View Full Version : Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles?
Antonio
13th April 2011, 06:11 AM
http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/scientist-directed-energy-weapons-turned-world-trade-center-into-nanoparticles-on-9-11
http://www.drjudywood.com/
vacuum
13th April 2011, 08:56 AM
I'm familiar with Dr Judy Wood's website and I think she's spot-on.
slvrbugjim
13th April 2011, 11:19 AM
I'm familiar with Dr Judy Wood's website and I think she's spot-on.
I am familiar with her work and I think without a doubt she is nothing more than a distraction. What would be the energy source first of all and the amount of energy needed would be immense.
I am more likely to believe in mini nukes provided by Israel via Dimona first which would explain the melted cars etc.
crazychicken
13th April 2011, 11:43 AM
Sure is an interesting read!
Thanks,
CC
Ares
13th April 2011, 12:02 PM
I have to agree with slvrbugjim. Where would you get that much energy to level a building with directed energy based weapon?
vacuum
13th April 2011, 12:02 PM
I'm familiar with Dr Judy Wood's website and I think she's spot-on.
I am familiar with her work and I think without a doubt she is nothing more than a distraction. What would be the energy source first of all and the amount of energy needed would be immense.
I am more likely to believe in mini nukes provided by Israel via Dimona first which would explain the melted cars etc.
Longitudinal waves, the same waves that Tesla experimented with were used. Energy can be made to seemingly appear out of nowhere. We aren't talking some laser here, but a scalar interferometer. People like Bearden have been talking about this technology way before 2001.
JDRock
13th April 2011, 01:40 PM
..i still want to know, WHO was the man who issued the orders to "return to work theres no problem" over the p.a. AFTER the first tower was on fire??
AND...WHO was in that white unmarked 747 that flew directly overhead LONG after the faa grounding?
no, it wasn "military" :oo-->
Hatha Sunahara
13th April 2011, 05:01 PM
If it was Directed Energy Weapons, how do you explain the explosions at the base of the buildings prior to the disintegration of each building. And why would the cancer rate among the first-responders be so high? And why do they call the WTC 'ground zero'?
And have such weapons been used elsewhere? Wouldn't they 'test' them before deploying them? Could all the tests be kept secret? Does anyone other than Judy Wood know of their existence?
I'm inclined to believe that a much better developed technology was used on 911. Nuclear explosives.
Hatha
midnight rambler
13th April 2011, 05:11 PM
I'm inclined to believe that a much better developed technology was used on 911.
There are a number of videos from different sources and perspectives showing UFOs during the event. I've seen no less than three videos from three different perspectives showing that one UFO which flew by in tandem with the plane which hit the south tower. And there were other videos showing UFOs at other times during the event, so there's the hidden technology (of course I'm not saying that the UFOs had anything to do with directed energy use in this case, just that there were those obvious anomalies captured from several perspectives by a number of sources).
midnight rambler
13th April 2011, 05:17 PM
What I find very interesting is that Alex Collier in an interview in 1994 alluded to some very major world changing event in late summer of 2001.
Antonio
13th April 2011, 05:22 PM
What can explain wilted cars and the buildings reduced to talcum powder? There are so many oddities in 911 that no single theory seems to explain all of them, except mooslems with boxcutters.
vacuum
13th April 2011, 05:36 PM
If it was Directed Energy Weapons, how do you explain the explosions at the base of the buildings prior to the disintegration of each building. And why would the cancer rate among the first-responders be so high? And why do they call the WTC 'ground zero'?
And have such weapons been used elsewhere? Wouldn't they 'test' them before deploying them? Could all the tests be kept secret? Does anyone other than Judy Wood know of their existence?
I'm inclined to believe that a much better developed technology was used on 911. Nuclear explosives.
Hatha
Tom Bearden claims they have been in use since the '60s and he gives a number of events in which he believes they've been used. For example, he says the soviets used the same technology to soften the metal in the Challenger which caused it to explode. Thats right, Tom has been saying this technology has been used at a distance to soften metal and he's been saying that since way before 2001.
Bullion_Bob
13th April 2011, 06:17 PM
What happened to the cars was truly bizarre.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsysQuv3ZrM&NR=1
Hatha Sunahara
13th April 2011, 06:30 PM
The fact that we don't know how or who did it after ten years is what concerns me. We have an arabian nights tale about 19 arab hijackers that is the official government version and we believe it like the Arabs believe stories about Sheherazade. What has been persistent throughout has been our government's refusal to do any further investigation, and to either dismiss or settle court cases arising from 911, so no new evidence can be introduced in a public trial.
Don't you find our government's behavior regarding 911 to be outrageous? It's like they have something to hide, and they remind us each time they use their power to hide what really happened. Isn't it also outrageous that the government has no accountability in enforcing the laws? Doesn't it seem like some evil force is controlling the government?
So what does it really matter if they used directed beam weapons, or nukes, or thermite. What matters is that the evil force depart the government. We can't make that happen if we're arguing for or against our favorite theories.
Hatha
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.