PDA

View Full Version : Mother of 3 Arrested for Taking Pictures of Tourist Attraction at Airport.



Ponce
19th February 2011, 09:53 AM
Mother of 3 Arrested for Taking Pictures of Tourist Attraction at Airport.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011


This case is a frightening example of what can happen when a photographer encounters ignorant bullies with badges. According to the complaint filed in Federal Court, Nancy Genovese, a mother of three, was driving home on County Road 31 past Gabreski Airport in Suffolk County. Gabreski Airport displays a decorative helicopter shell by the roadway to the public, which is visible to all who pass by.

Nancy Genovese stopped her car on the side of the road across the street from the airport in an area that is open and accessible to the public, and crossed over the road to the airport entryway that is also open and accessible to the public to take a picture of the helicopter display. While still in her car, she took a picture of the decorative helicopter shell with the intention of posting it on her personal “Support Our Troops” web page.

As Nancy Genovese was preparing to drive away, she was stopped and approached by Robert Iberger, a lieutenant with the Southampton Town Police. Lieutenant Iberger demanded to know why she was taking photographs. Nancy showed the lieutenant her camera, but Lieutenant Iberger grabbed her camera and handled it “without care”. In an attempt to prevent the lieutenant from damaging the camera, Nancy removed her memory card, which Lieutenant Iberger confiscated. To date, Nancy’s memory card still has not been returned to her.

Lieutenant Iberger demanded that Nancy remain where she is, and he refused to allow her to leave. At this time, Lieutenant Iberger notified the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office and the authorities at Gabreski Airport of Nancy’s presence outside the airport, and falsely and wrongfully informed them that she posed a terrorist threat.

Suffolk County Deputy Sheriff Robert Carlock responded to the scene, along with various members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office. When Deputy Carlock arrived, he placed cameras on the roof of his vehicle, aimed at Nancy Genovese and her 18 and 20 year old sons who had come to the scene at this point to help their mother. Deputy Carlock ordered all three of them to stand directly in front of the cameras, and not to move.

Officials from the airport, as well as other local and federal law enforcement agencies also responded, including, without limitation, the Southampton Police Department, the Westhampton Police Department, the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. Nancy was questioned on the side of the road for approximately five to six hours, from about 6pm until midnight, denied food or water, and denied the opportunity to use a restroom, all without having received any warnings as to her rights.

Nancy Genovese also had a left lower leg injury just above her ankle that she had received earlier in the day and which, exacerbated by the stress and length of her roadside detention, was causing her to limp. When the officers saw this, they ordered her to expose her wound, which was bleeding, for no legitimate purpose, and with no regard for Nancy’s health or well-being. Members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office used Nancy’s leg wound as another object to taunt her with, telling her that they were going to arrest her for an unreported knife wound.

Here’s where the story takes an interesting twist, and why I believe Nancy’s situation hasn’t received more press coverage. Before arriving at the airport to take a picture, earlier that day Nancy had been to the local shooting range with her rifle practicing her hobby, target shooting. During the first hour of questioning, Lieutenant Iberger searched Nancy’s vehicle, without her consent, and came across her unloaded rifle, which Nancy was legally carrying, in a locked case. Now some people throw up their arms (no pun intended) at this point, and say, “what does she want, she brought a rifle to the airport!”, but I would like to remind everyone that it is perfectly legal to drive around with an unloaded rifle in your car. Yes. Really. And Nancy did not enter the airport, she was parked alongside a public roadway. It is important to remember that no matter how you feel about firearms, nothing that Nancy did violated any laws.

Using force, Lieutenant Iberger pushed Nancy Genovese when she objected to the seizure of her rifle. Deputy Carlock taunted Nancy, asking in a disparaging tone, “You’re a real right winger, aren’t you?”, and stating in words or substance that she was never going to see her rifle again.

During the remainder of the six hours that Nancy Genovese was forcibly detained on the side of the road, she was taunted, verbally harangued, threatened, belittled, abused, humiliated and harassed by members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office. For example, Deputy Carlock repeatedly referred to Nancy as “a right winger” and “tea bagger”, and threatened that they were going to arrest her for terrorism to make an example of her to other “tea baggers” and “right wingers”.

Around midnight, officials from the airport and federal law enforcement agencies determined that Nancy posed no terrorist or other security threat. Once most of the other law enforcement officials left the scene, Deputy Carlock ordered Nancy Genovese to be handcuffed by another member of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office. Before placed in handcuffs, Nancy attempted to give her purse containing her wallet and cell phone to her sons. Her wallet contained approximately $13,000 in cash, money she was holding to pay tuition that day for her son’s college and her daughter’s Catholic school tuition. Deputy Carlock refused to allow her sons to take her bag, and ordered her to leave it on the front seat of her unlocked vehicle, even after being informed of the value of its contents. When Nancy’s sons objected, Deputy Carlock threatened to arrest them if they touched it, and ordered them to leave the scene. Not knowing what to do, they left.

When Nancy’s sons responded to a call from the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office in the early morning hours to pick up their mother’s vehicle from the roadside, they found $5,300 of the $13,000 missing. The money was never returned. In addition, the contents of the glove compartment box was missing, and there was damage to the body of the car, particularly around the trunk.

Around midnight, after her sons were ordered to leave upon threat of arrest, Nancy was transported, in handcuffs, to the Suffolk County Jail. While in a holding cell, Deputy Carlock continued to verbally harass Nancy, telling her “you will pay”, and admitting that they had nothing to charge her with, but that he would “find something in order to teach all right wingers and tea baggers a lesson.”

While in her holding cell, Nancy Genovese was interrogated by Suffolk County Undersheriff Caracappa without receiving any warnings as to her rights. Her requests to speak to a lawyer were ignored. Following her “interrogation”, Undersheriff Caracappa informed her that she was being arrested and charged with “terrorism.”

At this point, Nancy requested medial treatment for her bleeding and painful left leg. After several requests, and several hours later, she was taken to the Peconic Bay Medical Center by male members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office, and handcuffed to a bed. A sonogram was performed on Nancy’s left leg from her ankle to her inner groin, requiring her to disrobe. Despite her and the doctor’s request for them to turn away, the two male Suffolk Deputies insisted on staring at Nancy while she disrobed, further humiliating her. She was prescribed antibiotics, and discharged back to the Suffolk County Jail, with instructions on proper care for her leg wound.

Once back at the jail, the Suffolk County Sheriffs denied her access to her antibiotics, and denied her proper care of her leg wound. This caused a serious and painful staph infection to develop.

The following morning, Nancy Genovese was briefly questioned at the Suffolk County Jail by two FBI agents. No federal complaints or charges were ever brought against Nancy. That same day, Nancy was transported in handcuffs and ankle shackles, with no regard for her ankle wound, to the Southampton Justice Town Court. The driver drove fast and recklessly, intentionally making abrupt turns and laughing. This caused Nancy, who was not secured by a seatbelt, but was instead restrained with her hands cuffed behind her and her ankles cuffed together, to roll about in the back of the vehicle, further exacerbating her leg injury. When she requested that the Deputy Sheriffs secure her with a seatbelt, they laughed at her, and the driver continued to recklessly swerve the vehicle.

Nancy Genovese was brought into the courthouse in handcuffs and leg restraints, and was violently pushed through the door by the Deputy Sheriffs. This added to Nancy’s humiliation, particularly since Nancy knew some of the courthouse employees and other people who were present. Both before and after arriving at the courthouse, Nancy repeatedly requested to speak with an attorney. All of her requests were ignored.

Despite never stepping foot onto airport property, Nancy Genovese was arraigned on a single misdemeanor charge of Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree. She was assigned a Legal Aid Attorney by the Judge. Undersheriff Caracappa and Deputy Carlock intentionally lied to the Judge about the circumstances surrounding Nancy’s arrest, including that she was a terrorist and had surveillance equipment in her car, and the judge set bail in the amount of $50,000.

Due to the excessive amount of bail, Nancy’s children needed more time to come up with the money, so Nancy was returned to the jail. The Legal Aid Attorney assigned to Nancy spoke with the Deputy and Undersheriff, and due to the conversation, directly afterwards informed Nancy that he was no longer her attorney, and that he was going to ask the court to place her on suicide watch.

Once back at the jail, Nancy Genovese was processed, including being issued prison “greens” to wear, and was photographed, fingerprinted, and eye scanned. Members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department continuously verbally harassed Nancy. A woman in civilian clothes then interviewed Nancy. The woman told Nancy she was going to be placed in “general population.” During the interview, two men wearing “Suffolk County Emergency Response Team” jackets entered the room. One of them removed Nancy from the room and held her in the hallway outside of the interview room. From there, Nancy heard the woman who had interviewed her arguing with the other man, saying that “She is not suicidal.”

Despite the woman’s protests, Nancy was physically moved by the two men wearing “Suffolk County Emergency Response Team” jackets to another room. There, another woman who identified herself as a nurse administered, without Nancy’s consent, two injections into Nancy’s arm. One of the men held Nancy’s head so that she could not see what was being done, while the other man held Nancy’s arm down. Despite her demands to know what they were doing, no one answered her. Nancy experienced bruising and swelling in her neck and arm long after she was released from custody.

Nancy was then escorted by the two men into a cell area, where she was forced to disrobe and put on a “suicide gown”, consisting of a heavy, jacket-type blanket that fastens around the body with Velcro. Nancy was not permitted to wear undergarments under the blanket. Nancy was required to wear this same “suicide gown” for the next several days. After three days, Nancy was evaluated by a psychiatrist who determined her to be of sound and stable mind, and immediately removed her from suicide watch.

Later that day, bail was posted, and Nancy was able to go home. Subsequently, all charges against Nancy were dismissed.

Upon Nancy’s release, Undersheriff Caracappa issued a press release in response to media inquiries, titled “Armed Woman Arrested for Trespassing at Suffolk County Gabreski Airport”, which falsely stated that Nancy had been taking pictures of the airport and surrounding security”, and that she became hysterical, and began “screaming and flailing around” when confronted. Undersheriff Caracappa also falsely reported that Nancy had surveillance equipment, 500 rounds of ammunition, and “scary weapons” in her car, and that she was a right-wing extremist and terrorist, and that she had been at the airport trespassing several times and had been warned to stay away. Upon further inquiry, it turns out that Nancy had never trespassed at the airport before, had never been warned by anyone to “stay away” before, had no “surveillance equipment” of any kind other than her point and shoot camera, and certainly was not a terrorist. Undersheriff Caracappa has refused to issue a retraction or correction.

Nancy has filed a Federal Lawsuit seeking up to 70 million dollars from the Town of Southampton, the County of Suffolk, Lieutenant Iberger, Undersheriff Caracappa, Deputy Carlock, Lieutenant Leuete, and various other employees of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department. The lawsuit is still ongoing.


EDITOR’S NOTES:

•All of the alleged facts discussed in this article have been taken directly from the court documents filed in this case.
•Nancy Genovese was on public property the entire time. At no time did she trespass onto airport property, which is why the trespassing charge (the only charge against her) was dismissed.
•Here is the google maps view of the airport entrance, and the helicopter on display.
•Although Undersheriff Caracappa released a statement saying that Nancy was previously spotted around the airport in the past and had previously been warned not to return, not a single person can verify his claim. Nancy claims that she was never warned to “stay away” from a public area outside a tourist attraction.
•Yes, to some, Nancy’s claims seem far fetched and outrageous. But let’s look at the facts that both sides can agree on. Not a single crime was actually committed by Nancy. Yet, she was held against her will, in an isolated cell, in essentially a straight jacket, with no medical attention, for several days.

http://www.longislandlawyerblog.com/mother-of-3-arrested-for-taking-pictures-of-tourist-attraction-at-airport

uncletonoose
19th February 2011, 10:24 AM
watch the video, the town council just found out they were in default. This is hilarious blaming each other for not replying to the complaint. They just lost 70 million dollars. The whole budget for the city!!! :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XdrbNnZsCU

Nancy Genovese Lawsuit Updates: Town of Southampton in Default

he Town of Southampton has failed to timely file an answer to the Nancy Genovese lawsuit, possibly leaving the taxpayers of the town on the hook for $70 million dollars. A motion for a default judgment has been filed against the Town of Southampton and Town of Southampton Police Officer Robert Iberger, and we are awaiting a decision by the court.

So what happened, and how could the town fail to defend itself against such a large lawsuit?

Michael C. Sordi, the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, represents both the town and defendant Robert Iberger, a Town of Southampton Police Officer. He is the attorney responsible for defending both the town and the Southampton Police, but as a result of personal issues, he inadvertently “forgot” to serve an answer. Sordi states in court documents that he telephoned counsel for the Plaintiff the day before his answer was due, advising that his mother was in extremis, and that the doctors treating her had suggested that her death was imminent. He was granted a verbal two week extension, but did not follow up in writing, as he was en route to his mother’s bedside.

A week later, the Town Attorney’s mother passed away. One week later, the Town Attorney’s 25 year old nephew died suddenly and unexpectedly. Michael Sordi states that over the course of these weeks he was in and out of his office tending to family business and grieving the loss of his family members, and that he quite frankly “forgot” that he had not served an answer in this case. He states “I simply got ‘caught up’ in my personal events and I thought, erroneously, that I had actually served the Answer, when in fact I had forgotten to upon my return to work.”

This has not been the first time that the Town Attorney has missed a deadline. Last year, he failed to timely file a response to a lawsuit against the town by a level 3 sex offender, putting the town at risk for an excessive judgment. Luckily, the delay in that case was positively resolved for the town.

Before Michael Sordi was appointed as the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, he was the lead attorney in Nassau County in a high profile federal case involving excessive force by a Nassau County police officer. The county lost the case, and the jury awarded the plaintiff nearly $20 million dollars. Michael Sordi was fired by Nassau County shortly thereafter in December 2009. Republican County Attorney John Ciampoli clamed Mr. Sordi, as the lead council on the case, did not complete any prepatory work for several pretrial motions that needed to be filed. He stated “I would characterize that case as having been grossly mismanaged and mishandled by my predecessors in virtually every way that I could imagine.”

Although town officials were aware of the Nassau County mess, they hired Mr. Sordi anyway. Last Friday, Michael C. Sordi, the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, was asked to submit his resignation. As part of his parting package, he will receive one month’s salary (his annual salary was $115,000), compensation for unused vacation and sick days, and the town will pay for his health insurance coverage through May 2011. Mr. Sordi also had the town sign an agreement that the town will “fully, forever, irrevocably and unconditionally” release him from any liability in claims or lawsuits brought against the town.

No word yet on if the taxpayers of the Town of Southampton will be on the hook for the $70 million dollar default judgment.

http://www.longislandlawyerblog.com/nancy-genovese-lawsuit-updates-town-of-southampton-in-default

mightymanx
19th February 2011, 11:26 AM
I am glad she will probably win, but the cops that did this will not be held responsible so their behavior will not change.
Their screw up punishes the citizens they were supposed to serve and protect. They are protected by unions and the system so there is zero motive for change.

mrnhtbr2232
19th February 2011, 11:44 AM
There will come a point when putting down animals is appropriate for the welfare of society.

mightymanx
19th February 2011, 11:45 AM
I am glad she will probably win, but the cops that did this will not be held responsible so their behavior will not change.
Their screw up punishes the citizens they were supposed to serve and protect. They are protected by unions and the system so there is zero motive for change.

If $70 million default judgment is achieved then who do you suppose is going to be paying their salary. Not the citizens. They will be the new homeless.


Fereral law enforcement subsidies.

uncletonoose
19th February 2011, 11:45 AM
Michael C. Sordi, the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, represents both the town and defendant Robert Iberger, a Town of Southampton Police Officer. He is the attorney responsible for defending both the town and the Southampton Police, but as a result of personal issues, he inadvertently “forgot” to serve an answer. Sordi states in court documents that he telephoned counsel for the Plaintiff the day before his answer was due, advising that his mother was in extremis, and that the doctors treating her had suggested that her death was imminent. He was granted a verbal two week extension, but did not follow up in writing, as he was en route to his mother’s bedside.

If I was a resident of the city, I would make sure that none of the council were reelected, and make sure that everyone in town knew about it. 1st the nature of the way the police dept. handled the whole mess, and 2nd the inept city council.

midnight rambler
19th February 2011, 11:46 AM
This is a glaring example that it's IMPERATIVE that each and every one of us 'turn the light switch on' these cockroaches by STANDING when the call comes. I'd tell all of those (including to their face) who don't stand, but rather scurry like cockroaches themselves when the beast appears to go fuck themselves - but they already are fucking themselves by running from the problem rather than confronting it.

“Danger — if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Never run away from anything. Never!” --Winston Churchill (proving that even the wicked manage to get some things right)

Antonio
19th February 2011, 12:01 PM
I used to live in Suffolk county and got busted once for weed there about 17 yrs ago. The cops were outstanding, corteous, top-notch professional individuals with great sense of humor. I spent a night in jail, was given a cup of coffee by the Sgt and was let out after a firm handshake, paid my ticket and kept fond memories about those cops.
This was actually the norm for NY area in the good ole days.

WTF is happening to the cops lately?

midnight rambler
19th February 2011, 12:04 PM
WTF is happening to the cops lately?

In a word - training. It's all about the perceptions being formed FOR them via their training. And now with the SPLC 'in the loop' on their training you can imagine where it's all headed, i.e. if the people don't begin to STAND.

Antonio
19th February 2011, 12:12 PM
WTF is happening to the cops lately?

In a word - training. It's all about the perceptions being formed FOR them via their training. And now with the SPLC 'in the loop' on their training you can imagine where it's all headed, i.e. if the people don't begin to STAND.


What possible training can make a man belonging to one of the manliest professions disrespect and torture an innocent lady (who speaks the same language as himself, as if it mattered one bit)?

Is honor completely dead in USA?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_8dafLxLcI

mick silver
19th February 2011, 12:14 PM
it look like we are all terrorist in our home land ... i hope they have to lay off the hole police force there .

Ponce
19th February 2011, 01:50 PM
Uncle? while I don't appreciated the fact, or thank you, that you highjacked my thread I must say that the video that you posted was pretty good.

madfranks
19th February 2011, 03:07 PM
While still in her car, she took a picture of the decorative helicopter shell with the intention of posting it on her personal “Support Our Troops” web page.

Hopefully she learned a lesson on the results of devotion to the militarized/police state.

Neuro
19th February 2011, 03:26 PM
Uncle? while I don't appreciated the fact, or thank you, that you highjacked my thread I must say that the video that you posted was pretty good.
Whaaat? Hijacked the thread? He was totally on the subject! The thanks I gave you was by mistake...

Down1
19th February 2011, 03:59 PM
Damn North Korean Stalinists, someone needs to do something about them.
Sick of reading about the North Koreans being abused by the police state for minor and innocent acts.
I glad that kind of nonsense doesn't happen here in "The Land Of The Free" !

Antonio
19th February 2011, 04:02 PM
Damn North Korean Stalinists, someone needs to do something about them.
Sick of reading about the North Koreans being abused by the police state for minor and innocent acts.
I glad that kind of nonsense doesn't happen here in "The Land Of The Free" !


As a rabid Russian Stalinist myself I can certainly relate to what you have said ;).

willie pete
19th February 2011, 04:03 PM
that could've been many of US here at GSUS :o

Antonio
19th February 2011, 04:13 PM
A short lesson on how the police operated in USSR.

The cops carried ONLY Makarov or TT pistols and one spare clip. No sticks or handcuffs. If anyone suggested that a Soviet citizen may be hit with a stick like dog, this suggestion would be considered treasonable and that person had a real chance of going to jail for this.

The cops could use the pistols ONLY when having to subdue an armed suspect. If the guy was unarmed and violent, the cops had to use only bare hands to take him down. If the guy was armed, the cops had to give a verbal warning, then a warning shot and only then shoot in the arms or legs, no torso shots.

Due to these rules quite a few cops carrying pistols had the lights beaten out of them by drunken unarmed mobs. They had to take the punches but couldn`t legally pull the guns.

Ponce
19th February 2011, 04:24 PM
Uncle? while I don't appreciated the fact, or thank you, that you highjacked my thread I must say that the video that you posted was pretty good.
Whaaat? Hijacked the thread? He was totally on the subject! The thanks I gave you was by mistake...


Neuro.............noooooooooooooooooooo I need all the thanks that I can get to build my self ego....ego? hahahahaha, love you guys anyway :oo-->

Down1
19th February 2011, 04:26 PM
Good vid uncle. It would be nice if the vid from the meeting the week before they were referencing would be posted.
Notice the Pelosi clone chairwomen saying it is a frivolous lawsuit so it doesn't matter.
The disease is at all levels of government.

Antonio
19th February 2011, 04:29 PM
Uncle? while I don't appreciated the fact, or thank you, that you highjacked my thread I must say that the video that you posted was pretty good.
Whaaat? Hijacked the thread? He was totally on the subject! The thanks I gave you was by mistake...


Neuro.............noooooooooooooooooooo I need all the thanks that I can get to build my self ego....ego? hahahahaha, love you guys anyway :oo-->


Fuck ego, it`s libido that counts ;)

Ponce
19th February 2011, 04:32 PM
Hahahahahaha Antonio, coming from you that's a compliment...........lol

SWRichmond
19th February 2011, 05:34 PM
WTF is happening to the cops lately?


They are being sent to Iraq, hardened, then put back on duty here.

uncletonoose
19th February 2011, 05:59 PM
Uncle? while I don't appreciated the fact, or thank you, that you highjacked my thread I must say that the video that you posted was pretty good.


:dunno :whistle

midnight rambler
19th February 2011, 06:13 PM
Damn North Korean Stalinists, someone needs to do something about them.
Sick of reading about the North Koreans being abused by the police state for minor and innocent acts.
I glad that kind of nonsense doesn't happen here in "The Land Of The Free" !


Relax...it will never happen here.