government agency accepting any responsibility? No, No, No! One would think that of the entities heavily involved in fluoridation someone would take charge or accept liability. The American Dental Association does not. The CDC does not. The EPA does not. The FDA does not. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services does not. The National Sanitation Foundation does not. Yet, all these government agencies pass the buck to the National Sanitation Foundation who in turn accepts no liability for the safe levels or the safety of the chemicals it recommends. Pimps, hookers and tricks!

So what started out as an experimental program in 1945, without any health studies done whatsoever, turned out to be a "cash cow" for industries that previously had to dispose of this toxic waste to the tune of millions of dollars a year.
http://first-news.blogspot.com/2011/02/fluoridation-scam-of-century.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XSZQ3ixu7a4

[etc]

People are really stupid. I think American sheeple are the dumbest sheeple in the world.

[Serpo]

People are really stupid. I think American sheeple are the dumbest sheeple in the world.



Its a very competitive area..... ;D