Jury Rejects State Charges against 7/7 Ripple Effect’s Muad’Dib

[silver solution]

At 4pm on Thursday 12th May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad’Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to ‘pervert the course of justice’.

Mr. Hill has spent 151 days incarcerated in Wandsworth prison over the past few months and this verdict spared him, mercifully, a sentence of up to 20 years in jail.


His offence? He had sent six DVD copies of his film ‘7/7: The Ripple Effect’ to various persons at the time (in 2008) of the trial in Kingston of three ‘terror’ suspects, alleged co-conspirators with the London ‘suicide bombers’. The DVD’s were intercepted and never reached their targets. The Kingston suspects were found innocent (only to later be retried for the same offences, but that’s another story).

Muad’Dib’s trial started on Monday 9th May, with a challenge to the monarchy and, hence, the authority of the court. This was ruled ‘out of order’ by the judge. On Tuesday a jury were sworn in.

On Wednesday they watched all of his film, ‘The Ripple Effect’, in open court.

Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that both these ‘attacks by terrorists’ were, in fact, false flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a pretext for invasion of innocent countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources.

This was surely the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of false flag terror made against any state before an ordinary collection of the citizens of that state.

It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is placed before such ordinary citizens the majority of them ‘get it.’ The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the judge allowed a ‘majority verdict’, i.e. ten or more of the 12.

It is surely not unfair to deduce that Southwark Crown Court’s jury of ordinary persons did not reject Muad’Dib’s false-flag narrative as outrageous or even necessarily untrue. One wonders how many of that jury have now themselves been converted into active ‘troofers’?

During the trial (on Wednesday) JAH/Hill/Muad’Dib was asked why he moved to Ireland: “To pursue my study of the lost Ark of the Covenant” was his reply. Here is a character, both serious and refreshing, who brings a mythic dimension into life. Onlookers were impressed by the way he was able to conduct himself without fear in the witness-box, sometimes pausing 5-10 seconds to reflect, before replying. A group of up to 25 supporters attended the four days of the trial, a couple travelling from as far afield as Finland and the state of Montana.

Let’s hope that will be the end of the persecution of Mr JAH by the British state – and, that he soon starts on a 2nd edition of his Ripple Effect.

It’s the opinion of Sheffield University social-sciences professor Ridley-Duff, that Mr Hill’s Ripple Effect’s narrative of what happened on that day, is more plausible and better fits the facts than did the BBC’s 7/7 ‘Conspiracy Files‘ program. His well-referenced study focussed very much on what happened at Canary Wharf on that morning, seeing the Ripple narrative, whereby the young alleged bombers had been inveigled into a terror drill that morning, then fled to Canary wharf where they were shot – as the best account yet. The new 3rd edition of my book Terror on the Tube endorses this view. In contrast, the so-called ‘July 7th Truth Campaign’ has scoffed at the Ripple narrative calling it ‘evidence-free conjecture,’ a quite breathtaking (and very revealing) remark. http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/

[Buddha]

Muad’Dib, that is awesome.

Prophecy and prescience — How can they be put to the test in the face of the unanswered questions? Consider: How much is actual prediction of the "wave form" (as Muad'Dib referred to his vision-image) and how much is the prophet shaping the future to fit the prophecy? What of the harmonics inherent in the act of prophecy? Does the prophet see the future or does he see a line of weakness, a fault or cleavage that he may shatter with words or decisions as a diamond-cutter shatters his gem with a blow of a knife?

Much that was called religion has carried an unconscious attitude of hostility toward life. True religion must teach that life is filled with joys pleasing to the eye of God, that knowledge without action is empty. All men must see that the teaching of religion by rules and rote is largely a hoax. The proper teaching is recognized with ease. You can know it without fail because it awakens within you that sensation which tells you this is something you've always known.

[D sciple]

Sweet, nice update as I'm a big fan of his and hadn't seen this info elsewhere.

[D sciple]

Heres another article covering the event I found on 100777.com



May 14, 2011 -- London, England

Now that Muad’Dib/John Hill has been found not guilty, the full story to this point of His malicious and politically motivated prosecution can be told…

Three years ago, Muad’Dib mailed some DVDs containing his ‘7/7 Ripple Effect’ film to a courthouse near London, where three scapegoats were being prosecuted in hopes of lending credibility to the government’s “official” 7/7 story. These DVDs were sent by Muad’Dib because he wanted to keep innocent men from receiving very lengthy prison sentences. ALL the rest of us who knew about that situation should be ashamed for not having done exactly what Muad’Dib did.

As a result of his good-will, Muad’Dib’s home was raided by police and he was arrested on a charge of "perverting the course of justice". In the Orwellian 21st century, he was really just being attacked by a malicious and out of control police-state for getting in the way of their mass-murderous crimes (7/7 was an event of mass-murder). The charge against Muad’Dib originated out of long-standing nazi-stronghold—London—where the globalist banking syndicate is headquartered.

So, Muad’Dib then spent over a year and a half fighting extradition to England where he knew it was going to be one corrupt event after another. The very short story is that his lawyer in Ireland refused to do as instructed and sabotaged his defense. Since the Irish judges were all quite corrupt too, never applying Law or even the relevant legislation, Muad’Dib’s fight against extradition was eventually denied by the Irish Supreme Court in front of 40 supporters and he was re-imprisoned, then taken to the UK in November of 2010.

Once there, the more obvious corruption started, as he was at that point held firmly in the clutches of a filthy corrupt British Establishment (including police, courts, and media).

Firstly, Muad’Dib was deleted from the prison’s computer system, with them originally saying that Muad’Dib wasn’t even at their prison and they didn’t know where he was. About that same time, a police officer working to prosecute Muad’Dib stated openly that many other people sent DVDs to the same courthouse as Muad’Dib, but no one else was even investigated, never-mind charged. This was an open admission of a malicious and politically motivated prosecution/persecution.

Eventually the prison system admitted they had Muad’Dib in custody, and a bail application was made, then denied, by a corrupt judge for the official reason that he “didn’t want more DVDs to be sent out”. Sending out DVDs is, of course, not actually a crime. Muad’Dib then spent approximately three months straight incarcerated, teaching and waking up a sizeable portion of the prison staff and inmates.

In early March of 2011, bail was finally granted by the only judge throughout this entire process that actually seemed like a reasonably honest man. However, this process was still made very difficult by the fact that the prison service kept making “mistakes” or “forgetting” to bring Muad’Dib to his own court hearings. In all, Muad’Dib was only produced for two of seven different court hearings whilst seeking bail.

After being granted bail, one of Muad’Dib’s supporters went to go pay the ransom money, only to find out that, once again, he’d been deleted from the computer systems. This of course complicated things, but eventually the sabotaged system was fixed, the ransom paid, and after a bit of haggling with the prison, Muad’Dib was released with barely enough time to travel to his bail address before his court-imposed 10pm nightly curfew. At that point Muad’Dib began refining his defense and legal challenges.

His first action was to challenge the jurisdiction of the court, by proving, with a wealth of evidence, that “queen” Elizabeth is not the rightful monarch.

This was a two-point argument. First, that Elizabeth knew—both then and now—that she was crowned on a fake stone instead of the real Stone of Destiny/Coronation Stone, which meant not only was she never properly crowned, but she was also knowingly conning the public.

The second and absolutely irrefutable part of the argument, is that Elizabeth had broken her legally binding coronation oath, which is a valid contract she made with the British people allowing her to be their queen. Although more proof exists and was to be used in court, the skeleton legal argument summarizing this jurisdictional challenge can be found online at: REGINA v JAH.

At the end of March 2011, Muad’Dib submitted the basics of this challenge to the court, alongside applications to subpoena “queen” Elizabeth to testify, and for production of the Sovereign’s Coronation Bible, which Elizabeth had used when swearing her legally binding oath. She also signed a written version of the contract, and a high-quality picture of the original can be seen here: Signed Coronation Contract.

Unsurprisingly, nothing at all was heard back from the court as would normally happen. The final day that the court was open before his May 9th trial, Muad’Dib visited the court clerk’s office, and asked them what the situation was. At that point, he was finally notified that his subpoena applications had been denied (by an extremely dirty judge), but that the court had, once again, “mistakenly” mailed them to the wrong address.

After having been harassed, monitored, restricted, and imprisoned for long periods of time by a completely filthy “judicial system”, May 9th 2011 finally came, and with it, as one would guess, more corruption.

The judge, hand-picked by the Establishment to handle Muad’Dib’s case, was clearly unhappy to have been forced into what he surely saw as a difficult predicament for him. He had a totally innocent man (Muad’Dib) in front of him, and a courtroom full of witnesses which were going to make it very hard for this judge to carry out the orders he’d been given by his evil cronies, which was to make absolutely sure a guilty verdict was returned against Muad’Dib.

First, the judge flatly refused to hear Muad’Dib’s application to subpoena Elizabeth and the Coronation Bible. With that done, he then read Muad’Dib’s jurisdictional challenge, which, as above, had/has two points: a) the fake stone used, and b) the broken coronation contract.

After giving Muad’Dib a few minutes to make his case, the judge adjourned the trial for the rest of the day. The following morning he came back and said he was denying Muad’Dib’s challenge, ONLY on the grounds that it “didn’t matter” if a fake coronation stone was used. The judge very slyly attempted to ignore a huge amount of Muad’Dib’s challenge, saying absolutely nothing whatsoever about Elizabeth having broken her legally binding contract with the British people. The judge had to ignore and bypass that part of the challenge, because, even by their own silly “rules” and legislation, that part of the challenge is still absolutely water-tight and irrefutable.

The fact that the judge refused to even mention that crucial part of Muad’Dib’s challenge offers a great deal of proof that it cannot be argued against in court, therefore, everyone should be studying the information and using it themselves in any British (or Commonwealth) courtroom possible. If you’ve not broken a Biblical Law, then you cannot be prosecuted for anything by Elizabeth or her agents.

With Muad’Dib’s challenge officially denied (ran roughshod over as he predicted), the jury was then sworn in, and the prosecution began spewing out a bunch of pointless hot air. Basically, the prosecutor (who was an arrogant, rotten little girl with no moral decency) had no legitimate case to argue on behalf of those evil Establishment figures instructing her, and they ALL knew it. So, she just talked around in circles for the better part of a day, while some members of the jury struggled to stay awake.

Once that had finished, Muad’Dib’s only defense was getting up on the witness-stand and explaining to the jury that he sent the DVDs to the courthouse because innocent men were being maliciously prosecuted, just like he now was, and that he could not sit back and watch people go to prison for something they didn’t do. It really was that simple, so Muad’Dib used the opportunity to also enlighten everyone in the courtroom about other subjects like the false-flag 911. Upon cross-examination, the silly little girl prosecuting wasted everyone’s time by connivingly trying to get Muad’Dib to say he’d done something wrong. That didn’t work and she ended up hurting her own case even more, deciding she’d better sit down and be quiet when Muad’Dib scolded her for wasting everyone’s time speaking nonsense.

After this, both sides summed up their cases. The prosecution slandered Muad’Dib and the defense team basically said this whole thing was horribly ridiculous.

Then it was the corrupt (and probably free-masonic) judge’s turn to have the last word. This horror in a robe went on to do everything he could possibly come up with to try and manipulate the jury into giving a guilty verdict. This judge re-defined the words in the charge, stated Muad’Dib said things that he never said, then outright lied to the jury by stating it was not up to him which evidence they heard, when he had already forbid various pieces of evidence from being shown to the jury (thereby making decisions about evidence). He did basically everything he could to have Muad’Dib found guilty, just short of openly telling the jury that they must convict. Had the public gallery not been full to over-flowing, he probably would have done just that.

The jury then went back to deliberate and about 2.5 hours later came back saying they couldn’t reach a unanimous decision (possibly a plant or two in the jury). The judge probably thought the odds were in favor of a conviction, so he then allowed a majority verdict (no less than 10 to 2 either way), and the jury went out again, before coming back an hour later saying they’d come to a decision.

The jury forewoman that gave their verdict came in the room beaming with a wonderful smile, and a few other jury members were definitely grinning. A NOT GUILTY verdict was then give and the jury left the room once again to the applause of the public gallery.

The judge then left the courtroom quite visibly upset (knowing he was probably in trouble for failing to get this conviction on behalf of his masters) and the prosecutor waddled away back to whatever crypt she’d crawled out of. The police officer visibly heading-up Muad’Dib’s prosecution actually had the decency to say he was sorry—which was nice, all things considered.

Muad’Dib is once again at complete liberty after having proven that doing the right thing always pays off in the end—IF you don’t lose strength.

As for the rest of us? We can all look forward to a second-edition of the ‘7/7 Ripple Effect’ coming out soon. :-)

Yes, case closed… But a new beginning of sorts is upon us. Keep checking back for updates. This is just a battle won, but this war for Truth, Justice, and Liberty is not over yet.

AMEN.

-The Friends of Muad'Dib

[PatColo]

Ripple Effect v2 came out this recent 7/7, trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRVljxnrTVQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRVljxnrTVQ

full, much longer at 2h 22m,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwyzpzEgUWE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwyzpzEgUWE

also see:
TRAILER -- The Nazi Banksters' Crimes - Ripple Effect (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?55583-TRAILER-The-Nazi-Banksters-Crimes-Ripple-Effect&highlight=ripple+effect)