PDA

View Full Version : NASA: Our Moon Is Hollow



Serpo
28th March 2011, 03:10 PM
Always fun to be told the moon is hollow



http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/69926/History_Channel_Our_Hollow_Moon_Is_A_Space_Craft/

ximmy
28th March 2011, 03:42 PM
Yup... that's about as exciting as hollow chocolate...

Spectrism
28th March 2011, 03:52 PM
The mass of the moon can be calculated. The density can then be figured.

The density of the Moon is 3.346 g/cm3. The Moon is actually the second densest moon in the Solar System after Io.

Need some comparisons? The density of Earth is 5.52 g/cm3. This makes it the densest planet in the Solar System. The density of Io is 3.53 g/cm3.

Astronomers believe that the Moon formed when a Mars-sized object crashed into the Earth. The resulting debris from the collision collected into orbit around the Earth and became the Moon. The Moon’s relatively low density comes from the fact that it was mostly the Earth’s upper mantle and crust that was thrown up into space, and not very much of its core.
http://www.universetoday.com/20601/density-of-the-moon/

That is 3 times the density of water. Hollow? Only the guy's head who "heard" that there are bottomless craters and thinks it is an alien-inhabited death star that was brought here by aliens to populate the earth with life.

Serpo
28th March 2011, 04:07 PM
by Ronald Regehr




The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets."

—Robert Jastrow

First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee

After hundreds of years of detailed observation and study, our closest companion in the vast universe, Earth’s moon, remains an enigma. Six moon landings and hundreds of experiments have resulted in more questions being asked than answered. Among them:

1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.


2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.


3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson,

"The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned."

4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.


5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a "close call" with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.


6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.


7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria,

"are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident."

8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of "moonquakes" are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.


9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated,

"If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."

Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity."



MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote,

"the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field... indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow."

In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."


10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour.



This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.


11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 "Blackbird". Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.


12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover "space dust" remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also.



Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow "captured" by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated,

"It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible."

13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. "Something" had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.


14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the "coincidence" that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds,

"There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."

15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.

Greek authors Aristotle and Plutarch, and Roman authors Apolllonius Rhodius and Ovid all wrote of a group of people called the Proselenes who lived in the central mountainous area of Greece called Arcadia. The Proselenes claimed title to this area because their forebears were there "before there was a moon in the heavens."



This claim is substantiated by symbols on the wall of the Courtyard of Kalasasaya, near the city of Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, which record that the moon came into orbit around the Earth between 11,500 and 13, 000 years ago, long before recorded history.

1. Ages of Flashes: Aristarchus, Plato, Eratosthenes, Biela, Rabbi Levi, and Posidonius all reported anomalous lights on the moon. NASA, one year before the first lunar landing, reported 570+ lights and flashes were observed on the moon from 1540 to 1967.


2. Operation Moon Blink: NASA’s Operation Moon Blink detected 28 lunar events in a relatively short period of time.


3. Lunar Bridge: On July 29, 1953, John J. O’Neill observed a 12-mile-long bridge straddling the crater Mare Crisium. In August, British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens verified its presence,

"It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence."

4. The Shard: The Shard, an obelisk-shaped object that towers 1½ miles from the Ukert area of the moon’s surface, was discovered by Orbiter 3 in 1968. Dr. Bruce Cornet, who studied the amazing photographs, stated,

"No known natural process can explain such a structure."

5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.


6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall.

". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."







http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/esp_luna_16.htm

Ponce
28th March 2011, 06:30 PM
To me nothing is true or false until proven 100% for sure, otherwise many of my inventions would not had been made because they were not supposed to exist...........to some the Earth is still flat.

willie pete
28th March 2011, 06:36 PM
To me nothing is true or false until proven 100% for sure, otherwise many of my inventions would not had been made because they were not supposed to exist...........to some the Earth is still flat.




Ponce......what are some of the things you invented?

Spectrism
28th March 2011, 06:40 PM
Compare balsa wood to oak. Would you say that because the balsa wood is less dense than oak, that it is hollow?

In the same list he says that the moon comes from a different source than the earth. Different materials.

drafter
28th March 2011, 06:42 PM
I thought it was made outa cheese? Kinda looks like moldy swiss.

willie pete
28th March 2011, 06:50 PM
I thought it was made outa cheese? Kinda looks like moldy swiss.



it was made out of Bleu cheese...when we were kids... :D

Shami-Amourae
28th March 2011, 07:44 PM
You do realize this is The History Channel, right?
:baa

vacuum
28th March 2011, 09:15 PM
The mass of the moon can be calculated. The density can then be figured.

The density of the Moon is 3.346 g/cm3. The Moon is actually the second densest moon in the Solar System after Io.

Need some comparisons? The density of Earth is 5.52 g/cm3. This makes it the densest planet in the Solar System. The density of Io is 3.53 g/cm3.

Astronomers believe that the Moon formed when a Mars-sized object crashed into the Earth. The resulting debris from the collision collected into orbit around the Earth and became the Moon. The Moon’s relatively low density comes from the fact that it was mostly the Earth’s upper mantle and crust that was thrown up into space, and not very much of its core.
http://www.universetoday.com/20601/density-of-the-moon/

That is 3 times the density of water. Hollow? Only the guy's head who "heard" that there are bottomless craters and thinks it is an alien-inhabited death star that was brought here by aliens to populate the earth with life.

Flawed logic. The moon's density is calculated by its mass divided by volume. It's mass is determined by its gravitational field, by using the vague fudge-factor G. G was been measured in a couple different ways on Earth to try and get some relation between mass and gravity. Some of those measurements have been mutually exclusive, and none can truly be applicable to solar system level distances in my opinion. For gravity, they've already had to invent dark mass to explain galactic systems holding together, and then dark energy to explain intergalactic systems pushing apart. To think that measuring G with a few lead balls in a lab (in an ambient gravitational field) then expanding that to solar system sized problems is tenuous.

When you say it is denser than other moons, you are simply using a relative measure between moons, planets, and stars. If in fact all solar bodies were hollow, you'd have no way of knowing that necessarily.

Ponce
28th March 2011, 09:26 PM
Pete, some are really nothing.......like the one that made my money with.........and some I don't how they work or why but they do what I want them to do, many are innovations from hundred of years ago that I made work better thanks to new teck.............I always like to mix this and that to see what would happen and according to what they do I use it for something.....................the last one, about the box you put your arm into to see all the veins in your arm?, that was one that I was experimenting with light........have another one that I call a "LazerTronScope" that will do what a $100,000 microscope will do but for only $10.00.

The one that I made my money with? I hurt my hand back in 1992 and I put some flour and sand into a balloon, tied a knot and cut off the end to excersise my hand with........the name was (The Squeezable), my buddie wanted one and then his wife wanted one, she came to me three days later wanting ten of them because the people at her job wanted one and she was willing to pay me $1.00 each.............AND I SAW THE LIGHT BULB........made a bunch and took the to the swap meet and made $285.00 on my first day, $236.00 was clear money.......I then put them on consigment in different stores and then went to the big show in Vegas........to make the story short, I gave myself 10-12 years to make X ammount of money and I made it in only six and retired in 1998.

Funny story, this guy went to the store and bought 12 of them and when asked why he wanted so many he said "Well, everytime that I buy one and leave it on my desk someone steals it, so I bought one for everyone in the office" hahahahahahahah love it.

By the way, Walt Mart want them at the rate of 500,00 A WEEK to start with but I turn them down, it would have taken 7 months to get paid.........no way Jose.......I already had three factories going and I would have had to open, at least, five more........another guy from Texas got in with them after his aunt, from CA, sent him some samples of mine, the kid was only 21.

Neuro
28th March 2011, 11:39 PM
The mass of the moon can be calculated. The density can then be figured.

The density of the Moon is 3.346 g/cm3. The Moon is actually the second densest moon in the Solar System after Io.

Need some comparisons? The density of Earth is 5.52 g/cm3. This makes it the densest planet in the Solar System. The density of Io is 3.53 g/cm3.

Astronomers believe that the Moon formed when a Mars-sized object crashed into the Earth. The resulting debris from the collision collected into orbit around the Earth and became the Moon. The Moon’s relatively low density comes from the fact that it was mostly the Earth’s upper mantle and crust that was thrown up into space, and not very much of its core.
http://www.universetoday.com/20601/density-of-the-moon/

That is 3 times the density of water. Hollow? Only the guy's head who "heard" that there are bottomless craters and thinks it is an alien-inhabited death star that was brought here by aliens to populate the earth with life.

Flawed logic. The moon's density is calculated by its mass divided by volume. It's mass is determined by its gravitational field, by using the vague fudge-factor G. G was been measured in a couple different ways on Earth to try and get some relation between mass and gravity. Some of those measurements have been mutually exclusive, and none can truly be applicable to solar system level distances in my opinion. For gravity, they've already had to invent dark mass to explain galactic systems holding together, and then dark energy to explain intergalactic systems pushing apart. To think that measuring G with a few lead balls in a lab (in an ambient gravitational field) then expanding that to solar system sized problems is tenuous.

When you say it is denser than other moons, you are simply using a relative measure between moons, planets, and stars. If in fact all solar bodies were hollow, you'd have no way of knowing that necessarily.

Excellent reasoning! All the astronomical object mass estimates comes into question. Further you can't determine the mass/density of an astronomical object, by looking at the densities of the materials it is made up of. The density of the materials (even a solid) may be much different at several hundreds thousands of bars pressure and thousands of degrees. We really can't tell for sure what the center of earth consists of, if anything. There simply isn't any empirical evidence. Remember those cut off earth pictures (like an orange) in children science books, they are just a theory and a fantasy. So much to unlearn!

vacuum
29th March 2011, 12:17 AM
by Ronald Regehr

The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets."

—Robert Jastrow

First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee


That whole article you posted is really creepy. I can't think of anything more unsettling than the possibility that that pale object in the sky, watching us as we sleep, is directing humanity's existence for unknown and nefarious reasons.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/food-for-the-moon/

I think this could be the biggest "conspiracy" of all.

Neuro
29th March 2011, 12:20 AM
This is how the universal gravitational constant (G) is being measured:

http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~haar/ADV_LAB/BIG_G.pdf

I think vacuums objection to using the calculations on solar system levels is valid. There may be other forces interacting with lead balls a few centimeters apart, already immersed in earths gravitational field, maybe earths gravitational field itself "lends" gravity to the leadballs... It would be interesting to do this experiment on the moon, to see if the universal gravitational constant is indeed constant universally...

undgrd
29th March 2011, 05:26 AM
Here's something that just popped into my head. Let's assume the moon was placed here and serves some unknown purpose. If you've got the technology to build something like this, you've got the technology to move it, change it's position, etc.

Based on these statements



10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour.

7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria,

"are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident."

5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.

6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall.

". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."



So you've got the three great pyramids here on Earth. You've got spires (presumed to be in a coil shape) extending from the surface of the moon. You've got the moon that seems to ring like a bell. You've got huge circular disks below the surface of this object that seems to ring like a bell.

In my mind, you've got yourself one hell of a radio telescope (possibly transponder) here. You've got a transmitter/receiver in the spires. You've got resonate material in the disks. You've got the entire structure (the moon) holding it all together.

Here on earth, you've got the pyramids to receive or transmit information. If the pyramids line up with the spires, all you're missing is something to resonate a message from Earth, or an impact to the moon to resonate a message to Earth.


Thoughts?

messianicdruid
29th March 2011, 08:34 AM
In the same list he says that the moon comes from a different source than the earth. Different materials.


Titanium is different material and {I think} lighter than an iron crystal. And having the greater mass on the side facing earth would support the "gravity is a push" hypothesis.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
29th March 2011, 01:27 PM
Here's something that just popped into my head. Let's assume the moon was placed here and serves some unknown purpose. If you've got the technology to build something like this, you've got the technology to move it, change it's position, etc.

Based on these statements



10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour.

7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria,

"are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident."

5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.

6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall.

". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."



So you've got the three great pyramids here on Earth. You've got spires (presumed to be in a coil shape) extending from the surface of the moon. You've got the moon that seems to ring like a bell. You've got huge circular disks below the surface of this object that seems to ring like a bell.

In my mind, you've got yourself one hell of a radio telescope (possibly transponder) here. You've got a transmitter/receiver in the spires. You've got resonate material in the disks. You've got the entire structure (the moon) holding it all together.

Here on earth, you've got the pyramids to receive or transmit information. If the pyramids line up with the spires, all you're missing is something to resonate a message from Earth, or an impact to the moon to resonate a message to Earth.


Thoughts?


My thoughts on this immediately go to the "Kings Chamber" of the "Great Pyramid".

The "sarcophogas" in the king's chamber has never been confirmed to have a lid, or a mummy, meaning there is no confirmation whatsoever that it was ever intended for burial. It has recently been found, after a worker accidentally struck the "sarcophogas" with a tool, that it rings like a bell. In fact, it rings at such a frequency that it resonates perfectly with the great pyramid and can be heard with no audio loss from any position in the entire pyramid.

JJ.G0ldD0t
29th March 2011, 01:35 PM
http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/death-star-1.jpg

DMac
29th March 2011, 01:46 PM
When did the History Channel partner up with David Icke?

http://www.ebook3000.com/upimg/201011/15/111743194.jpeg

vacuum
29th March 2011, 03:07 PM
Here's something that just popped into my head. Let's assume the moon was placed here and serves some unknown purpose. If you've got the technology to build something like this, you've got the technology to move it, change it's position, etc.

Based on these statements



10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour.

7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria,

"are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident."

5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.

6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall.

". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."



So you've got the three great pyramids here on Earth. You've got spires (presumed to be in a coil shape) extending from the surface of the moon. You've got the moon that seems to ring like a bell. You've got huge circular disks below the surface of this object that seems to ring like a bell.

In my mind, you've got yourself one hell of a radio telescope (possibly transponder) here. You've got a transmitter/receiver in the spires. You've got resonate material in the disks. You've got the entire structure (the moon) holding it all together.

Here on earth, you've got the pyramids to receive or transmit information. If the pyramids line up with the spires, all you're missing is something to resonate a message from Earth, or an impact to the moon to resonate a message to Earth.


Thoughts?


My thoughts on this immediately go to the "Kings Chamber" of the "Great Pyramid".

The "sarcophogas" in the king's chamber has never been confirmed to have a lid, or a mummy, meaning there is no confirmation whatsoever that it was ever intended for burial. It has recently been found, after a worker accidentally struck the "sarcophogas" with a tool, that it rings like a bell. In fact, it rings at such a frequency that it resonates perfectly with the great pyramid and can be heard with no audio loss from any position in the entire pyramid.




When was that discovered? any links?

Serpo
29th March 2011, 03:27 PM
To me nothing is true or false until proven 100% for sure, otherwise many of my inventions would not had been made because they were not supposed to exist...........to some the Earth is still flat.


The earth has always been flat except for the bumpy bits

TheNocturnalEgyptian
29th March 2011, 03:51 PM
@ Vacuum:

http://www.tokenrock.com/article-John-Stuart--Annaliese-Shanda-Reid--Cymatics-Experiment-in-the-Great-Pyramid--139.html


http://books.google.com/books?id=7rQ-AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA140&lpg=PA140&dq=king's+pyramid+sarcophagus+rings+like+a+bell&source=bl&ots=Yl13xeh_Yb&sig=iNX0dmacu-MnAFRcTRml2P3eonE&hl=en&ei=5GGSTdHEFZTCsAPwqoDHBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=king's%20pyramid%20sarcophagus%20rings%20like%20 a%20bell&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=elAPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA101&lpg=PA101&dq=king's+pyramid+sarcophagus+rings+like+a+bell&source=bl&ots=PTme68ocEO&sig=DcwNPkb2yzx6EPgM2WZwjNCCH6E&hl=en&ei=5GGSTdHEFZTCsAPwqoDHBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=king's%20pyramid%20sarcophagus%20rings%20like%20 a%20bell&f=false

Horn
29th March 2011, 04:48 PM
by Ronald Regehr

The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets."

—Robert Jastrow

First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee


That whole article you posted is really creepy. I can't think of anything more unsettling than the possibility that that pale object in the sky, watching us as we sleep, is directing humanity's existence for unknown and nefarious reasons.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/food-for-the-moon/

I think this could be the biggest "conspiracy" of all.


The upper level and Egyptian Jews still operate on the lunar cycle, while forcing the rest of goyim to operate on some Georgian slury.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/calendar.html

Horn
29th March 2011, 06:21 PM
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6byg8_giza-pyramid-round-table-pt-7_news

Santa
29th March 2011, 07:36 PM
1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.

Just curious, but what technology can determine the age of rocks or dust like that? Isn't a rocks age normally determined by its type and position within a geologic stratus? I mean, what is a moon rock compared to in order to reference it's relative age?

freespirit
29th March 2011, 08:26 PM
i wonder if one studied the orbital patterns of the earth and moon, what would happen if the pyramids and the corresponding location on the moon lined up while you were laying in the sarcophagus? the body, in a meditative state providing the energy to power the "transmission"...

is there some way to find out if these locations on these 2 spheres have ever lined up, and how often it happens? maybe it will be 12/21/12?
;D






Here's something that just popped into my head. Let's assume the moon was placed here and serves some unknown purpose. If you've got the technology to build something like this, you've got the technology to move it, change it's position, etc.

Based on these statements



10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour.

7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria,

"are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident."

5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.

6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall.

". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."



So you've got the three great pyramids here on Earth. You've got spires (presumed to be in a coil shape) extending from the surface of the moon. You've got the moon that seems to ring like a bell. You've got huge circular disks below the surface of this object that seems to ring like a bell.

In my mind, you've got yourself one hell of a radio telescope (possibly transponder) here. You've got a transmitter/receiver in the spires. You've got resonate material in the disks. You've got the entire structure (the moon) holding it all together.

Here on earth, you've got the pyramids to receive or transmit information. If the pyramids line up with the spires, all you're missing is something to resonate a message from Earth, or an impact to the moon to resonate a message to Earth.


Thoughts?


My thoughts on this immediately go to the "Kings Chamber" of the "Great Pyramid".

The "sarcophogas" in the king's chamber has never been confirmed to have a lid, or a mummy, meaning there is no confirmation whatsoever that it was ever intended for burial. It has recently been found, after a worker accidentally struck the "sarcophogas" with a tool, that it rings like a bell. In fact, it rings at such a frequency that it resonates perfectly with the great pyramid and can be heard with no audio loss from any position in the entire pyramid.




When was that discovered? any links?

Horn
29th March 2011, 09:37 PM
i wonder if one studied the orbital patterns of the earth and moon, what would happen if the pyramids and the corresponding location on the moon lined up while you were laying in the sarcophagus? the body, in a meditative state providing the energy to power the "transmission"...

is there some way to find out if these locations on these 2 spheres have ever lined up, and how often it happens? maybe it will be 12/21/12?
;D


Someone will mostly find out how it works on 12/21/12 and mistakenly turn the switch off, and we'll all watch the moon plummit towards earth. :o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhzC_8-kszA