PDA

View Full Version : Why Aren’t Arab States – Instead of the U.S., France and Britain – Taking Care o



MNeagle
19th March 2011, 05:45 PM
Why Aren’t Arab States – Instead of the U.S., France and Britain – Taking Care of Libya?


Gaddafi is a lying psychopath who is slaughtering his own people.

So is the imposition of a no-fly zone a good thing?

Perhaps. The Arab League called for it. And even some Libyan rebels pleaded for imposition of a no-fly zone.

But if someone is going to stop Gaddafi, it should be Arab League nations – like Saudi Arabia, which is armed to the teeth.

America should not be involved, because:

• Most Americans are strongly against U.S. intervention in Libya

• America was already involved in 2+ wars costing the U.S. many trillions of dollars (Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz says that the Iraq war alone will cost $3-5 trillion dollars.) Indeed, America’s engagement in multiple wars is bankrupting our country – despite the claims by the military Keynesians

• We are creating more terrorists than we’re stopping by bombing and invading Arab countries

• And both conservatives like Ron Paul and liberals like Dennis Kucinich have pointed out that American intervention is unlawful without a Congressional resolution of war … which no one bothered to ask for.

So I don’t care whether or not someone imposes a no-fly zone or takes out Gaddafi … but the U.S. shouldn’t be the one to do it, even as part of a coalition with France and Britain.

Indeed, Gaddafi has accused the efforts by the three former colonial powers – U.S., France and Britain – as being “neo-colonial” aggression and a “crusade“.

If Arabic countries were the ones to intervene, Arabs wouldn’t be able to make those charges.

And if Arab countries are not willing to intervene themselves, that speaks volumes as to their true priorities … especially since Saudi Arabia just sent 1,000 troops to Bahrain to help the tyrants in that country brutally put down a pro-democracy protest



link (http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/03/why-arent-arab-states-instead-of-the-u-s-france-and-britain-taking-care-of-libya/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBigPicture+%28The+Big+Pict ure%29)

Many sub-links in original link too.

Ponce
19th March 2011, 05:50 PM
THEY ALL should had gone against the state of Israel long ago, not only because of what they are doing to the Paletinian people but also for what they will do to the Arab world in years to come........better to declare war on the state of Israel now and loose 20 millions than to let it happen later and loose 200 milions people.

Cobalt
19th March 2011, 06:20 PM
The US has become nothing more then a Thug for Hire

We have plenty of starving people here, but wander around the globe feeding others.

We sit with our thumb up our ass for days when we have a natural disaster here at home, but hit the road before the dust settles elsewhere.

We condemn other nations for suppressing democracy, but we allow corporations to buy our political seats.

We annihilate entire countries for denying it's citizens rights, but every day we strip our own citizens of theirs.

We talk of Peace, but spend more for machines of war then all other nations combined.


Why God has not thrown the towel in on us I'll never understand.

mick silver
19th March 2011, 06:23 PM
were a thug alright but who paying the usa

sirgonzo420
19th March 2011, 06:27 PM
fuck Libya; free America!

Ponce
19th March 2011, 06:40 PM
sirgonzo? I do hope that you are saying that as a joke........they are not the ones that came to the US to kill us, did they?.............what do you think if "FINALLY" the American people were to rebel against the Zionist governmnet in the US and then China decides to come in to "help" us? and then they stay here for good?

"Don't look at what we are doing to them but rather.....what would happen if THEY were to do it to us".

ShortJohnSilver
19th March 2011, 09:37 PM
Pay attention: Gadhaffi is JEWISH. He is not Libyan.