PDA

View Full Version : White House Insider: Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin La



osoab
3rd May 2011, 05:52 PM
FWIW

White House Insider: Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden (http://socyberty.com/issues/white-house-insider-obama-hesitated-panetta-issued-order-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/#ixzz1LKKQFegv)



Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?

A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.

I was correct in stating there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts. One, that the military action could fail and harm the president’s already weakened standing with both the American public and the world. Second, that the attack would be viewed as an act of aggression against Muslims, and further destabilize conditions in the Middle East.

Q: What changed the president’s position and enabled the attack against Osama Bin Laden to proceed?

A: Nothing changed with the president’s opinion – he continued to avoid having one. Every time military and intelligence officials appeared to make progress in forming a position, Jarrett would intervene and the stalling would begin again. Hillary started the ball really rolling as far as pressuring Obama began, but it was Panetta and Petraeus who ultimately pushed Obama to finally act – sort of. Panetta was receiving significant reports from both his direct CIA sources, as well as Petraeus-originating Intel. Petraeus was threatening to act on his own via a bombing attack. Panetta reported back to the president that a bombing of the compound would result in successful killing of Osama Bin Laden, and little risk to American lives. Initially, as he had done before, the president indicated a willingness to act. But once again, Jarrett intervened, convincing the president that innocent Pakistani lives could be lost in such a bombing attack, and Obama would be left attempting to explain Panetta’s failed policy. Again Obama hesitated – this time openly delaying further meetings to discuss the issue with Panetta. A brief meeting was held at this time with other officials, including Secretary Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but Gates, like Panetta, was unable to push the president to act. It was at this time that Gates indicated to certain Pentagon officials that he may resign earlier than originally indicated – he was that frustrated. Both Panetta and Clinton convinced him to stay on and see the operation through.

What happened from there is what was described by me as a “masterful manipulation” by Leon Panetta. Panetta indicated to Obama that leaks regarding knowledge of Osama Bin Laden’s location were certain to get out sooner rather than later, and action must be taken by the administration or the public backlash to the president’s inaction would be “…significant to the point of political debilitation.” It was at that time that Obama stated an on-ground campaign would be far more acceptable to him than a bombing raid. This was intended as a stalling tactic, and it had originated from Jarrett. Such a campaign would take both time, and present a far greater risk of failure. The president had been instructed by Jarrett to inform Mr., Panetta that he would have sole discretion to act against the Osama Bin Laden compound. Jarrett believed this would further delay Panetta from acting, as the responsibility for failure would then fall almost entirely on him. What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound. Basically, the whole damn operation was already ready to go – including the specific team support Intel necessary to engage the enemy within hours of being given notice. Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself. Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority – namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat. Panetta admitted that possibility, but felt the opportunity to get Bin Laden outweighed that risk. During that meeting, Hillary Clinton was first to pledge her full support for Panetta, indicating she would defend him if necessary. Similar support was then followed by Gates. The following day, and with Panetta’s permission, Clinton met in private with Bill Daley and urged him to get the president’s full and open approval of the Panetta plan. Daley agreed such approval would be of great benefit to the action, and instructed Clinton to delay proceeding until he had secured that approval. Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval. Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order.

This insulation ended at some point with an abort order that I believe originated from Valerie Jarrett’s office, and was then followed up by President Obama. This abort order was later explained as a delay due to weather conditions, but the actual conditions at that time would have been acceptable for the mission. A storm system had been in the area earlier, but was no longer an issue. Check the data yourself to confirm. Jarrett, having been caught off guard, was now scrambling to determine who had initiated the plan. She was furious, repeating the acronym “CoC” and saying it was not being followed. This is where Bill Daley intervened directly. The particulars of that intervention are not clear to me beyond knowing he did meet with Jarrett in his office and following that meeting, Valerie Jarrett was not seen in the West Wing for some time, and apparently no longer offered up any resistance to the Osama Bin Laden mission. What did follow from there was one or more brief meetings between Bill Daley, Hillary Clinton, a representative from Robert Gates’ office, a representative from Leon Panetta’s office, and a representative from Jim Clapper’s office. I have to assume that these meetings were in essence, detailing the move to proceed with the operation against the Osama Bin Laden compound. I have been told by more than one source that Leon Panetta was directing the operation with both his own CIA operatives, as well as direct contacts with military – both entities were reporting to Panetta only at this point, and not the President of the United States. There was not going to be another delay as had happened 24 hour earlier. The operation was at this time effectively unknown to President Barack Obama or Valerie Jarrett and it remained that way until AFTER it had already been initiated. President Obama was literally pulled from a golf outing and escorted back to the White House to be informed of the mission. Upon his arrival there was a briefing held which included Bill Daley, John Brennan, and a high ranking member of the military. When Obama emerged from the briefing, he was described as looking “very confused and uncertain.” The president was then placed in the situation room where several of the players in this event had already been watching the operation unfold. Another interesting tidbit regarding this is that the Vice President was already “up to speed” on the operation. A source indicated they believe Hillary Clinton had personally made certain the Vice President was made aware of that day’s events before the president was. The now famous photo released shows the particulars of that of that room and its occupants. What that photo does not communicate directly is that the military personnel present in that room during the operation unfolding, deferred to either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates. The president’s role was minimal, including their acknowledging of his presence in the room.

At the conclusion of the mission, after it had been repeatedly confirmed a success, President Obama was once again briefed behind closed doors. The only ones who went in that room besides the president were Bill Daley. John Brennan, and a third individual whose identity remains unknown to me. When leaving this briefing, the president came out of it “…much more confident. Much more certain of himself.” He was also carrying papers in his hand that quite possibly was the address to the nation given later that evening on the Bin Laden mission. The president did not have those papers with him prior to that briefing. The president then returned to the war room, where by this time, Leon Panetta had personally arrived and was receiving congratulations from all who were present.

In my initial communication to you of these events I described what unfolded as a temporary Coup initiated by high ranking intelligence and military officials. I stand by that term. These figures worked around the uncertainty of President Obama and the repeated resistance of Valerie Jarrett. If they had not been willing to do so, I am certain Osama Bin Laden would still be alive today. There will be no punishment to those who acted outside the authority of the president’s office. The president cannot afford to admit such a fact. What will be most interesting from here is to now see what becomes of Valerie Jarrett. One source indicated she is threatening resignation. I find that unlikely given my strong belief she needs the protection afforded her by the Oval Office and its immense powers to delay and eventually terminate investigations back in Chicago, but we shall see.

Stay safe.

Uncle Salty
3rd May 2011, 06:24 PM
I wonder if this story was leaked to give the impression that Osama was really killed. In my mind this is all just a psyop.

osoab
3rd May 2011, 06:31 PM
I wonder if this story was leaked to give the impression that Osama was really killed. In my mind this is all just a psyop.


I was thinking along the same lines. All the previous WH Insider things have always postured Obummer as weak. This just keeps that line of thinking going. I like how Patreaus and Panetta are portrayed as the balls. The same two guys that are swapping places basically.

I could have sworn, that the Insider said he wasn't going to give another scoop during his last scoop.

Cebu_4_2
3rd May 2011, 06:32 PM
All is psyop, this guy must have 9 lives if he just recently was shot... and died later from such wounds.

What happened to the Nuke thing in Japan? How about the twisters in the South US?

No other issues I can think of besides the PIGS in IL targeting and fining them college kids from celebrating the end of their year.


Hmmm... Nothing to see here, move along.

SilverMagnet
3rd May 2011, 07:12 PM
The fact that the USA says that it immediately destroyed the evidence (i.e., the bin Laden body) by dumping it in the ocean should tell you all you need to know that the US government lied to the public. You don’t destroy evidence unless you want to cover something up. It’s as simple as that. Once again, we’re left with the US government’s word on the subject, rather than real evidence. And that only tells you that the US government is lying yet again.

iOWNme
3rd May 2011, 07:13 PM
As if Barry Soetoro has any real organic autonomous 'power'.

BrewTech
3rd May 2011, 07:19 PM
What I think is hilarious is this call for pictures so all the doubters will shut up.

What's never mentioned is that photographic "proof" ceased to exist the day photoshop was invented.

Glass
3rd May 2011, 07:39 PM
so someone went over the President. Someone went over the Commander in Chief. Someone acted against the wishes of the President.

What does this mean?

osoab
3rd May 2011, 07:43 PM
so someone went over the President. Someone went over the Commander in Chief. Someone acted against the wishes of the President.

What does this mean?


Even if the above is to be believed. I took it that everything was setup to go, and Panetta maneuvered Obummer/Jarrett into the decision he desired to make the operation a go.

vacuum
3rd May 2011, 07:58 PM
What I think is hilarious is this call for pictures so all the doubters will shut up.

What's never mentioned is that photographic "proof" ceased to exist the day photoshop was invented.



Not to mention it is impossible to prove when the pictures were taken.

keehah
3rd May 2011, 09:50 PM
But once again, Jarrett intervened, convincing the president that innocent Pakistani lives could be lost in such a bombing attack...

That line runs false. They bomb weddings and such regularly in Pakistan, why not a house for Osama?

Glass
3rd May 2011, 11:22 PM
so someone went over the President. Someone went over the Commander in Chief. Someone acted against the wishes of the President.

What does this mean?


Even if the above is to be believed. I took it that everything was setup to go, and Panetta maneuvered Obummer/Jarrett into the decision he desired to make the operation a go.


Ah I C. thx. Still seems odd. Why would there need to be any discussion?

bellevuebully
4th May 2011, 12:37 AM
The fact that the USA says that it immediately destroyed the evidence (i.e., the bin Laden body) by dumping it in the ocean

What?! I heard they sent it to China for recycling.

Opps, sorry. My bad. Wrong story.

Hatha Sunahara
4th May 2011, 11:51 AM
The fact that the USA says that it immediately destroyed the evidence (i.e., the bin Laden body) by dumping it in the ocean should tell you all you need to know that the US government lied to the public. You don’t destroy evidence unless you want to cover something up. It’s as simple as that. Once again, we’re left with the US government’s word on the subject, rather than real evidence. And that only tells you that the US government is lying yet again.


People shouldn't forget that all the evidence for the 911 destruction of the WTC buildings was also destroyed. Also, there was no real evidence linking OBL to 911:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13664.htm

How much more obvious could it be that the government is trying to cover up everything about OBL. Watch when the 'retaliatory' strikes happen how the government tries to cover that up as well. Al Qaeda and the war on terror is a huge, unconscionable fraud perpetrated by a group psychosis whose participants are psychopathic killers.

Hatha

old steel
4th May 2011, 12:55 PM
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/04/article-1383396-0BE76C8800000578-319_634x394.jpg

midnight rambler
4th May 2011, 01:23 PM
What I think is hilarious is this call for pictures so all the doubters will shut up.

What's never mentioned is that photographic "proof" ceased to exist the day photoshop was invented.




I'm thinking 'alien autopsy'. lol

midnight rambler
4th May 2011, 01:27 PM
I'm wondering where this authority for the DCIA to order the assassination of anyone comes from.

osoab
13th June 2011, 01:40 PM
More from the Insider.

White House Insider: Obama’s Rage Over Netanyahu Meeting: "What the F-ck was that?" (http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-obamas-rage-over-netanyahu-meeting-what-the-f-ck-was-that/#ixzz1PA0NdTKF)





Received this information late yesterday. Thought you might wish to know.
Shortly after the photo-op meeting and “working lunch” with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the one that saw President Obama openly chastised by the Prime Minister for Obama’s earlier public comments regarding wanting to see Israel return to its 1967 borders, the president verbally “went off” on Richard Daley in the private study area that adjoins the Oval Office. President Obama’s verbal attack was clearly heard by numerous staff up and down the West Wing hallways.
The essence of the president’s rage and embarrassment can best be summed up with him yelling out very loudly, “What the f-ck was that!?” That phrase was apparently repeated a number of times in the span of about five minutes, a time period in which Obama’s voice (http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-obamas-rage-over-netanyahu-meeting-what-the-f-ck-was-that/#) became “louder and louder” and culminating in Obama exclaiming, “Never again! Do you understand me? Never again!” Any response by Bill Daley back to the president, if given, was not overheard.


Daley was soon after seen walking slowly down the hallway back toward his own office (http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-obamas-rage-over-netanyahu-meeting-what-the-f-ck-was-that/#). He appeared “unconcerned” and was walking alone. His mood was apparently good enough that he took the time to speak briefly with some junior staffers before continuing down the hall. There was no sign of the president, though Valerie Jarrett did make an appearance on her way into the Oval Office. This was viewed as somewhat of a rare thing as Jarrett has apparently not been seen much on the lower levels of the West Wing (http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-obamas-rage-over-netanyahu-meeting-what-the-f-ck-was-that/#)for the last month or so. Neither she nor the president was seen for some time after that. The president did not emerge until it was time to make another brief speech at a nearby location later that afternoon. I did not receive information on whether or not Daley accompanied the president on that short trip (http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-obamas-rage-over-netanyahu-meeting-what-the-f-ck-was-that/#), but the president’s mood was described as “much improved” when he returned.


While the details of this confrontation are a bit dated, I found them very interesting and think they provide some clear insight into the debilitating pressures that I am certain are getting to the president, and given the more recent developments that are now challenging the administration, I would not be at all surprised to hear more such examples coming from inside White House (http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-obamas-rage-over-netanyahu-meeting-what-the-f-ck-was-that/#) in the very near future.
Oh, and another little FYI in case you missed it. Obama had a recent “meeting” with some of his former top advisers very recently. In my line of work that means only one thing. This administration is absolutely sh-tting itself right now. The cover is being blown off, the fingers of blame are being pointed, and discussions over who is going to take the fall are happening this very moment. Things are going rather well for us. Not too bad for an old news almost out to pasture relic huh? Much work (http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-obamas-rage-over-netanyahu-meeting-what-the-f-ck-was-that/#) remains to be done though.
Stay safe.