View Full Version : The dirt on 0bunghole and Elena Kagan
midnight rambler
25th April 2011, 10:36 PM
He owed her big time, and now she owes him big time.
A post from a yahoo group I subscribe to:
Subject: Fw: SNOPES EXPOSED! PASS THIS ON FOR SURE
I always said WHO checks Snopes, as most think they are the gospel, well here is the answer.
We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes!
Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?
We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros; a big time supporter of Obama!
“In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.
I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice, Elena Kagan who Obama appointed and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets so I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in 'Obama-Kagan' and guess what?
Yep you got it; Snopes Lied!
Everyone of those dockets are there.
So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false.
I went directly to the Supreme Court's website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to.
I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking.
Thank You,
I hope you will be much more truthful in the future.
That being said, I'll bet you didn't know this.
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship.
Now she may help rule on them.
Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on.
Once gain the US Senate sold us out!
Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.
Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.
She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.
He owed her big time.
All of the requests were denied of course.
They were never heard.
It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it?
The American people mean nothing any longer.
It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:
You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?
Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm
Son of Dave
25th April 2011, 10:53 PM
Wow, I wonder if the wheels coming off Oboingo's cart are going to eclipse the markets turning into liquid poop. As I write this "Elena Kagan" is one of the worlds most "Powerful" women on Yahoo, up there with Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Sotamayor.
I'm gonna go to bed now, and try not to have any nightmares. Sotamayor looks like Gadaffi without a mustache.
Neuro
25th April 2011, 11:40 PM
Payback that bitch! She/he/it just flatly denied to investigate, anything re Obama's citizen questions, and then she was appointed Supreme Court justice for life. The system is truly rotten to the core.
iOWNme
26th April 2011, 06:22 AM
This is absolutely incredible. These tactics are directly out of the Soviet playbook. Stack the deck, and then play your hand.
How in the hell did our system of checks and balances end up like this? Ill tell you how: MORALLY BANKRUPT.
gunDriller
26th April 2011, 06:46 AM
This is absolutely incredible. These tactics are directly out of the Soviet playbook. Stack the deck, and then play your hand.
How in the hell did our system of checks and balances end up like this? Ill tell you how: MORALLY BANKRUPT.
MORALLY BANKRUPT Talmud Worshippers.
yes, i know it's an oxymoron.
sirgonzo420
26th April 2011, 06:48 AM
This is absolutely incredible. These tactics are directly out of the Soviet playbook. Stack the deck, and then play your hand.
How in the hell did our system of checks and balances end up like this? Ill tell you how: MORALLY BANKRUPT.
MORALLY BANKRUPT Talmud Worshippers.
yes, i know it's an oxymoron.
Not an oxymoron, just redundant.
DMac
26th April 2011, 08:12 AM
Do I think there are shenanigans (and/or dirty dealings) going on between Kagan and Obama? - Yes.
Do I think the email/article posted in the OP is accurate? - No.
Kagan was the attorney representing Obama for the 3 cases cited not due to some grand conspiracy, but due to the fact that it was her job at the time:
Elena Kagan
45th Solicitor General of the United States
In office March 19, 2009 – May 17, 2010
United States Solicitor General (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Solicitor_General)
The United States Solicitor General is the person appointed to represent the Federal government of the United States before the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Solicitor General determines the legal position that the United States will take in the Supreme Court. In addition to supervising and conducting cases in which the government is a party, the Solicitor General's office also files amicus curiae briefs in cases in which the federal government has a significant interest in the legal issue. The Solicitor General's office argues on behalf of the government in virtually every case in which the United States is a party, and also argues in most of the cases in which the government has filed an amicus brief. In the federal courts of appeal, the Office of the Solicitor General reviews cases decided against the United States and determines whether the government will seek review in the Supreme Court. The Solicitor General's office also reviews cases decided against the United States in the federal district courts and approves every case in which the government files an appeal.
The 3 cases cited in the OP as proof of misconduct is misrepresenting fact:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm
Docketed: December 22, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm
Docketed: October 1, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
Docketed: January 29, 2010
iOWNme
26th April 2011, 12:03 PM
Do I think there are shenanigans (and/or dirty dealings) going on between Kagan and Obama? - Yes.
Do I think the email/article posted in the OP is accurate? - No.
Kagan was the attorney representing Obama for the 3 cases cited not due to some grand conspiracy, but due to the fact that it was her job at the time:
Elena Kagan
45th Solicitor General of the United States
In office March 19, 2009 – May 17, 2010
United States Solicitor General (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Solicitor_General)
The United States Solicitor General is the person appointed to represent the Federal government of the United States before the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Solicitor General determines the legal position that the United States will take in the Supreme Court. In addition to supervising and conducting cases in which the government is a party, the Solicitor General's office also files amicus curiae briefs in cases in which the federal government has a significant interest in the legal issue. The Solicitor General's office argues on behalf of the government in virtually every case in which the United States is a party, and also argues in most of the cases in which the government has filed an amicus brief. In the federal courts of appeal, the Office of the Solicitor General reviews cases decided against the United States and determines whether the government will seek review in the Supreme Court. The Solicitor General's office also reviews cases decided against the United States in the federal district courts and approves every case in which the government files an appeal.
The 3 cases cited in the OP as proof of misconduct is misrepresenting fact:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm
Docketed: December 22, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm
Docketed: October 1, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
Docketed: January 29, 2010
I think you missed the point.....
It could have been the Easter Bunny serving......And then we would have the Easter Bunny on the US Supreme Court.
INSIDE Soviet Politics. Not the RULE OF LAW.
DMac
26th April 2011, 12:15 PM
No, I did not miss the point, and I don't rule out the Kagan-Obama connection as being one with a conspiratorial background.
However, the facts in this case do not prove to a grand conspiracy. They only show a lack of research in the originator of this faux conspiracy.
If the Easter bunny was the Solicitor General then the Solicitor General would have been listed as the Attorney representing Obama on the Supreme Court dockets.
gunny highway
26th April 2011, 12:16 PM
now i understand why presidents look like they've aged 20 years during their first term. :-\
gunDriller
26th April 2011, 01:11 PM
now i understand why presidents look like they've aged 20 years during their first term. :-\
i think in some cases it's because they stop dying their hair.
and in some cases, it's because of the stress.
Neuro
26th April 2011, 01:43 PM
No, I did not miss the point, and I don't rule out the Kagan-Obama connection as being one with a conspiratorial background.
However, the facts in this case do not prove to a grand conspiracy. They only show a lack of research in the originator of this faux conspiracy.
If the Easter bunny was the Solicitor General then the Solicitor General would have been listed as the Attorney representing Obama on the Supreme Court dockets.
I am not quite sure what the job of solicitor general is. Is it to act as the personal lawyer of the current serving president of the USA. Or is it to represent the office of the president of the US? In many cases it may be the same thing. But in the case of the elected president of the US, not being eligible, it may actually be the opposite! IOW NOT TO PROTECT OBAMA THE FRAUD, BUT THE PRESIDENTS OFFICE...
sirgonzo420
26th April 2011, 02:18 PM
No, I did not miss the point, and I don't rule out the Kagan-Obama connection as being one with a conspiratorial background.
However, the facts in this case do not prove to a grand conspiracy. They only show a lack of research in the originator of this faux conspiracy.
If the Easter bunny was the Solicitor General then the Solicitor General would have been listed as the Attorney representing Obama on the Supreme Court dockets.
I am not quite sure what the job of solicitor general is. Is it to act as the personal lawyer of the current serving president of the USA. Or is it to represent the office of the president of the US? In many cases it may be the same thing. But in the case of the elected president of the US, not being eligible, it may actually be the opposite! IOW NOT TO PROTECT OBAMA THE FRAUD, BUT THE PRESIDENTS OFFICE...
The Solicitor General represents the government of the United States.
Neuro
26th April 2011, 02:23 PM
No, I did not miss the point, and I don't rule out the Kagan-Obama connection as being one with a conspiratorial background.
However, the facts in this case do not prove to a grand conspiracy. They only show a lack of research in the originator of this faux conspiracy.
If the Easter bunny was the Solicitor General then the Solicitor General would have been listed as the Attorney representing Obama on the Supreme Court dockets.
I am not quite sure what the job of solicitor general is. Is it to act as the personal lawyer of the
current serving president of the USA. Or is it to represent the office of the president of the US? In many cases it may be the same thing. But in the case of the elected president of the US, not being eligible, it may actually be the opposite! IOW NOT TO PROTECT OBAMA THE FRAUD, BUT THE PRESIDENTS OFFICE...
The Solicitor General represents the government of the United States.
I guess a solicitor general should then work as a prosecutor if someone unlawfully tries to access the head of government position?
sirgonzo420
26th April 2011, 02:41 PM
No, I did not miss the point, and I don't rule out the Kagan-Obama connection as being one with a conspiratorial background.
However, the facts in this case do not prove to a grand conspiracy. They only show a lack of research in the originator of this faux conspiracy.
If the Easter bunny was the Solicitor General then the Solicitor General would have been listed as the Attorney representing Obama on the Supreme Court dockets.
I am not quite sure what the job of solicitor general is. Is it to act as the personal lawyer of the
current serving president of the USA. Or is it to represent the office of the president of the US? In many cases it may be the same thing. But in the case of the elected president of the US, not being eligible, it may actually be the opposite! IOW NOT TO PROTECT OBAMA THE FRAUD, BUT THE PRESIDENTS OFFICE...
The Solicitor General represents the government of the United States.
I guess a solicitor general should then work as a prosecutor if someone unlawfully tries to access the head of government position?
Only in a non-bizarro world.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.