PDA

View Full Version : Forbes Predicts U.S. Gold Standard Within 5 Years



Ares
11th May 2011, 07:14 AM
A return to the gold standard by the United States within the next five years now seems likely, because that move would help the nation solve a variety of economic, fiscal, and monetary ills, Steve Forbes predicted during an exclusive interview this week with HUMAN EVENTS.

“What seems astonishing today could become conventional wisdom in a short period of time,” Forbes said.

Such a move would help to stabilize the value of the dollar, restore confidence among foreign investors in U.S. government bonds, and discourage reckless federal spending, the media mogul and former presidential candidate said. The United States used gold as the basis for valuing the U.S. dollar successfully for roughly 180 years before President Richard Nixon embarked upon an experiment to end the practice in the 1970s that has contributed to a number of woes that the country is suffering from now, Forbes added.

If the gold standard had been in place in recent years, the value of the U.S. dollar would not have weakened as it has and excessive federal spending would have been curbed, Forbes told HUMAN EVENTS. The constantly changing value of the U.S. dollar leads to marketplace uncertainty and consequently spurs speculation in commodity investing as a hedge against inflation.

The only probable 2012 U.S. presidential candidate who has championed a return to the gold standard so far is Rep. Ron Paul (R.-Tex.). But the idea “makes too much sense” not to gain popularity as the U.S. economy struggles to create jobs, recover from a housing bubble induced by the Federal Reserve’s easy-money policies, stop rising gasoline prices, and restore fiscal responsibility to U.S. government’s budget, Forbes insisted.

With a stable currency, it is “much harder” for governments to borrow excessively, Forbes said. Without lax Federal Reserve System monetary policies that led to the printing of too much money, the housing bubble would not have been nearly as severe, he added.

“When it comes to exchange rates and monetary policy, people often don’t grasp” what is at stake for the economy, Forbes said. By restoring the gold standard, the United States would shift away from “less responsible policies” and toward a stronger dollar and a stronger America, he said. “If the dollar was as good as gold, other countries would want to buy it.”

An encouraging sign for Forbes is that key lawmakers besides Rep. Paul are recognizing that the Fed is straying well beyond its intended role of promoting stable prices and full employment with its monetary policies.

Forbes cited Rep. Paul Ryan (R.-Wis.), who, he believes, understands monetary policy better than most lawmakers and has shown a willingness to ask tough but necessary questions. For example, when Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke appeared before the House Budget Committee in February, Ryan, who chairs the panel, asked Bernanke bluntly how many jobs the Fed’s quantitative-easing program had helped to create.

Politicians need to “get over” the notion that the Fed can guide the economy with monetary policy. The Fed is like a “bull in a China shop," Forbes said. “It can’t help but knock things down.”

“People know that something is wrong with the dollar," Forbes concluded. "You cannot trash your money without repercussions.”

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=43439

Blink
11th May 2011, 07:23 AM
I guess they decided to read American history and find out the secret to repairing fiscal stupidity when fiat currency barons take over the money supply. Realistically, I don't think the bankers want to go that route. If we all go global, we can spread the pain of debt to everyone and keep this game going for a few more years before a solution is presented to us. Hopeful delay tactic is all this article is. You'll hear it around the water cooler soon, "Forbes says we'll go back to gold, that fix everything".......

Plastic
11th May 2011, 08:57 AM
We could easily go back to gold right now... only problem is... all of it would be instantly gone to pay off our ficticious national debt... The only way to bring back the gold/silver standard is to repudiate all debt first.

palani, screw tar and feathers, it's rope time. No quickly snapped neck either, but a nice slow agonizing haul up and strangle.

Ponce
11th May 2011, 11:36 AM
Well Plastic......make the dollar so, when equal to gold, so high that it will pay the national debt and have left over to start all over again........but of course America being America that would mean that gold would be at $500,000 per oz.

Plastic
11th May 2011, 12:42 PM
Well Plastic......make the dollar so, when equal to gold, so high that it will pay the national debt and have left over to start all over again........but of course America being America that would mean that gold would be at $500,000 per oz.


Sweet! I'll trade the 1oz 18k bracelet that I purchased in the UAE @ about 275.00 for a farm!

Sparky
11th May 2011, 02:02 PM
It's one thing to argue in favor of a gold standard. It's another to predict that the U.S. will adopt one within 5 years.

A gold standard would have to be legislated by the very people who benefit the most from abuse of the fiat dollar. How could that possibly happen?

Forbes has a lot of money, but to me he always comes across as a bit of a simpleton.

mick silver
11th May 2011, 02:05 PM
as long as the paper masters are around there will be no gold money . they then would have to stop the way they do business

vacuum
11th May 2011, 02:14 PM
It's one thing to argue in favor of a gold standard. It's another to predict that the U.S. will adopt one within 5 years.

A gold standard would have to be legislated by the very people who benefit the most from abuse of the fiat dollar. How could that possibly happen?

Forbes has a lot of money, but to me he always comes across as a bit of a simpleton.


One could argue there could easily be a defacto gold standard even if not authorized by law. Monetary events seem to precede laws many times, not the other way around.

Sparky
11th May 2011, 02:24 PM
It's one thing to argue in favor of a gold standard. It's another to predict that the U.S. will adopt one within 5 years.

A gold standard would have to be legislated by the very people who benefit the most from abuse of the fiat dollar. How could that possibly happen?

Forbes has a lot of money, but to me he always comes across as a bit of a simpleton.


One could argue there could easily be a defacto gold standard even if not authorized by law. Monetary events seem to precede laws many times, not the other way around.


One could also argue that we already have a de facto gold system. The gold price floats, and at any time I can exchange my FRNs for gold, and vice versa. The only problem is the transaction cost.

So I guess those who favor a gold standards should just live it rather than complaining about it. Think about it...the main negative about the gold standard is that we don't collect interest on our deposits. If the banking usury system is evil, we shouldn't complain about that.

I think the biggest drawback to our de facto system is the volatility in the exchange rate, which is too sensitive to speculation. The purchasing power of my ounce changes week to week.

I have to hand it to you that have committed all of your surplus financial resources to PM; you've established your own personal gold standard. That's a commitment I couldn't make at this point.

TheNocturnalEgyptian
11th May 2011, 02:38 PM
A gold standard would instantly put the power into the hands of those who have been using fake debt money to buy gold since 1972.

However much you purchased, they have more.

BabushkaLady
11th May 2011, 04:30 PM
:ROFL:

So Forbes thinks there's still gold at Ft. Knox?

Book
11th May 2011, 04:53 PM
However much you purchased, they have more.



Warren Buffet recently said that all the above-ground gold on Earth amounts to a thirty-seven foot cube.

GSUSers and GIMers with their few coins have absolutely no reason to identify with WHO actually has possession of most of this 37' cube.

Kinda like Fox News viewers cheering for no new taxes on the TOP 1%.

:)