PDA

View Full Version : What Is the Purpose Of A Gold Standard?



mick silver
1st May 2011, 09:06 AM
http://www.forbes.com/2011/04/28/gold-standard-purpose.html ... Even its adherents have an imprecise grasp on why we need gold-defined money.



What is the purpose of a gold standard system?

If you ask the typical academic Keynesian economist this question, he would probably say that there was no purpose at all. People used gold just because it is shiny and beguiling, and therefore attractive to superstitious, primitive people.

Article Controls
email

print

reprint

newsletter

comments (6)

share

del.icio.us
Digg It!
yahoo
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
rss
If you ask the typical gold standard advocate this question, he would probably respond with some vague platitudes like "gold is honest money," or perhaps would argue that a gold standard prevents government debt issuance, or some such thing. They have, I would say, only an imprecise grasp of the purpose of a gold standard system.

And what of the typical lay person, with an interest in these matters? From one side she hears that there is no purpose at all, and from the other side she hears a somewhat disjointed collection of vagaries, which gives rise to the thought that perhaps the first side has a point.

A gold standard system has a very specific purpose. If you don't understand the purpose, then of course it wouldn't seem to make much sense. If you didn't know that the purpose of an airplane was air travel, then you might think it was a rather badly designed movie theater.

The purpose of a gold standard system is to produce a currency of stable value.

Related Stories
Addressing The Notion Of 'Different' Gold Standards
A Currency Board Linked To Gold
A Strong Focus On The Concept Of Currency Value
Why the Gold Standard Still Matters Today
The Astonishing Genius Of Men In Tights
Related VideosOvercoming The Debt SupercycleEconomists Reduce Economy By Billions of DollarsTD Ameritrade's Trade ArchitectTax Deadline: Making Last-Minute MovesTaming The Taxman: The Elusive Goal Of Reform
StoriesVideosRate This Story
Your Rating Overall Rating Reader Comments
The gold standard must eliminate the creation of currency by bankers. It is as simple as that. The world's monetary scheme is a supreme fraud where bankers control governments, and have designed a


Read All Comments (6)Post a CommentNow we can say what a gold standard does not do: It does not prevent panics, crashes, depressions and so forth, caused by various factors unrelated to currency value. It does not prevent government debt issuance--historically, governments favored gold standard systems because they make issuing debt easier--although it does prevent printing-press finance of government expenditures. It does not cause some sort of "balanced trade"; in fact it tends to facilitate international capital flows, which go by the confusing term of a "trade imbalance."

A gold standard system does not put some sort of artificial limit on the supply of money. You can have as much currency as your economy needs, within the constraint that the currency must be stable in value. In other words, you cannot over-issue money to the point that it loses value. A gold standard system does not inhibit any of the various financial tools common today, such as credit cards, bank transfers, derivatives or other instruments. All of that could be just the same as today, denominated in a currency of stable value.

A gold standard system does not exclude central banking of the 19th century variety--the "lender of last resort," an important element for financial system stability in those times. Of course, it would disallow the sort of currency fiddling common to central banks today. The world's greatest gold standard institution and the world's first central bank were in fact the same bank--the Bank of England.

Page:12 Next

Half Sense
1st May 2011, 02:18 PM
Then some fool in the comments says that Volcker destroyed the value of gold by raising interest rates.

That's completely backwards. Volcker merely raised the value of the dollar by offering 15% for the lending of them. The lower price of gold in dollars just reflected the sudden strength of the dollar, not the weakness of gold.

Ponce
1st May 2011, 05:00 PM
When we had silver coins the coins themselves never change it value but what we bought did, if something as a quater and it went up in price then it would cost you a quarter + what ever it wen up to.....with a gold standard only the initial printing of the paper fiat wuould be the real value of gold and anything after that then government would have to deal with it as inflation........and no more paper fiat could be printed unless it was as a replacement for the old ones.

The above would be the ideal situation but........having a new war every few years while at the sametime keeping the old wars still in production and by having no export and to much import and etc, etc, etc......

Second WW was a very productive war because it gave everyone a job and that was when the building of new houses went up up and away........now days either the weapons are made overseas and if they are mfg in the US is then made by robotic machines where one machine can do the job of 20 people.

The only way to move forward (besides wars) would be by having innovating ideas that we can masproduce and export to the world......but with the school system that we now have that's out of the question.