PDA

View Full Version : .07 RD/Hr.......waesn't here before.



Ponce
19th March 2011, 06:30 PM
For the past three days I have been taking a reading around my property with my high sensitive rad meter, the one to use for food.........today is the first time that I read anything here............pretty soon I won't need a light bulb to read by, my body glow will be all that I will need hahahahahahahahahahah.

Don't worry guys, I get a higher reading from my old Coleman mantles.

mick silver
19th March 2011, 06:32 PM
thats what the gov keeps telling us it will be ok .... the number will be low

slvrbugjim
20th March 2011, 09:53 PM
They say all will be fine, eat all the food, esp from the gulf, the more the better and all is quite well and do not worry the government is here to help you.

mamboni
20th March 2011, 10:15 PM
For the past three days I have been taking a reading around my property with my high sensitive rad meter, the one to use for food.........today is the first time that I read anything here............pretty soon I won't need a light bulb to read by, my body glow will be all that I will need hahahahahahahahahahah.

Don't worry guys, I get a higher reading from my old Coleman mantles.


Roughly speaking 1 rad = 1 REM = 10 mSv (I'm discounting the biological impact factor)

So .07 rad/hr approximates to 700 microSv/hr

In 24 hours, this amounts to ~17 mSv.

The maximum total dosage allowed for a nuclear facility worker in one year is 50 mSv, so 17 mSv in 24 hours sounds too damn high. Are you sure about that measurement?

Maybe my calculations are off?

Hillbilly
21st March 2011, 02:11 AM
Wow that seems like a lot too. I'd like to know what his most current readings are too.





For the past three days I have been taking a reading around my property with my high sensitive rad meter, the one to use for food.........today is the first time that I read anything here............pretty soon I won't need a light bulb to read by, my body glow will be all that I will need hahahahahahahahahahah.

Don't worry guys, I get a higher reading from my old Coleman mantles.


Roughly speaking 1 rad = 1 REM = 10 mSv (I'm discounting the biological impact factor)

So .07 rad/hr approximates to 700 microSv/hr

In 24 hours, this amounts to ~17 mSv.

The maximum total dosage allowed for a nuclear facility worker in one year is 50 mSv, so 17 mSv in 24 hours sounds too damn high. Are you sure about that measurement?

Maybe my calculations are off?

mamboni
21st March 2011, 06:37 AM
No sign of Ponce. :o

Horn
21st March 2011, 07:13 AM
No sign of Ponce. :o


Loading Tp to La Habana?

Castro condemns NATO's 'inevitable' war on Libya
March 3, 2011 -- Updated 2154 GMT

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/americas/03/03/cuba.castro.libya/

sunnyandseventy
21st March 2011, 08:12 AM
No sign of Ponce. :o


I hope Team Bagel from across the road didn't grab him while he was outside with his counter! :D

Walter Mitty
21st March 2011, 08:24 AM
I thought M= 1000 millimeter = 1/1000 of a meter. I thought micro was a million
so mSv= 1/1000 of a Sv 1 Sv = 100 rem

1/1000 Sv = 100/1000 rem so mSv= .1 rem

If 1 rad (roentgen) = 1 rem
.1 rem = 1mSv
.070 rad x 1mSv = .07 mSv /hr
70/1000 rad x 1/1000 Sv = 70/1000 = .07mSv
.07mSv/hr x 24 = 1.68mSv / day.

background radiation= 3mSv /year

Are you sure 1 rad = 1- rem?

Sounds too high.
Someone check my math. I am not very good at math.

mamboni
21st March 2011, 08:40 AM
I thought M= 1000 millimeter = 1/1000 of a meter. I thought micro was a million
so mSv= 1/1000 of a Sv 1 Sv = 100 rem

1/1000 Sv = 100/1000 rem so mSv= .1 rem

If 1 rad (roentgen) = 1 rem
.1 rem = 1mSv
.070 rad x 1mSv = .07 mSv /hr
70/1000 rad x 1/1000 Sv = 70/1000 = .07mSv
.07mSv/hr x 24 = 1.68mSv / day.

background radiation= 3mSv /year

Are you sure 1 rad = 1- rem?

Sounds too high.
Someone check my math. I am not very good at math.



You are off by a factor of 10 here. By now, Ponce has probably grown a third testicle. :boohoo

Horn
21st March 2011, 08:56 AM
You are off by a factor of 10 here. By now, Ponce has probably grown a third testicle. :boohoo


Is that a bad thing?

I started to put mine to good use, and before second glance it vanished!

Spectrism
21st March 2011, 09:29 AM
You are off by a factor of 10 here. By now, Ponce has probably grown a third testicle. :boohoo


Is that a bad thing?

I started to put mine to good use, and before second glance it vanished!


On his forehead?

Horn
21st March 2011, 09:33 AM
You are off by a factor of 10 here. By now, Ponce has probably grown a third testicle. :boohoo


Is that a bad thing?

I started to put mine to good use, and before second glance it vanished!


On his forehead?


Now its reappeared, and is carrying some early star formation icon. :-*

sunnyandseventy
21st March 2011, 09:33 AM
By now, Ponce has probably grown a third testicle.

Better than a second asshole! He'd only have half enough TP.

Neuro
21st March 2011, 12:00 PM
He shouldn't have bought that pallet of cheap Japanese glow-in-the-dark toiletpaper, at the dollar store the other day...

lapis
21st March 2011, 12:37 PM
[said in a little girl voice] You guys are MEAN!!!







My second reaction: :ROFL:

Walter Mitty
21st March 2011, 04:03 PM
Night of the Ponce-upus. Filmed in Terrifying, Glowing Vista-Vision.