PDA

View Full Version : No Trespassing Sign that Works



gunDriller
14th June 2011, 03:32 PM
I got a copy of this from one of my neighbors. He was getting hassled by the county for doing something on his property, I think panning for gold and possibly for diverting a creek to facilitate his gold-panning.

So he put up this sign, and IT WORKED !

http://oi55.tinypic.com/241tpwx.jpg

It's possible the county just decided that what he was doing was small potatoes, and to go hassle somebody that was easier to hassle.

Does anybody know anything about USC Title 18, Section 241 ?

I found these citations -

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/federal-statutes

http://trac.syr.edu/laws/18/18USC00241.html

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/13/241


As far as I can tell, this sign actually scares the cops - that's the main thing.

Buddha
14th June 2011, 03:39 PM
Panning for gold and possibly diverting a creek? Bill of Rights on door? Awesome neighbor!

palani
14th June 2011, 03:43 PM
this sign actually scares the cops - that's the main thing.
A scared cop is an irrational cop.

iOWNme
14th June 2011, 03:46 PM
gunDriller....Can you make a .pdf of the one you have?

I want that!

gunDriller
14th June 2011, 05:50 PM
gunDriller....Can you make a .pdf of the one you have?

I want that!

http://cid-34bbd2e0b65c0078.office.live.com/self.aspx/Books/Title18.pdf

OK - I uploaded it to MSN Skydrive.

Who knew Bill Gates could be so helpful ? :-)

It's not the best reproduction - there is an optical effect where it's narrower at the top & bottom. So I thought it looked better with a bit of wood around it, like a frame.

I have a scanner that makes great *.pdf's ... but I had to send it back to the North Pole for fixing.

So I'll upload a smaller file size, better image quality when I get that fixed.

I hope I didn't overstep any bounds - now I'm wondering if this is his original work. But he does make copies of it and give them to neighbors.

Guy is 83 - his wife is 91. He has No Fear.

iOWNme
14th June 2011, 05:59 PM
http://cid-34bbd2e0b65c0078.office.live.com/self.aspx/Books/Title18.pdf

OK - I uploaded it to MSN Skydrive.

Who knew Bill Gates could be so helpful ? :-)

It's not the best reproduction - there is an optical effect where it's narrower at the top & bottom. So I thought it looked better with a bit of wood around it, like a frame.

I have a scanner that makes great *.pdf's ... but I had to send it back to the North Pole for fixing.

So I'll upload a smaller file size, better image quality when I get that fixed.

I hope I didn't overstep any bounds - now I'm wondering if this is his original work. But he does make copies of it and give them to neighbors.

Guy is 83 - his wife is 91. He has No Fear.


Thanks gD......I think it will work!

being*
14th June 2011, 06:07 PM
how about?

STAY OUT

or face me

mf

palani
14th June 2011, 06:26 PM
The use of the word "intruder" is inappropriate


INTRUDER. One who, on the death of the ancestor, enters on the land, unlawfully, before the heir can enter.

being*
14th June 2011, 06:41 PM
The use of the word "intruder" is inappropriate

i'm not intruder

been here

TomD
14th June 2011, 07:07 PM
Here's a shot of about 500 feet up my drive---

It works for some people, I've walked down in the AM on a couple of occasions and seen tire tracks where people saw that and turned around.

http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x229/TomD77/post%20from/DSC1432.jpg

being*
14th June 2011, 07:25 PM
Here's a shot of about 500 feet up my drive---

It works for some people, I've walked down in the AM on a couple of occasions and seen tire tracks where people saw that and turned around.

http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x229/TomD77/post%20from/DSC1432.jpg

you gthoat to be

wrning



not

being*
14th June 2011, 07:27 PM
you gthoat to be

wrning



not
just go away

Dogman
14th June 2011, 07:33 PM
you gthoat to be

wrning



not


just go away



Question?

In a past forum life, did bombers ever scan you? ;D

being*
14th June 2011, 07:35 PM
I'm clean as you

LSD 25/sunshine

sunshine 25

being*
14th June 2011, 07:46 PM
has that question been answerered?

being*
14th June 2011, 07:59 PM
Question?

In a past forum life, did bombers ever scan you? ;D

Dogman when

Dogman
14th June 2011, 08:02 PM
Dogman when

It is really nothing, you sort of reminded me of a poster on another forum. A year or so back.

being*
14th June 2011, 08:07 PM
It is really nothing, you sort of reminded me of a poster on another forum. A year or so back.

did I tell this MF what

I will soon

being*
14th June 2011, 08:09 PM
dog man back off

mf closing in

you ill back me

being*
14th June 2011, 08:40 PM
back off now

and then you will back me

Gaillo
14th June 2011, 08:48 PM
dog man back off

mf closing in

you ill back me

AAAAWLLLRighty, then...
Gave you the "chance" you asked for, and all you've done with it is troll, troll, and served up a side of troll with troll gravy.
Good luck with the next forum - this one no longer welcomes you.

gunDriller
15th June 2011, 06:03 AM
Here's a shot of about 500 feet up my drive---

It works for some people, I've walked down in the AM on a couple of occasions and seen tire tracks where people saw that and turned around.



i like that. effective and, to me, funny.

the sign i posted is oriented towards law enforcement types. your sign is oriented towards general public.

i also like

"Trespassers will be
Composted"

which could be turned into a Haiku -

"Trespassers will be
Composted quite thoroughly -
Blood Meal and Bone Meal."

horseshoe3
15th June 2011, 06:13 AM
TomD, good to see you over here more often. And under a name we recognize. I hope more of the good guys from GIM can find the place.

SLV^GLD
15th June 2011, 06:23 AM
Isn't there a contradiction in invoking the Constitution as supreme law of the land than invoking USC in the same document?
Just wondering out loud.

JJ.G0ldD0t
15th June 2011, 06:29 AM
That's a fair question.

I hope someone answers.

horseshoe3
15th June 2011, 06:39 AM
The Constitution being supreme, would trump the USC in case of conflict. If they are not in conflict, I see no problem. Of course tresspassing really should be a state or local violation and the USC shouldn't have anything to say on the subject.