PDA

View Full Version : So Much for Japanese Engineering



MAGNES
18th March 2011, 12:12 PM
Total failure, this surprises me and what most were led to believe.

Fukushima nuclear plant owner falsified inspection records

* Alexi Mostrous and Alex Ralph
* From: The Times
* March 17, 2011 10:25AM

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/fukushima-nuclear-plant-owner-falsified-inspection-records/story-fn84naht-1226023073141

THE Japanese owner of the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant falsified safety data and "dishonestly" tried to cover up problems there.

Tokyo Electric Power Co injected air into the containment vessel of Fukushima reactor No 1 to artificially “lower the leak rate”. When caught, the company expressed its “sincere apologies for conducting dishonest practices”.

The misconduct came to light in 2002 after whistleblowers working for General Electric, which designed the reactor, complained to the Japanese government. Another GE employee later confessed that he had falsified records of inspections of reactor No1 in 1989 - at the request of TEPCO officials. He also admitted to falsifying other inspection reports, also on request of the client. After that incident TEPCO was forced to shut down 17 reactors, albeit temporarily.

End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

Dale Bridenbaugh, a GE employee who was not the whistleblower, resigned 35 years ago after becoming convinced that the design of the Mark 1 reactor used at Fukushima was seriously flawed. Five of the six reactors were built to that design.

Mr Bridenbaugh told ABC News: “The problems we identified in 1975 were that, in doing the design of the containment, they did not take into account the dynamic loads that could be experienced with a loss of coolant.”

In a document entitled Lessons Learned from the TEPCO Nuclear Power Scandal, released by the company and seen by The Times, TEPCO blamed its “misconduct” in 2002 on its “engineers' overconfidence of their nuclear knowledge”. Their “conservative mentality” had led them to fail to report problems, the company said, resulting in an “inadequate safety culture”.

In 2007, TEPCO ran into trouble again after misinforming government officials about breakdowns at its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant, which had been damaged after a magnitude 6.8 quake. In a cable released by WikiLeaks, a US official said: “TEPCO issued a corrected statement on July 18 in which it admitted it miscalculated the amount of radiation leakage.”

WikiLeaks cables also reveal that Japan was warned in 2009 that its power plants could not withstand powerful earthquakes.

The US was highly critical of Japan's senior safety director at the International Atomic Energy Association “particularly with respect to confronting Japan's own safety practices”, according to confidential documents obtained by WikiLeaks. In July 2009, in a cable to Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State, the US mission at the IAEA said Tomihiro Taniguchi, the deputy director of the IAEA department of nuclear safety and security, was a “weak manager” and in a cable sent later that year said that the department had suffered because of his “weak management and leadership skills”.

The Times

keehah
18th March 2011, 12:27 PM
This culture is world-wide.

http://www.latimes.com/news/la-sanonofre14-m,0,1512796.story

Operators of the concrete-domed San Onofre nuclear plant Monday were trying to reassure jittery Southern California residents that the nuclear disaster unfolding in Japan won't happen here.

The 84-acre generating station in the northern corner of San Diego County is built to withstand a magnitude 7.0 earthquake, said Gil Alexander, a spokesman for the generation station's operator, Southern California Edison. That is greater than the 6.5 shaker that scientists predicted could strike the plant before it was built 42 years ago, he said. But it's less than the 8.9 quake that hit Japan last week.

A 25-foot-high "tsunami wall" of reinforced concete was also erected between the plant and the adjacent ocean, a height based on scientists' best estimates of the potential threat, he said. The geological fault most likely to directly threaten San Onofre lies about 5 miles offshore, Alexander said.


Can we at least hope these Calfornians have found somewhere else to store 40 years of even more radioactive used fuel rods rather than right on top of the reactors?

Ponce
18th March 2011, 12:34 PM
The state of Israel was incharged of the safety and alarms of the nuke.......so, now they are guilty of nothing?..............remember that "they" are also incharged of the safety of our nuclear codes.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
18th March 2011, 01:56 PM
This culture is world-wide.

http://www.latimes.com/news/la-sanonofre14-m,0,1512796.story

Operators of the concrete-domed San Onofre nuclear plant Monday were trying to reassure jittery Southern California residents that the nuclear disaster unfolding in Japan won't happen here.

The 84-acre generating station in the northern corner of San Diego County is built to withstand a magnitude 7.0 earthquake, said Gil Alexander, a spokesman for the generation station's operator, Southern California Edison. That is greater than the 6.5 shaker that scientists predicted could strike the plant before it was built 42 years ago, he said. But it's less than the 8.9 quake that hit Japan last week.

A 25-foot-high "tsunami wall" of reinforced concete was also erected between the plant and the adjacent ocean, a height based on scientists' best estimates of the potential threat, he said. The geological fault most likely to directly threaten San Onofre lies about 5 miles offshore, Alexander said.


Can we at least hope these Calfornians have found somewhere else to store 40 years of even more radioactive used fuel rods rather than right on top of the reactors?


That's really the worst part. Storing 600,000 spent fuel rods directly above a live reactor is nothing short of unintelligent.

DMac
18th March 2011, 01:57 PM
Remember, all 6 reactors contain plutonium in the spent fuel rods.

Wonderful....

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/03/18/plutonium-troubled-reactors-spent-fuel-pools/

ximmy
18th March 2011, 02:10 PM
Why don't they build reactors below sea level, so that in an absolute worst case scenario, the sea would simply swallow it up...

even if all power failure, you simply blow the gate...

osoab
18th March 2011, 02:16 PM
Remember, all 6 reactors contain plutonium in the spent fuel rods.

Wonderful....

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/03/18/plutonium-troubled-reactors-spent-fuel-pools/



Only six percent of the fuel rods at the plant's Unit 3 were a mixture of plutonium-239 and uranium-235 when first put into operation. The fuel in other reactors is only uranium, but even there, plutonium is created during the fission process.

This means the fuel in all of the stricken reactors and spent fuel pools contain plutonium.


Fox news over-hype from first glance. Minute amounts of Plutonium is created in the fission process I guess. That only technically that there is plutonium at all 6 reactors. None of it amounts to the MOX that was used in #3. I have yet to see where any used MOX rods are stored. I would assume above #3 if there are any.

Publico Pro Se
18th March 2011, 02:24 PM
The reactors are a GE design - and three engineers resigned (35-40 years ago) because they didn't want their names attached to it.

MAGNES
18th March 2011, 02:30 PM
Why don't they build reactors below sea level, so that in an absolute worst case scenario, the sea would simply swallow it up...

even if all power failure, you simply blow the gate...


There was an initial report this week, the reactor was scheduled to close , to be shut down.
To the week it was stated, we don't have any proof but this stinks if true.

The most trouble some reactor is over 40 years old and plagued with problems for decades.

North America has many of these old reactors too built by GE. Makes you wonder what they are hiding too.

It is amazing that this is Japan because we are led to believe everything is over engineered,
being Japan, it is no stranger to earth quakes and even massive tsunamis, they have sea
walls built to mitigate this damage, some of the pictures shown even, of devastation, are
below sea level, mostly agricultural use, the sea easily reclaims that without massive tsunamis.

In my local area authorities are stating this cannot happen here, impossible they say.
The nuke regulators also demanded more info from Japan complaining, alarming everyone.
I got a brother on the West coast on beach.

MAGNES
18th March 2011, 02:35 PM
That's really the worst part. Storing 600,000 spent fuel rods directly above a live reactor is nothing short of unintelligent.


This is so crazy I don't know what to believe.

RADIATION COVERUP: Radioactive Spent Fuel Rods blown into atmosphere at Fukushima No1 & No3: Where is the press?
http://yourdaddy.net/2011/03/15/radiation-coverup-radioactive-spent-fuel-rods-blown-into-atmosphere-at-fukushima-no1-no3-where-is-the-press/

Spectrism
18th March 2011, 02:45 PM
That's really the worst part. Storing 600,000 spent fuel rods directly above a live reactor is nothing short of unintelligent.


This is so crazy I don't know what to believe.

RADIATION COVERUP: Radioactive Spent Fuel Rods blown into atmosphere at Fukushima No1 & No3: Where is the press?
http://yourdaddy.net/2011/03/15/radiation-coverup-radioactive-spent-fuel-rods-blown-into-atmosphere-at-fukushima-no1-no3-where-is-the-press/


That report was on Tuesday (3-15) and it has no definite answers- only questions. The explosions were above and around the cooling pools. There is no reason to think that the rods were blown out.

Serpo
18th March 2011, 03:28 PM
[quote=TheNocturnalEgyptian

That's really the worst part. Storing 600,000 spent fuel rods directly above a live reactor is nothing short of unintelligent.
[/quote]

Or really really stupid is another term that comes to mind

gunDriller
18th March 2011, 08:42 PM
the problem was not Japanese engineering per se - it was Japanese management not listening to their technical leads, and the nuclear industry pushing bad designs against the advice of their own technical leads ... in 1972.

vacuum
18th March 2011, 09:38 PM
Does israel have any nuclear power plants in it?

Gaillo
18th March 2011, 09:40 PM
Does israel have any nuclear power plants in it?


Dimona. Of course, its main purpose is to produce the nuclear weapons that Israel doesn't have... ::)

Buddha
18th March 2011, 09:45 PM
Just another Russian lullaby.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux2qH8CMVr4

slvrbugjim
20th March 2011, 09:58 PM
Would not a good idea had been to take the back up cooling facilities above say 40 feet in case of a tsunami??

2 meters would have meant the difference. Ok we are trying to make some money here and that would cost more....l.....