Putin: Who gave NATO right to kill Gaddafi?

[Serpo]

Who gave coalition forces in Libya the right to eliminate Gaddafi? That's the question Vladimir Putin's been asking, during an official visit to Denmark. The Russian Premier also said NATO's effectively joined one of the warring sides in the conflict. And more responsible action should be taken instead.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iw5Ij_RFJ1Q&feature=channel_video_title

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/04/ex-cia-chief-kadhafi-was-good-partner.html

[Cebu_4_2]

I didn't know he was dead!

[Serpo]

I didn't know he was dead!


Who gives nato the right to kill him

[Low Pan]

I didn't know he was dead!


Who gives nato the right to kill him


The African Union did...but shhhh, it's supposed to be a secret :rocket_hor

[keehah]

Mohammed al Zarroug Rajab's real boss? (boss of head of the Rebel's new central bank)

[DMac]

Re: Putin: Who gave NATO right to kill Gaddafi?

Your Zionist masters did Mr. Putin.

http://www.crownheights.info/media/4/20060410-Lazar-Putin.jpg
http://www.thenewsturmer.com/On%20Jews/PutinWithBerelLazar.jpg
http://www.ejpress.org/ImageGallery/f75a3634-51f3-4785-bd50-dda847c6c1c8.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_T8t5gwy9dIw/S19vdW-1PmI/AAAAAAAAAWQ/ujIX_DWd4aY/s400/Putin+Rabbis+revisionism.jpeg
http://www.thenewsturmer.com/On%20Jews/PutinPresidentRussia.jpg
http://img2.newser.com/square-image/2007-20110401035201/putins-top-rabbi-lifts-sect-to-power.jpeg
http://abbc6.com/jewish-photos/manipulat-the-wold/RUSSIA-Putin.jpg

[madfranks]

For what it's worth, that yarmulke on top of Putin's head looks totally photoshopped to me.

[keehah]

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/04/us-authorizes-oil-transactions-with.html

The US Treasury specifically authorized transactions with Qatar Petroleum and the Vitol Group "related to oil, gas, or petroleum products exported from Libya under the auspices of the Transitional National Council of Libya."

Buyers must report the transactions to the Treasury Department and provide information to show that the Libyan government or others under sanctions derive no benefit, the Treasury Department statement said..

[JohnQPublic]

For what it's worth, that yarmulke on top of Putin's head looks totally photoshopped to me.


Did that photo come from the Obama Whitehouse website?

[learn2swim]

Putin is a tool like all of them.

[keehah]

Libya: It’s Not About Oil, It’s About Currency and Loans (http://www.blacklistednews.com/Libya%3A_It%E2%80%99s_Not_About_Oil%2C_It%E2%80%99 s_About_Currency_and_Loans_/13692/0/0/0/Y/M.html)

April 28, 2011 By John Perkins - BLN Contributing Writer

World Bank President Robert Zoellick Thursday said he hopes the institution will have a role rebuilding Libya as it emerges from current unrest.

Zoellick at a panel discussion noted the bank’s early role in the reconstruction of France, Japan and other nations after World War II.

“Reconstruction now means (Ivory Coast), it means southern Sudan, it means Liberia, it means Sri Lanka, I hope it will mean Libya,” Zoellick said.

On Ivory Coast, Zoellick said he hoped that within “a couple weeks” the bank would move forward with “some hundred millions of dollars of emergency support.”

We listen to U.S. spokespeople try to explain why we’re suddenly now entangled in another Middle East war. Many of us find ourselves questioning the official justifications. We are aware that the true causes of our engagement are rarely discussed in the media or by our government.

While many of the rationalizations describe resources, especially oil, as the reasons why we should be in that country, there are also an increasing number of dissenting voices. For the most part, these revolve around Libya’s financial relationship with the World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), and multinational corporations.

According to the IMF, Libya’s Central Bank is 100% state owned. The IMF estimates that the bank has nearly 144 tons of gold in its vaults. It is significant that in the months running up to the UN resolution that allowed the US and its allies to send troops into Libya, Muammar al-Qaddafi was openly advocating the creation of a new currency that would rival the dollar and the euro. In fact, he called upon African and Muslim nations to join an alliance that would make this new currency, the gold dinar, their primary form of money and foreign exchange. They would sell oil and other resources to the US and the rest of the world only for gold dinars.

The US, the other G-8 countries, the World Bank, IMF, BIS, and multinational corporations do not look kindly on leaders who threaten their dominance over world currency markets or who appear to be moving away from the international banking system that favors the corporatocracy. Saddam Hussein had advocated policies similar to those expressed by Qaddafi shortly before the US sent troops into Iraq.

In my talks, I often find it necessary to remind audiences of a point that seems obvious to me but is misunderstood by so many: that the World Bank is not really a world bank at all; it is, rather a U. S. bank. Ditto, its closest sibling, the IMF. In fact, if one looks at the World Bank and IMF executive boards and the votes each member of the board has, one sees that the United States controls about 16 percent of the votes in the World Bank – (Compared with Japan at about 7%, the second largest member, China at 4.5%, Germany with 4.00%, and the United Kingdom and France with about 3.8% each), nearly 17% of the IMF votes (Compared with Japan and Germany at about 6% and UK and France at nearly 5%),and the US holds veto power over all major decisions. Furthermore, the United States President appoints the World Bank President...

[Low Pan]

“Reconstruction now means (Ivory Coast), it means southern Sudan, it means Liberia, it means Sri Lanka, I hope it will mean Libya,” Zoellick said

No Egypt? Looks like the World Banks hit list of Gloabalist hold-outs.