"We need to stick together" against whitey

[nunaem]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gerq4GpHpKw&feature=player_embedded#at=19

Fuck the what?! Is this for real?

[chad]

appears to be. adler2011.com. holy smokes!

[mamboni]

Cannot view this at work. Can you kindly provide a verbal synopsis?

[midnight rambler]

What's that Korean woman say at the end??

[chad]

she says "what's a mensch?"

synopsis for mamboni:

1. some guy named adler is running for congress. he's a democratic candidate supported by hollywood.

2. american indians, mexicans, and koreans should support him, because he's a jew + is married to a korean as well. didn't see any black people in it.

3. another reason they should support him is that they all need to stick together against whitey.

4. oh, also, he's a jew, so he's a minoirty there as well.

the bit is kind of in your face comedy or used car salesmen tv commerical-ish. i thought it was fake until i googled him.

[midnight rambler]

Cannot view this at work. Can you kindly provide a verbal synopsis?


Korean woman: I'm Korean!

Addler: My wife's 's Korean!

Korean woman: Aren't you Jewish?

Addler: Yes, my family is Jewish.

Korean woman: We minorities should stick together!

[iOWNme]

After watching that i can only come to one conclusion.


That was written by the Pentagon.

[AndreaGail]

Dan’s views are formed through his deeply held personal beliefs, his extensive experience with key players on all sides, and, especially, the fact that his father was a survivor of the Holocaust who was liberated from Auschwitz.
:oo-->

[Awoke]

Minorities should definitely stick together. Whites are a minority.

[nunaem]

Minorities should definitely stick together. Whites are a minority.


Haven't you gotten your newspeak memo yet? Minority = non-White, Diverse = non-White. So a country that is 100% Black or Hispanic is still 100% minority and 100% diverse.

When people talk about us needing 'diversity', they mean to say that we need less Whites. And they wont be satisfied until we reach 100% diversity.

[sirgonzo420]

Minorities should definitely stick together. Whites are a minority.


Haven't you gotten your newspeak memo yet? Minority = non-White, Diverse = non-White. So a country that is 100% Black or Hispanic is still 100% minority and 100% diverse.

When people talk about us needing 'diversity', they mean to say that we need less Whites. And they wont be satisfied until we reach 100% diversity.


hammer, meet nail

[Quad]

she says "what's a mensch?"

synopsis for mamboni:

1. some guy named adler is running for congress. he's a democratic candidate supported by hollywood.

2. american indians, mexicans, and koreans should support him, because he's a jew + is married to a korean as well. didn't see any black people in it.

3. another reason they should support him is that they all need to stick together against whitey.

4. oh, also, he's a jew, so he's a minoirty there as well.

the bit is kind of in your face comedy or used car salesmen tv commerical-ish. i thought it was fake until i googled him.


A very nicely done and concise preview of liberalism's vision of late 21st century America.

A very light skinned, off-white, and heavily Jewish ruling minority at the top. ("We're not white! We're victims of white racism! Just like you!)

A tiny, marginalized, heavily incarcerated black pariah caste at the bottom. (You do realize the SWPL are anti-black, don't you? If that sounds too far-fetched, just listen to Chris rock: “The niggaz have got to go!”)

A "vibrant," servile, and entertaining brown majority in between.

[nunaem]

she says "what's a mensch?"

synopsis for mamboni:

1. some guy named adler is running for congress. he's a democratic candidate supported by hollywood.

2. american indians, mexicans, and koreans should support him, because he's a jew + is married to a korean as well. didn't see any black people in it.

3. another reason they should support him is that they all need to stick together against whitey.

4. oh, also, he's a jew, so he's a minoirty there as well.

the bit is kind of in your face comedy or used car salesmen tv commerical-ish. i thought it was fake until i googled him.


A very nicely done and concise preview of liberalism's vision of late 21st century America.

A very light skinned, off-white, and heavily Jewish ruling minority at the top. ("We're not white! We're victims of white racism! Just like you!)

A tiny, marginalized, heavily incarcerated black pariah caste at the bottom. (You do realize the SWPL are anti-black, don't you? If that sounds too far-fetched, just listen to Chris rock: “The niggaz have got to go!”)

A "vibrant," servile, and entertaining brown majority in between.




SWPLs may be hypocritically anti-Black ("White neighborhoods for me, Great Society for thee.") but by the same token they are also anti-White.

[Hermie]

We need to see a commercial saying,
"Remember everybody, Your Skin Is Your Uniform!"
Now go to it!"

[nunaem]

We need to see a commercial saying,
"Remember everybody, Your Skin Is Your Uniform!"
Now go to it!"


That's what non-Whites are being told on a daily basis, while Whites are told, "Your skin is just a social construct. You do not exist but somehow you cause all of the problems in the world."

[mamboni]

Dan’s views are formed through his deeply held personal beliefs, his extensive experience with key players on all sides, and, especially, the fact that his father was a survivor of the Holocaust who was liberated from Auschwitz.
:oo-->


Another Holohoax survivor? Did the Nazis succeed in killing any prisoners? :oo-->

[Awoke]

Only about 6 million. (...for about the 10th time.)

::)

[midnight rambler]

Dan’s views are formed through his deeply held personal beliefs, his extensive experience with key players on all sides, and, especially, the fact that his father was a survivor of the Holocaust who was liberated from Auschwitz.
:oo-->


Another Holohoax survivor? Did the Nazis succeed in killing any prisoners? :oo-->


Surely you realize by now that saying "My (whatever relative, preferably one if not both parents [meaning poor pitiful me almost didn't make it into this world boohoo]) survived the Holohoax (TM)" adds cachet, if not outright laying on of the guilt trip.

[midnight rambler]

Endorsed by Glen Beck - http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110515005087/en/Glenn-Beck-Endorses-Democrat-Dan-Adler-California%E2%80%99s

[sirgonzo420]

hahahahahaha


I just watched the video.

It's hilarious.


Isn't it great how jews revile whites for their "racism" and at the same time laud themselves as champions of diversity/minorities/multiculturalism with ridiculous and insulting racist-against-whites-so-it's-not-racism-but-some-sick-form-of-marxist-jewish-social-justice campaign commercials?


Chutz-fucking-PAH!

[nunaem]

Diverse = non-White.


Here is a good example of what I'm talking about:
http://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/diversity-is-a-code-word-for/

[sirgonzo420]

Diverse = non-White.


Here is a good example of what I'm talking about:
http://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/diversity-is-a-code-word-for/




here's an image from the link above:

http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/742/californiadiversity.png


"more diverse"...




Good thing they upped the choco ration to 25 grams. Up from 50 grams last week!

[nunaem]

Good thing they upped the choco ration to 25 grams. Up from 50 grams last week!




Race War is Peace
Freedom of Association is Slavery
Diversity is Strength

[ximmy]

conduct a little business with the jew and try to get paid...

[nunaem]

conduct a little business with the jew and try to get paid...


Hell, try to keep your country!

[Horn]

conduct a little business with the jew and try to get paid...


Hell, try to keep your country!


The Anglo-Saxon bank is kaput.

[Awoke]

she says "what's a mensch?"



New word to me.

Mensch
(Yiddish: מענטש mentsh; from German: Mensch, for "human being") means "a person of integrity and honor"

[k-os]

she says "what's a mensch?"



New word to me.

Mensch
(Yiddish: מענטש mentsh; from German: Mensch, for "human being") means "a person of integrity and honor"


Thanks, I didn't know what a mensch was.

[ShortJohnSilver]

she says "what's a mensch?"



New word to me.

Mensch
(Yiddish: מענטש mentsh; from German: Mensch, for "human being") means "a person of integrity and honor"


note that only Jews can be human beings; the rest of us are cattle (goyim).

[midnight rambler]

Don't be calling me any such thing as a 'human being'.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread233602/pg1

[sirgonzo420]

Don't be calling me any such thing as a 'human being'.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread233602/pg1


Let them be "human beings".

I'm fine with being a man.




Also, in the incredibly ridiculous campaign commercial in the OP, I think it's funny how the jew chuckles when the asian says "we minorities should stick together".

[Quad]

"SWPLs may be hypocritically anti-Black ("White neighborhoods for me, Great Society for thee.") but by the same token they are also anti-White."

Exactly.

The SWPL see themselves and their (small number of) progeny as being apart from and above other whites, and as sure bets to constitute the core of any future managerial/ruling regime.

A few will make the cut, but the majority are in for a rude shock, as most of those future managerial slots will be filled by Asians, Jews, and sundry near-whites, all of whom can claim “minority” status and eligibility for race-based affirmative action . (Charles Murray’s ½ Asian daughters being a prime example.)

When it comes to shove, Aiden and River will be lumped right along with Bubba and Amber, and legally shunted aside.

[illumin19]

That looked like some low budget "cult" movie acting from a Quinton Tarantino movie or something.....

The korean lady at the end was great ;D

[k-os]

Can someone tell me what SWPL is? I looked it up, and I am getting "Stuff White People Like", but . . . that doesn't seem right in the context of this thread. In this thread it seems like it's an acronym for some type of people, not a characteristic of some type of people.

[Awoke]

nunaem and Quad are the only ones I have seen use that term, so you are best to ask them.

[sirgonzo420]

Stupid White Progressive Liberal?

[DMac]

Can someone tell me what SWPL is? I looked it up, and I am getting "Stuff White People Like", but . . . that doesn't seem right in the context of this thread. In this thread it seems like it's an acronym for some type of people, not a characteristic of some type of people.


http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SWPL

white educated liberal bohemian?

[nunaem]

Can someone tell me what SWPL is? I looked it up, and I am getting "Stuff White People Like", but . . . that doesn't seem right in the context of this thread. In this thread it seems like it's an acronym for some type of people, not a characteristic of some type of people.


'The right kind of White people', for stereotype see: liberal arts degree, lives in Seattle, drinks fair trade coffee while listening to NPR, feels guilty about his 'White privilege' and wants 'the wrong kind of White people' to make sacrifices.


http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/12/smells-like-white-guilt-christian-lander%E2%80%99s-whiter-shades-of-pale/


The right kind of White people are urban, college-educated, and from upper-middle and upper-class backgrounds. And, most importantly, they are liberal.

Lander also adds that the right kind of White people are “rich”: they live in expensive cities, go to expensive colleges, travel widely, and can afford to take a year off from time to time. They know how to trade their hip, grungy attire for expensive suits and ties, and their ironic detachment for “attaboy” attitude, when opportunities for advancement in the system present themselves (courtesy of people from their parents’ generation and social circles).

And they know how to hold onto what’s theirs. They can be cheap and multicultural at the same time simply by replacing White workers with Guatemalans.

The wrong kind of White people live in suburbs and rural areas. They are not college educated, or, if they went to college, they were in frats and sororities, did not attend first tier schools, and did not take liberal arts degrees. They are working or middle class, or horrible businessman and industrialists. And they are not liberal. They are Tea Partiers and Republicans. They watch Fox News.

The right kind of White people define themselves by looking down on the wrong type of White people. This sort of intra-White status competition is a perennial feature of colonial societies like the United States and Lander’s native Canada, where an absence of fixed class distinctions creates immense social anxiety and a strong desire to distinguish oneself from “those people” through an ever-shifting set of conventional status markers that Lander focuses on with often uncanny perspicacity. (It takes a special kind of brilliance to see things that are so close to who we are that we cannot help but overlook them.)

I asked Lander “What percentage of White people are White people?” and he answered “90%” But it was clear he was talking only about 90% of the people he knew. In fact, 90% of the people he knows belong to the 20% of Americans who describe themselves as liberals. Lander also mentioned growing up in Toronto, where the White working and middle classes have been pretty much replaced by non-Whites, which is a vision of the world being engineered by Lander’s type of White people for the rest of us.

Lander’s work is softball satire, not serious sociology. But he is nevertheless significant, because White liberals tend to think that they are generic, universal humans that all other humans aspire to imitate. In this, White liberals are true White supremacists. White Nationalists, who actually believe that the races are different, would never expect the other races to yearn to be just like us. We would sooner just let them be themselves.

By getting White liberals to realize that no, the things they like are not universal but parochially and ethnically White, Christian Lander has stumbled into something very subversive.

White liberals wish to give all the things they like the force of law: women’s rights, gay rights, animal rights, environmentalism, historical preservationism, natural foods, walkable communities, general social tolerance. But the wrong type of White people stand in their way.

The solution is simple: dissolve the people and elect a new one. Destroy the wrong kind of White people by shipping their jobs overseas and importing non-Whites to displace them at home. Destroy their will to reproduce by ridiculing and penalizing large families. Destroy their ability to reproduce by taxing them to support large non-White families. And do whatever you can to make a buck producing a culture that leads the wrong kind of White people to political powerlessness, poverty, degradation, and death.

The right kind of White people think this will work, because they believe (1) that the new non-White peasantry will be grateful to them, (2) that deep down the grateful peasants all want to be just like them, and (3) that the emerging non-White majority will continue to accept the leadership of “the right kind of White people” even when they have dwindled to a minority segment of just another minority group. Lander talks about the magical process by which expensive colleges and urban environments transform select non-Whites, mostly Asians, into White people.

Of course White Nationalists know that the White liberal plan for hegemony leads only to oblivion. The non-White hordes are well-aware of the parochial Whiteness of liberal values. But non-White groups tend to be highly ethnocentric, and given the power, they will promote their own values, not the values of White liberals. Why in the world would they adopt the values of a people who have destroyed their civilization and handed their lands over to aliens?

In an America ruled by Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Hindus, and Muslims of all races, the stuff White liberals like—tolerance, feminism, gay rights, support for “the arts” (for White arts), environmentalism, historic preservationism (of White history), animal rights, etc.—will have pretty much the same status they have in every Third World country.

[Libertytree]

I reckon they don't know that there are those of use who are and have been sticking together also, by the glue of the Constitution. I don't think they're prepared to party though ;D

[Down1]

The loser lost.
Only got 285 votes.
http://rrcc.co.la.ca.us/elect/11051110/rr1110pa.html-ssi


In a seemingly major upset in the race to replace former Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), Republican Craig Huey appears to have captured one of the spots in a July 12 runoff.

With all of the election night ballots counted late Tuesday, Huey squeaked past California Secretary of State Debra Bowen, a Democrat, by 206 votes.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-south-bay-election-20110518,0,1649996.story