PDA

View Full Version : US Gov. Software Creates 'Fake People' on Social Networks to Promote Propaganda



sunshine05
20th February 2011, 12:07 PM
By Sean Kerrigan
The US government is offering private intelligence companies contracts to create software to manage "fake people" on social media sites and create the illusion of consensus on controversial issues.

The contract calls for the development of "Persona Management Software" which would help the user create and manage a variety of distinct fake profiles online. The job listing was discussed in recently leaked emails from the private security firm HBGary after an attack by internet activist last week.

Click here to view the government contract (PDF)

According to the contract, the software would "protect the identity of government agencies" by employing a number of false signals to convince users that the poster is in fact a real person. A single user could manage unique background information and status updates for up to 10 fake people from a single computer.

The software enables the government to shield its identity through a number of different methods including the ability to assign unique IP addresses to each persona and the ability to make it appear as though the user is posting from other locations around the world.

Included in HBGary's leaked emails was a government proposal for the government contract. The document describes how they would 'friend' real people on Facebook as a way to convey government messages. The document reads:

* "Those names can be cross-referenced across Facebook, twitter, MySpace, and other social media services to collect information on each individual. Once enough information is collected this information can be used to gain access to these individuals social circles.
* Even the most restrictive and security conscious of persons can be exploited. Through the targeting and information reconnaissance phase, a person’s hometown and high school will be revealed. An adversary can create a classmates.com account at the same high school and year and find out people you went to high school with that do not have Facebook accounts, then create the account and send a friend request. Under the mutual friend decision, which is where most people can be exploited, an adversary can look at a targets friend list if it is exposed and find a targets most socially promiscuous friends, the ones that have over 300-500 friends, friend them to develop mutual friends before sending a friend request to the target. To that end friend’s accounts can be compromised and used to post malicious material to a targets wall. When choosing to participate in social media an individual is only as protected as his/her weakest friend."



Other documents in the leaked emails include quotes from HBGary CEO Aaron Barr saying, "There are a variety of social media tricks we can use to add a level of realness to all fictitious personas... Using hashtags and gaming some location based check-in services we can make it appear as if a persona was actually at a conference and introduce himself/herself to key individuals as part of the exercise, as one example."

Additional emails between HBGary employees, usually originating from Barr, discuss the vulnerability social networking causes.

One employee wrote, "and now social networks are closing the gap between attacker and victim, to the point I just found (via linked-in) 112 females, wives of service men, all stationed at Hurlbert Field FL - in case you don't know this is where the CIA flies all their "private" airlines out of. What a damn joke - the U.S. is no longer the super power in cyber, and probably won't be in other areas soon."

Barr also predicted a steady rise in clandestine or secret government operations to stem the flow of sensitive information. "I would say there is going to be a resurgence of black ops in the coming year as decision makers settle with our inadequacies... Critical infrastructure, finance, defense industrial base, and government have rivers of unauthorized communications flowing from them and there are no real efforts to stop it."

The creation of internet propoganda software is only one of HBGary's controversial activities. According to Wikileaks competetor and occasional collaborator Cryptome.org, several other progressive organizations were intended to be targeted including anti-war activist, anti-torture organizations and groups opposed to the US Chamber of Commerce.



http://www.patriotactionnetwork.com/forum/topic/show?id=2600775%3ATopic%3A3237602&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

dys
20th February 2011, 12:14 PM
Anyone noticed how desensitized we are getting? No one is surprised by stuff like this anymore. We have to try and fight the tendency to accept the unacceptable simply because it is now the norm.

dys

sunshine05
20th February 2011, 12:22 PM
Anyone noticed how desensitized we are getting? No one is surprised by stuff like this anymore. We have to try and fight the tendency to accept the unacceptable simply because it is now the norm.

dys


So true.

midnight rambler
20th February 2011, 12:52 PM
Anyone noticed how desensitized we are getting? No one is surprised by stuff like this anymore. We have to try and fight the tendency to accept the unacceptable simply because it is now the norm.

dys


I tell you I'm so shocked by this development! :sarc:

RJB
20th February 2011, 12:58 PM
At this point I figure we already know a few. This just confirms the suspicion.

Serpo
20th February 2011, 12:58 PM
Well just imagine this .......what if this whole forum was made up of fake people and you where the only real person. ;D

RJB
20th February 2011, 01:03 PM
Well just imagine this .......what if this whole forum was made up of fake people and you where the only real person. ;D
Dude, don't screw with my paranoid side.

BrewTech
20th February 2011, 01:15 PM
Well just imagine this .......what if this whole forum was made up of fake people and you where the only real person. ;D


Don't laugh (assuming you're not a fake persona, that is - I know they can't laugh ha ha), but I had seriously considered that possibility at one point.

Maybe two points...

Ok, ok... I never fully discounted that possibility... ???

dys
20th February 2011, 03:01 PM
There are far more shills than genuine people on message forums. Chew on that for awhile...it is the absolute truth.

dys

Hatha Sunahara
20th February 2011, 04:51 PM
If you want some idea of how evil this HB Gary company really is, check this:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgary-wrote-backdoors-and-rootkits-for-the-government.ars/2

Hatha

sunshine05
20th February 2011, 05:21 PM
If you want some idea of how evil this HB Gary company really is, check this:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgary-wrote-backdoors-and-rootkits-for-the-government.ars/2

Hatha


Good find, Hatha. I'm reading the comments now.

Serpo
20th February 2011, 05:28 PM
i was going to answer this ,except my programming dosnt allow it......bleep,bleep

k-os
20th February 2011, 05:30 PM
There are far more shills than genuine people on message forums. Chew on that for awhile...it is the absolute truth.

dys


I don't believe that. What if there are no fake people, and they just want us to think everyone is fake so that we don't trust each other? Not that we trust each other here, but just in case. ;)

RJB
20th February 2011, 05:33 PM
Sic 'em, Magnes.

cortez
20th February 2011, 07:33 PM
more on that

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgary-wrote-backdoors-and-rootkits-for-the-government.ars

LuckyStrike
20th February 2011, 07:44 PM
There are far more shills than genuine people on message forums. Chew on that for awhile...it is the absolute truth.

dys


I don't believe that. What if there are no fake people, and they just want us to think everyone is fake so that we don't trust each other? Not that we trust each other here, but just in case. ;)



I have little doubt that they are trying to make "fake people" so that the sheep will just move along with the rest of the herd. However I think claiming that there a "far more shills than genuine people" on forums is ludicrous. I would assume 5% of any forum (of the nature) is in some way not genuine, either government agents, agent provaceteurs, trolls, or shills but this is still a low number.

As K-os said, in a sense they want you to think that they control everything, that you can't make one wrong move or they will be up your ass, resistance is futile. However anyone who has ever stepped outside of the boundaries of the law knows there is A LOT that they don't know, remember the same inept dumbshits who run the post office and the DMV are the ones enforcing their laws, so long as you are smarter than them (which includes most of this forum) you won't have much problem.

dys
20th February 2011, 07:57 PM
There are far more shills than genuine people on message forums. Chew on that for awhile...it is the absolute truth.

dys


I don't believe that. What if there are no fake people, and they just want us to think everyone is fake so that we don't trust each other? Not that we trust each other here, but just in case. ;)



I have little doubt that they are trying to make "fake people" so that the sheep will just move along with the rest of the herd. However I think claiming that there a "far more shills than genuine people" on forums is ludicrous. I would assume 5% of any forum (of the nature) is in some way not genuine, either government agents, agent provaceteurs, trolls, or shills but this is still a low number.

As K-os said, in a sense they want you to think that they control everything, that you can't make one wrong move or they will be up your ass, resistance is futile. However anyone who has ever stepped outside of the boundaries of the law knows there is A LOT that they don't know, remember the same inept dumbshits who run the post office and the DMV are the ones enforcing their laws, so long as you are smarter than them (which includes most of this forum) you won't have much problem.


You are sorely mistaken, unfortunately. They control just about everything.

dys

LuckyStrike
20th February 2011, 08:33 PM
You are sorely mistaken, unfortunately. They control just about everything.

dys


Surely a defeatist mentality, I know for a fact that they don't control everything. They have rules that govern everything sure, but they can't enforce those rules. They can have cameras on every corner, but there are ways around cameras (IR LED's for one) and they also don't have the man power to watch and monitor what everyone does.

The best weapon they have is making people think they are invulnerable, who would dare oppose an entity which was invulnerable, all knowing and all seeing?

At the top there are smart people, the people pulling the strings aren't dumb. However everyone below them on the ladder is of average or below average intelligence.

Think about it they had plans for a network of networks so that their information couldn't be wiped out in the event of a nuclear attack, now they had this technology for 40 years and it wasn't until we got a hold of the internet that we turned it into a powerful world changing force. They did nothing meaningful with it, we turned it into one of the most powerful tools ever imagined.

So stay positive, we are smarter than them. Smarter, more informed, more agile and we are all fueled ultimately by the same passion, to live free. That is why we read, write and try and wake people up online and off. They "work" because they need money and are to stupid and or lazy to work in the non unionized private sector, we work because we honestly want a better world for ourselves and our posterity.

dys
20th February 2011, 08:36 PM
Nordic-

I respect you as a poster, but I have to disagree. They are much more entrenched than you understand. This I know, because I have lived it.

dys

LuckyStrike
20th February 2011, 09:10 PM
Nordic-

I respect you as a poster, but I have to disagree. They are much more entrenched than you understand. This I know, because I have lived it.

dys


I guess we are just going off of differing life experiences.

I don't want to argue with you about it, I just chimed in because I don't think the wizard is as big as he wants people to believe.

I respect your opinions and I'm sure you have reasons for them. :)

Glass
21st February 2011, 05:23 AM
So... if they can do it, we can do it. Or can't we?

gunDriller
21st February 2011, 07:43 AM
http://www.seankerrigan.com/docs/PersonaManagementSoftware.pdf

/\ URL for the link.