PDA

View Full Version : This is why you must hold gold and silver bitchez!



mamboni
12th April 2011, 01:55 PM
Mamboni comments: This is why you must hold gold and silver! This is blatant crony capitalism that should outrage every honest hardworking man and woman in America. This is blatant corruption and a ripping off of the taxpayer - there is no excuse for this bullshit. This is only possible in an unbacked fiat money system and could not be perpetrated if we had commodity backed money and integrity in the system. The FED and US government are corrupt to the core and they will slowly suck every drop of wealth and labor out of each of us unless we stop them. Short the damn rotten FRN! Go long physical gold and silver! :redfc :redfc :redfc



Matt Taibbi Asks Why The Fed Gave $220 Million In Bailout Money To The Wives Of Two Morgan Stanley "Bigwigs"Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/12/2011 12:51 -0400

Commercial Real Estate Consumer lending CRAP Federal Reserve Free Money Matt Taibbi Morgan Stanley Real estate TALF


Matt Taibbi has resurfaced with another stunner of Wall Street impropriety which will lead to merely more silence, even more unanswered questions and be quickly buried by the kleptocratic oligarchy.

The Real Housewives of Wall Street: Look Who's Cashing In On the Bailout

Why is the Federal Reserve forking over $220 million in bailout money to the wives of two Morgan Stanley bigwigs?

From Rolling Stone Magazine

In August 2009, John Mack, at the time still the CEO of Morgan Stanley, made an interesting life decision. Despite the fact that he was earning the comparatively low salary of just $800,000, and had refused to give himself a bonus in the midst of the financial crisis, Mack decided to buy himself a gorgeous piece of property — a 107-year-old limestone carriage house on the Upper BeerEast Side of New York, complete with an indoor 12-car garage, that had just been sold by the prestigious Mellon family for $13.5 million. Either Mack had plenty of cash on hand to close the deal, or he got some help from his wife, Christy, who apparently bought the house with him.

The Macks make for an interesting couple. John, a Lebanese-American nicknamed "Mack the Knife" for his legendary passion for firing people, has one of the most recognizable faces on Wall Street, physically resembling a crumpled, half-burned baked potato with a pair of overturned furry horseshoes for eyebrows. Christy is thin, blond and rich — a sort of still-awake Sunny von Bulow with hobbies. Her major philanthropic passion is endowments for alternative medicine, and she has attained the level of master at Reiki, the Japanese practice of "palm healing." The only other notable fact on her public résumé is that her sister was married to Charlie Rose.

It's hard to imagine a pair of people you would less want to hand a giant welfare check to — yet that's exactly what the Fed did. Just two months before the Macks bought their fancy carriage house in Manhattan, Christy and her pal Susan launched their investment initiative called Waterfall TALF. Neither seems to have any experience whatsoever in finance, beyond Susan's penchant for dabbling in thoroughbred racehorses. But with an upfront investment of $15 million, they quickly received $220 million in cash from the Fed, most of which they used to purchase student loans and commercial mortgages. The loans were set up so that Christy and Susan would keep 100 percent of any gains on the deals, while the Fed and the Treasury (read: the taxpayer) would eat 90 percent of the losses. Given out as part of a bailout program ostensibly designed to help ordinary people by kick-starting consumer lending, the deals were a classic heads-I-win, tails-you-lose investment.

So how did the government come to address a financial crisis caused by the collapse of a residential-mortgage bubble by giving the wives of a couple of Morgan Stanley bigwigs free money to make essentially risk-free investments in student loans and commercial real estate? The answer is: by degrees. The history of the bailout era reads like one of those awful stories about what happens when a long-dormant criminal compulsion goes unchecked. The Peeping Tom next door stares through a few bathroom windows, doesn't get caught, and decides to break in and steal a pair of panties. Next thing you know, he's upgraded to homemade dungeons, tri-state serial rampages and throwing cheerleaders into a panel truck.

The impetus for this sudden manic expansion of the bailouts was a masterful bluff by Wall Street executives. Once the money started flowing from the Federal Reserve, the executives began moaning to their buddies at the Fed, claiming that they were suddenly afraid of investing in anything — student loans, car notes, you name it — unless their profits were guaranteed by the state. "You ever watch soccer, where the guy rolls six times to get a yellow card?" says William Black, a former federal bank regulator who teaches economics and law at the University of Missouri. "That's what this is. If you have power and connections, they will give you a freebie deal — if you're good at whining."

This is where TALF fits into the bailout picture. Created just after Barack Obama's election in November 2008, the program's ostensible justification was to spur more consumer lending, which had dried up in the midst of the financial crisis. But instead of lending directly to car buyers and credit-card holders and students — that would have been socialism! — the Fed handed out a trillion dollars to banks and hedge funds, almost interest-free. In other words, the government lent taxpayer money to the same assholes who caused the crisis, so that they could then lend that money back out on the market virtually risk-free, at an enormous profit.

Cue your Billy Mays voice, because wait, there's more! A key aspect of TALF is that the Fed doles out the money through what are known as non-recourse loans. Essentially, this means that if you don't pay the Fed back, it's no big deal. The mechanism works like this: Hedge Fund Goon borrows, say, $100 million from the Fed to buy crappy loans, which are then transferred to the Fed as collateral. If Hedge Fund Goon decides not to repay that $100 million, the Fed simply keeps its pile of crappy securities and calls everything even.

This is the deal of a lifetime. Think about it: You borrow millions, buy a bunch of crap securities and stash them on the Fed's books. If the securities lose money, you leave them on the Fed's lap and the public eats the loss. But if they make money, you take them back, cash them in and repay the funds you borrowed from the Fed. "Remember that crazy guy in the commercials who ran around covered in dollar bills shouting, 'The government is giving out free money!' " says Black. "As crazy as he was, this is making it real."

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/matt-taibbi-asks-why-fed-gave-220-million-bailout-money-wives-two-morgan-stanley-bigwigs

DMac
12th April 2011, 02:02 PM
Absolutely disgusting and a hat tip to Tabbi for digging this one up.

midnight rambler
12th April 2011, 02:05 PM
This is...a ripping off of the taxpayer

I hope you appreciate the glaring distinction between the terms 'taxpayer' and 'tax payer'. Those two terms may sound exactly the same, but there's a world of difference.

mamboni
12th April 2011, 02:08 PM
Absolutely disgusting and a hat tip to Tabbi for digging this one up.




Dmac: kudos on that fantastic avatar!!! ;D

mamboni
12th April 2011, 02:10 PM
This is...a ripping off of the taxpayer

I hope you appreciate the glaring distinction between the terms 'taxpayer' and 'tax payer'. Those two terms may sound exactly the same, but there's a world of difference.


You're bwaking my balls Hans, bwaking my balls! :-\

Ponce
12th April 2011, 02:50 PM
Is to late to worry about others........so........take care of yourself and to hell with the others......money is given away to the bankers like the rays of the sun shines upon us and there is nothing to stop either from happening.

Twisted Titan
12th April 2011, 10:21 PM
And when I say this sheeeet is gonna end in Bullets and Gunsmoke people think I am crazy.


T

Silver Shield
13th April 2011, 06:15 AM
There is no reforming this system. It MUST die of a death so aweful that generations will learn its lesson.

Winston Smith
13th April 2011, 06:59 AM
http://gold-silver.us/forum/gallery/894_13_04_11_7_57_17.jpeg

Silver Rocket Bitches!
13th April 2011, 08:21 AM
The day they announced that TALF program I knew this kind of shit would happen.

gunny highway
16th April 2011, 08:37 AM
i dare anyone to read this article and NOT throw up a little in the back of their throat!

PatColo
16th April 2011, 09:58 AM
from the FWIW file, Taibbi has a history as controlled-opp/left-gatekeeper,

http://911blogger.com/topics/matt-taibbi

But then again in the recent few years 911blogger also became co-opted by the dark side. Still you can browse there past incidences of Taibbi's seeking to marginalize/ridicule 911 Truth...

Doesn't make the OP article any less true; just think of Tiabbi's gatekeeper peers like M Moore, same deal, throws out some red meat to their base, but keeps the forbidden truths out of the dialog (IE farenheit 911: dubya's a dummy-head, scary moozlems did 911, not one mention of Izzy throughout...)

gunny highway
16th April 2011, 01:17 PM
he really does work the whole rich vs. poor, us vs. them angle throughout the article. maybe the new paradigm isn't right/left like we are used to. tptb could be pushing the rich/poor model of social control because, historically speaking, this is the dynamic the produced the most revolts and outright revolutions. something to think about i guess...

Jersey Thursday
16th April 2011, 09:42 PM
Video that coincides with the article.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yZjPCJfvV0M

Awoke
16th April 2011, 10:59 PM
This is...a ripping off of the taxpayer

I hope you appreciate the glaring distinction between the terms 'taxpayer' and 'tax payer'. Those two terms may sound exactly the same, but there's a world of difference.


You're bwaking my balls Hans, bwaking my balls! :-\


That's barrs.

Bwaking my barrs.