View Full Version : Intimate portrait of Liz Taylor at 24 seen for the first time.
Ponce
2nd April 2011, 01:44 PM
This was my birthday present because even dead she will always be the one....... if because of "Helen of Troy" 1,000 ships were sunk then for Liz 100,000 ships would I sink.
================================================== ===============
A goddess revealed: Intimate portrait of Liz Taylor at 24 seen for the first time.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1372513/Elizabeth-Taylors-nude-portrait-24-seen-time.html#ixzz1IQpoQ7m5
Jersey Thursday
2nd April 2011, 02:07 PM
Even that would get old pretty quickly if she was a demanding tyrant. A sweet and gentle woman is a rare delight.
Cebu_4_2
2nd April 2011, 02:29 PM
A+ for Ponce, good find! |--0--|
Twisted Titan
2nd April 2011, 02:35 PM
A breathless photo indeed.........
Santa
2nd April 2011, 03:37 PM
My wife had a better figure when she was that age. :)
BrewTech
2nd April 2011, 03:40 PM
Mrs. Brewtech has a better figure than that, and she is nearly twice that age!
;D
Pretty cool pic though... gotta admit. She was a beautiful young woman.
Rebel Yarr
2nd April 2011, 04:12 PM
yeah liz doesn't do anything for me - at all - quite the opposite for some reason.
General of Darkness
2nd April 2011, 04:14 PM
She died a jew. I know, I'm a buzz kill.
BrewTech
2nd April 2011, 04:16 PM
She died a jew. I know, I'm a buzz kill.
I read your post, then checked my buzz. No problem found!
Antonio
2nd April 2011, 04:20 PM
I grew up among Russian and Russian/Jewish girls. In my class Liz would be average. I`m so spoiled by female beauty since I was a kid that very few "stars" do it for me.
lapis
2nd April 2011, 04:22 PM
Geez, tough crowd! ;D
I saw the picture last night, and thought she was beautiful, especially after seeing all the ones of bony Angelina Jolie that I posted in another thread.
StreetsOfGold
2nd April 2011, 04:22 PM
Liz was the (1960's) equivalence of (un)lady(like) gaga, in other words a SLUT or as some would put it, an attention craving whore.
Ponce
2nd April 2011, 04:24 PM
That particular photo was to me like the one of Marilin Monroe on the cover of "Playboy's" first issue.
The photo that really attracted me was the one taken in the 1950's........she had "that look" that said a lot by saying nothing.
lapis
2nd April 2011, 04:25 PM
Liz was the (1960's) equivalence of (un)lady(like) gaga, in other words a SLUT or as some would put it, an attention craving whore.
If that's the case, then our society has fallen pretty far down, hasn't it?
Ponce
2nd April 2011, 04:33 PM
Lapis?, In the old days by giving little they were giving a lot.........but now days they give it all and you get nothing, because they are all the same.
Antonio
2nd April 2011, 04:36 PM
Very few have the ability to see the spiritual ugliness in today`s stars. I could never separate a woman`s personality from her looks, I always see the whole package. There are more physically beautiful women than empty beer bottles.
IMHO Meg Ryan and Michelle Pfeiffer are much better than Liz but you already know I love cats, purrrr and Liz was a bitch,hehehehe...
solid
2nd April 2011, 05:14 PM
Geez, tough crowd! ;D
I saw the picture last night, and thought she was beautiful, especially after seeing all the ones of bony Angelina Jolie that I posted in another thread.
I agree with you lapis, it's a beautiful photo, with a lot of class. I don't know why the media pushes for anorexia starving bony women these days, that photo shows true femininity, soft, elegant, timeless, imo.
ShortJohnSilver
2nd April 2011, 05:15 PM
She either seemed to really like men, or, had a severe mental issue; not sure which.
Of course, her career only took off as a "serious" actress and everyone said she had "matured" once she played a prostitute in Butterfield 8.
BrewTech
2nd April 2011, 05:43 PM
Very few have the ability to see the spiritual ugliness in today`s stars. I could never separate a woman`s personality from her looks, I always see the whole package. There are more physically beautiful women than empty beer bottles.
IMHO Meg Ryan and Michelle Pfeiffer are much better than Liz but you already know I love cats, purrrr and Liz was a bitch,hehehehe...
Funny... I share a special day with Meg Ryan and Michelle Pfeiffer went to a school I am familiar with,...odd.
oldmansmith
2nd April 2011, 05:56 PM
No matter how beautiful we think we are, in the end we are all compost. I mean how good does she look NOW?
Awoke
2nd April 2011, 06:49 PM
Fucks sake.
NSFW
willie pete
2nd April 2011, 07:33 PM
Michelle Phiffer was an absolute beauty in the late 80's, early 90's.
Gene Tierney was always my favorite old time Hollywood babe actress.
she was no slouch, but I never saw the BIG draw in Liz....Tierney was Hot...so was Hayworth...and Brigette Bardot ;)
Ponce
2nd April 2011, 08:14 PM
Rita Hayworth was not only beatifull but also very intelligent.......she even had a patent to control a torpeto from a sub.
gunDriller
2nd April 2011, 08:22 PM
<Image removed- JQP>
I think the link in the OP is sufficient.
Mammaries Ahoy !
Awoke
2nd April 2011, 08:39 PM
Hey, that is bullshit.
Please edit you post and remove the image. You guys know that this is not safe for work and it is against the moral code to post porn on the forum.
I'm not a trying to be a hard nose about this, but you could get people in shit for posting that.
The original post should have had the NSFW warning to begin with, and you certainly should not have posted the image in the thread.
BrewTech
2nd April 2011, 10:06 PM
Hey, that is Bullshit.
Please edit you post and remove the image. You guys know that this is not safe for work and it is against the moral code to post porn on the forum.
I'm not a trying to be a hard nose about this, but you could get people in shit for posting that.
The original post should have had the NSFW warning to begin with, and you certainly should not have posted the image in the thread.
PORN?? That pic?
ROFL dude! You need to get out more... just because a human being is shown in their natural state does not porn make.
::)
Ponce
2nd April 2011, 10:39 PM
Awoke? do you really want to see a dirty picture, do you really want to see me naked?........better not, you just might fall inlove with me........after all, I don't know you ::)
freespirit
2nd April 2011, 10:54 PM
i think you guys are missing awoke's point. some companies have serious policies regarding that sort of thing, and posting the image in particular could get some people in serious shit at work.
freespirit
2nd April 2011, 10:55 PM
...it is a nice pic of her though....
dys
2nd April 2011, 11:36 PM
Michelle Phiffer was an absolute beauty in the late 80's, early 90's.
Gene Tierney was always my favorite old time Hollywood babe actress.
Michelle looked better at age 40 than she did at age 20. Holly Hunter was like that, too. That is a very rare thing in women.
dys
gunDriller
3rd April 2011, 07:34 AM
Hey, that is Bullshit.
Please edit you post and remove the image. You guys know that this is not safe for work and it is against the moral code to post porn on the forum.
I'm not a trying to be a hard nose about this, but you could get people in shit for posting that.
The original post should have had the NSFW warning to begin with, and you certainly should not have posted the image in the thread.
sorry, i should have labelled it NSFW.
although the thread title may constitute enough of a warning.
Antonio
3rd April 2011, 01:00 PM
I`m the most anti-porn guy you`ll ever meet but that pic ain`t porn. Porn is when there are 2 people depicted...at least...
freespirit
3rd April 2011, 02:47 PM
I`m the most anti-porn guy you`ll ever meet but that pic ain`t porn. Porn is when there are 2 people depicted...at least...
antonio, you know as well as anyone that the faceless, heartless corporation blindly following policy to the letter isn't going to give a shit. right or wrong, policy is policy as far as the company is concerned...
midnight rambler
3rd April 2011, 02:58 PM
I find it extremely twisted and sick to regard any innocent depiction of a woman's breasts to be 'dirty' or 'obscene'. I consider it a mental illness of some sort. Only in Amerika - you don't find this sick shit in other societies. Perhaps it's due to breasts having been commercialized and exploited for profit.
Sparky
3rd April 2011, 06:15 PM
You know something is porn if, for the first several seconds, you're not even sure what you're looking at.
Antonio
3rd April 2011, 06:41 PM
I find it extremely twisted and sick to regard any innocent depiction of a woman's breasts to be 'dirty' or 'obscene'. I consider it a mental illness of some sort. Only in Amerika - you don't find this sick shit in other societies. Perhaps it's due to breasts having been commercialized and exploited for profit.
I`m pretty savage in my sexuality, breasts are not a sexual object IMHO, they are there to feed babies. If every woman around me was topless I wouldn`t care much, same as men from primitive cultures.
I ain`t a tit man for sure ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tujqM2u-BVo
mick silver
3rd April 2011, 07:10 PM
i to alway thought she had the look
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.